search posts of RSS chess feeds archive in yourchess.net  

RESULTSFound 269 results for the word 'tool' in 39828 chess posts stored in the archive of yourchess.net since june 2008
 
<< SEARCH MORE
 
The first Internet-based FIDE Arbiters' Seminar
news_320x160

For two weekends in July, 17 participants from across North America came together virtually, to take part in the first ever Internet-based Arbiter Seminar! The seminar is a recent addition to the requirement for those seeking recognition by FIDE for the title of FIDE Arbiter, but it also opens a new way in the training of the Arbiters globally.

Traditionally, this seminar has been held in a physical location with lecturer and participants traveling to some destination, established by the seminar organizer. Unfortunately the traditional format of the seminar requires considerable financial expenditure by the organizer and participants. As such, some national federations have not had the opportunity to organize this required seminar.

The idea for the Internet-based Arbiters' Seminar began in March 2010 during the first arbiter seminar held in the United States which I organized. I discussed this concept with David Sedgwick from England, who was acting in the capacity of Chief Lecturer. David in turn referred me to the Chairman of the FIDE Arbiters' Commission, Mr. Takis Nikolopoulos to discuss the matter further.

Takis explained to me that the idea of organizing a FIDE Arbiters' Seminars on the Internet had been already discussed in the FIDE Arbiters' Commission's meetings in the Halkidiki 2009 FIDE Congress and the Commission was trying to find a way to organize the first on line Seminar. So we discussed the details and found it to be a worthy experiment to undertake and as such the Internet-seminar (hereafter referred to as webinar) was born, with Takis serving as the Chief Lecturer, and myself as the Assistant Lecturer, webinar moderator, and technical support. It was decided that as it would be the first time that such a Seminar was organized, the participants would not be charged a fee and the Lecturers would receive no stipend.

The technology chosen for the webinar was a combination of Dim Dim and Skype. While Dim Dim is capable of handling voice conferences, it only provides a localized US phone number at no cost. Toll-free calling is available for an additional fee however we did not wish to experiment with this added cost at this time.

Through the combination of Dim Dim and Skype, we were able to display the slide show presentation that Takis had prepared, while speaking at the same time. We maintained all participants on 'mute' to reduce background noise, and if there were any questions, they could utilize the public chat feature in Dim Dim where either Takis or I would respond.

The Seminar was held over two weekends (10, 11, 17 and 18-July), in three sessions of five hours each, while the last session was for the Examination test, that was sent to the participants and returned by them by a specific time, via e-mail. The participants who will achieve at least 80% in the test (which included 36 questions with 100 points maximum), will be awarded a norm for the title of FIDE Arbiter, according to the Regulations for the title of Arbiters.

During the sessions all the Arbiters' issues, according to the Regulations of the training of the Arbiters (Laws of Chess, Tournament Rules, Titles and Ratings Regulations, Systems of games, Swiss pairings Rules e.t.c.), were discussed and analyzed, while the differences in the regulations between USCF and FIDE were mentioned. The participants had the possibility to ask questions and receive answers through the chat window.

In conclusion, both Takis and I found the experiment a success, with minor technical and logistical issues, which will be worked out during a second experiment, after we deliver our report to the FIDE Arbiters' Commission in September at the FIDE Congress.


arbiters-seminar


Below are some feedback received from the webinar participants:

- "I thought that the on-line seminar is a great idea. There were a few technical issues that seemed to work themselves out. The exam questions were good, and covered a wide range of topics, and challenged our knowledge. More time for the test would be recommended especially for those that are typing challenged. All in all it was a good experience. I do like, very much, how you kept on top of the technical issues, and your hosting. Takis is a very good presenter."
David Kuhns, Minnesota USA - US Chess Federation National Tournament Director and Chair of USCF Rules Committee

- "Overall, the seminar seemed to be quite successful to me. I was pleasantly surprised how well Skype and Dim Dim worked for the presentation. How cool was that -- Takis at home in Athens, Greece, presenting to attendees scattered across the U.S., Canada, and Mexico! I was really glad that between the two weekends, I spent a good bit of time getting familiar with the FIDE web site and the handbook."
Ken Ballou, Massachussetts, USA - US Chess Federation National Tournament Director

- "It's amazing to me that I was taught by a guy in Greece in a seminar organized by a guy in Chicago with fellow students from the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. As a whole, I think the seminar was excellent and went really well. I appreciate the opportunity to attend this seminar because I probably wouldn't have done it any other way. Previously, I've read up on the differences between FIDE and USCF and structured the U.S. Masters Championship so that norms could be achieved. Nevertheless, it was good to step through all the rules again. I think future seminars would be very worthwhile and if we could get more FIDE arbiters in the U.S., there would be more FIDE tournaments in the U.S. which would be a good thing."
Kevin Hyde, North Carolina, USA - US Chess Federation National Tournament Director

- "First I would like to take the opportunity to thank you for giving me the chance to take this seminar on line, I want to assure you that your efforts are appreciated and that you have my gratitude. I was thinking what I improve on this seminar, and I could not think about one thing that I would change. With this seminar on line, you are opening new ways for the FIDE family to grow and to improve the quality of the tournaments around the globe. When actions as this seminar, I hope then one day chess will be recognize as a sport everywhere and some day will be part of the Olympics. The seminar by itself was very well structured and presented, and the participants added to the learning experience. Their questions and their experience and of course on top of all this Takis' high level of professionalism and knowledge."
Andrei Botez, Canada - Canadian Chess Federation Tournament Director

The Internet Arbiter Seminar was a great experience. I would like to say thank you to Mr. Muradian and Mr. Nikolopoulos for coming up with this wonderful idea.

A major advantage of having such seminar is that it reduces arbiter's costs to travel to a place that have such seminar. As a University student, I could not afford to travel outside my province to take the FA seminar even though it is my dream to someday obtain the FA title. So, when I saw this idea on the website, I was so excited and quickly send an email to Mr. Muradian and Mr. Nikolopoulos. Thanks to them for giving me this great opportunity to attend this seminar.

Secondly, the power point slides presented in this seminar was nicely organized and easy to understand. The slides can be helpful tool when studying for the examination. Thirdly, it was a great honor to be taught by one of the top arbiter in the world, Mr. Nikolopoulos. Mr. Nikolopoulos gave many examples and it was interesting to hear how things are different in European tournaments. Mr. Nikolopoulos was also very good in answer any questions that were brought up. He also used the online whiteboard to explain some of the concepts (i.e. calculating norms, ratings, etc).

Even though sometime there were problems regarding the audio (either very noisy with background noise or no sound at all). Mr. Muradian was there to fix the problem and the seminar was back in session with minimal delay. Mr. Muradian took his time to notify everybody the start of meeting.

Initially, I had family vacation on the same two weekends but decided to skip them to join this Internet Arbiter Seminar. But, I have no regrets because I learned many new things that I have never learned before in my life. So, thanks again Mr. Muradian and Mr. Nikolopoulos.

Simon Ong, Canada - Canadian Chess Federation Tournament Director


Mr. Takis Nikolopoulos
International Arbiter
Chairman, FIDE Arbiters Commission

Mr. Sevan A. Muradian
North American Chess Association
International Arbiter and International Organizer


 
http://www.fide.com/component/content/article/1-fide-news/4669-the-first-internet-based-fide-arbiters-seminar.html
Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:51:10 +0000
 
 
 
The Brits and Social Media
This seems to be ruining a perfectly good ad banner, but I suppose it's one way of emphasising the message. In case you miss it, the British Chess Championships are underway!


A couple of things about the BCC coverage. First, they've got a dedicated Facebook page, and secondly, a Twitter account. Two very good ideas, especially for well-established regular events. The Facebook page allows you to publicise the event while the tweets keep those who can't make it abreast of happenings during the event.

Now I know we all just miss TCG's live blogging. As it happens, I've discovered a new tool for this purpose. Google Wave. Here's how it's done.

There's even a chess example here!
 
http://closetgrandmaster.blogspot.com/2010/07/brits-and-social-media.html
Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:57:00 +0000
 
 
 
Chess and Marketing
A video for an herbal supplement uses chess as a marketing tool in a rather amusing way.
 
http://gambit.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/12/chess-and-marketing/
Mon, 12 Jul 2010 16:14:22 +0000
 
 
 
Double Exchange Sacrifice

While exchange sacrifice is a very common strategical tool for achieving positional transformation, a double exchange sacrifice is rare guest in the tournament practice. The material deficit is bigger and it is harder to obtain positional compensation. In addition, the opponent can always be alert to give one exchange back and kill the counterplay, while still keeping some extra material at hand.

In our example we have a setup that resembles pawn structure resulting from Nimzo-Indian or Ragozin defence. White’s position looks very appealing at the first glance. He has pair of Bishops and prepares to roll the central pawns with e3-e4. Black h5-pawn also seems to be running ahead of the time and can become target for White pieces.

cs243.gif

White’s next move looks natural, the Knight presses h5 and supports the advance e3-e4.

(...)
Read the rest of Double Exchange Sacrifice (383 words)


© Goran Urosevic for Chess Strategy, 2010. | Permalink | No comment

Add to del.icio.us

Search blogs linking this post with Technorati

Want more on these topics ? Browse the archive of posts filed under Lessons, Positional Sacrifice.

 
http://www.chesslodge.com/2010/06/double-exchange-sacrifice/
Fri, 25 Jun 2010 04:59:15 +0000
 
 
 
Errores en la Apertura – Minijuegos (2)

ajedrez-estupidezContinuando con errores prematuros, ahora nos ocupamos de otro frecuente error: Cbd7 dejando encerrada a la Dama y sin haber enrocado.

Lo veremos en esquemas de la Defensa Pirc o Moderna.

Como muchos errores, las causas son múltiples. En este caso pareciera que puede tratarse de una jugada “normal” o automática, sin tener en cuenta los elementos de la posición y lo inconveniente de esta jugada, que debe llevar a la derrota. Lo llamativo es que muchas veces no es percibido por el rival que también hace una jugada “normal” o automática.

Como dijimos en nuestra primer nota (Errores en la Apertura – Minijuegos), no se trata de memorizar las secuencias, sino de entender los por qué y los procedimientos. No se trata de otra cosa que aplicar la comprensión a principios que rigen en una partida de ajedrez. Entendiendo esto, no sólo evitaremos errores sino que aprovecharemos los del rival. Hay que tener en cuenta el concepto de analogía, ya que estos recursos son válidos para cualquier momento de la partida.

Hace poco un amigo me mostró una de sus partidas, donde el Negro (otro amigo) había jugado Cbd7 en una Pirc o Moderna.

-Esto que jugó tu rival es un error y es conocido. En esta estructura no es bueno jugar Cbd7. Siempre da temas de ataque. Tenías que buscar, teniendo en cuenta que la Dama está encerrada y no tiene salida; que el Rey no ha enrocado y f2 es un objetivo y se facilitan los saltos de Caballo g5 y e6. ¿Cómo no te diste cuenta?

 
http://www.zonadeajedrez.com/miscelanea/indeterminado/890-minijuegos-dos.html
Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:14:00 +0000
 
 
 
Natalia Pogonina Interview For Sport.ru


On her blog Natalia Pogonina has posted an article from her sport.ru live online interview. Viwewers could send their questions and her answers were happily published real-time.

From that interview I'd like to point out a few interesting answers:

Q: Whom were you rooting for at the World Championship? Why? (Traglodit)

A: I can't say I was actively rooting for someone, but I like Topalov's agressive and risky style.



This answer made me giggle for one basic reason. I was rooting for Anand the entire match. I think Natalia just had to be different from me. ;-)

Q: Do you like clubs and hanging out? (Oleg Haliulin)

.A: Rarely visit them, I am not a fan of clubbing.

Only in chess would such a question be asked in an open forum. Why is it we suffer such peculiarities?

Q: If you became FIDE President, what would you change? (Andrey Santalov)

A: Stabilize the World Championship cycle. Find respectable sponsors. Promote chess in the media, including TV and Internet. Expanding the geography of top events. Serious and constant work connected with the support of developing (in the chess sense) countries. Becoming part of the Olympics. Changing the rating system.

I like all of these ideas (well, actually the last two I really have no opinion of because it doesn't seem to matter all that much). I think if she were running for office i'd probably be singing her praises right now but, alas, to my knowledge she isn't a candidate ... it just goes to show that those who are most interested in what's good for chess are busy playing.

Natalia, I know you or Peter are gonna read this so here's my personal message to you: A very well answered interview altogether. Steering clear of those questions that really had no place and being prepared for the obvious (women in chess, having a family) questions. And most importantly, staying far away from the political questions. At any rate, it's always good to hear from you and you're doing all the right things to publicize yourself on the internet. I'd like to think I've helped pave the way for chess professionals to use the internet as a marketting tool but people like yourself deserve all the credit for having the sense to latch onto the idea and run with it!

That's it folks. There's no more of my commentary for the day. Go play some good chess. ;-)
 
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Chessvine/~3/QzuL8CLgvS0/837-Natalia-Pogonina-Interview-For-Sport.ru.html
 
 
 
Leon rapid takes off today

Leon rapid takes off todayVery few top tournaments have been played for 23 years in a row, like the City of Leon (Spain), where chess has strong social roots that not even the financial crisis has broken. Four stars: Levon Aronian (Armenia), Boris Gelfand (Israel), Leinier Dominguez (Cuba) and Paco Vallejo (Spain), will give a vibrant show, again at the Auditorium in Leon, Spain with live TV and internet coverage (June, 4-7).

By Leontxo Garcia

Garry Kasparov said in 1998: “Leon is a symbol of the chess avant-garde”. The central strand of this tournament has always been the innovation, in order to make it attractive to the general public: electronic boards, live internet broadcast with high quality commentators (seven times Spanish champion GM Miguel Illescas and IM Michael Rahal) and earphones for the public.

The two main novelties in 2009 were a big success, and therefore will be repeated in 2010: the excellent Auditorium will be the venue, and the Castilla and Leon TV has scheduled a special coverage, including live broadcasting of some games.

Such an elegant stage requires great actors, as the four already engaged for 2010. Levon Aronian, current Grand Prix champion, is one of the Big Five beyond any doubt due to a very universal style, pretty uncomfortable for his opponents, and comes from a country where chess is as popular as football.

Aronian

Boris Gelfand, current World Cup champion, has demonstrated that, in top chess, being older than 40 doesn’t necessarily imply being on the decline, if you combine outstanding talent with huge homework.

Gelfand

Over the last two years, Leinier Dominguez has made clear he’s ready to stay at thetop of chess for a long time, thanks to his excellent preparation, professionalism and cold blood.

Dominguez

In 2009, Paco Vallejo went over the 2700 Elo points mark, and his bravery and creativity at the recent Linares tournament, where he was praised by all his opponents, indicate his ceiling is still far away.

Vallejo

The tournament rules, written by the renowned arbiter Joaquin Espejo, state the two strongest players (Aronian and Gelfand) can only meet in the final. Their respective opponents became known after the drawing of lots, which took place on Thursday, June 3rd at the Conde Luna hotel.

Press conference and drawing of lots

The semi-finals will be: Vallejo-Gelfand (Friday 16.30 CET)

Vallejo-Gelfand

and Dominguez-Aronian (Saturday, 16.30 CET).

Aronian-Dominguez

Four games will be played in every match, with 20 minutes per player plus 10 additional seconds after each move. If necessary, blitz tie-breaks (five minute games) will decide.

The Leon organizers, whose director is Marcelino Sion, maintain that social and professional chess should function like communicating doors. Even more now, when the latest scientific studies indicate that the frequent practice of chess improves the delay of brain aging, and therefore could be very useful to prevent Alzheimer’s disease, apart from what we already know since almost a century ago: chess teaches how to think.

The parallel activities are consistent with that idea: a simul by Aronian, a lecture class by Illescas, another lecture on “Chess as a social tool” by journalist Leontxo Garcia, a chess cinema week and a Young Talents tournament. Despite the big economic crisis, everything will be sponsored by a balanced combination of public bodies and private companies: a clear sign of how solid this tournament is.

The four participants in Leon this year

Link

 
http://www.chessvibes.com/reports/leon-rapid-takes-off-today/
Fri, 04 Jun 2010 08:20:26 +0000
 
 
 
De igual a igual frente a un GM de Ajedrez

chess-king-small De cómo Yorch (un aficionado) se plantó frente al GM Iván Salgado López y salió airoso.
Nuestro compañero Yorch (Manuel J. Pérez Lorenzo) comenta como un jugador del Club Ajedrez Postal puede jugar sin complejos ante quien se supone superior.
 
Como todo jugador que quiere progresar en ajedrez y se respeta a si mismo, analiza su partida frente al GM Iván Salgado López. Como afirmaba Botvinik: “El jugador que no analiza las partidas propias no llegará a ningún lado.” Y Yorch lo hace con espíritu crítico, análisis serios, objetivos, claros y sin ocultar nada. Generosamente vuelca todo su proceso de pensamiento y trabajo y lo pone a disposición y consideración de los lectores. Esperamos que los lectores utilicen su propio espíritu crítico y metódicamente descubran y se aproximen a la verdad, para superar los errores y las insuficiencias en el juego; ya que esta es una de las principales fuerzas del progreso. Lamentablemente falta una de las voces, pero no es ni por decisión de la página ni por decisión de Yorch. Más allá de anécdotas, historias, caída de aguja o lo que fuese, Yorch debe estar orgulloso de su juego. Así que le cedemos la palabra y de tanto en tanto agregaremos algún comentario. Mi intención, a la hora de plantearme hacer el comentario de mi propia partida, no puede ser la de ofrecer una clase magistral de Ajedrez, ni mucho menos. Soy un buen aficionado, que ama el Ajedrez, y estudiarlo, pero que no tiene los conocimientos suficientes para abandonar esa categoría de “aficionado", y, ni siquiera, para poder realizar un comentario profundo de una partida; tarea que encaro por primera vez en mi vida. Sin embargo, sí que quiero hacer partícipes a todos los habitantes de Zona, del fruto de mi propio estudio (de libros y partidas) y de mis propias comeduras de coco, a lo largo de esta partida, que, a pesar de acabar abruptamente, me ha ofrecido una inmensa satisfacción. Ojalá le sirva a alguien de algo. Al ataque. (Yorch)

GM Iván Salgado -Yorch  [A90]
Ajedrez Postal Game Ajedrez Postal, 11.01.2010
Comentarios: Yorch

1.d4 e6 Los jugadores de Francesa suelen elegir esta jugada. Siempre recuerdo un comentario de Petrosian, respecto de su partida con Larsen en San Antonio 1972, tras 1.d4 e6 y que palabras más o menos, era así: "¿Qué es esto? Una invitación a la Francesa, incluso con 3.Cd2. No, a 2.e4 seguramente jugaría 2. ... c5 entrando en la Siciliana. Y a 2.c4? La Holandesa, Eso sería bueno para mi." [ Poco después de iniciada esta partida, tras 1...f5 Iván jugó 2.Ag5 Salgado Lopez,I (2584)-Iljushin,A (2551); Aeroflot Open-9th-A, Moscow (6), 2010 (1-0/27) que comentáramos en Aeroflot Open 2010 - Ronda 6 y es lo recomendado en Análisis del GM Viktor Moskalenko (luigi)]

2.c4 f5 ¿Por qué no la Holandesa? La Defensa Holandesa me parece una estructura que combina tres o cuatro características que la hacen muy interesante para el jugador de las Negras. Su nombre se debe al jugador y teórico holandés Elías Stein (1748-1812), que publicó un estudio sobre ella (lo digo, no porque no lo sepa ya todo el mundo, sino para demostrar que yo también lo sé). Es una estructura sólida (sobre todo si hablamos de la formación Stonewall), que, inmediatamente busca la ganancia de espacio en el Flanco de Rey, y que, además, lejos de ser pasiva, tiene un gran potencial de ataque sobre dicho Flanco de Rey Blanco. Por otro lado, bajo mi punto de vista, es lo suficientemente rica como para albergar distintas filosofías de juego, desde estructuras con d6 y b6, que se pueden emparentar con la Nimzoindia, hasta el Muro de Piedra, pasando por la magnífica Leningrado; y, una cosa todavía muy importante, pues quien domine la Holandesa puede perder el miedo a la incertidumbre sobre qué esquema cerrado utilizarán las Blancas: nos da igual, pues nuestro esquema servirá prácticamente para todos. Evidentemente, respondiendo 1. __, e6, las Negras tienen que ser jugadoras también de la Francesa. Pero, ¿dónde está el problema? En esta época de Petrovs y Sicilianas, la Francesa es un soplo de anti pensamiento único y “libertad estructural". Además, dicho sea con la modestia necesaria de quien solamente es un buen aficionado al Ajedrez, lejos de profesionales y maestros, creo que ofrece muy buenas posibilidades de ir a ganar, incluso en la “tablífera" Variante del Cambio. ¿Por qué responder 1. __, e6, en lugar de directamente f5? A título personal, puedo responder que porque, cuando yo juego 1. d4, y me enfrentan 1. __, f5, me gustan esquemas como 2. e4 (Gambito Staunton), 2. Cc3 y 2. Ag5, y, por lo tanto, no me gusta que me los hagan a mí. Pero si mi criterio no es -lógicamente- demasiado considerado, téngase en cuenta que, por ejemplo, Botvinnik prefería llegar de esta forma a la Holandesa, porque, al parecer, “temía" el Staunton, y no voy a ser yo quien tenga nada que decir al respecto. (Yorch) ¿Por qué Iván, siendo un muy buen jugador de Francesa, tanto con Blancas como con Negras, no jugó 2.e4? Será interesante ver como un GM juega contra la Holandesa. Hay un antecedente de Iván, con Negras, en la que se jugó el Gambito Staunton (1.d4 f5 2.e4). Este orden de jugadas lo impide y es común entre jugadores de Francesa, como Jussupow y Short, Radjabov o Dreev por ejemplo. Sin embargo, en los últimos años no hay partidas de jugadores de alto nivel planteando la Holandesa en partidas a ritmo normal. ¿Es entonces que, el GM, pensó como Petrosian y que Yorch no era Larsen? A veces esto es peligroso. (luigi)

3.g3 Cf6 4.Ag2 d5 Ciertamente, aquí parece aconsejarse demorar d5, jugando 4. __, c6. La idea de 4. __, c6, es “desmotivar" a las Blancas a jugar 5. Ch3, que podría ser respondido con 5. __, Ae7!, favoreciendo una estructura con d6 y e5, aprovechando que el Ch3 no controla la casilla e5, con lo que, además, se puede privar al Caballo Blanco de “su" casilla f4, amenazando con que quede de invitado durante muchos movimientos (p.e. Mils Michaelsen-Eckhard Schmittdiel, Bundesliga 1997/8, que siguió: 5. Ch3, Ae7!; 6. 0-0, 0-0; 7. Cd2, d6!; 8. b3, e5; 9. dxe5, dxe5; 10. Cf3, Dc7; 11. Ab2, Cg4!, defendiendo e5 por medios agresivos; y que terminó con victoria Negra en 36 jugadas). Sin embargo, en mi ánimo estaba, precisamente, jugar contra Ch3, porque considero que no es tan fiero el león como lo pintan. Una única cosa más, antes de seguir con la partida. Para aquéllos a quienes no les guste enfrentarse en la Holandesa contra un Ch3, recomiendo llegar a ella a través de los movimientos 1. d4, d5; 2. c4, c6; 3. Cf3, e6, y, un posterior 4.__, f5, planteando directamente un Stonewall que ya no se va a enfrentar al esquema Blanco con g3 y Ch3. (Yorch) Yorch define inmediatamente la ubicación del peón d. Crea tensión en el centro al entrar en contacto con el peón c Blanco. Hay que evaluar si en algún momento puede ser ventajoso para alguno de los jugadores el cambio. Hay muchos antecedentes y los jugadores mencionados la han jugado, como Agdestein que es un especialista en Holandesa. También Spassky, Korchnoi, Tal. (luigi)

5.Ch3 Tal y como decíamos, una vez la Negras han jugado directamente 4.__, d5, parece que no hay impedimento para que el Caballo salga por el extremo del Tablero. ¿Por qué tiene tantos adeptos esta jugada? Parece ser que por una confluencia de circunstancias. Por una parte, se entiende que el Caballo se encuentra muy bien situado en f4, a donde puede llegar sin dificultad desde h3; desde f4, toca e6 y d5, y molesta la casilla g6, si las Negras pretenden un h6 para buscar g5. Por otro lado, las Blancas se encuentran preparadas para cambiar en d6 el posible Alfil Negro ahí situado, sin tener que aceptar el doblaje de peones, Y, por fin, también parece que dificulta la llegada (o estancia) de un Caballo Negro a e4, puesto que tiene a mano la jugada f3. (Yorch)

5...c6 Ya tenemos el famoso Muro de Piedra, o Stonewall, que es, precisamente, lo que yo quería jugar: Stonewall contra formación Blanca con Ch3. (Yorch)

6.0-0 Ad6 Esto no tiene ningún misterio. En efecto, hoy en día se juega mucho más que Ae7. Mi intención era tratar de demostrar (o de comprobar) que el Caballo de Rey y el Alfil de Dama Blancos se pueden estorbar, poniendo en tela de juicio la estructura Blanca. (Yorch) 7.Af4

Diag-1

Lo usual y aparentemente el mejor plan de las Blancas. Plantea el cambio del Alfil “bueno" del Negro. (luigi)

7...Ae7 Tampoco nada novedoso. Ahora, se trata de demostrar si, en efecto, el Af4 estorba al Caballo de h3, atascando la posición Blanca. Véase cómo, además de por lo dicho, el que se muevan dos veces seguidas el Alfil Rey Negro, no puede verse como una pérdida de tiempo, porque, en todo caso, podría recuperarse más adelante, con un hipotético g5, que lo atacaría, a la vez que dejaría fuera de juego al Ch3. (Yorch). El Negro tiene su plan y su idea. La textual es la elección de estos tiempos. [Es posible 7...0-0 8.Dc2 ( 8.Axd6 Dxd6 9.Cd2 b6 ( 9...Ce4; 9...Ce4) 10.Tc1 Cbd7 11.b4 a5 = 1/2 Tunik, G (2505)-Gleizerov, E (2576); RUS-Ch, Krasnodar (1),2002.) 8...b6 ( 8...Ca6; 8...dxc4; 8...Ae7) 9.Tc1 ( 9.Cd2 Ab7 +/=; 9.Axd6 Dxd6 =) 9...Ae7 10.cxd5 cxd5 11.Cd2 Ad7 12.Ac7 De8 13.Cf4 Cc6 14.Ae5 Tc8 15.Dd1 Cg4 = Illescas Cordoba, M (2598)-Vaganian, R (2600); Casino Barcelona (7), 2007 (0-1/43) (luigi)]

8.Cd2 Db6

Diag-2

Soy jugador de Francesa, y ese movimiento de Dama me es conocido y, además, me gusta en esta posición. Me parecía un movimiento ágil, que ataca a la vez los Peones de b2 y d4; y, por otro lado, no me apetecía experimentar con las variantes que terminan con un Caballo Blanco en f3 y otro en f4, ni tampoco con el cambio en f4; situaciones que habitualmente vienen tras 8.__, 0-0. (Yorch) [Plausible espíritu. Interesante plan. Una jugada no común, sólo encontré 4 antecedentes. Un par del IM FIDE noruego Yvan Bern, varias veces representante Olímpico, GM de Ajedrez Postal y Campeón Mundial en el 17th WCh ICCF (Federación Internacional de Ajedrez Postal), celebrado entre 2002 y 2007. Los que han jugado la Francesa, conocen esta jugada. En este caso, las Negras posponen el 0-0 y amenazan los peone d y b. Sabemos los riesgos de sacar a pasear la Dama, los tiempos de desarrollo que se pierden en eso y la ventaja en desarrollo y espacio que puede representar para el Blanco. Sin embargo no es claro que el Negro tenga mejores caminos ni que el Blanco lo pueda aprovechar contundentemente en este tipo de posiciones. 8...0-0 9.Dc2 Ca6 10.Tfd1 h6 11.a3 g5 12.Ae5 Cg4! = Aleksandrov, A (2530)-Gleizerov, E (2525); Voskresensk 1993 (1-0/75) (luigi)]

9.cxd5 [Creo que es la mejor forma de afrontar el esquema Negro. De esta manera, se defienden los dos Peones. Podrían buscarse otras soluciones, pero no me disgustaban. Por ejemplo, con el sacrificio de un Peón: 9.Dc2 Dxd4 10.Ae3 1/2 Linna Asko-Bern, I (2592); Corr WCh-17th, 2002 10...De5 11.Af4 Dd4 12.Ae3 repitiendo jugadas y forzando las Tablas.; O, más bestia, con el sacrificio de dos Peones, como, en Yakovich-Bern, Bergen 2002: 9.Cb3 dxc4 10.Cd2 Dxd4 11.Dc2 Cd5 ( 11...b5) 12.Cxc4 Cxf4 ( 12...Dc5) 13.Cxf4 0-0 14.e4 Df6 15.e5 Dh6 16.Tad1 g5 17.Cd3 f4 18.Tfe1 Ca6 19.Cd6 Cc7 con juego complejo. (Yorch) Esta fue la elección del GM inglés Keith Arkell en la que parece ser la primera partida en que se jugó 8. ... Db6. Una de las posibilidades lógicas en la posición. Se abre la columna c. El Negro tiene varias posibilidades y su sufrido Ac8 tendrá más juego. (luigi)]

9...cxd5 [No es bueno 9...Cxd5 10.Cc4 Db4 11.Dc2 Cxf4 12.Cxf4 Ag5 13.Cd3 De7 14.e4 +/-; Si era posible 9...exd5 10.Cb3 a5 11.a3 0-0 12.Dc2 Cbd7= (luigi)]

10.Cb3 La jugada que salta a la vista, protege al mismo tiempo ambos peones (b2 y d4) . Acá se ve la diferencia con la variante principal 8. ... 0-0, ya que el Cd2 suele jugarse normalmente a f3. Puede decirse que ésto da sentido a la jugada 8. ... Db6 en lugar de 8. ... 0-0 No parecen mejores ni 10.e3 ni 10.Dc2 (luigi)

10...Ad7 [La “natural" 10...Cc6 no me gustaba. No parecía bueno que, tras esa jugada, el Peón de e6 quedara sin la protección de la Dama, y que tanto la columna “c", como la diagonal e8-h4 quedaran bloqueadas por el propio Caballo.; También pensé la posibilidad de 10...a5 pero tendrá que ser para otra vez. (Yorch); Las Negras tienen su propia idea. Veamos la partida antecedente, demostrativo de la solidez de la línea 10...Cc6 11.Ag5 0-0 12.Cf4 Ad6 13.Axf6 Txf6 14.e3 Ad7 15.Cd3 Cb4 16.Cdc5 Ab5 17.Te1 = Arkell,K (2442)-Shaw,D (2114); Winter Congress Wigan (4), 2001 (1-0/54); (luigi)]

11.Tc1 Entre las jugadas posibles, el Blanco elige la “natural" ocupación de la columna abierta. (luigi)

11...Ca6 Desde la anterior, ya vislumbré, más o menos, cómo iba a quedar el teatro de operaciones, con posibles Ab5 o Ab4, 0-0 y Tac8, y me gustaba. (Yorch)

12.Ag5 He de reconocer que esta jugada me sorprendió. ¿Yo había tenido razón? ¿Se estorbaban el Alfil y el Caballo Blancos? (Yorch) El Blanco planea la reorganización de sus piezas y mejorar su acción. (luigi)

Diag-3

12...0-0 [Ciertamente, me pensé seriamente 12...Rf7 sin embargo, no yo quería que mi Ae7 dejase de controlar c5, y sabía que, tras Rf7 Negro y un Cf4 Blanco, existía una posibilidad muy seria de romper mi estructura. Tras Rf7, aunque juegan Negras y no Blancas (y me faltaría un movimiento), veía que Axf6 tendría que ser contestado con Axf6, para evitar gxf6 o Rxf6?? (horrible jugada). Con 12. __, 0-0, pretendía responder al Axf6 Blanco con Txf6, antes que hacerlo con el Alfil y perder el control de c5. (Yorch); No creo que haya problemas en jugar 12...Rf7 13.Axf6 Axf6 14.Cf4 ( 14.Cc5?! Cxc5! 15.dxc5 ( 15.Txc5? Thc8 -/+) 15...Db5 16.Cf4 Tac8 =/+) 14...Thc8 15.Dd2 Aa4 16.Tc3 Txc3 17.bxc3 Tc8 = lo que no quiere decir que sea mejor que la efectuada en la partida. Lo que quiero resaltar es que el Negro tiene varias posibilidades y esto es indicativo de la corrección de su plan, la comprensión de la posición y su toma de decisiones es consecuencia de todo ello. (luigi)]

13.Cf4 Activa el Caballo. Ésta fue la idea de Ag5. Es bueno observar que el Alfil no tiene casillas de retroceso; por eso suele aconsejarse no jugar Ag5 habiendo hecho g3, salvo que la intención sea canjearlo. Esta es la valoración del Blanco cambiarlo si fuese necesario por el Cf6 y si fuese posible por el Ae7. (luigi)

13...Tac8 [Hay que pelear por la columna “c" y seguir metiendo presión sobre c5. Yo seguía con mi leit motiv: si a 13...Tac8 14.Txc8 Txc8, seguía manteniendo el control de c5, pese a Axf6 y Axf6.; Pensé como alternativa 13...Aa4 pero me pareció que 14.Tc3 solucionaba los posibles problemas Blancos: si luego venía 14...Tac8 parecía que las Negras estuvieran ayudando a las Blancas a mejorar su posición (y, si era 14...Ab4 tras 15.Te3 tampoco me gustaban las Negras. (Yorch)) Durante los análisis previos me parecía interesante, aunque complejo 13...h6 14.Axf6 Axf6 15.Dd2 ( tal vez mejor, aunque pacífica sea 15.e3 Rh7 16.Dc2 Tac8 17.Dd2 Ae7 18.Txc8 Txc8 19.Tc1 Txc1+ 20.Cxc1 g5 21.Cfd3 Cb4 =) 15...g5 16.Cg6 Tf7 17.h4 gxh4 18.Cxh4 Ag5 19.f4 Axh4 20.gxh4 Tg7 y no me disgusta la posición de las Negras, pero hay que animarse.; Lo primero que se me ocurrió y me parecía interesante, como dije en su momento, era 13...Aa4 14.Tc3 Ab4 15.Axf6 Txf6 16.Te3 Ad7 17.a3 Ad6 y hay un aparente y delicado equilibrio. No creo sea preferible a la jugada en la partida. (luigi)]

14.Ch5 Esto sí que me sorprendió, pero pensé: “tanto tiempo para reubicar Caballo y Alfil, ¿para ahora cambiarlos?". Ciertamente, pensé que algo debía de estar haciendo bien. (Yorch) Llamativa jugada. Aprovecha la indefensión el Ae7 y eso es un recurso táctico; planteando la posibilidad de cambiar ya no sólo Axf. No se veía nada muy interesante para el Negro. Podía haber cambiado directamente, podía haber jugado Dd3. Pero el Negro no tiene problermas, así que realiza una simplificación y tratará de generar una mayoría de peones en el Flanco Dama y explotar alguna debilidad estática del Negro (e3). (luigi)

14...Txc1 Yorch decide cambiar y parece correcto. Tiene la posibilidad de ocupar transitoriamente o no la columna c, seguir su plan y permitir los cambios al GM. El Negro debe estar satisfecho de la posición conseguida y sus posibilidades. El GM debe encontrar algún plan que desbarate los del Negro y eso implicaría asumir algunos riesgos. Marchamos hacia un pre-final y eliminadas varias piezas ver si hay chances de desnivelar. [ Ahora 14...Aa4 15.Tc3 Tc4 no da mucho y tiene varias intermedias para analizar. (luigi)]

15.Dxc1 Aa4 [ ¿Qué debía mover aquí? Creo que la Dama Blanca no está bien en c1, y, si hubiera jugado 15...Tc8 ayudaría a que la Dama dejara esa casilla, con lo que dejaría espacio a la Torre Blanca en c1 y, además, tendría que solucionar la posible rotura de Flanco de Rey con los cambios. Me decidí, por fin, por Aa4, y, prácticamente, forcé la continuación de la partida. La verdad es que vi hasta 18. Cc5, y me gustaba. (Yorch); La jugada esperada. Buen espíritu de Yorch. Creo que tras 15...Tc8 16.Db1 Aa4 17.Tc1 Txc1+ 18.Dxc1 Rf7 19.Cxf6 Axf6 20.Axf6 Rxf6 21.Dc8 ( 21.Cc5 Cxc5 22.dxc5 Db4 =) 21...Axb3 22.Df8+ Rg6 23.De8+ Rf6 24.Df8+ el Blanco no tiene mucho por hacer y puede optar por esta variante de tablas o seguir en una lucha estéril. (luigi)]

16.Axf6 [Es lo mismo 16.Cxf6+ Axf6 ( 16...gxf6 17.Ah6 +/=) 17.Axf6 Txf6 (luigi)]

16...Axf6 17.Cxf6+ Tal vez haya otros planes, pero seguramente este cambio es necesario. El Af6 apunta al d4 y a b2. No parece bueno dejar la pareja de Alfiles ni tendría mucho sentido el Ch5. (luigi)

17...Txf6 [Es posible 17...gxf6 pero no aporta mucho y obviamente la textual es lo lógico. (luigi)]

18.Cc5 Lo lógico era mover el Caballo y no permitir el cambio en b3. En esta casilla genera un cambio que da alguna chance. [No promete mucho 18.Cd2 Cb4 19.Cf3 Cxa2 20.Dc5 Dxc5 ( 20...Ac6) 21.dxc5 a5 22.Cd4 Cb4 23.Ta1 Ae8 24.Txa5 Cc6 y no se ve que las Blancas puedan llegar a mucho. (luigi)]

18...Cxc5 19.dxc5

Diag-4

[La verdad es que no me gustaba un Peón Blanco en c5, pero lo aceptaría si, a cambio, podía llevarme el botín de un Peón (¿?). Para la textual 19.dxc5 tenía pensado 19...Da6 y, tras la defensa (o el movimiento del e2), 20.Te1 hacer 20...Ab5 y tomar mi botín. Pero la vida no era tan bella: 21.Df4 impedía indirectamente tomar cualquiera de los dos Peones, y mi gozo en un pozo.; También luego de 19.dxc5 Da6 20.Af3 mis anteriores planes se derrumbaban y no tuve suficiente tiempo para seguir buscando soluciones (iba un poco apurado en ese movimiento). Si hubiera visto lo que aconseja Luigi en sus comentarios 20...Da5 21.a3 Dc7 22.De3 f4 23.Dd4 Ab5 24.Tc1 creo que lo hubiera hecho, pero no lo vi. La verdad es, que tras el shock de no haber visto a la primera la posibilidad de 21. Df4, tras el hipotético 20.__, Ab5, creo recordar que descarté totalmente 19. __, Da6. (Yorch); Las pequeñas posibilidades del Blanco necesitan de la Dama en el tablero. 19.Dxc5 Dxc5 20.dxc5 Ab5 deja a las Negras con una buena posición en la que el Blanco sólo puede aspirar a Tablas. (luigi)] Y jugué, 19...Db4 Tras esta jugada, ya se encontraba el plan que seguí después. (Yorch) Yorch tiene su idea y no está mal. No es esta jugada inferior a las referidas en el comentario anterior. (luigi)

20.a3 Lógica. Ahora el Negro debe mostrar su idea. De paso se prepara la cadena de peones con b4. (luigi)

20...Dd4 No es la única opción del Blanco. Aunque no se ve que sean mejores y si que no sean muy útiles. [ Desde luego no 20...Dc4?? 21.Dxc4 dxc4 22.Axb7 +- (luigi)]

21.e3 Vuelve a interrogar a la Dama. Pero también controla d4 y f4. De nuevo el Negro debe ubicar bien su Dama. [21.b4 f4 si bien no varía mucho el relativo equilibrio de la partida, al menos permite activar un poco a las Negras. (luigi)]

21...Dd3 Mi idea era mantener centralizada la Dama, y no tenerla “encerrada" en mi Flanco de Dama. Además, así, al menos de momento, paraba su juego en su Flanco de Dama, ante una situación en la que ya no estaba cómodo y en la no hubiera entrado si hubiera visto antes aquel hipotético 20. Df4. (Yorch) La Dama Negra sigue molestando y dificulta un rápido reacomodamiento y mejora de piezas del Blanco. (luigi)

22.b4 Una jugada lógica, natural y necesaria para mejorar y activar las piezas. (luigi)

Diag-5

22...g5 [Ciertamente, valoré 22...Db3 pero me pareció que ayudaba a las Blancas a hacer jugadas útiles, como Da1, controlando la gran diagonal y dejando espacio a su Torre.; También estudié 22...e5 pero 23.Db2 me forzaba a defender mi flamante e5 con mi Torre y no me apetecía ni esclavizarla de esa manera ni sacarla de la columna “f".; Por contra, 22...g5 me pareció interesante: actividad en el Flanco de Rey, con mi Torre en lo que me parecía una buena posición, y mi Dama centralizada. 23.Db2 (Yorch); Como dije en su momento no esperaba esta jugada, sino 22...e5 pero como bien analiza Yorch 23.Db2 Te6 deja un cómodo juego al Blanco y el Negro tiene que estar únicamente esperando y sosteniendo la posición.; Pero tras la modesta 22...Tf8 23.Db2 Db3 24.Dd4 Te8 25.Ta1 a6 26.Af3 Ab5 27.Ad1 Dc4 28.Ah5 g6 29.Af3 Dxd4 30.exd4 Rf7 más allá de buscar otras posibilidades o líneas que la dada, a título ilustrativo, no se ve que las Blancas vayan a ningún lado. (luigi)]

23.Db2 Por fin, la Dama Blanca toma la gran diagonal. ¿Para qué haberlo favorecido yo antes con, por ejemplo, 22.__, Db3? (Yorch)

23...Rg7 [Otra posibilidad era 23...Rf7 para evitar la clavada, pero, tras la llegada de la Dama Blanca a e5, los jaques no podrían taparse con la Torre, y eso era un problema. (Yorch); Como dijimos en su momento 23...Rf7 puede ser objeto de algún tema táctico sobre casillas blancas o alguna irrupción molesta, pero concretamente las Blancas se movilizan sin inconvenientes y el peón c parece ser la llave, veamos: 24.Tc1 a6 25.Af1 De4 26.b5 axb5 27.c6 bxc6 28.Txc6 +/- da la impresión que el Blanco tienen buenas posibilidades. (luigi)]

24.Tc1 El Blanco tiene alguna iniciativa, aunque nada muy concreto. El Negro debe tomar decisiones correctas y varias posibilidades. Puede esperar o puede intentar algo no tan pasivo. (luigi)

Diag-6

24...f4 [Aquí, lo cierto es que busqué alguna posibilidad de poder terminar merendándome el a3, pero requería mucho tiempo intentarlo y resulta que, mientras, las Blancas también jugaban. También estudié 24...Db3 pero, tras 25.Dd4 habría sido necesario 25...g4 y, desde luego, no me había metido en ese avispero para terminar cerrando el Flanco de Rey. (Yorch); Yorch es consecuente con su plan y eso es muy plausible. El GM deberá trabajar para demostrar su teórica calidad y superioridad. 24...Db3 25.Dd4 a6 26.Ta1 Dc2 27.Af3 Ab5 28.h3 Ac6 y da la impresión que las Negras sostienen la posición. (luigi)]

25.exf4 [¿Por qué no 25.gxf4? ¡Ojalá! Me hubiera encantado poder jugar contra un GM a dar mate (aunque fuera solamente a intentarlo). (Yorch)]

25...gxf4 El Blanco debe ahora jugar con precisión para mantener la ventaja. El Negro tiene un plan claro y activo para resistir. (luigi)

26.Te1 El Blanco amenaza el peón e indefenso y planea reagrupar sus piezas alrededor de ese tema y ubicada su Dama en e5 acceder a la retaguardia del Negro (luigi).

26...Rf7 [Deshago la clavada. La otra posibilidad era 26...fxg3 27.hxg3 Df5 pero no me gustaba dejar que hicieran las Blancas 28.f4 (Yorch); Tras 26...fxg3 27.hxg3 Df5 me parece interesante 28.b5 (luigi)]

27.De5 [Vi la posibilidad de 27.Af1 pero me gustaba 27...Df5 (Yorch) Lógico. La Dama se planta en el centro amenazante e intimidante. El Negro tiene sus recursos para controlar lo mejor posible la situación. (luigi)]

27...fxg3 [Valoré 27...Dd2 pero no me gustaba nada la idea de 28.g4; 27...fxg3 Aquí quedó la partida. El GM no movió en tiempo y se le cayó la bandera. Evidentemente, tendría que haber seguido 28.hxg3 y mi intención era seguir con 28...Dd2 Ahora me parecía mejor, aunque no podía evitar la que me disgustaba, 29.f4 Creo que habría jugado 29...Ad7 porque me preocupaba la presión sobre mi e6, que se podría incrementar, en su caso, con Ah3, aunque no ahora mismo, porque, en caso de, por ejemplo, 29...Rg7 30.Ah3 podría ser contestada con 30...Ac2 y el Peón es intocable, ante la amenaza de Ae4. (Yorch));

Diag-7

27...fxg3 28.hxg3 Dd2 29.f4 Rg7 30.Af1 Ae8 31.f5 Af7 32.Te2 Dg5 33.fxe6 Dxe5 34.Txe5 Axe6 35.Ag2 Rf7 36.Axd5 Axd5 37.Txd5 Re7 38.Rg2 Ta6 39.Td3 Ta4! Un difícil final de Torres y peones en el que obviamente las Blancas llevan la ventaja. No parece muy fácil encontrar el camino hacia la victoria. Una tarea que dejo a los lectores. Tal vez alguno sea capaz de demostrar si hubo mejores caminos o si ahora los hay. (luigi) En fin, no niego que las Blancas estén más cómodas y que seguramente lleven ventaja; y tampoco niego que el GM exprimiría el Final y terminaría ganando la partida. Pero, eso ya es otra historia. (Yorch)] 0-1

 



 

posicion_final

POSICION FINAL

0 GM Iván Salgado–Yorch 1

Aquí quedó la partida. El GM no movió en tiempo y se le cayó la bandera. Evidentemente, tendría que haber seguido 28.hxg3 y mi intención era seguir con 28...Dd2 Ahora me parecía mejor, aunque no podía evitar la que me disgustaba, 29.f4 Creo que habría jugado 29...Ad7 porque me preocupaba la presión sobre mi e6, que se podría incrementar, en su caso, con Ah3, aunque no ahora mismo, porque, en caso de, por ejemplo, 29...Rg7 30.Ah3 podría ser contestada con 30...Ac2 y el Peón es intocable, ante la amenaza de Ae4. (Yorch));

27...fxg3 28.hxg3 Dd2 29.f4 Rg7 30.Af1 Ae8 31.f5 Af7 32.Te2 Dg5 33.fxe6 Dxe5 34.Txe5 Axe6 35.Ag2 Rf7 36.Axd5 Axd5 37.Txd5 Re7 38.Rg2 Ta6 39.Td3 Ta4! Un difícil final de Torres y peones en el que obviamente las Blancas llevan la ventaja. No parece muy fácil encontrar el camino hacia la victoria. Una tarea que dejo a los lectores. Tal vez alguno sea capaz de demostrar si hubo mejores caminos o si ahora los hay. (luigi)

En fin, no niego que las Blancas estén más cómodas y que seguramente lleven ventaja; y tampoco niego que el GM exprimiría el Final y terminaría ganando la partida. Pero, eso ya es otra historia. (Yorch)] 0-1

{iframe height="730"}visor3/visor.php?archivo=pos_final_ivan_yorch.pgn{/iframe}

 
http://www.zonadeajedrez.com/component/content/article/73-desafios-zona/882-de-igual-igual.html
Mon, 31 May 2010 10:09:59 +0000
 
 
 
Errores en la Apertura – Minijuegos

donkeyplaychess2Repasando casos de “ceguera ajedrecística”. Errores prematuros que bastan para decidir inmediatamente una partida.

Hace tiempo miraba mini-partidas y trataba de emprender la difícil tarea de clasificar errores. Los hay de todo tipo. Los hay de muy buenos jugadores y de flojos jugadores. Seguramente hay multiplicidad de causas. Recuerdo de niño haber leído una nota sobre una partida perdida por un GM (creo que holandés) ante otro GM (creo que Petrosian); por estar escribiendo una postal a la familia, quiso jugar la Dama a e7, pero tomó el Rey y ubicado en e7 no tuvo más que abandonar (no pude encontrar la partida, así que no puedo afirmar quiénes eran los jugadores). Hay errores por desconocimiento, lisa y llanamente una burrada. Fallas que no son por no conocer la apertura, sino por no conocer el concepto, ni la estrategia ni la táctica. Claro que hay “celadas”, más o menos sutiles y todos podemos caer. Pero lo que son burradas, son burradas.

Considero que no está mal darle un vistazo, no para memorizar, sino para entender, ya que en este caso lo que parece absurdo, responde a principios que rigen durante toda la partida de ajedrez. El mecanismo es el mismo en la jugada 5 que en la 55.

Empecé por ver partidas de 2009 y lo que va de 2010, en que el error terminó en derrota en 10 o menos jugadas. Aproximadamente el 0.1% (1 de cada mil) de mi base de datos.

Lo más llamativo, es que buscando en la base general encontraba una y otra vez los mismos errores. No ya los que tienen el mismo chiste táctico, sino idéntica burrada.

Diag1_GDAceptadoHay un error recurrente en el Gambito de Dama Aceptado: justamente el creer que se puede mantener el peón. Un error que se repite desde 1620 a 2010. Veamos: 1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.e3 b5?! (3.… Cf6 jugaría Anand, aunque también hay otras posibilidades) 4.a4 (socavando la cadena de peones negra que se desintegra, con el agravante de no sólo tener que devolver el peón sino ver arruinarse su posición) 4. … c6? (66 partidas con esta burrada. 4.… b5 es el mal menor) 5.axb5 cxb5? (La burrada completa. Menos malo es 5. … Ab7) 6.Df3 ganando el Caballo. (por ejemplo: 6.… Cc6 7.Dxc6+ Ad7 8.Da6 e6 9.Cf3 con clara ventaja o 6.… Dc7 –queriendo encerrar a la Dama- 7.Dxa8 a6 8.Df3 +-). En fin, 52 partidas con la posición del Diagrama. La primera, data de 1620 y es de Gioacchino Greco “el Calabrés” contra no se sabe quien y también puede que sean análisis propios. La última, por ahora, es de 2009.

Greco (1600-1634), fue el mejor en su época y se lo considera el primer profesional del Ajedrez (así lo afirmaba entre otros Botvinik), ya que ganó dinero por jugar. Escribió libros de ajedrez, compuso problemas (el conocido Mate de Greco) y finales (ponemos el más conocido para que se entretengan resolviéndolo).

Diag2_Final_GrecoGioacchino Greco (1623)

Juegan las Negras y consiguen Tablas.

(Pequeña ayuda: los peones de columnas a o h –es decir los peones de la columna Torre-, que coronarían en casilla distinta a la del color del Alfil propio, salvo casos excepcionales –Rey adversario lejos-, no consiguen su objetivo.

 

 

Diag3_Dragon_6_Cg4

En la Defensa Siciliana, Variante Dragón, hay un error muy conocido y repetido, que se puede producir en varios momentos. 1.e4 c5 2.Cf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Cxd4 Cf6 5.Cc3 g6 6.Ae3 Cg4? Y se perderá el Caballo ya que la pieza que lo defiende (el Ac8) está sobrecargada y quedará clavada; o perderá calidad tras Ab5+ [claro que lo correcto es 6...Ag7] 7.Ab5+ Cc6 [7...Ad7 8.Dxg4 Cc6 9.Dh4 con una pieza de ventaja (9.De2; 9.Dd1)8.Cxc6 bxc6 [8...Cxe3?? 9.Cxd8+ a) 9.fxe3 no es tan preciso, pero igualmente las Blancas quedan con ventaja de calidad 9...bxc6 10.Axc6+; b) es linda 9.Ce5+ Ad7 10.Cxd7 Ag7 (10...Cxd1?? 11.Cf6#) 11.fxe3 a6 12.Cb6+ axb5 13.Cxa8] 9.Axc6+ Ad7 10.Ad4 [claro, que no tan precisa, pero vale 10.Axa8 Cxe3 11.fxe3 Dxa8 12.Dd4] ahora tanto 10...e5 [como 10...Axc6 11.Axh8 Dc8 12.f3] 11.Axa8 Dxa8 [11...exd4? 12.Dxd4] 12.Cd5! amenaza Cc7+ doble al Rey y la Dama. 12...Dd8 13.Ac3. La partida más antigua que encontré con este error fue Rahn,K-Rellstab,L Sr.; GER-Ch 08th Bad Oeynhausen (11), 1941. Digamos que Ludwig Rellstab (Sr.), estaba, en esa época, entre los 100 mejores del Mundo; ha sido Campeón de Alemania, varias veces representante Olímpico, donde obtuvo algunas Medallas. Así que no sólo los peores cometen graves errores en la apertura.

Diag3_Dragon_8_Cg4Más común aún es el mismo tipo de error que se produce también en la Variante Dragón: 1.e4 c5 2.Cf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Cxd4 Cf6 5.Cc3 g6 6.f4 [6.Ae3 es lo más jugado como en Anand,V (2790)-Carlsen,M (2810); Corus Chess-72nd-GM-A Wijk aan Zee (6.1), 2010 y que analizáramos en nuestra nota Impresionante Final.; 6.Ae2 es otra posibilidad, que también analizamos en Divar vs Alambique] 6...Ag7 No es un error, pero favorece los planes del Blanco. Exigirá un perfecto conocimiento de la apertura. El Blanco dispondrá de espacio y amenazas concretas se forman en todas direcciones. El Negro deberá ser preciso en la defensa. La posición es de doble filo. 7.e5! dxe5 [Mejor es 7...Ch5 8.Ab5+ Ad7 9.e6 = (o 9.exd6) ] 8.fxe5 Cg4? Esto si es un error, aunque no tiene consecuencias tan drásticas como en la anterior mini-partida. Pero las similitudes son evidentes y el procedimiento análogo. [Preferible es 8...Cfd7 9.e6 Ce5 (9...fxe6 10.Cxe6 Axc3+ 11.bxc3 Da5 (11...Db6? 12.Ac4 +-) 12.Dd4 +/=) 10.Ab5+ Cec6 11.exf7+ Rf8 12.Cxc6 Dxd1+ 13.Cxd1 Cxc6 14.c3 Ae6 15.0-0 +/=] 9.Ab5+ (143 partidas con esta posición) 9...Cc6 Lo mejor y lo que más resistencia ofrece. Fue la respuesta en 33 de las 143. [9...Ad7? se jugó en 26 partidas 10.Dxg4 +-; 9...Rf8?? en 80 se jugó esta burrada, que pierde 10.Ce6+! fxe6 (10...Rg8 11.Dxd8+ Af8 12.Dxf8#; 10...Axe6 11.Dxd8#) 11.0-0+ me pareció más linda que tomar (11.Dxd8+ claro que gana la Dama y la partida.) 11...Cf6 12.Dxd8+ Rf7 13.Dc7 +-; 9...Cd7? en 2 partidas 10.Dxg4 +-] 10.Cxc6 bxc6 En 6 de las 33. [10...Dxd1+ En 24 de las 33. 11.Cxd1 a6 12.Aa4 Ad7 13.h3 Ch6 (13...Cxe5 14.Cxe5 Axa4 15.Af4 Axc2 16.Tc1 +-) 14.Cxe7! Axa4 (14...Rxe7 15.Ag5+ Re6 16.Axd7+ Rxd7 17.Cc3 +-) 15.Cd5! +/- Pilnik,H-Kashdan,I; New York 1948 (1-0/28) Va mi recuerdo y homenaje al GM argentino Herman Pilnik, en aquel entonces uno de los 30 mejores del mundo y uno de los Sub-Campeones Olímpicos en 1950, 1952 y 1954. Isaac Kahsdan, por entonces entre los 50 mejores, había sido considerado a principios de la década de 1930 entre los 5 mejores del mundo.] 11.Axc6+ Ad7 12.Axa8 Dxa8 13.0-0 Cxe5 +/- El Blanco tiene ventaja de calidad y debería encontrar el camino hacia la victoria. 1-0

Todas las partidas y comentarios pueden verse en los magníficos visores de la página. También pueden descargarse.

Se aceptan aportes, sugerencias y consultas sobre el tema. En caso de interesar se le dará continuidad a este tema.

{iframe height="730"}visor3/visor.php?archivo=ERRORES_EN_ LA_APERTURA.pgn?lenguaje=spanish{/iframe}

 
http://www.zonadeajedrez.com/miscelanea/indeterminado/880-errores-apertura-minijuegos.html
Wed, 26 May 2010 07:09:00 +0000
 
 
 
Recursos Tácticos: Doble de Caballo 3/3

doble de caballo zona de ajedrez zonadeajedrez.comdoble de caballo zona de ajedrez zonadeajedrez.comTercera y última entrega de ejercicios tácticos de "Doble de Caballo"

Ocho ejercicios tácticos presentandos a modo de problemas para que sean estudiados desde la propia  página o bien ser descargardos y dedicarles algún tiempo más.

 

 

 
http://www.zonadeajedrez.com/aprendizaje/tactica/869-recursos-tacticos-doble-caballo33.html
Thu, 22 Apr 2010 23:00:00 +0000
 
 
 
My Favorite Chess Books For Teaching And Learning
Top ten lists are extremely popular in modern society. Chess isn’t immune from this phenomenon. All around I see lists of the best world champions, the best players never to be world champion, the top ten games of all time, etc. Even those who seem resistant to the mass hysteria pay close attention to the FIDE rating list and the national rankings.


Having said all that I’m infected with the bug myself. I set out writing this blog post to give all my readers a glimpse into my way of thinking as well as recommending some very useful books. The following list is in no particular order and certainly isn’t comprehensive. Too often I think when we evaluate chess books we’re looking for a panacea to turn us into chess calculating machines. Such a book or collection of books does not exist. However, if I were asked by a student “what book should I read about chess?” I have little doubt that one of these books would be on the tip of my tongue.



1. Chess 5,334 Problems, Combinations, and Games - Laszlo Polgar Any chess teacher worth their salt knows a little something about the training the Polgar sisters received at the hands of their determined father. This book, manual, reference, or whatever you want to call it is a glimpse into the main tool of the chess coach: directed practice.



2. Zurich International Chess Tournament 1953 - David Bronstein I discovered this book on my own some time ago and I enjoyed it as a trip through professional chess history. Years later I was discussing great chess classics with some trainers whose experience far outweighed my own and was a little surprised to hear them talk about this book as a necessity. I had accidentally stumbled upon a brilliant gem. Consider yourself educated where I had been ignorant.



3. Think Like A Grandmaster - Alexander Kotov Kotov experienced success as a chess player and teacher but he recognized that his greatest idol, Mikhail Botvinnik, really was far beyond him. This knowledge led to a great adventure that Kotov is willing to share with us. It is a good lesson to realize the superiority of others and yet have the bravery to stand up and ask “why are you better?”. I remember when I was training with Grandmaster Gregory Kaidanov he produced an old Russian copy of this book that was so used the pages were falling out. That’s as good a recommendation for this book as I needed.



4. Play Like a Grandmaster - Alexander Kotov Some of the ideas in “Think Like A Grandmaster” are a bit innocuous and this is Kotov’s attempt to bring a better understanding of those concepts as well as adding to the methods of the previous book. If you loved “Think Like A Grandmaster” you’ll love this one.



5. How To Reassess Your Chess - Jeremy Silman I can sing the praises of Silman all day but two of the most valuable concepts are the idea of reassessment and imbalances. Reassessing your chess involves a breaking down of your play and rebuilding from the ground up. Ideas that you have about chess can many times be toxic to your improvement … get rid of them. The idea of ‘imbalance’ is much simpler. Better pawn structure, the two bishops, bishop vs. knight, etc. It’s a matter of classifying advantages. Not an entirely new concept but certainly effective in practice even today.



6. Art Of Attack In Chess - Vladimir Vukovic I don’t know many people who have even heard of this book. It’s not a read for the feint of heart. You have to be dedicated to your own improvement to wrestle this book. In my early days of playing chess I called myself a “positional” player. All this means is my unwillingness to calculate led to small attacks, a preference for closed positions, and little desire for all-out assaults. It may have its faults but this book will get your mind thinking more about attack. It was more important to me that my paradigm of thinking shifted than any other help this book could have given me. It can help you too.



7. Dvoretsky’s Endgame Manual - Mark Dvoretsky Many students who have come to me complained that their previous instructor spent weeks or months going over king and pawn endgames with them. Books like Dvoretsky’s Endgame Manual are not for the average player. I have tried many times to read this book from cover to cover only to give up. I haven’t got the patience required and for that reason I recommend the use of the manual as a reference only. I have been congratulated many times for fighting the clock and winning in a long endgame at the club/hobby level and it’s because of this book. If you can finish it in a few sittings you’ll be a Grandmaster of the endgame.



8. I Play Against Pieces - Svetozar Gligoric Little known and unappreciated, this book stands in my mind as the book I wish Petrosian had written. I like to think of Gligoric as the Petrosian of Yugoslavia. Petrosian was certainly the better player of the two but Gligoric’s home analysis and recollection of the games in this collection is still very instructive. It’s a good manual of what a positional player should be. The key here for all players is this: If you like positional play you need to steer the game in that direction and see how that is accomplished. If you’re a tactical player loving complication and you get bored with positional games you need to know how to survive without making gross errors in your desperation to steer the game. The true genius is two sided and you have to cultivate a love for tactical and positional play in yourself.



9. Modern Chess Planning - Efstratios Grivas Grivas is a very well respected chess trainer currently serving on the FIDE Trainer Commission. This book in my opinion has only one use but it is every bit as powerful for the average to advanced player as Laszlo’s book is to the improving calculator. Namely: directed practice. With the help of Grivas the reader is guided amidst extreme complication. Improvement is inevitable if you can combat the various ideas put forth in this deceptively small volume.



10. Chess Success: Planning After The Opening - Neil McDonald Middlegame texts that are useful are rare so when you find one hold onto it. This is one of my book recommendations and it actually came to me from a student who had a book fetish. This is one of those books that grows with the reader. You see a little more each time you read it. Don’t take my word for it, take a look for yourself.


I hope you enjoyed this list. I look forward to reading and replying to your comments. I’m especially interested in books that you’d recommend and your experience reading my recommendations.

 
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Chessvine/~3/lw0bKRlET6g/814-My-Favorite-Chess-Books-For-Teaching-And-Learning.html
 
 
 
Hard to surpass

‘What Campo did will be hard to surpass’
BY CHRISTINE MONCADA

GRANDMASTER Eugene Torre yesterday said Philippine chess will mourn the passing of Florencio Campomanes, adding his contributions to the game will be hard to forget and surpass.

Although shocked by Campomanes’ passing yesterday, Torre said: "Talaga namang dadating na rin ‘yan, nahirapan na rin siya, mahina na rin."

He chose instead to focus on what Campomanes did to chess here and the whole world, especially when he brought two big events here–the 1978 World Championship between Bobby Fischer and Anatoly Karpov and the 1992 Chess Olympiad.

"Napakalaki ng contribution niya sa chess, hindi lang sa Pilipinas kundi sa buong mundo. His being FIDE president was in itself a remarkable achievement. He had good relations with presidents of various federations. And under his term, he focused on the development of young players. That explains kung bakit napakaraming mga batang magagaling ngayon," said Torre, who became the country’s and Asia’s first GM as a 22-year-old back in 1974 when the Philippine team finished a fighting 11th overall in the World Chess Olympiad in Nice, France.

"We worked together during those days. Although the PCF (Philippine Chess Federation) was led by Bombi Aznar then, Campo was our titular head. He helped us strategize and he took care of all the team’s needs," said Torre, now 58.

Along with Torre, making up the RP team in the Nice Olympiad were Ramon Lontoc Jr., Renato Naranja, Rosendo Balinas Jr., Rodolfo Tan-Cardoso, and Glenn Bordonada.

That team’s 11th place finish stood as the best for the country until another squad that also included Torre finished seventh overall in 1988.

"Practically we were a father-and-son tandem. But make no mistake about he, he was the godfather of Philippine chess. Almost all of the country’s best players, especially the veterans, grew up with Campo at the helm," said Torre.

"It’s a great privilege na nagkaroon ako ng close association sa kanya. I won’t forget it. He was a great man of the chess world, parang Fischer," Torre concluded.

Source: http://www.malaya.com.ph

Campo makes his final move


Tuesday, 04 May 2010 18:53

FLORENCIO Campomanes, the first Filipino—and Asian for that matter—to head the World Chess Federation (Fide), died yesterday after a lingering illness. He was 83.

The chess icon, who stunned the world by capturing the Fide presidency as an underdog in 1982 in Lucerne, Switzerland, breathed his last at 1:30 p.m. at Iggy’s Inn in Baguio City.

“He moved on peacefully, and with quiet gentleness all around him,” said Des Bautista, who built the Iggy’s Inn with wife Auring. “He was a giant in Philippine sports and his passing created a void that will be hard to fill in.”

Bautista and Campomanes—Pocams to his dear friends—had been bosom buddies since ’60s.

“I lost a man who was more than a brother to me,” said Bautista. “And, if I may add, I also lost a poker mate, whose passion for and skills in the card game are rivaled only by his love for and deft-laden moves in chess.”

Before his ascent to chess officialdom, Campomanes, a national master, had been a professor of Political Science at the University of the Philippines Diliman and had also played for flag and country.

He was playing team captain, Philippine delegate and media reporter (he wrote columns for The Manila Times and the defunct Daily Express) in the Cuba World Chess Championship in the 1960s, with Carlos Benitez, Renato Naranja and Rodolfo Tan Cardoso as his teammates.

Until his election as Fide president, Campomanes had been a virtual outsider as the world chess body was then dominated virtually by Europeans.

Under his watch, Campomanes, a linguist who also spoke Spanish fluently, literally opened the Fide doors to the world—from Asia to Africa, from the Arab world to South America.

Using his battle cry “One World Through Chess,” he courted nonchess-playing nations to join Fide, including the Middle East countries and such African countries like Tunisia and Nigeria and even Trinidad and Tobago.

In his pre-Fide days, he produced Asia ’s first grand master, the legendary Eugene Torre, in 1973.

More here.

Posted by Picasa
 
http://www.malaya.com.ph/05042010/sports5.html
2010-05-03T12:13:00.003-05:00
 
 
 
Recursos Tácticos: Doble de Caballo 3/3

doble de caballo zona de ajedrez zonadeajedrez.comdoble de caballo zona de ajedrez zonadeajedrez.comTercera y última entrega de ejercicios tácticos de "Doble de Caballo"

Ocho ejercicios tácticos presentandos a modo de problemas para que sean estudiados desde la propia  página o bien ser descargardos y dedicarles algún tiempo más.

 

 

 
http://www.zonadeajedrez.com/aprendizaje/tactica/869-recursos-tacticos-doble-caballo33
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 23:00:00 +0000
 
 
 
New Features in Aquarium 2010

A new version of Aquarium 2010 (version 4.0.3) will soon be released and it’s free for current users. The new version has several new features, some of which are described below. First a quick overview, followed by more detailed description of each feature:

  • A new correspondence chess module and improved support for correspondence players.
  • Hide selected names in the Navigation Pane.
  • Highlight the moves in the notation that lead to the current position.
  • Automatically mark moves that have been analyzed deeply with infinite analysis.
  • See which games are being analyzed with infinite analysis.
  • Keyboard shortcut to add infinite analysis evaluation and time to the notation.
  • Configurable fields in database list (new fields: Date and ECO).
  • Cancel option in IDeA startup dialog box.
  • Three new options when stopping IDeA.
  • Two new IDeA presentation options.
  • “Active” button to activate/deactivate projects in IDeA Control Center.
  • “View Project” button in IDeA Control Center.
  • IDeA session statistics in IDeA Control Center.
  • Automatic creation/correction of tree configurations.
  • QAT Engine configuration button in IDeA view.
  • A new Root Node button in IDeA Project View ribbon.
  • Improved project statistics.
  • 2D-Eval chart showing IDeA node distribution by score.
  • MM-Delta chart, comparing infinite analysis evaluations with IDeA scores.
  • Branching chart, showing number of candidate moves for variations.
  • A link to analysis settings has been added to the IDeA Project Status window.
  • A single-click link to enable/disable root nodes added to Project Status window.
  • Improved Root Node List dialog box.
  • Four new lists for storing positions along with comments.
  • Changed display of IDeA analysis queue to facilitate handling of large number of positions.
  • A feature that makes accurate count of nodes in an IDeA tree.
  • Reset IDeA marks in notation.

Besides the new correspondence chess module, most new features can be characterized as usability improvements.

Correspondence Chess

The new Aquarium correspondence chess module is a major new feature that gives you a unified method of playing your correspondence games on Xfcc compliant servers.


Starting Aquarium’s correspondence play module

You get a quick overview of all your games in a single list, even if you have games in progress on different servers.


The new Aquarium correspondence play module

When you make your moves, many of the possible sources of error are eliminated. Games can be saved directly in an Aquarium database where you can check opening statistics, look up the position in endgame tablebases or use Aquarium’s analysis tools. No matter how extensive your notes and analysis are, Aquarium automatically ensures that only the move you make is transferred to your opponent and your notes and analysis will stay private.

For an overview of this new module, see Correspondence Chess with Aquarium 2010.

Hidden Names in Navigation Pane

Another feature that is of interest to correspondence players is the new “Hidden Names” option. It specifies names of players that should be hidden in the Navigation pane (sidebar) list. Click the Aquarium button, select “Options” and then “Display Options” from the menu. Clicking the “Hidden Names” button allows you to enter names that won’t be displayed in the Navigation pane.


Hide names in Navigation pane

In this example, when a game involving “Karpov, Anatoly” is open, only his opponent’s name will be displayed in the Navigation pane. If Karpov had white against Kasparov, then “- Kasparov, G” would be displayed so you can easily see the opponent’s name.

If you are a correspondence player, you might want to take advantage of this feature and hide your own name. When you are working with a database of your own games, you can quickly see your opponents’ names, as they won’t get cut off in the Navigation pane, even when you have the white pieces.

How Did I Get Here?

When examining a heavily annotated game, have you ever got lost in the notation? Unsure about the path you followed to reach the current position? Press the “L” key and the path will be highlighted as shown in the next image.


The path to the current position is highlighted

If you press “L” again, the highlight effect will be removed. If you move to a position outside the current path, press “L” to highlight the new path.

This new feature works in the Sandbox, database game view, and IDeA Project View.

Infinite Analysis

Now you can highlight moves in the notation that you have analyzed with infinite analysis. This feature gives you a quick overview of the moves you have analyzed and helps you spot positions that may need more attention.


Highlight analyzed moves

Click the dialog box launcher (tool button) in the Infinite Analysis group (highlighted in the image above). “Additional Infinite Analysis Options” will be displayed. Here you can enter the number of seconds required to mark a move as analyzed. In this example a move will be marked after 10 seconds of infinite analysis. Here is an example showing several moves marked as analyzed.


Analyzed moves highlighted in notation

Moves that have been analyzed for more than 10 seconds are highlighted with “Engine analysis” style, which in this case has been defined to display the move in pink color. You can modify the style by pressing Shift+S. For more information about styles and move classes, see Aquarium’s Hidden Treasures, Part One.

Even those who use IDeA as their main analysis tool, like to browse analysis trees looking for positions where they suspect the evaluation may not be correct. In that case, they can run infinite analysis to verify the IDeA results. Since the “Engine analysis” style is saved with the game, you can quickly see which positions you have analyzed when you open the game at a later time.

This is another feature that will be useful for correspondence players who need to keep track of their analysis in several ongoing games. This is a good opportunity to remind users that Aquarium stores all your infinite analysis, as long as it is sufficiently deep.


Stored infinite analysis

If you hover with the mouse pointer over the move and evaluation shown in the status bar, a window will pop up showing the results of your previous analysis of the current position as the screenshot above illustrates.

Now that multi-core computers have become common, and some players even have access to two or more computers, you may want to run infinite analysis on more than one game at the same time. You can always see which games are being analyzed by the green rectangle next to the games in the Navigation pane as shown below.


Green rectangles indicate analysis

Here we see three games being analyzed at the same time with infinite analysis. The green rectangles help you to quickly identify which games are being analyzed.

One more infinite analysis feature worth mentioning is the new Ctrl+E keyboard shortcut. It copies the current evaluation from the analysis window and inserts it as a “Long After” comment in the notation along with the analysis time.

Configurable Fields in Database List

Aquarium is slowly adding improved database features. In the new version, you can configure which fields are displayed in the database list.


Configurable columns

When you want to add or remove columns, right-click over the game list to display the menu shown above and click “Select columns.” Two new fields are available for the database list: Date and ECO code.

The IDeA Control Center

IDeA sees many improvements in the new Aquarium 2010 version. Unlike the initial Aquarium 2010, which revolutionized the analysis features, the new version focuses on usability improvements and giving the user more information about the status of the analysis.

Since there are so many changes, I break them into sections based their location. I start with the new buttons in the Ribbon and changes to how existing buttons work.

Starting IDeA

When you click “Start IDeA” in the IDeA Control Center and there is more than one active project, a list of the projects is displayed. If these are actually the projects that you want to analyze, just click OK.


IDeA informs about active projects

Now there is a Cancel button in case these are not the projects you want to analyze. After canceling, you can activate the projects you want to analyze and deactivate others before starting IDeA again.

Stopping IDeA

When stopping IDeA you get three new options, instructing IDeA to perform certain tasks before shutting down.


Actions to perform before stopping

If you don’t select any of these options, IDeA will stop immediately, without completing the analysis of current tasks, as it did in the previous version.

Wait for current IDeA tasks to finish stops IDeA after completing the tasks that are currently being analyzed.

Minimax after finish will minimax IDeA trees for all active projects before stopping.

Make accurate position count in subtrees (long) is a new feature that makes an accurate count of positions reachable from every node in the tree. Note that this is a very time consuming operation and you should not use it at all for trees with more than 30,000 positions. The method used for counting is more advanced and accurate, but also different from the method normally used by IDeA itself. One of the differences is that IDeA counts each node in the tree once, but the new option may count the same position many times if it can be reached via different paths. Also, it is not affected by move colors. Therefore, the numbers you see will often be very different from those normally shown by IDeA.

IDeA Presentation Options

Clicking the tool button in the IDeA group gives you two new options.


IDeA presentation options

Automatically show the selected task in the notation refers to what happens when you click a task in the task queue, which is displayed in the Stage Status window in project view. If you select this option, the position corresponding to the task, and the line leading up to the position, will be automatically displayed in the notation.

Display a warning when there are many active projects decides if the dialog box described above is displayed when you start IDeA with more than one active project.

Activate/Deactivate Project

The “Active” button is now available in the IDeA Control Center. This means that you can select a project in the project list and press “Active” to toggle the active state of the project.

In this example, the project at the top of the list has been selected as shown by the black border around it. It’s currently inactive and indicated by the “Status” column and the gray characters. Clicking the “Active” button will activate the project.

View Project Button

The new “View Project” button, below the project list, opens the selected project.

In this example, the Carlsen-Kramnik project would be displayed in project view. The “View Project” button is equivalent to double-clicking the project or selecting it and pressing the Enter key.

IDeA Session Statistics

The “Statistics” button in the IDeA Control Center displays statistics about the current analysis session.

Here you can see at what time the analysis session started and the CPU efficiency. Of course you want the CPU efficiency to be as close to 100% as possible. In this case it is 95%, which means that the engines have been busy 95% of the time. The rest of the time (5%), they have waited for a task to analyze; e.g., while IDeA is minimaxing the analysis tree.

CPU efficiency can be low if you are starting a new project from scratch with several engine instances. In general, the efficiency will increase if you analyze more than one project at the same time.

Automatic Creation/Correction of Tree Configurations

It seems that tree configurations are the main cause of frustration for new IDeA users. This problem is addressed in the new Aquarium version.

If there is no tree configuration specified for an IDeA project, it will be created automatically when the IDeA Project View is opened.

IDeA also examines existing configurations when IDeA Project View is opened. It checks if the fields “Positions,” “IdeA,” and “Main tree” use the IDeA tree that the user selected for the project. If not, then they are updated to use the project’s IDeA tree.

In addition to this, all changes to tree configurations as well as IDeA project settings are now immediately saved to disk. The former is not limited to IDeA or IDeA tree configurations.

Engine Button in QAT

You can now customize the Quick Access Toolbar (QAT) in IDeA view to display an “Engine” button that brings up the “IDeA Engines Setup” dialog box.


IDeA QAT customization

You can add the new button by right-clicking somewhere in the QAT and selecting “Customize.” Make sure that “idea” is displayed in the “Mode” drop-down list and then select “Engines” by clicking the check box in the “Visible” column. The “Engines” button (highlighted in the image above) will be added to the QAT when you click OK.

The new button is available both in the IDeA Control Center and IDeA Project View. Previously, you had to switch to the IDeA Control Center and click the “Engines” button in the ribbon to modify the IDeA engine list. As before, it can only be modified when IDeA isn’t running.

IDeA Project View

The Project View Ribbon has several new buttons, including new statistics buttons, which give you a new insight into the analysis tree, beyond what a simple score and position count can do.

The “Root Node” button allows you to add a new analysis root with a single click.


Add the current position as root

When you click the button the current position is added as a root. One of the most common operations in Aquarium 2010 IDeA is to add and remove root positions. As you’ll see later in this column, removing root positions has been made equally easy.

Next we come to a feature that truly deserves its own special column: The “Statistics” group in the Project View Ribbon. It opens up a completely new view of the analysis results. This can help you to better understand where to focus your analysis resources, how likely your opponent is to go wrong in different variations, if the IDeA analysis is likely to surprise an opponent who relies only on infinite analysis, etc.


IDeA statistics

The four statistics buttons are shown in the image above.

The leftmost button, Project, gives you numeric information about the project.

2D-Eval displays a chart showing the distribution of scores for the sub-tree starting in the current position.

MM-Delta graphs the differences between infinite analysis evaluations and the IDeA scores.

Branching charts the number of alternatives examined for moves following the current position. This helps you find positions where additional analysis may be needed.


IDeA project statistics

The first pane, “Overall statistics,” shows the total passes or stages that have been completed and how many tasks of each type (”Prolongation,” “Alternatives,” and “Deep Prolongation”) have been created. Finally the results of the “False Alarm” checks are shown.

The second pane is an overview of the latest “Prolongation” stage. It shows the total number of leaf nodes in the tree, how many of those were rejected because of the limit you have set on variation length and the number of analysis tasks that were generated.

You can reset these statistics at any time by clicking the “Reset” button.

The third pane, “Other,” is new and shows when the tree was last minimaxed, when the latest backup was created and how many positions the tree contains.

The 2D-Eval chart shows the frequency distribution of scores in the sub-tree starting from the current position. The chart title in the screenshot below shows that the current score is +0.52 pawns, which means that White has a slight advantage. The chart is based on the 5 best moves in each position.


IDeA project statistics

The X-axis shows evaluations, but the Y-axis the number of positions. Here we can for example see that 41.1% of positions in the sub-tree are equal.

There are many things you can read from the 2D-Eval chart. In this case, we see that the distribution is rather flat across the three highest bars where the bulk of the nodes fall. If a game is played from this position, it wouldn’t be a surprise if the evaluation changes and if it does it most likely will move towards equality. In an over the board game, Black should be able to draw the position, but he has to be careful.

If you right-click over a chart, you get the option to save it to a graphics file or copy it to the clipboard.

There are several options available for the 2D-Eval chart. There is a drop-down list in the upper-right corner of the chart where you can choose to chart the nodes for all moves, or just for a specific move.


Chart a selected move

By default all moves are charted, but the drop-down list shows all available moves along with their score. When you select a specific move the chart is immediately updated to reflect your selection.

There are also options at the bottom of the chart window where you can specify the maximum number of alternatives that are included in the statistics.


Limit the number of alternatives

In this example, “Best White moves limit” is set to one. This means that in positions where White is to move, only the best move is considered. “Best Black moves limit” is set to five, so Black’s five best moves are added to the chart. After modifying the values, you must click the “Refresh” button to update the chart.

Finally, there are a few common presets available for the number of alternatives considered for each side.


Presets for number of alternatives

If you select “everything” all nodes in the sub-tree will be included. The other options are are displayed as two numbers, separated by a colon. The first number stands for the number of white alternatives and the second one for the number of black alternatives. If you, for instance, select “1:5″ only the best move from White will be included, but Black’s five best moves will be included in the chart.

The next chart is the “MM-Delta.” It compares the IDeA scores for the positions in the tree with the infinite analysis evaluations.


Infinite analysis evaluations vs. IDeA

The statistics are broken down by the color, so you get several pairs of yellow and brown bars, where the former represents White’s moves and the latter Black’s moves.

The Y-axis shows the difference between the infinite analysis evaluation and the IDeA score, measured in percentages, which are commonly used in Aquarium when evaluations need to be converted to winning percentages. On this scale, 5-7% means that when translated to probability of winning, the difference between infinite analysis and IDeA is 5-7%.

Positions where there is less than 1% difference between infinite analysis and IDeA are not shown in the chart.

If you right-click over one of the bars in the chart and select “Add to Notes”, the positions corresponding to that bar are added to a note list (see the description of note lists above), where you can browse them and examine further. This feature can be quite interesting for positions where there is a big difference between infinite analysis and IDeA.

The options for selecting data for the chart are similar to those for the “2D-Eval” chart described above.

The third chart is the “Branching” chart. This shows you which positions have many candidate moves analyzed and which have fewer moves analyzed.


The Branching chart

You can, for instance, take advantage of this information to decide where you want to focus your analysis. The following options are available for this chart.


Branching chart options

If you click a point on the lines in the chart, the corresponding variation is displayed in a box below the chart. You can then click “Go to position” to view the position on the board in Aquarium.

The chart can show moves for “Both Sides,” as in this example above or only for the “Current Side.” The chart can be limited to the best candidate moves, by specifying a low “Evaluation delta.” After changing delta, you must click “Refresh” to update the chart.

I have only described the technical part of using the new charts above. Their practical application is much more exciting, and an Aquarium user (”buffos”) will soon publish some interesting examples of their application on the Aquarium support forum. You should definitely check the forum, because it has a lot of useful information about Aquarium.

Project Status Window

The Project Status window has three improvements, which make working with IDeA faster and more convenient.


The improved Project Status window

The first change is that the “Analysis settings” is now a link that brings up the “Analysis Quality Settings” dialog box with a single click. Previously you had to switch to the IDeA Control Center to change the seconds/position, depth, maximum time, etc.

The second change makes working with root nodes more convenient. In the example above, you see three “Root nodes” links: “52 root node(s),” “(1/2),” and “disable this root.” When you click the second link, you cycle through the active roots. The first number (”1″ in this example) shows the current root and the second number (”2″ in this example) shows the total number of active root nodes. The third link is only displayed when the current position is a root node. If it is enabled, as it is in this example, the link shows “disable this root” so you can disable it with a single click. If the root is currently disabled, the link changes to “enable this root” and clicking it enables the root node. In the previous version you had to open the Root Node List to disable and enable root nodes. Clicking the leftmost link (here “52 root node(s)”) displays the improved Root Node List dialog box, shown below.


The new Root Node List dialog

The following improvements have been made since the initial Aquarium 2010 release:

1. The “Eval” column, showing the current score of the root node has been added.
2. The “Position” column now shows the final moves leading up to the root position, if they are available. Previously, only the FEN string for the position was displayed. This makes it much easier for the user to remember how the position shown on the board (missing from the image) arose.
3. The “Comment” column let’s you add comments to individual root positions. This can be very useful if you have several root positions.
4. If you open the Root Node List, where the current position is a root node (active or inactive), then the corresponding line is highlighted in the Root Node List. An example can be seen in the image above, where the third line from the bottom is highlighted.

The third and final improvement to the Project Status window is the addition of four lists that you can use for storing important positions along with verbal commentary. The names of the lists indicate what kind of positions they are intended for: “Good,” “Interesting,” “Critical,” and “Dubious.” As you can see when you look at the Project Status window image above, each list is displayed as two links, similar to the root nodes, and the links work in a similar manner. The two links are the name of the list (e.g., “Critical”) and a link with two numbers separated by a slash. The first number stands for the current position in the list and the second number is the total number of positions in the list. Clicking the numbers displays the next position in the list. When you reach the end of the list, it rewinds to the start of the list. Using this feature you can quickly scan the positions in each list. Clicking the name of the list displays the “Note List” dialog box. An example is shown in the next image.


A Note List dialog

As you can see, the “Note List” dialog box is similar to the “Root Node List.” For every position, you can see when it was added to the list, it’s current and initial score (the score when it was added to the list) and the most important piece of information, your notes about the position. You can edit, copy and paste the commentary. Right-clicking on an item in the list opens a menu where you can copy or move the position to other note lists. Double-clicking an item in the list opens the position setup dialog box.

There are five buttons at the bottom of the “Note List.” The leftmost button let’s you “Remove” the currently selected position, while “Remove All” deletes all positions from the list. The next button is “Add Board Position”; this is a quick way of adding the position displayed on the main board to the list. If you run into an interesting position that you want to remember, click the “Interesting” link in the Project Status window and then this button. It is disabled in the screenshot, because the current position is already in the list. When you are done, click the OK button to store your changes, or Cancel to ignore them.

Once you have opened the “Note List” dialog box, there is a drop-down list below the chess board (not shown in the image above), which lets you switch between the available lists.

Whenever you open a list and the current position is in the list, it will be highlighted. This applies both to the note lists and the root node list. An example can be seen in the image above, where the first position in the list is the current position.

Stage Status Window

The first thing you will notice about the Stage Status window in the new version is that the task queue looks different.


The Stage Status window

Instead of a fully expanded queue with one square for each task, only the tasks that are being analyzed are displayed individually. The leftmost gray square shows that there are eight finished tasks. There are two green squares, which represent the tasks that are currently being analyzed. You can click an active task to see the engine analysis. In this example, the second active task has been selected and you can follow its analysis in the space below the queue. The yellow square shows that there are 14 tasks in the queue waiting to be analyzed.

One of the reasons for this change is to allow the processing of large EPD files when showing each individual task would not be practical.

A new menu item has been added to the “Manage” menu in the Stage Status window.


Make an accurate position count

The “Fill Subtree Power” scans every position in the tree and makes an accurate count of positions that can be reached from it. It is the same operation as was described above when the new features of the IDeA “Stop” button were described. Note that this is a very time consuming operation and you should not use it for trees with more than 30,000 positions.

IDeA Notation Window

There is one change in the IDeA notation window, which clears IDeA related highlighting from the notation and then displays all root positions, both active and inactive, with a blue color.


Reset IDeA marks

If you want to highlight the root moves and remove highlighting from positions that were manually added to IDeA, right-click over the notation window and select “Reset IDeA marks” from the menu.

Conclusion

As you have seen in this column, the new Aquarium 2010 version is a major update. It offers new features, such as the correspondence chess module, and numerous changes that were designed to improve the usability of Aquarium 2010. Best of all, the new version is free for current users!

 
http://chessok.com/?p=23571
Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:32:28 +0000
 
 
 
New Chess Masters Database released

After some time of development we proudly announce that we just released a new feature: the Masters Database.

Now you can browse and search a selected database, composed only of games played by both chess masters of 2400 elo and more at the time of the game. So expect to find only the top games of the elite.

You can use this tool easily. You will find a selector in the Chess Opening Explorer and in the Sear Position tools.

We hope you enjoy it and find this new feature useful!

 
http://www.365chess.com/news/new-chess-masters-database-released/
2010-04-08T12:07:00Z
 
 
 
Pawn Wars
In Breaking Through: How the Polgar Sisters Changed the Game of Chess (2005), Susan Polgar mentions a game she played with her father when she was starting to learn chess.
After introducing the chess board and the pieces, for some time we only played "pawn wars". That means games where only the pawns participate without the rest of the army. The goal of the game was whoever queens a pawn first wins. Then later we added the kings and playing all the way to checkmate.
Polgar, 6-7
I had found that young children enjoy what we had been calling the pawn game a few years before this book came out. After reading that passage a few years ago, I've increased my investment in pawn wars as a teaching tool. It is a central element in my private lessons with young students. In classrooms full of seven year old children, I start with pawns.

The game can be modified easily. Last spring, a kindergarten student that had been playing chess one month with his grandfather showed some promise, and his father made arrangements for me to offer some instruction. We played pawn wars with the kings. He started with eight pawns to my six--my rook pawns were missing. It took him perhaps two or three games to learn that he could lure my king to one side of the board by creating a passed pawn there, then create one on the other side that was outside my reach. After several victories, we played eight against seven.

One need not use all the pawns.

The classic Szén Position is a challenge even to strong players that still need work on the endgame. The player to move has a theoretical win, but precision is necessary to keep the win in hand.



According to David Hooper and Kenneth Whyld, The Oxford Companion to Chess (1996), the three pawn problem--a king against three connected passed pawns--had been studied for over two hundred years without success until Jószef Szén solved it in 1836.

Another variation of pawn wars that I've been using the past few weeks appears to be a theoretical draw. Remove the kings, and the player on move should win.


 
http://chessskill.blogspot.com/2009/10/pawn-wars.html
Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:29:00 +0000
 
 
 
Game whips mind into top shape

On Chess
Game whips mind into top shape
Saturday, March 20, 2010 2:52 AM

In the age of video games, the ancient game of chess curiously maintains a special cachet.

In particular, there is an increasing recognition of its effectiveness as an educational tool.

Recently, the Rhode Island Senate passed a resolution "urging the state education commissioner to support chess instruction either in classrooms or clubs in Rhode Island's public schools."

Actor and filmmaker Edward James Olmos recently urged the Brownsville, Texas, school board to do a documentary film about its successful school chess program.

Olmos starred in the film Stand and Deliver, which documents the use of math in motivating underprivileged students to high academic achievement.

"Look at what chess has done for these (Brownsville) students," he declared.

"It breeds self-respect at the highest level. It infuses them with self-esteem and self-worth."

Olmos, who was similarly motivated by baseball as a youth, wishes that he had instead concentrated on chess.

Chess has been extolled by many renowned thinkers. Pascal described it as "the gymnasium of the mind"; Goethe, as "the touchstone of the intellect."

Source: http://www.dispatch.com
Posted by Picasa
 
http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/life/stories/2010/03/20/game-whips-mind-into-top-shape.html?sid=101
2010-03-20T09:16:00.001-05:00
 
 
 
Not again!?

Europe-Echecs interview DanailovPerhaps it was because I’m currently reading The Age of Empathy – Nature’s Lessons for a Kinder Society, Frans de Waal’s latest book on how and why humans (and other primates) are capable of showing empathy and solving moral problems – that I found myself shocked by the recent Europe Echecs interview with Topalov’s manager Silvio Danailov. Topalov’s match against Anand hasn’t even started yet, but the first provocations are already in the air again.

Photo: Europe-Echecs

Tiebreak in ElistaFrans de Waal is one of the world’s leading primatologists and has written an impressive body of work about the similarities between apes and humans. In his latest work, he hands us a toolkit on how to improve our society by looking at (human) nature. Empathy and morality are not only human affairs, but also play an very important role in other species, such as chimpansees and dolphins. De Waal argues that the election of president Obama is a clear sign that the ‘nightmare’ days of Reagan and Thatcher are over and that perhaps it is time to transform society into a more empathic place. Well, I think it’s time to end the ‘nightmare’ of Toiletgate and start a new era where chess professionals actually show some empathy and respect for each other instead of constantly trying to provoke the opponent.

In the video of the interview, Danailov talks about whether the ‘Sofia rules’ apply in the upcoming Topalov-Anand match, to be held in Sofia next month. They will not be applied – at least not officially. But that’s no problem for Danailov:

If one player doesn’t offer or accept draws they will apply. Vishy [Anand] doesn’t agree but he will be forced, because Topalov will not offer him a draw and he will not speak to him. So, what to do? He will be forced. This is the best. This is the best, otherwise… I don’t know, there’s people who are absolutely conservative, they are against these rules, but this is the future of chess. This is for sure. Everybody now understands this. Of course, I understand there are some players, old players, who don’t want to work… they like short draws and whatever. They like to offer them, but this is finished. Chess … we need a professional sport, and in professional sport, we cannot do this.

It’s a remarkable statement: Anand – forced against his will to comply to rules that are not official; this is the future of chess, no matter what ‘old’ chess players say – their opinion clearly is unimportant and shouldn’t be respected. But the most remarkable is that Danailov says that Topalov will not only refuse to offer any draws but also will ignore his opponent altogether: “He will not speak to him.” In other words, he will drop all courtesy and normal etiquette and create a ‘non-speaking terms’ atmosphere in a match in his home country, against one of the most relaxed and friendly chess players in the professional chess scene.

And why? Because of ‘professionalism’, that vacuous word all too often misused by people who refuse to acknowledge that most if not all work requires empathy and social skills – in other words, people who haven’t the slightest idea what ‘professionalism’ really means. (Here’s how one competency library actually defines ‘professionalism’: “Thinking carefully about the likely effects on others of one’s words, actions, appearance, and mode of behavior.”) To exclude all social elements from a profession is in fact the ultimate un-professional thing imaginable.

It’s a fallacy Frans de Waal convincingly demolishes in his book, showing how cooperation and social interaction are absolutely crucial to succeed in any job and society, and are in fact measures by which we judge people and choose them as colleagues, friends or mates. Not so for the Bulgarians, who’ve created their own rules and apparently don’t mind to be social isolates in the chess world, as long as the results speak for themselves. What an utterly unprofessional attitude!

In a similar vein, we’ve argued before on this site that shaking hands before and after a game shouldn’t actually be incorporated in the rules of chess, but instead should be respected even though they’re not in the rules – because, as De Waal shows, that’s how empathy and social skills work: intuitively, without explicit rules, automatically. And that’s why apes and other animals are capable of displaying them, too, without being able to read lawbooks or guides on ethical behaviour. It’s a thing of nature. It’s in our genes.

Tiebreak in ElistaThe sad thing is that we’ve seen this all before, four years ago in Elista. There, the Bulgarian team made themselves ridiculous in the eyes of world by accusing Vladimir Kramnik – without a shred of hard evidence – of cheating. They even published a childish book on it – still lacking any solid evidence – to prove their point, which I reviewed back in 2007. Perhaps it’s worth recalling how Topalov accused Kramnik of unfairly using his ‘home advantage’ up till the Kremlin in order to “keep the title at any cost” and that he (Kramnik) “will not balk at violating ethical principles.”

In his book, Topalov wrote that it was naive of him to agree to the match against Kramnik being played on Russian (well, kind of) ground, because such a match obviously couldn’t be fair. Well, it’s four years later and look who’s playing on home ground this time. Will Topalov and Danailov return the compliment and agree if Anand claimed a match in Bulgaria couldn’t ever be fair because of some kind of home advantage? Frans de Waal devotes an entire chapter on the ‘walking in other man’s ’shoes’ concept, but looking at the interview of Europe Echecs, I have my doubts if Danailov has read it. Note how he laughs during the entire interview, routinely dismissing dissenting views and announcing how the reigning World Champion will be ‘forced’ to do this and that. Does that sound like someone showing any kind of empathy or ‘ethical principles’ at all?

Silvio Danailov has recently announced his candidacy for president of the European Chess Union. Heaven forbid someone who doesn’t understand the first thing about ‘professionalism’, baselessly accuses some world class players of unethical behaviour and laughingly tells others what to do, ever gets to play such an important role in European chess, even if he did show some good initiatives like the exciting M-Tel tournament and his passion for more fighting chess. This kind of destructive madness really can’t be tolerated in our beautiful chess world. Frans de Waal ends his book The Age of Empathy (I am quoting from the Dutch version) with the following words:

We must rely on our intellect to figure out how to balance individual and collective interests. One instrument we have and which enriches our thinking enormously, has been selected over ages, meaning its survival value has been proven time and again. It is our capacity to show a sense of oneness with others, to understand them, and to place ourselves in their situation.

We can only hope this message will reach the Bulgarian team before the Topalov-Anand match starts.

 
http://www.chessvibes.com/columns/not-again/
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 07:15:15 +0000
 
 
 
Part 3: Finding training patterns in your Repertoire


In part 1 I proclaimed my new training regimen which basically consists of creating a personalized set of positions from my own games, repertoire and study material.

In Part 2 I showed you how I used chess base to create my own training positions to have a set of tactical and positional puzzles themed from my own games.

In this entry I will show you how I develop a repertoire data base and how I use this to create study positions.

But first a brief update on the growing A.C.I.S of Caissa movement:


Following an action from the playbook of Loomis, I plan on keeping the ACIS of Caaissa updates limited to THIS blog and not on my mirrored site at the greater community at Chess.com. I like the smaller closer circle of friends here as it tends to promote a more supportive environment. The "how to" stuff will get forward to chess.com.


Unlike the brutish Knight’s errant DLM movement of the mid ‘00’s, A.C.I.S. of Caissa is proving to be more accessible to the “common folk” as the final circles of the MDLM method was just unreachable if you work, have a family and want to practice good hygiene. If the truth be known, most of the knights errant had modified the MDLM method to smaller circles and approached it in a more realistic manner.


Loomis has joined in this universalistic approach and proclaims to be Baaaack.

Steve (learn’s chess) Eddins is firing up the blog to declare his mission and thoughts.

Chunky Rook has fired off a series of gif patterns worth checking out on his blog

Linuxguy reviews a game he played on FICS and shows appreciation to having studied Zurich 1953

And finally, Chess tiger was lulled into this quest with this line:





What pulled my attention is that one may choose his or her own study plan. So
one isn't pushed towards Rapid Chess Improvement of Michael De La Maza or How to Reassess Your Chess from Jeremy Silman or Novice Nook written by Dan Heisman orInternational Chess School (ICS) or Lev Albert's Chess Course or ... . This is a good thing because for all we know, all combined may bring a bigger outcome chess wise then following only one of these courses.



Building a repertoire database.

I use chess base for a lot of reasons. One of the things I’ve done was create a blunder-rep database with games centered around my openings I play. First, I pull in games that I have studied from the classic tournaments that are in any shape or form close to what I play in my chess games.

Hastings 1895, London 1924 and Zurich 1953 is not enough resources for what I am looking for. There are several ways to approach this. You can set up a position using chessbase and use the search online tool to pull games from their huge inventory. I find this tedious as I haven’t found a clean way to import the large volume of games as a result of this method. The best I was able to achieve was dumping them all into one huge game file or saving each one individually. I will use this method to find key players ( grandmasters) who play this variation but not as a means to build the volume I seek for the purpose of building a training database.

I wanted a quicker method to build the base up. I use google to search for PGN or CBH data bases of specific variations. There are several websites that fill this gap. Chessgames.com will allow a search for the position and provide a collection of games to download as PGN. Chessopolis (http://www.chessopolis.com/openings.htm) is another resource I use frequently and they actually have CBH files that can import directly to Chess base. There are plenty more if you search.

The trouble with “canned” data sets from some of these places is the quality of games are littered with amateur games. But my philosophy at this stage in my improvement path is that I can still learn from these amateurs.

Panning for gold.

Once you have a repertoire database built up, the next step is to use the search capability of chess base to find positions to study.

Finding Traps in the opening to avoid or inflict:

The first thing I do is to find the opening traps I want to avoid. I will set the search to find the games that end in 15 moves or less where the side I would most likely play loses.



I will create training positions described in my previous post for each of the unique wins. Some are duplicates and worth skipping over. What you get is a clear pattern of what not to play in certain lines. Optionally, you could run the engine on each of these to get some annotations and ideas what to play. I merely reference my books and make a quick note where to improve and what not to play. The opening tactical trap becomes the positional study that I solve for the aggressor. Then I look at the notes in the game centered around the failing position. This is where having an amateur database comes in handy as you will more likely have a lot of examples to chose from.

On the flip side, from the same repertoire base I will change the search to games where my side wins and repeat the process. The result will build up tactical positions found in the openings of my games that I can inflict if my opponent doesn’t play exactly in this line. Positional themes start to come about from these and I get a better understanding of the opening.

Finding Mating themes:

Another search I will conduct in the bluder-rep is to find those games that have ended definitively with a check mate. To weed out the previous search I set the move order to a range greater than 15 to include the long games. I go through the same process of looking at wins for both sides to see the kind of attacks typical from both perspectives. I then create training positions from these making notes of the type of attack as a memory marker for the pattern.

For added measure I use the same filter but instead of definitive mates, I search for results being my side to win. This will include winning endgame positions to come about in my games with higher probability.

Middle game positions:

There’s no way around this but to review games against masters who play the same openings in your repertoire. I am building on this with my tournament games studies and include several positions from each of the highlighted games.

So far I have just over 100 positions as I build upon this. I think it’s a good start. I’d like to build this to at least 500 by Spring, but I don’t want to get stuck in the process before using it. 100 problems to start with will be a good litmus for the upcoming Pillsbury Memorial here at the end of the month.
 
http://blunderprone.blogspot.com/2009/11/part-3-finding-training-patterns-in.html
Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:50:00 +0000
 
 
 
D.I.Y. ( Do It Yourself) CT-ART
In my last post, a movement was started in terms of Adult Chess Improvement Seekers. The movement has morphed from the ashes of the old Knights Errant to a new form that is calling itself A.C.I.S ( pronounced as Axis) of Caissa. A few bloggers have thrown their hats in to the ring to claim “membership” in this method-agnostic quest to improve ones play that is individually tailored to suit your ability and keep you seeking. The demographic seems to be mostly adult amateur players stuck in a non-master level ELO rating. The only real requirement is that you establish a method you can sign up for and blog about your journey. More details will follow as this movement is still on the ground floor. If you identify with this and feel like becoming a part of a growing community, state your quest on your blog and give us a glimpse of your chosen method by dropping a comment with a link. I will add you to a growing link list. I ask you do the same. ( The link list will be on my blunderprone.blogspot.com home and not necessarilly on my mirrored site on chess.com)

Here are a few ACIS of Caissa members to consider to date ( note:If I left you out, it was entirely unintentional) :

Wang : States his claim and starts talking


Whareit is ROCKING the world with his claim ( and nice Eddie Van Halen clip)

ChunkyRook : stakes a very well thoguht out claim on "yet another improvement post"

LinuxGuy is foucsing on endgames and developing calculation skills


Continuation of my Quest:

I mentioned in my last post that I am looking at creating my own pattern training database so I can do a “circles” method training. This will consist of a mix of positions from my own games, reference games in my repertoire database and positions from my games studies. This week I will talk about the mechanics of creating training positions using Chessbase. Next time I will talk about building a reference/repertoire database and how to I plan to use it to create training positions for my “BP-ART”.

Choosing games and first entry into the database:

An integral part of my plan involves playing games on a regular basis. I can play on ICC, Chess.com or other online servers, but I am mainly going to focus harvesting positions form serious OTB games played under arbitration of a tournament or club event that gets rated. Going over your very own wins and losses is a very important aspect of training. I have a database of my games dating back a few years. I have decided to select only the games where I changed my white repertoire in 2008 on forward as it is most pertinent to my immediate improvement.

How am I coming up with positions in my own games? Some are rather obvious. Taking time to go over the game with my opponent after a match provides the first line of input. I am practicing to improve my annotations during this phase as my thinking as well as my opponent’s is very fresh and provides valuable insight in certain positions.

I start by entering the games in Chessbase, I will start with self annotations based on the post mortem analysis. ( see picture below). I double click the position to annotate and enter the text. If I want to add text before the move, I “right click” and select Add text before. This may seem basic to most my readers but for others just navigating around CB tools, I hope this helps.

After I enter my self annotations and commentary, I then use a chess Engine like Fritz or Rybka to run the full analysis. I make sure I select “save old annotations” so not to over write my original mark up. I also use the “replace” otherwise I end up with all kinds of extra games in the database.

Finding Positions for training.

After the analysis, typically a critical position comes out. Often the post mortem has a critical position I want to recall. The resulting analysis from the chess engine will also typically pop out a few blunder checks. If the game was tight, I look at the various evaluations and look for when the equal sign starts to shift in the other direction and look at that position for clues.

I will also check to see how far down the line we went in an opening variation. I may create a position from this discovery if I feel a need to improve that aspect of the game.

The Ideal game will have a training position for the opening, middle game and endgame. In reality, I have games that were clearly decided in the opening stage. Not much else to learn in the crash and burn that followed unless a good defensive maneuver was passed.

Making Training positions:

First thing I do is create a new database specifically for training positions as I use the games database to harvest positions. This is an important step to really get the CT-ART like action. From the games database, in a selected position from one of the games, I then use the right mouse button selected over the move. I select over the “Special annotation” and it opens another drop down list. From there I select “Training annotation”



A box pops up and you can enter any text you wish. The score is usually automatically set for 10 points. Often I have a position that branches into a better variation. When that happens, the list of moves will include it. The mainline ( the bad move I made) is automatically set at a score of 10. To make the winning variation a the correct choice in training, I select the top move and demerit the score to 0 and the winning variation I increase to 10.

Now, the other thing I will do is delete moves prior and after that critical position. This helps for the focus. You can do this easily with Right Mouse Button , scroll over Delete and select from the list of options. Then I do a “save as” and select the training data base to stor the position as it will keep the whole game intact in my games database so I can go back for future reference.

A dialog box will open asking for game information, Typically this has been filled during the games entry phase. What I would like to suggest is in the “annotators” tab, you enter a “head line”. It’s no coincidence that my sample position is against none other than Rolf Wetzell, author of the book “Become Master at any age”. This is my modern version of doing flash cards. Setting the headline in the annotator’s index allows it to appear in the headline. Don’t forget to save.

Next time I will continue this series with how to build a repertoire to add opening positions to the training database.

I hope you find this helpful as some of my readers were asking about building their own training database. Again, this is only one aspect of my new regimen. I have just begun to enter positions and almost have 50 positions set up from my own games. My goal is to get to about 500 positions in my database with a mix from my own games, my tailored opening repertoire and of course the magical history tour positions that are most pertinent to my games.
 
http://blunderprone.blogspot.com/2009/11/diy-do-it-yourself-ct-art.html
Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:20:00 +0000
 
 
 
Adult Chess Improvement Seekers ( ACIS)




I will be stepping out of the time machine between now and through the holidays. Partly because I am waiting for Christmas before I pick up my next tournament book ( Dear Santa, I want the Grandmaster Chess: The Book of the Louis D. Statham Lone Pine Masters-Plus Tournament 1975 for Christmas).

There is a large community of adult chess improvement seekers out there. You know who you are. I believe improvement is still out there for us old dogs as long as we are willing to put in the right effort. Coaching is a big benefit but if you are like me, sometimes, the financial resources aren’t there. Which books to buy, what method to choose and how to train vary with the individual ACIS.

In a recent post by Eric, aka Blue Devil Knight. The question of whether the ill famed cult of the knight errants DLM have died off. In brief, and for you new comers, a Knight Errant DLM is basically an improvement seeker who has attempted to follow ( loosely) the Rapid Chess Improvement method of Michael De La Maza by doing what I call the seven circles of hell. There was a blog community that had formed as a result and for the chess blog-osphere… this was a viral moment. Like a moth to a flame, I too, did the MDLM method and saw moderate results ( gaining roughly 300 USCF… warning results vary widely).

Most of us realized the original author was unemployed and could focus the time and effort to reach the 400 points in 400 days idea. The rest of us did modifications according to our real world experience. For instance, I chose a concentric circle method, doing each level of CT-ART 3.0 seven times before advancing to the next level. MDLM, suggests doing all 9 levels sequentially and repeating it 7 times decreasing the allotted time by one half ( roughly). Some felt a smaller set of circles was more beneficial and others used a different set of tactical problems… like How to beat your dad in chess.

The plus side of this method is that it is a brute force way to etch a bunch of tactical patterns in your noggin especially if you score poorly in tactics in the first place. The repetitious nature of the MDLM method is a good way to ultimately a good way to increase your base of pattern recognition into long term memory. In his landmark book, Thought and Choice in Chess. Adriaan de Groot determined the fundamental difference between Master and amateur was the ability to recall these patterns. A master is in order of magnitude greater than that of an amateur thus, underscoring the idea of finding a way to improve your base of patterns to recall. De Groot’s study was lot more complicated than that but I don’t want to digress from the plus side of having some kind of method to increase you ability to recall and play with confidence a certain number of positions.

Aside from the outrageous time commitment ( which can be dialed down to practical real-life terms), the down side to the MDLM method is that it’s like pheasant hunting with a canon. Once the circles are completed you may recall only a few of the patterns. This is because in practice, you only use a small subset of those patterns. The rest never or so rarely occur that they don’t make it into long term memory. Sustaining the 1000 tactical patterns in memory is not realistic with this method. You lose it if you don’t use it.

What should one do? I believe the answer requires picking the right problem set for the individual. The best results would be to study patterns and positions that occur in your regular games based on your opening repertoire. Notice how I also say patterns and positions and not necessarily tactics alone. I believe you have to include the whole game. Making the right choice in an opening, middle game and endgame requires an understanding of position and patterns.

I point back to Adriaan De Groot. He believed players went through four stages to determine the right move:

Stage one: “Orientation phase” requires the player to assess the situation and determine generally what to do next. Now, whether you use a method like Silman’s imbalances or Nimzovitche’s system … there is a requirement to recognize patterns here.

Stage two: “Exploration Phase” is the calculation phase and Kotov’s Think like a Grandmaster “tree of analysis” is a good example of this. Does pattern recognition help here? Sure it does. In order to evaluate a branch in your head, if you can recognize a winning position that can be reached it saves time OTB.

Stage three: “Investigation phase” is where the subject actually chooses a line to play as the “best move” and then Stage four is the “Proof phase” where the player confirms the choice being valid.

Here is what I plan on doing over the next couple months and will blog on my progress and efforts.

1) I will select a personal set of problems based on my recent games and put them into chess base using the training position tool and setting scores based on complexity. These will mostly come from my losses and even some wins.
2) I will create opening training positions where I have difficulties
3) I will use chess base to filter miniatures out of the database based on my specific repertoire. I will create additional problems to add from these.
4) I will select games from my previous historical games studies that pertain to my openings I encounter and find specific middle and endgame positions that are most beneficial to my repertoire.
5) As the data base grows, I will apply the circles training method ala MDLM.
This is a work in progress subject to modifications. My next post will be on the mechanics of setting up my own problems using chess base as I work on the first item.
 
http://blunderprone.blogspot.com/2009/11/adult-chess-improvement-seekers-acis.html
Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:09:00 +0000
 
 
 
Moving from Blogger FTP to WordPress, Part 1

Life was easy when I set up this blog (and others) way back in May 2005 using Blogger's friendly FTP service.  Then in January 22 of this year, Blogger announced that they are shutting down FTP access in March -- since pushed back to May 1, 2010 -- and had set up a blog and some migration tools to help users shift to other Blogger-supported methods.  It's good to know that switching to a simple blogging method would be easy and painless -- but I don't trust Blogger now and want to maintain some of our traffic.  So I have decided to switch over to WordPress (which I've been admiring for a while anyway) and see if I can continue to maintain the same web addresses for our blogs.  Some things may change -- such as the RSS feeds (from what I have read) and certainly the blogging interface -- but I hope to pull off the switch with a minimum of downtime and no change to our link structure (fingers crossed).  Here are some guides I have been reading on the subject, in case you are in the same boat:
These seem pretty helpful, but I get the sense that WordPress may be working behind the scenes to make the process even easier.  Just wish they would do more to announce what they are up to.  Seems like a great opportunity for them to gain customers.  I have backed up our site and started experimenting with The Center Square blog to see how this will go.  I'll keep you posted on my progress and welcome reader advice.
 
http://www.kenilworthchessclub.org/kenilworthian/2010/03/moving-from-blogger-ftp-to-wordpress.html
Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:14:00 +0000
 
 
 
Plastics firms play chess in recession - Crain's Cleveland Business

Plastics firms play chess in recession
Crain's Cleveland Business
Mergers and acquisitions are not the hot topic they once were, but in Northeast Ohio's plastics industry, they're a chief tool for companies ...

and more »
 
http://news.google.com/news/url?fd=R&sa=T&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.crainscleveland.com%2Farticle%2F20100308%2FSUB1%2F303089980%2F1005%26Profile%3D1005&usg=AFQjCNELvK0RMQArn7r4BhzEYPmvUj_IVQ
Mon, 08 Mar 2010 09:33:57 GMT+00:00
 
 
 
Correspondence Chess with Aquarium 2010

Rybka 3 Aquarium logotype A new version of Aquarium 2010 (version 4.0.3) will be released soon. It’s a free update for current Aquarium 2010 users. One of the new features is a correspondence chess module that keeps track of correspondence games played on Xfcc compliant chess servers. The Xfcc protocol was designed by Martin Bennedik. Servers of this type include the International Correspondence Chess Federation (ICCF), SchemingMind.com, and myChess.de.

Correspondence chess has changed a lot in recent years; transitioning from snail-mail to email and now to server based play. Aquarium only supports server based play, which without doubt is the most convenient method of playing.

When playing correspondence chess, you must, of course, respect the rules regarding the use of chess engines. Some servers allow them (e.g., ICCF in most events), while their use is forbidden on other servers. Some servers allow the use of engines under special circumstances. As an example, SchemingMind only allows their use in “Advanced chess.”

For the purposes of this column, I will assume that you have already registered and joined a tournament on one of the supported servers.

Aquarium for Correspondence Players

Correspondence players normally play several games at the same time and Aquarium supports simultaneous analysis of multiple games and positions using either traditional infinite analysis or the innovative IDeA (Interactive Deep Analysis) method that explores and expands critical lines automatically.


IDeA in action

Many correspondence players already make extensive use of IDeA. The improvements in Aquarium 2010 were especially useful for them (multiple projects, positions and engine instances). Although IDeA can be used as a fully automatic tool, it really shines when the player takes advantage of its interactive features. IDeA records all its results in an “analysis tree.” This is a valuable feature for correspondence players, as they can later access their stored analysis from any game where a previously analyzed position arises. If you find yourself playing the same opening again, you can expand your analysis tree, searching for interesting alternatives, novelties, etc.

The implementation of infinite analysis in Aquarium also has many convenient features (see Infinite Analysis with Rybka Aquarium) for correspondence players. Several engines can be used to analyze different games at the same time and analysis presets (see Analysis Presets in Rybka Aquarium) let you use more than one engine to analyze the same position and quickly switch between different engines and methods.

The image below shows an example of three games being analyzed with infinite analysis. One of the positions is displayed on the board with the analysis window below the board. This game is highlighted in the sidebar with a blue background.


Simultaneous analysis of three games

A red rectangle has been drawn around the three games. You can always see which games are being analyzed by the green rectangle next to the game in the sidebar as shown below.


Green rectangle indicates analysis

Many of you will notice that this is the same icon as is shown in the status bar for each active engine.

As mentioned above, both IDeA and infinite analysis support simultaneous analysis by multiple engines. In the case of IdeA, it would normally be multiple instances of the same engine. Both methods can also take advantage of analysis on networked computers as described in Networked Computers with Aquarium 2010. This means that you can combine the analysis power of several computers.


Networked analysis with thirty-four engines

There are many other Aquarium features that are useful for correspondence players. Browsing the Aquarium articles archives should give you insight into some of them. For a quick overview of various smaller features see Aquarium’s Hidden Treasures, Part One and Aquarium’s Hidden Treasures, Part Two.

The only thing that has been missing for playing correspondence chess in Aquarium is a tool for live updates of games (sending and receiving moves from the server). This may seem like a minor issue that can be solved by copy/paste to and from the server. Technically that is correct. However, correspondence players must perform this action thousands of times a year, and they need to take great care not to make a “technical” mistake, as it can easily lead to the loss of a game. It’s frustrating to see hours or days of analysis go down the drain due to such a mistake.

The Aquarium correspondence play module is designed to minimize manual intervention and thereby the chance of mistakes. It accepts moves automatically from the server. When a game is saved, all previous analysis is preserved, the game is activated and you can instantly start analyzing the position.

Getting Started

Click the Aquarium Button in the upper left corner, select “External programs” and then “Correspondence Play” from the right pane to start the module.


Starting the correspondence chess module

The Correspondence Play module will appear on the screen as shown below.


The correspondence chess module

The first step is to tell the program which correspondence chess server(s) you want to use. Click the “Server options” button and the corresponding dialog box will be displayed.


Add the servers to which you want to connect

Here you can add, edit, and remove servers. Note that you can connect to more than one server. Near the bottom you can specify how often the program checks for new information on the servers (once every sixty minutes in this case). Click the “Add” button to add a new server.


Specify a new server

Here you enter information that is required to connect to the server and retrieve information about your games.

Server name is a name you choose to identify the server; e.g., ICCF for the ICCF server. You can use any name you like.

Server address is the URL used for Xfcc communication with the server. You will usually find the address to use in the help file or the FAQ of the server. The correct addresses for SchemingMind.com and ICCF are given as examples in the dialog box. For your convenience, here are the addresses for the three servers mentioned at the beginning of the column. You can copy the address of the server you want to connect to and paste it into the server address field:

  • ICCF: http://www.iccf-webchess.com/XfccBasic.asmx
  • SchemingMind.com: http://www.schemingmind.com/xfcc/xfccbasic.asmx
  • myChess.de: http://www.myChess.de/xfcc/xfccbasic.php4

User name is your username on the server. As mentioned earlier, you need to register on the server through their website.

Password is the password you use when logging onto the server.

After filling out these fields, click OK and a list of your games will be fetched from the server and displayed on the screen as shown in the screen-shot below.


Connected to server

If you select a game from the list, it is displayed at the top of the screen and the current position is shown on the board.


The game list

If a game in the list is shown in bold (such as the first line in the list), it’s your turn to move. When a new move arrives, the corresponding game is shown in red type until you select the game; after that it’s shown in bold. The list above shows two red games.

The list itself consists of the following columns:

The leftmost column (#) shows the identification (game number) that the server has assigned to this game.

Col shows your color in the game. Yellow means that you have white and brown means that you have the black pieces.

Opponent is your opponent’s name.

Event shows the name of the event or tournament. It is assigned by the server when the event starts.

Your time shows how much time you have remaining until the next time control.

Opp. time shows how much time your opponent has left until the next time control.

Status shows the current status of the game. When a game is in progress it shows the current move. When a game is finished it shows the result.

Comment allows you to keep notes about the game. They are your private notes and are not sent to your opponent. This is very useful for correspondence players with many games. They can use the notes to get a quick overview of the games. The notes can be used for your evaluation of the position, what needs to be checked, how you intend to analyze, etc. The Comment column is not shown in the image, but here is an example of how it can be used.


Private comments about the games

The text wraps automatically, but you can also press Ctrl+Enter to force a new line.

Saving Games to a Database

You can enter moves and variations directly on the board in the correspondence chess module and then send your move to the server without using Aquarium at all. However, a serious player will always save his games to the database and do his analysis there. Even while playing the first few moves, he needs to research the opening repertoire of his opponent and look up the latest games in the opening variation that is being played. So, after connecting to the server and getting a list of your games, the next step is to save the server games to a local database.

First, you need to create the database. Click the “Base options” button. The “Database Options” dialog box will appear.


Create/select a database for the games

Here you should click the ellipsis button to the right of the “Save game to database” field. It opens up a standard Windows dialog for choosing a database name and a directory for storing it. After selecting a directory and choosing a name for the database, click the OK button. Your database will be created and you can start saving your games.

There are two scenarios to think about when you save new games from the server.

If you don’t have any previous analysis of the game or you don’t want to merge the game with existing analysis, just select the game from the list (by clicking it) and then click the “Save” button. The game will be appended to the database as a new game. Note that when you save the game, it will automatically be opened in Aquarium where you have full access to it and all other games in the database.

This was simple enough, but if you just started to use the correspondence chess module and already have a lot of analysis for the games, you can choose to merge the server game into an existing game. This is a convenient way of taking advantage of your previous analytical work. In this case, do the following (note that this is only required the first time you save the game):

  1. Open Aquarium (if it isn’t already running)
  2. Open the database that you defined above.
  3. Open the game containing the existing analysis. You will merge your server game with this game.
  4. Switch back to the correspondence chess module and select the game you want to save
  5. Press “Save.” The following dialog box will appear.


Merge game with existing game analysis?

If you select “Yes,” the server game will be merged with the game you opened in Aquarium. If you select “No,” the server game will be appended to the database as a new game.

If you change your mind and don’t want to save the game, click “Cancel.”

Remember that this process is only needed the first time that you save this game to the database. Once you have done that, simply press “Save” when you want to update the game in the database after a new move has been made.

Note that your analysis of the games in Aquarium will stay private, so there is no need to keep one copy of the game with your analysis and another “clean” copy without annotations. If you need to see the bare game score, you can always do so in the correspondence chess module.

For the more technically minded, the link between your correspondence game and the game in the database is maintained in Config/xfccBasesList.xml. If you delete an entry in that file (you can find the game by its id), then that link is broken and you can re-link it.

Making a Move

You can make your move either directly in the correspondence chess module or start by selecting the move in Aquarium itself. Both methods are described below.

Making a move in the correspondence chess module is very simple. Just make your move on the board and click the “Make move” button. You will be presented with the following window.


Sending a move to the server

The move you are going to send is shown in large, red type at the top of the window. There are two text areas below the move. The one at the top shows your opponent’s comments for his previous move (if any). You can write a message to your opponent in the lower text area and it will be delivered with the move.

There are four radio buttons below the text areas. In this example, two of them are active and you can use them to resign or offer a draw. “Accept draw” is inactive unless your opponent has offered a draw, in which case you would select it to accept the draw. “Claim draw” is only active when you can claim a draw according to the laws of chess. That’s all there is to it when you make your move using the correspondence chess module.

You can also start by selecting your move in Aquarium if you have previously saved the game to the database as described above. Start by opening the game in Aquarium. Go to the current position in the game. Move the mouse pointer to the tree window, right-click the move you want to make (23.Nxb5 in this example) and select “XFCC Play” from the menu as shown in the next image.


Sending a move from Aquarium

The correspondence chess module will be opened and the selected move will be played on the board. Now you can submit it by clicking “Make move” as described above.

It would be interesting to receive feedback from users about this method of selecting the move from the tree window. It does have the advantage that it practically forces you to look at its evaluation before you submit it (assuming engine analysis is allowed). In the image above, 23.Nxb5 has the best score (+0.00), but you would probably hesitate and recheck everything if you saw another move with a better score. If you have a better suggestion, I’m sure that the developers would like to hear about it.

Conclusion

The new Aquarium correspondence chess module gives you a unified method of playing your games on Xfcc compliant servers. You get a quick overview of all your games in a single list, even if you have games in progress on all these servers. The list has a very useful comment field for each game, where you can enter your private notes. When you make your moves, many of the possible sources of error are eliminated. Games can be saved directly in an Aquarium database where you can check opening statistics, look up the position in endgame tablebases or use Aquarium’s analysis tools. The combination of Aquarium’s powerful analysis features and the new correspondence chess module makes Aquarium a one stop solution for correspondence players.

 
http://chessok.com/?p=23472
Wed, 03 Mar 2010 12:47:05 +0000
 
 
 
New: Wojo’s Weapons

Wojo's WeaponsNew: Wojo’s Weapons, Winning with White – Vol.1.

The late Aleksander Wojtkiewicz was one of the most feared players in the U.S. tournament circuit. Wojo’s Weapons is the definitive “how-to” manual for learning Wojo’s repertoire with White after 1.Nf3 d5. This book is your tool to building a world-class repertoire and to achieving positional mastery.

Get started winning the Wojo way!

 
http://www.chessvibes.com/advertisement/new-wojos-weapons/
Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:12:33 +0000
 
 
 
Computer Workout 2.0
Today I'd like to unveil what will be an extremely valuable training tool for those who choose to make use of it: Computer Workout. What? You've seen it before? Tried it before? No way! This is a 90% "completely" new Computer Workout, redesigned ...
 
http://www.chess.com/news/computer-workout-20
Fri, 05 Mar 2010 02:56:28 -0800
 
 
 
Recursos Tácticos Doble de Caballo 2/3

doble de caballo zona de ajedrez zonadeajedrez.comdoble de caballo zona de ajedrez zonadeajedrez.comContinuamos con la segunda de las tres entregas de ejercicios tácticos de "Doble de Caballo"

Diez ejercicios tácticos presentandos a modo de problemas para que sean estudiados desde la propia  página o bien ser descargardos y dedicarles algún tiempo más.

 

 

 
http://www.zonadeajedrez.com/aprendizaje/tactica/846-recursos-tacticos-doble-caballo23
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 23:00:00 +0000
 
 
 
New: Chess Opening Essentials 4

Chess Opening Essentials 4Just in from our printers: Chess Opening Essentials 4.

The final volume of the Chess Opening Essentials series focuses on 1.c4 / 1.Nf3 / Other First Moves. It gives a flavour of how every opening works and explains the similarities with other openings as well as the differences.

An indispensable tool for understanding the basics.

 
http://www.chessvibes.com/advertisement/new-chess-opening-essentials-4/
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:05:13 +0000
 
 
 
Chess in School
For 2010, Amaroo School (in Canberra, ACT) has added chess to the school curriculum. Each 3,4 and 5 grade classes (250+ kids in total) has 1 hour of chess per week one of its regular subjects. The classes are run in a specialised chess classroom, which is fitted out with sets, posters and will soon have a smart-board system installed. The classes are taught by one of the schools teachers, who has put together a chess course for the year.
The school is also running 2 lunchtime chess clubs (one for primary school and the other for high school) and are getting 60+ children to each session.
Of course the aim of the program isn't just to get more kids playing chess (although that is always a nice goal to achieve) but to also use chess as a tool to improve the educational outcomes of the school's students. At the school's Parent Information evening, the listed benefits of the program included improved concentration and problem solving skills, as well as better memory and strategic thinking.
Hopefully the program will produce masses of happy, smart, chess playing kids (including my daughter) and that its success will encourage other schools in Canberra to implement similar programs.
 
http://chessexpress.blogspot.com/2010/02/chess-in-school.html
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:44:00 +0000
 
 
 
Arte Visual - Imaginación Creativa
loshinsky

En un primer acercamiento al tablero hay una percepción física y una atracción por la disposición y los movimientos de las piezas, también por la relación sutil entre éstos y las casillas. Este arte visual impacta en el "ojo de la mente" y allí, la imaginación creativa los toma y transforma. Todo este proceso es arte porque es creación. Y es dinámico porque transforma la posición en una nueva, que a su vez genera un nuevo proceso y una nueva obra de arte visual. La maravilla del ajedrez es que este arte es obra de cualquier simple jugador y tan válido como el de Carlsen. Simplemente porque genera satisfacción al creador. Cada uno en su nivel podrá disfrutarlo.

El problema creo que refleja plenamente esto y es una gran combinación de arte visual e imaginación. Su autor, Lev Ilich Loshinsky, fue presentado en nuestro anterior: "La Belleza de este Problema".

El Blanco debe desalojar la casilla d4, pero para ello necesita antes una sutil jugada que permita controlar dos casillas blancas imprescindibles para que el Rey Negro no escape. Recuerden que es sutil y que el procedimiento permitirá crear siempre una doble amenaza sin respuesta. No es fácil, creo, pero es cuestión de ponerle empeño y ganas.

Recuerdo que la primer jugada no es jaque. Todas las piezas cumplen un objetivo, por eso, si bien hay dos piezas que podrían cumplir la función, una está cumpliendo una función defensiva. Claro que hay varios mates en 4 y seguramente en más también y que las Blancas ganan. Pero hay que encontrarlo en tres y para eso sólo sirve una única movida. La segunda movida, también es única (no a que es una sola, sino ante las diferentes respuestas del Negro no habrá 2 sino 1). La jugada que da mate también es única.
{iframe height="730"}visor3/problema.php?archivo=Problema-Arte Visual.pgn{/iframe}

 
http://www.zonadeajedrez.com/aprendizaje/problemas/842-artevisual-imaginacincreativa
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:00:00 +0000
 
 
 
More useful studies
Using studies as a training tool is (a) quite effective and (b) not that popular. As with other chess problems (in the classical sense) chess players tend to shy away from 'unreal' positions. But it is only looking at 'normal' positions, and 'normal' moves that can cause the biggest blunders.
The diagrammed position is from a game played at Street Chess last week. It was one of the last games to finish for the round, the crowd had gathered round, and White was running short of time. No problems. With the study like 1.Qa4 (resisting the usual urge in Queen endings to check like a maniac) White set up a mate in 1, and iced the game.
 
http://chessexpress.blogspot.com/2010/02/more-useful-studies.html
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:41:00 +0000
 
 
 
Book Store Events in RP
Good news from Filipino chess writer Bobby Ang:
The National Book Store is putting together a series of chess tournaments aimed at kiddies (two categories: 15-under and 11-under) to be held at the Robinsons Galleria Activity Center starting in March. National Book Store wants to use chess as a marketing tool for itself (makes sense, chess and books have an intellectual bent) by sponsoring a series of large (200 participants) tournaments every six months, then between those tournaments a smaller tournament every month (about 40 participants). The idea is to attract and encourage our younger players and give them a venue to learn chess and to develop their skills.
Read more.

When I entitled my post "Darwin Ducks Out", I had no idea that the guy was going to take it so literally. He is reported to have withdrawn from Aeroflot going into the eight round. Compatriot Wesley, on the other hand, performed creditably and finished with 5 points.
 
http://closetgrandmaster.blogspot.com/2010/02/book-store-events-in-rp.html
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 05:36:00 +0000
 
 
 
New in Chess Top 5

1. New In Chess issue 2010/1
The World’s Premier Chess Magazine by The NIC Editorial team
NIC’s Caf? – Carlsen Claims London Chess Classic – A Country for Old Men – Roulette Chess – Alexander Grischuk Russian Champion – Alexander Alekhine’s Paris Years – Kortchnoi-Spassky Reunion – Chess Metaphors – Old Hands and Young Talents – Just Checking – did they play your opening? In this issue games with the following openings were annotated by world class players read more…

2. New In Chess: The First 25 Years
An Anthology, edited by Steve Giddins
Ever since its launch in 1984, New In Chess has been the most popular and widely-read chess magazine in the world, with a readership that ranges from world champions to the humblest club player. No other magazine in chess history can boast such a glittering array of world-class grandmasters amongst its regular contributors. Now, to mark the 25th anniversary of the read more…

3. Revolutionize Your Chess
A Brand-new System to Become a Better Player, by Viktor Moskalenko
A breakthrough in chess teaching by Former Ukrainian Champion and experienced chess coach Viktor Moskalenko. A new concept which teaches players how to develop their personal skills and presents five new basic rules for improving at chess. Moskalenko’s Five Touchstones provide players with tools to assess any position. Club players are shown how to get a read more…

4. Attacking Manual 1 & 2
SAVE 10% on volume 1 & 2 Combined, by Jacob Aagaard
Jacob Aagaard explains the rules of attack (the exploitation of a dynamic advantage), balanced between understandable examples, and deep analysis. Where Volume One was about the laws of dynamics, the font of all attacks. Volume Two deals with weak kings, sacrifices, various minor attacking themes, intuitive sacrifices, opposite castling, modern king hunts, and read more

5. Chess Strategy for Club Players
The Road to Positional Advantage by Herman Grooten
AWARDED: ChessCafe 2009 Book of the Year! With this book, International Master Herman Grooten presents to amateur players a complete and structured course on: how to recognize key characteristics in all types of positions, how to make use of those characteristics to choose the right plan. His teachings are based on the famous “Elements” of Wilhelm Steinitz, but Grooten read more…

 
http://www.chessvibes.com/advertisement/new-in-chess-top-5/
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:30:22 +0000
 
 
 
GM Moskalenko responds to ChessVibes review of Revolutionize Your Chess

Revolutionize your chessOn January 28th we published a review of Viktor Moskalenko’s latest book Revolutionize Your Chess, and it wasn’t a positive one. Now we have received a reaction by Mr Moskalenko, which we’re happy to publish as an open letter here at ChessVibes.

In his review of Revolutionize Your Chess our reviewer Arne Moll wrote that he didn’t like the book. He used strong words, like ‘amazingly silly’, ‘rather confusing’, ‘extremely simplistic’ and ‘hopelessly flawed’. Here’s GM Moskalenko’s reaction:

On January 28 ChessVibes posted a singularly negative review, written by Arne Moll, of my new book Revolutionize Your Chess. The way Mr Moll approached my book, the tone of his review, the many (in my view) unjustified points he makes, and the subsequent vitriolic reactions by quite a few ChessVibes readers (some of whom confessed they didn’t know my book at all) did shock me.

My initial reaction was quite emotional. I really could not understand what I did to deserve Mr Moll’s bashing. On a Spanish website I did question Mr Moll’s motives, an unjustified action for which I have apologized. Now, after I have had some time to reflect, I am very grateful that ChessVibes has allowed me to post this more considered reaction.

Mr Moll hits his review off by venting his irritation that there are appearing many “improve your chess” books on the market. He confesses that he is not really interested in those books, because improving is only of secondary interest to him. Could it be that this negative attitude towards this type of works has coloured what he writes on my book?

Because the sole purpose of Revolutionize Your Chess is indeed this: to give to aspiring club players a set of tools with which they can improve their chess. I cannot help that Mr Moll dislikes the genre, and I cannot help that there are other books that make the same claim. But I think my book deserves to be judged for what it is. Mr Moll does not do this. In his incredibly fierce attack on my book he uses hyperbole, sarcasm and condescension in an apparent effort to humiliate me. He calls a part of my book ‘amazingly silly’, ‘extremely simplistic’ and ‘hopelessly flawed’. He says somewhere that when I write about the basic concepts of chess I ‘didn’t have a clue’, and he calls me ‘a show-off’. But, strangely, he fails to do one important thing: he does not contend that my system isn’t working! He has not tested, or even probed, if a chess player who does what I recommend in my book and who uses the tools I hand to him, becomes a better player or not. I will explain, later on, why I maintain that my system works.

Mr Moll heavily focuses on the foreword and the first two chapters of my books, in which I describe the structure of my system. Indeed 70% of his review is on less than 10% of my book. Briefly: in this part I offer a comprehensive analysis of all aspects of the game: Chess Skills, Personal Skills, as well as my 5 so called “Touchstones”: tools to use for a dynamic understanding of all positions on the board. I also propose a test, which I jokingly call the Moskalenko Test, which my students use to rate their performance in a game. Obviously, Mr Moll does not like what he sees.

One of Mr Moll’s big problems is that I say my system is ‘revolutionary’, while he recognizes various elements in my system that other writers have mentioned before me. He seems to think that finding elements in my book that also feature in other chess writers’ books somehow falsifies my claim that my system could lead to a revolution. I think that the comprehensiveness of my system (Personal Skills, Chess Skills, Touchstones and Test) is indeed new, and that most club players who follow my advice will truly revolutionize their chess, and become a better player.

In the Foreword of my book I tried to find the reason why most chess players, once they have reached a certain level, fail to make real progress (of course a central problem in chess teaching). I made Mr Moll almost choke with anger by writing: “The answer is quite simple: the general rules of the game have not been discovered yet.” This is what Mr Moll calls ‘amazingly silly’. And why? Because there are, writes Mr Moll, ‘thousands of grandmasters and tens of thousands of IM’s’ (incidentally, Mr Moll is more than 500% wrong here about the actual numbers) who are pretty strong players. He suggests, no doubt sarcastically, that I think that strong players have still not grasped the right system.

What a strange thing to say! Maybe Mr Moll does not know that I am a strong player myself? Please allow me to explain: I am a Grandmaster and a former champion of Ukraine. I have won dozens of international tournaments, and I am still an active player. I have coached quite a few strong players, Vassily Ivanchuk is one of them. I think I am well qualified to judge what top-players know and how they think. I am not an idiot, of course I know that I don’t need to explain to them the basics of how they must think about chess. Obviously, my book is meant for club players. About elite players I explain that the reason they are almost invincible for any amateur is that they are so good in applying the Touchstones. Being aware of the process in their head is another matter; often top-players are thinking intuitively. This is also in the book.

My statement about the general rules that have not been discovered yet, is of course meant to provoke my readers. That is my style of writing, I always look for ways to keep them awake.

“I like to see myself as a philosopher” writes Arne Moll somewhere in his review. I think therein may lie one of the basic problems with his article. My concepts are not philosophical at all, they are very practical. Mr Moll looks for philosophical trouble behind many statements I make. He says concepts like ‘time’ and ‘material’ (which I use as ‘Touchstones’ to evaluate a position on the board) are ‘tricky philosophical ideas in the first place’. But in my book they are not tricky, and they are not philosophical. They are practical tools which every chess player can use to become better. And in my book I explain how they can do so.

I am not a philosopher. Apart from my own career as a player, I have been a chess trainer for many years. I have taught hundreds of club players. My classes have been recorded by the Catalan Chess Federation and are available online for thousands of players. I have written two successful books (which Mr Moll to my amazement says he liked) which sold thousands of copies all over the world. I get good feedback, literally daily, from my pupils, my viewers and my readers. I think I know quite well what beginning and more advanced chess players know and how they think. And what they should do to become better players.

I was amazed to see Mr Moll stating that “Moskalenko really didn’t have a clue when he wrote about these concepts”. This statement is, among other things, quite strange for someone who professes he liked my other books. How does Mr Moll think a Grandmaster who has written some good chess books (that’s me) reaches that level? By not having a clue? My friends have advised me not to use the word I will use now, but I strongly feel I have to do it: here I think Mr Moll is being disrespectful.

Somewhere at the end of his review Mr Moll calls me ‘a show-off’ because I use my own games or fragments of my games to illustrate specific chess instruction topics. I have thought about the merits of his reproach for quite a while. Let me just say that I think it is a strange thing to blame me for. An illustration of an instructional theme is either on or off the mark, at least that is my opinion. The show-off reproach, again, fits in the general condescending tone of his review. Strangely, Mr Moll says he likes my other books (The Fabulous Budapest Gambit, and The Flexible French) a lot; but in these books I use my own games as examples just as much as I did here! Does Mr Moll think that Nimzowitsch is a show-off because he uses his own games in his books? Besides, I use games from dozens of other players as well.

From my 340 pages book with hundreds of games, fragments, exercises and examples, Mr Moll cites just one practical example. In this position:

Revolutionize your chess

I discuss two possible moves for White: the good move Be3 and the dynamic move d5. I recommend d5. Mr Moll claims that I fail to give ‘any reasons’ why I think d5 is more dynamic. But he is simply wrong! I do explain that after Be3 Black plays …e6, blocking the position and giving White some trouble to exploit his lead in development. On the move d5 I explain that I choose this advance ‘in order to fight for space, hindering the development of the black kingside at the same time’. I think the example is not a bad illustration of the theme: there is a good, solid positional move available. And yet I recommend another move, a dynamic move. Without the solid move my example would be less valuable, I think.

After treating this one example wrongly, Mr Moll says that ALL the examples I give in the book (and there are many hundreds of them) are deficient. ALL examples suffer in that I ‘focus on the Touchstones for the sake of the Touchstones only’. Again, I find this a puzzling swipe. Mr Moll may not like the concept, but does he really think I employ the Touchstones just for their own sake? That I select my examples just to prove my system? Doesn’t he think my pupils would have left me many years ago if I would be doing just that?

I am not claiming originality in every point I make in the book. It is a strange thing to ask from an author, even from an author who claims to aim for a revolution. My book is a real revolution in that it brings everything together. Naming other books or authors who have written about some elements of my system does not mean my approach would somehow not be fresh.

And judging from the many positive reactions I get from readers, I may very well have succeeded. Obviously, not with Mr Moll. Maybe he is too strong a player (and too much of a philosopher) to find my concepts good tools. It may be that Mr Moll dislikes my enthusiasm. But I am a passionate believer in my system, because I know, from experience, that it works. It works for players of 1600 ELO, as well as for players with 2200 ELO, and even higher.

Maybe next time a chess improvement book comes up for review at ChessVibes, it would a good idea to ask someone to review it who does not dislike the genre, who does not see himself primarily as a philosopher, and who is more interested in the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Once more I would like to thank for the opportunity to publish this reaction.

Sincerely,

GM Viktor Moskalenko
Barcelona, 12 February, 2010

Update 14:40 CET: meanwhile Arne Moll has responded in the comments – we’ll give it here as well:

As it is a true honour for me to have such a respected Grandmaster and author respond to my reviews, let me just mention a few general points that Mr. Moskalenko seems to have misunderstood in my initial review, rather than addressing every single sentence of his letter point by point.

Mr. Moskalenko starts off his letter with the complaint that I am supposedly not interested in ‘Improve your chess’ books and am therefore biased against his book Revolutionize Your Chess (and hence unqualified to review it objectively). To me, this merely shows Moskalenko doesn’t read my reviews on a regular basis (and indeed I couldn’t possibly expect him to), for then he would have known that the very review before the one I wrote on Moskalenko’s book, is a highly positive and enthusiastic review of Lars Bo Hansen’s book called (ironically, if anything) Improve Your Chess.

In fact, I was also very positive about Herman Grooten’s Chess Strategy for Club Players, the book that recently beat Revolutionize Your Chess in the ChessCafe Book of the Year competition, and numerous other books that intend to improve the reader’s chess skills. My remark ‘What’s with all these improve your chess books recently’ was just a ‘by the way’, trying to make the related (but admittedly not terribly relevant) general point that lately, a lot of books focus on chess improvement while surely trying to make the reader enjoy chess is at least as important as that.

In any case, as I had already written in the comments underneath my review, a reviewer’s personal taste is not relevant as long as he’s ‘not prejudiced, focuses on the book and not his own taste, and he knows his literature.’ I would think my liking Moskalenko’s previous book sort of proves I’m not prejudiced against him, and apart from this one ‘by the way’ paragraph, I focus my entire review on the contents of the book itself. As for ‘knowing my literature’, I think I’ve shown this already sufficiently in the review itself.

I could mention several other points in Mr. Moskalenko’s letter where he misinterprets my intentions and words. For instance, he makes much of my sarcasm and hyperbole, but then without blinking an eye declares that he himself means to ‘provoke his readers’ and that this is simply his ‘style of writing, I always look for ways to keep them awake’. Well, Mr. Moskalenko, it seems we agree on something after all! Perhaps we should just drop this point?

Another small thing to note is that Mr. Moskalenko altogether ignores the positive things I have mentioned about his book in my review, instead claiming it is ‘singularly negative’. This is also why it’s simply untrue that the one example I picked from the book to illustrate a point is used by me to imply that ‘ALL the examples I give in the book (and there are many hundreds of them) are deficient.’

But here’s what I actually wrote in my review: ‘To be sure, there are better examples in the book, but they all suffer from the same illness.’ I also wrote, ‘The book does contains good stuff, but I liked the Viktor Moskalenko of The Flexible French much, much better.’ Forgive me for thinking this small nuance is probably worth pointing out.

I suppose I should also say I’m surprised by Mr. Moskalenko’s statement that his concepts ‘aren’t philosophical at all’ and that he himself, unlike me, ‘isn’t a philosopher’. Well, fair enough, but Moskalenko himself claims that while authors like Suba and Beim discuss many interesting aspects of dynamic chess, they offer ‘no theoretical framework’ – surely implying Revolutionize Your Chess is different in this respect! A few sentences later, he even explicitly states that ‘in the present book, we will make an attempt to systematize this dynamic approach to our game’.

And in Chapter 2, just to take one example, Moskalenko writes that the factor Time ‘has thus far been neglected in theoretical works. This dynamic factor should be included in any chess system if we want to call it conclusive’.
To me all this sounds distinctly philosophical. In fact, capitalizing the t in Time is, if anything else, the generally acknowledged way of indicating a ‘Platonization’ of the object at hand. But perhaps I’m again being too, well, philosophical here.

There is, however, one point in Mr. Moskalenko’s reply that I would like to elaborate upon a bit in more detail. This is when he writes that I do not contend that the system described in Revolutionize Your Chess ‘isn’t working’: ‘He has not tested, or even probed, if a chess player who does what I recommend in my book and who uses the tools I hand to him, becomes a better player or not.’

Indeed I must confess that I haven’t fully tested the system (although Mr. Moskalenko couldn’t possibly know this himself), for the inexcusable reason that I am, apart from being a father and a full-time employee, just a reviewer whose task it is to read the book and write his conclusions down as accurately and conscientiously as possible. (I imagine Mr. Moskalenko also doesn’t accept positive reviews when the reviewer hasn’t fully tested the system?)

But suppose I would like to test Mr. Moskalenko’s system before writing anything at all about it. How would I do it? Surely applying the ‘Touchstone Tools’ in my own games is not nearly enough: a sample of just 1 player can’t possible say anything meaningful about a method, can it? I’d have to ask perhaps my entire chess team to study the book and apply it in their own games to the best of their ability.

But then there would still be the (in my view very likely) possibility that our game improved not because of the Touchstone Tools, but by us being suddenly occupied with chess for much more than we currently are. You see, this is what statisticians call the correlation is not causation maxim: the fact that we’re reading Moskalenko’s book and actively trying to apply the Touchstones doesn’t prove Moskalenko’s method works – not at all.

For all we know the very fact that we’re in an experiment might make us more conscious of our play during games, and we might improve our game even without studying anything at all. This is a variation of the well-known placebo effect. To avoid such confusion, we’d at least need some sort of control group with a bunch of players of the same average level who would also engage in active chess study, but specifically without using Moskalenko’s Touchstones – say, by studying Mark Dvoretsky’s books.

After some time – say, a year – we’d probably be able to say something about whether Moskalenko’s method works or not (calibrating for random rating fluctuations and such, of course), and whether it works any better than other current chess-improvement methods.

Now, this would be an extremely interesting experiment, and I would be more than willing to try it myself if given enough time and money, but what I’m really wondering is whether Mr. Moskalenko himself has ever done such an experiment.

After all, he accuses me of not having tested his method and very firmly claims that his method does work. My question is very simple: has Mr. Moskalenko systematically tested his method, and can we see the results? And perhaps I should mention another statisticians’ maxim, which is that the plural of anecdote is not data. It’s great to have many testimonies from players who are happy their money was well spent and they improved their chess by receiving chess training, but this doesn’t, of course, prove the training method itself works: it just proves they improved their game.

And this may have happened for numerous reasons – the most important one being what I also wrote in my initial review, which is that ‘improving one’s chess can be achieved by studying any chess book seriously.’ (Mr. Moskalenko seems to have overlooked this remark.)

Let me finish by what strikes me as an extremely important point, made by one of the commenters to this post. It’s this: ‘Maybe [Moskalenko] is right in saying so, but he fails to address how his students got better using his advice.’

This is precisely my whole problem with the book. It’s not the Touchstone tools, it’s not the provocative language, not the lack of philosophical depth, not even the annoying -T1 and -T4 notation: it’s the lack of specificity; the lack of explaining how the touchstones work (and why), how students improve their game and how dynamic chess works; and how revolutionary Moskalenko’s book is, precisely.

Perhaps these questions are typical philosophical questions, but so be it. I’m just a an ordinary chess player trying to improve and be inspired by chess. Mr. Moskalenko claims he knows ‘quite well what beginning and more advanced chess players know and how they think.’ In other words, he knows exactly how I think. I can only hope he will some day understand my point of view in this matter after all.

Links

 
http://www.chessvibes.com/reports/gm-moskalenko-responds-to-chessvibes-review/
Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:43:03 +0000
 
 
 
Defensa Holandesa - La sortida aguda de alfil

por Viktor Moskalenko

Viktor Moskalenko

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




1.d4 d5 2.Ag5!?

nonamep1

nonamep2

''Si tu oponente amenaza con jugar la Defensa Holandesa, no impides que lo haga!'' -  9º Campeón del Mundo Tigran Vartanovich Petrosian (1929-1984).

Obviamente a Tigran Petrosian haya gustado el lado blanco de dicha Defensa, pero si Usted no está bien preparado para una larga discusión teórica en contra de variante Leningrado o sistema Stonewall, o si simplemente quiere sorprender a su rival, entonces la jugada original 2.Ag5!? podría ser una opción digna de confianza para su repertorio.

 









Tigran Petrosian

 

El verano pasado, durante el abierto tradicional en Sitges 2009, he jugado contra el líder del torneo (7 de 7), Gran Maestro y el ex campeón sueco Lars Karlsson:

nonamep3

Juega el blanco (15.?)

Después de una apertura fácil para mí, ha surgido una posición deseable: lo que permitió ir a ganar con un ataque imparable de 'Gran Prix'.
{iframe height="580"}visor3/viktor.php?titulo=Moskalenko,V - Karlsson,L  1-0&archivo=/visor3/pgn/viktor.pgn{/iframe}
 
http://www.zonadeajedrez.com/aprendizaje/partidas-comentadas/832-defensa-holandesa
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:11:42 +0000
 
 
 
Morning Minutes: Feb. 10 - Pembroke Mariner & Reporter

Morning Minutes: Feb. 10
Pembroke Mariner & Reporter
By Anonymous Sign up for the free program online fitness tool and it will help keep track of your weight, activity level, diet and more. ...
This day in historyWestern Courier (subscription)

all 31 news articles »
 
http://news.google.com/news/url?fd=R&sa=T&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wickedlocal.com%2Fpembroke%2Fnewsnow%2Fx231970385%2FMorning-Minutes-Feb-10&usg=AFQjCNHbTMnvQ52CdE0Y4GxYabwq6eEqFA
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:00:43 GMT+00:00
 
 
 
The role of computers in preparation

The role of computers in preparationBeing able to use a computer has become extremely important for today’s professional chess players. This technological development was described in an article at TechRepublic, focusing on the story of Kris Littlejohn, who is not a grandmaster but a successful second of top grandmaster Hikaru Nakamura nonetheless.

Screenshot: Debra Littlejohn Shinder

Mainstream media have recently started covering chess a bit more, mainly because of Magnus Carlsen’s rise to the top. In the Philippines they have their story (Wesley So), in the Netherlands we have ours (Anish Giri), and of course there are more examples of very young chess players becoming strong grandmasters.

The general explanation of this development is the increasingly important role of the computer in the world of chess. But how does this work exactly? How can someone who’s not into chess, but a little into computers, understand what’s going on in our scene?

At first it seemed very surprising that Hikaru Nakamura, the reigning US champion and currently the world’s number 28 (but 17th on the live rating list), is working with Kris Littlejohn as his second. Littlejohn is not a GM, not even an IM. But from the start Nakamura has made clear that this doesn’t really matter for him, and that he’s very happy with Littlejohn’s work.

Hikaru Nakamura and Kris Littlejohn

Hikaru Nakamura and Kris Littlejohn at the NH Chess Tournament in August 2009

Debra Littlejohn Shinder, a technology consultant, trainer, and tech writer, wrote an article for TechRepublic in which she explains how chess players actually work with computers, and how her son Kris works for preparing Hikaru well. TechRepublic is an online trade publication and social community for IT professionals, designed to provide timely and relevant advice, best practices, and tools for the day-to-day needs of IT decision-makers.

A fragment:

Kris performs some of his work weeks or even months before a tournament, as soon as he knows which players are entered. He starts gathering information from the databases about the moves those players like to use. Once he knows which players Hikaru will be going up against and finds out the “colors” (who will play white and who will play black in each game), he analyzes the openings commonly used by Hikaru’s opponents. Then he tries to find a “novelty” — a responsive move that has never been played before. (…) Since the tournaments are played all over the world, Kris uses his laptop and the Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) to connect to his Nehalem computer back home and perform all these tasks. He also has a backup laptop available that runs the chess engine and database, albeit more slowly, in case of Internet outages.

You can read the full article here.

 
http://www.chessvibes.com/reports/the-role-of-computers-in-preparation/
Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:09:08 +0000
 
 
 
Software für Blindschach-Übungen
tal.blindfold

Mikhail Tal 1968 beim Blindspiel (Screenshot vom Video - siehe Text)

Darbietungen von Blindschach und besonders Blind-Simultan-Schach sind immer eine Attraktion. Ein solches Spektakel fand vor zehn Jahren in Berlin statt, als Robert Hübner im Blindsimultan an acht Brettern gegen die erste Mannschaft des SC Kreuzberg antrat und fünf Siege und drei Remis erzielte. Harald Fietz hat darüber einen sehr schönen Bericht – “Blinder Durchblick” – geschrieben. Spektakulär ist auch das jüngst aufgetauchte Videozeugnis eines Blindsimultans von Mikhail Tal an zehn Brettern. Steve Giddens hat das Geschehen in einem Chessbase-Artikel zusammengefasst und teilweise ins Englische übersetzt. Bei dem Video handelt es sich übrigens um einen Ausschnitt aus dem 1968 gedrehten Dokumentarfilm “Seven Steps beyond the Horizon”.

Warum Blindschach-Training?

Das Spiel ohne Ansicht des Brettes ist beeindruckend. Aber auch am Brett müssen die Spieler gewissermaßen “blind” spielen. Denn die sichtbaren Bewegungen der Figuren auf dem Brett sind ja nur die Spitze des Eisberges. Größtenteils bleibt das Geschehen einer Schachpartie unsichtbar und spielt sich nur in der Vorstellungswelt der Spieler ab. Im Aufsatz  “Die Psychologie des Schachspielers” (1909) schreibt Siegbert Tarrasch: “Eigentlich ist ja auch die gewöhnliche Partie, ist ja auch das ganze Schach Blindspiel. Man geht von einer gegebenen sichtbaren Stellung aus, kommt aber dann beim Berechnen auf eine ganz andere, die man sich völlig deutlich, durchaus plastisch vorstellen muss, um von ihr aus seine Berechnungen fortzusetzen. Man muss also völlig von der auf dem Brette sichtbaren Stellung abstrahieren, ja im Gegenteil, diese Stellung wird nur störend, denn sie erschwert die plastische Veranschaulichung der im Geiste geschauten Zukunftsstellung.” (zitiert nach W. Kamm: Siegbert Tarrasch. Leben und Werk, Unterhaching 2004, S. 562)

tarrasch1908

Siegbert Tarrasch 1908

Tarraschs Schilderung lässt an Jonathan Tisdall’s “Stepping-Stone-Technik” denken. Aber das ist ein Thema für einen anderen Beitrag. Hier möchte ich Tarraschs Hinweis folgen, dass die sichtbare Stellung durchaus zum Störfaktor werden kann. In seinem Artikel “Reflections on Becoming a Master Player” (2000) erinnert sich Kevin Spraggett an die 80er Jahre. Damals sorgte eine neue Generation sowjetischer Spieler für Aufsehen, weil sie während der Partie weniger auf das Brett als an die Decke, in die Zuschauer oder auf einen Punkt in der Ferne blickten. Die Ergebnisse waren allerdings ziemlich beeindruckend. Für Spraggett kombiniert diese neue Methode die gewöhnlichen Techniken (“usual ‘visual’ chess thinking”) mit Techniken des Blindspiels (”‘blindfold’ chess thinking“). Der Erfolg der neuen Methode beruht laut Spraggett darauf, dass sich die beiden Techniken ergänzen, man also mit ihnen zusammen besser “sieht” als mit einer allein.  (”There are many things you don’t ’see’ in chess which you do ’see’ when you close your eyes, and of course, the reverse is equally true. I suggest you try some experiments!“) Laut Spraggett verwendeten diese von sowjetischen Trainern neu entwickelte Methode z. B. Shirov, Ivanchuk, Gelfand und auch Anand.  Blindschach dürfte mithin für jeden Schachspieler ein wichtiges und spannendes Thema sein!

Das Brett und immer nur das Brett

Womit könnte ein Blindschach-Training beginnen? Hinweise dazu lassen sich bei Tarrasch in “Das Blindspiel” (1897) finden : “Ein Punkt ist nicht zu übersehen. Wer blind spielen will, muss das Brett beherrschen; er muss von jedem Felde die Farbe kennen, muss wissen, wohin von jedem Felde aus ein Springer ziehen kann, muss wissen (abgesehen davon, dass er es geistig sehen wird), dass ein Läufer auf b1 nach h7 zieht etc. Das Brett und immer nur das Brett! Die Figuren sind viel weniger wichtig! Am Brett ohne Figuren spielen, ist sehr leicht, kaum schwerer als mit Figuren.” (zitiert nach W. Kamm: s.o., S. 567) Das Brett und immer nur das Brett, schreibt Tarrasch. In der Tat ist es bereits für Anfänger und Kinder wichtig, sich mit dem Schachbrett vertraut zu machen. Dazu gehört die Benennung der Felder, der Linien, Reihen und Diagonalen, die Geometrie des Schachbretts, die Zugmöglichkeiten der Figuren sowie deren Wirkungen und Wechselwirkungen etc. Und vertraut macht man sich durch kleine Übungen, sowohl auf dem Brett als auch blind.

KevinSpraggett

Kevin Spraggett (Foto von Mikel Larreategi)

Auch Spraggett betont im bereits genannten Aufsatz “Reflections on Becoming a Master Player” die Bedeutung des Schachbretts: “It has always surprised me how little time books spend explaining the importance of the chessboard in itself. It has an importance more than just being the ‘table’ onwhich the game takes place… Knowing the characteristics of the board is extremely important. Books spend too much time on the pieces, not realizing that much is missed by neglecting a closer study of the relationship of the board with each separate piece.” Wie gesagt, das Studium und die Verinnerlichung von Schachbrett und der Beziehungen der Figuren und Brett ist von Anfang an ein wichtiger Bestandteil der Schachausbildung. Tatsächlich haben aber selbst erfahrene Spieler hier oft Defizite. Dazu Spraggett: “A lot of players have difficulty visualizing a chess board. You can ask them to close their eyes and then quiz them on squares (what colour they are), on diagonals (what squares are attached to them), files, etc. My experience as a trainer is that many players have difficulty doing so. This is compounded by the popularly held belief that it is unimportant…”

Trainieren der schachlichen Einbildungskraft (Visualisierung)

Aber die Vertrautheit mit dem Schachbrett ist wichtig. Und Spraggett erklärt auch warum das so ist. Beim Schachspielen sehen wir nicht nur mit den Augen, sondern auch mit unserem Geist. Wobei es hier nicht auf die Worte ankommt. Wichtig ist, dass wir in unserer Vorstellung das Brett nicht als Ganzes sehen, sondern zerlegt in Teile. Es ist daher nötig, diese Fragmente sozusagen immer zusammen denken. Und damit dies funktioniert, müssen wir uns mit dem Schachbrett und den Figuren sowie deren Wechselwirkungen so gut vertraut machen, dass das Zusammendenken möglichst automatisch und fehlerlos abläuft. In Spraggetts Worten: “But it is important because of how the brain works! The thinking process in chess involves the use of our eyes as well as our ”mind’s eye”. Our mind’s eye sees the board in a different way, as it can not ‘visualize’ the board as a whole it must break the board down into components, with each component being geometrically related to the others. If we haven’t consciously understood the geometry of the board sufficiently and all of the implications with respect to each and every piece, then our mind’s eye (our way of imagining the board) will not appreciate the whole board, and hence certain tactical oversights may go unnoticed.”

Hilfsmittel für Blindschach-Übungen

Womit wir endlich bei den angekündigten Hilfsmitteln für das Blindschachtraining wären. Im Folgenden möchte ich kurz eine Website und zwei Programme vorstellen, die Übungen zum Vertraut werden mit dem Brett bieten. (Die Wiedergabe der Bilder und Screenshots erfolgt mit der freundlichen Genehmigung der Autoren.)

Kurz ein paar Bemerkungen zum Vokabular: Im Englischen spricht man von “Vision”, “Board Vision” oder “Visualisierung”. Im Deutschen wird Visualisierung eher im engeren Sinn von Verbildlichung gebraucht, einer Umsetzung von Daten oder Sprache in Bilder. Beim Schach genügt vielleicht der alte Ausdruck “Vorstellung”.  Allerdings gefällt mir “Einbildung” noch besser. Etwas altmodisch ließe sich von Trainieren der “schachlichen Einbildungskraft” sprechen. Wobei heutzutage für die gleiche Sache allerdings “Fantasie” und Trainieren der “schachlichen Fantasie” gebräuchlicher sind. Wie auch immer. Wichtig ist, dass es sich um eine aktive, schöpferische Tätigkeit handelt, die sich üben lässt!

Die “Chess Drum-Chess Academy” von Daaim Shabazz

Die Website “The Chess Drum” bietet im Rahmen ihrer “Chess Academy” eine ganze Reihe von Aufgaben. Klicken sie auf diesen Link und scrollen sie weit hinunter. Dann kommen Sie unter der Überschrift “Improve your Chess Skills!” zur Rubrik “Board Vision” (siehe Screenshot unten). In drei Tests finden Sie jeweils in vier verschiedenen Abschnitten insgesamt 155 Übungen.

chessdrum1

Übersicht der "Board Vision"-Aufgaben auf "The Chess Drum" (Screenshot)

Klicken Sie auf einen der Tests, kommen Sie zu den Abschnitten. Ich habe hier “Test 2″ gewählt (siehe Screenshot unten). Unter “Square Dancing” finden Sie Fragen nach Felderfarben, etwa: Ist das Feld c6 ein weißes oder schwarzes Feld? Auch bei “Board Stretch” gibt es solche Fragen, allerdings auf einem größeren Brett. Eine sehr schöne Idee!

chessdrum7

Übersicht der 50 zum "Test 2" gehörigen Aufgaben (Screenshot)

Bei “Board Geometry” kommen die Figuren ins Spiel (siehe Screenshot unten). Sie werden z. B. gefragt, von welchen Feldern ein Springer sowohl nach e6 als auch nach h7 ziehen kann.

chessdrum4

Zwei Fragen aus dem Bereich "Board Geometry" (Screenshot)

Im Abschnitt “Blindfold Chess” geht es dann um Blindspiel-Aufgaben (siehe Screenshot unten). Sie werden etwa gefragt, welchen Zug Sie als Weißer in der Stellung nach 1.e4 e5 2.Sf3 f5 3.exf5 Kf7 4.Sx5+ Kf6 5.d4 Kxf5 6.Dg4+ Kf6 machen würden.

chessdrum5

Eine Frage aus dem Bereich "Blindfold Chess"

Für die Eingabe der Lösungen genügt bei den Felderfragen ein Klick auf den entsprechenden Button. Bei den weiteren Aufgaben müssen Sie ein Feld, eine Zahl oder einen Zug in ein Feld eintragen. Dabei ist zu beachten, dass Sie die Vorgaben beachten (englisches Buchstabenkürzel für die Figuren, x für Schlagen etc.). Eine Kurzanleitung finden Sie auf der Webseite. Feedback erhalten Sie entweder sofort, oder indem Sie nach Eingabe der Lösungen einen Button klicken. Die Auswertung erscheint dann in einem Pop-up-Fenster. bei mir hat alles gut funktioniert.

Fazit: Wer solche Übungen noch nicht ausprobiert hat, findet hier eine bequeme Möglichkeit zum Einstieg. Ein tolles Angebot!

Der “Chess Blindfold Trainer” von Alf Magne Kalleland

Wie die Übungen bei “The Chess Drum” ist auch der “Chess Blindfold Trainer” von Alf Magne Kalleland in Javascript geschrieben. Sie bearbeiten die Aufgaben ebenfalls im Browser. Hier der Link für die Online-Demo. Sie können sich die Dateien aber auch herunterladen und lokal auf Ihrem Rechner aufrufen. Hier der Link zum Programm auf dhtmlgoodies.com und hier der Link zu Beschreibung und Anleitung.

Ich habe das Programm heruntergeladen und auf meinem Rechner die html-Datei des Programms mit dem Browser geöffnet (siehe Screenshot unten).  Klicken Sie auf das Bild, kommen Sie zur Online-Demo, die genauso aussieht. Rechts sehen Sie, welche Übungen der Blindfold Trainer anbietet. “Color of Squares” sind Fragen zur Feldfarbe, “Diagonals” und “Knight Moves” zu Figurenbewegung und Brett. “Correct Move” und “Correct move (from sequence)” sind Aufgaben zum Blindschach. “Mixture” bietet eine Mischung aus allen. Wie viele Aufgaben es insgesamt sind, habe ich nicht gezählt. Aber es sind eine ganze Menge. In der Anleitung wird zudem beschrieben wie man selbst weitere Übungen ergänzen kann.

blindfoldtrainer1

Die Oberfläche des "Blindfold Chess Trainers" (Screenshot - zur Demo auf das Foto klicken)

Ein Beispiel für eine “Diagonals”-Aufgabe (siehe Screenshot unten). Liegen die Felder c8 und g4 auf einer Diagonale?

blindfoldtrainer2

Frage aus dem Bereich "Diagonals"

Und noch ein Beispiel aus dem “Correct Moves”-Abschnitt (siehe die beiden unteren Screenshots). Eine Stellung wird angesagt und der nächste Zug ins Feld eingetragen werden. Nach Bestätigung der Eingabe öffnet sich eine Antwortseite, die das Ergebnis und die richtige Lösung mitteilt.

blindfoldtrainer3

Frage aus dem Bereich "Correct Moves"

blindfoldtrainer4

Antwort zur Frage aus dem Bereich "Correct Moves"

Fazit: Der “Chess Blindfold Trainer” ist ein schönes kleines Programm. Praktisch ist zudem, dass man selbst eigene Aufgaben hinzufügen kann. Ausprobiert habe ich dies aber noch nicht.

Die “Chess Training Tools” von Dietrich Kappe

Die “Chess Trainings Tools” (aktuelle Version ist 1.4) sind in Java geschrieben. Daher muss die Java-Laufzeitumgebung  auf Ihrem Rechner installiert sein. Diese können Sie hier herunterladen. Diese “Chess Trainings Tools” finden Sie zum Download entweder hier auf der Site von sourceforge.net oder hier auf der Site “Chess Training” von Dietrich Kappe. Nach dem Entpacken starten Sie einfach die jar-Datei und schon sehen Sie die Programmoberfläche mit geöffneter Hilfe-Datei vor sich (siehe Screenshot unten).

chesstrainingstools1

"Chess Training Tools" mit geöffneter Hildedatei (Screenshot)

Alles ist sehr übersichtlich und aufgeräumt. Für leichte Verwirrung sorgen nur die verschiedenen Namen für das Programm: “Chess Training Tools 1.4″ kennen wir ja schon. Unter dieser Bezeichnung haben wir es gefunden und heruntergeladen. In der Titelleiste heißt es jetzt “Chess Trainer 1.4.0″. Das klingt etwas anders, aber noch ähnlich. In der Hilfedatei ist nun aber die Rede von “CVT” für “Chess Visualisation Trainer”. Ich vermute, dies rührt von der gemeinsamen Herkunft mit dem kommerziellen Programm “Chess Eye” her. Eine teilweise freie Ergänzung ist “CVT Online“, wo nach Anmeldung  jeder online Aufgaben bearbeiten kann. Allerdings ist die Menge der Aufgaben beschränkt. In welcher Weise, habe ich allerdings nicht ganz verstanden. Auch über die Geschichte von “Chess Eye” und “Chess Training Tools” weiß ich nichts zu berichten. Zurück zum Programm, das so einiges zu bieten hat.

In der Menüleiste am oberen Rand können Sie die gewünschten Aufgaben auswählen. “Color”, “Same Color”, “Diagonal 2″, Diagonal 3″, “Knight” und “Knight 2″ beinhalten die uns schon bekannten Übungen zu Brett und Figuren. Daneben gibt es aber noch “Mate”, “Vision”, “Blindfold” und “Vince”.  Bei “Mate” bekommen Sie eine Stellung in Schriftform (Stellung der Figuren) und müssen angeben, ob es sich um eine Mattstellung handelt oder nicht. D. h., Sie müssen die Stellung in Ihrer Fantasie aufbauen und prüfen. Und bei “Vision” bekommen Sie in Diagrammform die Stellung von König und Turm vorgegeben und müssen angeben, von welchen Feldern ein Doppelangriff durch die Dame möglich ist (siehe Screenshot unten). Im Beispiel habe ich nur ein Feld markiert (grün). In der Lösung werden mir meine Auslassungen gezeigt (rot).

chesstrainingstools3

Übung "Vision" - Der Doppelangriff der Dame auf e5 wurde erkannt (grün), die beiden anderen auf c7 und g3 übersehen (rot). In der Lösung werden diese Fehler angegeben. (Screenshot)

So weit, so gut. Der Hit des Programms von Dietrich Kappe sind aber die Übungen “Blindfold” und “Vince”. Bei “Blindfold” kann man selbst eine beliebige Partie im pgn-Format einfügen und wird dann Zug für Zug blind durch die Partie geführt, wobei man nach jedem Zug immer wieder fünf Fragen zur aktuellen Stellung beantworten muss (siehe Screenshot unten).

chesstrainingstools4

Übung "Blindfold" - Zur Stellung nach dem 10. Zug sind fünf Fragen zu beantworten (Screenshot)

Diese Übung hat einiges Potential. Wie man damit am günstigsten arbeitet, weiß ich noch nicht. Z. B. könnte man die Fragen auch nur alle drei oder fünf Züge beantworten. Oder man könnte nach verschiedenen Kriterien ganz bestimmte Partien auswählen. Die letzte Übung ist “Vince”, bei der man die Figuren in Teilen des Brettes oder auf dem ganzen Brett unsichtbar machen kann. Vor allem aber kann man gegen eine eingebaute (nicht sehr starke) Engine spielen und dabei eine Verzögerung der Darstellung einstellen. Dann wird auf dem Brett die bis zu sieben Halbzüge zurück reichende Stellung angezeigt. Man spielt real also immer “vor” der Brettstellung. Eine interessante Übung. Ich glaube, das kommerzielle Programm “Chess Vision Trainer” (man muss bei den Namen echt aufpassen!) von www.chesstechno.com ist auf dieser Idee aufgebaut.

Fazit: Die “Chess Training Tools” sind eine tolle Sache und stehen dazu noch unter der GNU GPL. Ein Dankeschön an den Autor.

Nachtrag

Nach Fertigstellung des Artikels habe ich noch ein paar Online-Übungen im Web entdeckt, und zwar bei www.chessvideos.tv als Chess Visualization Trainer.

Weitere Hinweise, Ergänzungen oder Kritik sind sehr erwünscht.

 
http://www.schachfieber.de/2009/10/07/software-fuer-blindschach-uebungen/
Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:21:58 +0000
 
 
 
La Belleza de este Problema...
loshinskyAutor: luigiferri
La Belleza de este Problema radica en la Profundidad y la Estructura del Pensamiento necesario para resolverlo." (J'onathan Levitt & David Friedgood) Lev Ilich Loshinsky, compositor de ajedrez sovietico (17 enero 1913-19 de febrero de 1976). De una creatividad excepcional y de alta tecnica compuso problemas en los que incorporo complejas y originales ideas en forma muy artistica. Profundidad tematica y la habilidad tecnica es lo que se encuentra en su obra. Cerca de 400 de sus obras fueron distinguidas, de ellas 166 recibieron el primer premio. ¿Como se hace para resolver el problema?

Comprendiendolo. Invirtiendo tiempo en desentranar su mecanismo. No se trata de algo magico ni una inspiracion que viene de no se donde. Hay que pensar y determinar para que esta cada pieza y entender que cada una tiene una funcion.

Es un ejercicio en este caso y una realidad necesaria frente al tablero para cualquier posicion. No es muy dificil ver que Ce6 seria mate sino estuvieran el Ac4, el peon f7 y la propia T. Si uno no mira panoramicamente se da cuenta que la Db8 ...

{iframe height="580"}visor3/loshinsky_mateentres.php{/iframe}
 
http://www.zonadeajedrez.com/aprendizaje/problemas/829-la-belleza-de-este-problema
Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:02:19 +0000
 
 
 
Aquarium’s Hidden Treasures. Part Two

Aquarium 2010 has been released. In comparison to the initial Aquarium version, which was released last year, it is clear that progress has been very rapid, both in improvements to existing features and the addition of new features and stability. Its database feature started out with a limit of two open bases, but now the limit has been removed and database performance has been improved. Aquarium has also taken the lead on publishing iBooks and HTML content for web pages and blogs. That’s quite a change from the initial version, which didn’t even have a printing feature. Aquarium has been a leading analysis tool from the beginning; nevertheless, the new version shows huge improvements in this area, as you can see by reading last month’s column about IDeA. The new Aquarium also emphasizes analysis on networked computers; a new feature that can give a big boost to IdeA, as well as advanced infinite analysis.

This month I’ll continue with Aquarium’s hidden treasures, including some new features in Aquarium 2010 that have not received much attention yet.

Drag and Drop

Aquarium 2010 databases have extensive support for drag and drop operations. You can drag and drop individual games, a list of games, and even whole databases. Games can be dragged between different types of databases.

In many cases it is easiest to use the navigation tree in the sidebar for dragging and dropping. The graphic below shows the navigation tree with two open databases: elite2008 and hugebase. Each of them has one open game. The game Greco J. - Amateur in hugebase is being dragged into elite2008.

Drag and drop a single game

As a result of this operation, the game will be copied from hugebase and appended to elite2008.

When dragging games, the blue background highlights the source and the destination. The source has white letters on a blue background and the destination has dark-blue letters on a blue background.

In the next example, the same two databases are open, but this time we are looking at a subset of hugebase; a list of only three games instead of the full database. This list is being dragged into elite2008.

Drag and drop a list of games

The three games in the hugebase list will be copied and appended to elite2008. This same method can be used to update a database with games you download from the Internet. Normally, you would download a database in PGN format, open it in Aquarium and then drag the whole database into the destination database.

Drag and drop can also be used to merge games. In the example below, the game Greco J – Amateur is being dragged into the Karpov game.

Merging two games

As a result of this operation the Greco game will be merged into the Karpov game. After that the Karpov game will contain all moves, variations, and annotations from both of the original games.

It is also possible to merge several games by dragging a list of games into an existing game. In the next example, you see a list consisting of three hugebase games being dragged into the Karpov game.

Merging several games

The result is that the Karpov game will contain the moves, variations, and annotations from all four games.

If you want to create a new version of an open game, you can do so by dragging the game back into the same database as shown below.

Here, the Karpov game is dragged into the elite2008 database, the same database as the original game belongs to; this creates a new copy of the game in the database.

In some cases it is easier to drag and drop from the game list to the navigation tree. The next illustration shows how a game from hugebase is being dragged from the game list into elite2008.

Appending a game from the game list

There is no need to mark the game in the list before doing that. Simply drag it over to the navigation tree. The destination will be highlighted as elite2008 is in this case.

Marking games is useful if you want to drag several games in one operation After marking the games, you can drag them all into the destination database.

Appending marked games from the game list

In this example, the three marked Nigel Short games will be appended to elite2008.

Similar to what was described above you can also use this method to merge games, by dragging the marked games into an existing game, which is shown in the navigation tree.

Note that although you can drag a chess game into an EPD database, only the initial position will be stored. Also remember that CBH databases are read-only in Aquarium, so you cannot drag games into them.

Besides dragging and dropping, you can use other methods for the same purpose. The keyboard shortcuts Ctrl+C/Ctrl+V are also fast, but if you prefer to use the Copy/Paste buttons on the ribbon, you will find them in the leftmost tab (the home tab), as is customary in the new Fluid GUI.



Tree Views

I have often mentioned tree configurations in these columns. Many of Aquarium’s advantages can be attributed to its extensive use of trees, which are positional databases as opposed to game databases. Aquarium 2010 has several new features that make tree configurations easier to define, maintain, and use.

A tree configuration allows you to view data from several trees at the same time. The tree window displays the tree configuration in columns, and each column is connected to a tree. Some of the columns may be connected to the same tree or they can all come from different trees. It all depends on how the tree configuration is defined.

While viewing a game, select the Tree tab and click Options. The currently selected tree configuration will be displayed (Annotations, in my example). The “Tree configurations” dialog box shown below defines which tree is behind each column in the tree window.

Tree configuration with the new Quick column

The first three columns are familiar from the previous Aquarium version. “Name” is the column heading displayed in the tree window. “Tree” shows the tree that is connected to the column, and “Visible” allows you to switch the display of the column on or off. If it is marked as visible, it will be displayed in the tree window.

The new Quick column gives users a faster and easier way to select the trees that are displayed in the configuration, as you will see in the Quick Load section below. A new button has been added to the Configuration group in the Tree tab, allowing users to quickly load any trees they wish into the configuration. The Quick check boxes are used to mark the columns that users are allowed to change with the Quick Load button.

Another new feature supports the Quick Load function and also makes it easier to define and maintain a tree view. In the image below, I right-clicked over the Tree cell of the Total% line and selected Link from the menu and then Total from the sub-menu.

Linking columns: Change one to update all

What happens here is that I create a link from the Total% column to the Total column. This means that if I change the tree displayed in the Total column, the Total% column will be automatically updated to show the data from the same tree. This is what the tree configuration will look like after I have linked all the statistics columns together.

Linked columns

I have linked the following columns to the Total column as shown by the “&t”: Total%, Success, Rating, and Year. This means that whenever I change the tree for Total (currently statisticsd2m), the linked columns will automatically show data from the same tree.

I have also made Total a quick load column, as seen by the check mark in the Quick cell. The next section shows how this enables users to quickly switch to a new tree for all the linked columns above.




Quick Load

Quick Load is a new feature in Aquarium 2010. It allows users to quickly select trees that are displayed in a tree configuration. I’ll continue with the example above, where the Annotations configuration was modified by linking all statistics columns and changing Total into a quick load column.

The Quick Load button is located in the Configuration group on the Tree tab as shown below.

Loading a new tree for all statistics columns

If you are viewing a game, using the Annotations configuration as modified above, the Quick Load button becomes active. When you click it, a menu showing recently used trees is displayed, with the current tree highlighted with a check mark. Since this is the first time we open the menu after defining a quick load column, only the current tree is displayed in the list. Normally, after switching a few times between trees, you will find the tree you want in this list. If it isn’t, select Browse from the menu and locate the tree you want to load into the configuration.

If there are more than one quick load columns in the configuration, you will see one item in the Quick Load menu for each such column as shown below.

Two quick load columns

Here we see a menu with two quick load options: N and succ. The image shows the sub-menu for N and we see that there is a check mark next to ctg test.ctg. This means that currently the data is read from that opening book. I can use this menu to select another tree (or opening book) for this column (and linked columns, if any). The list contains other recently used opening books: Balanced-16.ctg and Storm IV.ctg. I could either select one of them from the list or click Browse and locate some other opening book I have stored on my computer.

The addition of this new feature to Aquarium gives the user an easy way to change the data that is shown in the tree window without modifying the underlying configuration. Each configuration becomes a framework that users can tailor to their own needs, without a great deal of knowledge about the inner workings of tree configurations.




Lock Tree

Normally, the same tree configuration is displayed in the tree window of all open games, both database games and the Sandbox. If you switch to a different tree configuration when viewing a game, the new configuration will also show up in all other games.

Aquarium 2010 allows you to lock the tree configuration for individual database games, so it doesn’t change while the game is open, regardless of the configurations selected for other games.

Locked tree configuration

Right-click the game in the sidebar and select “Lock Tree” from the menu. After that the tree configuration for the current game will not change while the game is open.




Tree Variables

Besides the mechanism around Quick Load, another nice feature has been added to tree configurations. Now, instead of pointing directly to a specific tree you can specify a variable. Let’s start by seeing how it works. After that it will be easier to understand the advantages.

Like most things related to tree configurations, the place to define a new variable is the “Tree configurations” dialog box, which is brought up by clicking the Options button on the Tree tab.

Defining a tree variable

First click the Variables button (1). The “Setup Variables” dialog box will be displayed. Type the variable name, preceded by a “*” into the text box labeled

(2) in the image. In this example, I call the variable “*MyTree.” When you click the Add button (3), the variable will be created and added to the list above the button. Finally, type the path of the tree into the field labeled (4) in the image and click the OK button. Now the variable can be used in any tree configuration.

Using a variable in a tree configuration

The image above shows how you can use the newly defined variable. Right-click over the tree where you want to use the variable. From the menu, select Variable and then pick the variable you want to use. In this case, I chose *MyTree, the variable that was defined above. After that the tree used for the Total column, will be the tree that the *MyTree variable points to.

You can use the same variable in as many tree configurations as you like. One of the advantages is that later on you can change the variable to point to a different tree and all the tree configurations using the variable will be automatically updated to display the new tree. If you hadn’t used a variable, you would need to go into each tree configuration and modify it manually.




Insert Best Line from Tree

You can add moves one by one from a tree to the notation simply by browsing the tree (either by clicking through the moves or by using the arrow keys), but Aquarium also allows you to transfer whole variations from the tree to the notation with the click of a button.

Let’s say that we have been analyzing the following position for a while with IDeA.

We can look at the current status of the analysis by browsing the tree within IdeA, or switch to the original game in the database or the Sandbox and browse the tree from there. A faster way to get an overview of the best variations found so far is to select a position in the notation and then press the F4 key on the keyboard. In response, Aquarium adds the best variations from the tree to the notation as shown below.

Best variations automatically inserted

The tree window shows that IDeA currently sees two moves with an equal score of +2.38: 1.Qg4 and 1.Qg3. Consequently, the best variations beginning with these two moves have been added to the notation. The notation window was empty, so all the moves you see were added by Aquarium.

You can repeat this process for any position in the tree in order to see the best variations starting from the selected position. Of course you can also use it to see the best responses to sub-optimal moves and build a complex set of variations.

In most cases this is all you need to know; e.g., for a tree created with IDeA, but if you prefer to use the mouse instead of the keyboard, you can click the “Best Line From Tree 1” button on the Tree tab instead.

Insert best variations from tree

Many users probably wondered why there is both a “Best Line From Tree 1” and a “Best Line From Tree 2” button. The reason is that a single tree view can be based on several trees. The tool button (highlighted in the image above) allows you to choose two of them and assign to these buttons. Clicking the tool button opens the “Tree insert options” dialog box.

Here you see two boxes, each with a list of the trees in the tree view that contain evaluations. I have highlighted the “Eval” tree in the “Tree 1” list. This means that when I click “Best Line From Tree 1” the inserted variations will be based on the evaluations in the “Eval” tree. Similarly, I have selected the “CAP” tree in the “Tree 2” list. If I click the “Best Line From Tree 2” button, I will get the best variations based on the evaluations in the “CAP” tree.

Conclusion

In this article we examined two sets of Aquarium features: Drag and drop game manipulation and using trees. The first of these showed intuitive ways of performing a function that is well-known in graphical user interfaces and is therefore easy to understand by most users. The second one is designed for more advanced users who want to get as much as possible out of Aquarium’s tree features. These two different sets of features well illustrate that the design of Aquarium provides an easy access to common functions that are sufficient for most users, while also providing more advanced features. Some of them are unique to Aquarium and cannot be found in any other chess software, so there is no quick way to get around the learning curve – but the time invested is worth it.

 
http://chessok.com/?p=23409
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:15:18 +0000
 
 
 
Recursos Tácticos Doble de Caballo 1/3

doble de caballo zona de ajedrez zonadeajedrez.comdoble de caballo zona de ajedrez zonadeajedrez.comComenzamos la primera de las tres entregas de ejercicios tácticos de "Doble de Caballo"

Diez ejercicios tácticos presentandos a modo de problemas para que sean estudiados desde la propia  página o bien ser descargardos y dedicarles algún tiempo más.

 

 

 
http://www.zonadeajedrez.com/aprendizaje/tactica/822-recursos-tacticos-doble-caballo13
Sat, 30 Jan 2010 23:00:00 +0000
 
 
 
Mucho más que un Maestro de Ajedrez

Francisco Benko - foto La Nación 2008Un adiós al Gran Francisco Benko (24-06-1910/12-01-2010)

Autor: luigiferri

Como millones de inmigrantes que llegaron a la Argentina entre mediados del Siglo XIX y mediados del XX, en 1936 arribó al país Franz Benkö, desde Alemania.

A una tierra en crecimiento y que sería el Granero del Mundo, en busca de la Esperanza. Escapando de múltiples dolores, hambre, Guerras Mundiales, Guerras Civiles, persecuciones políticas y religiosas. Y Argentina los acogió en un crisol de razas. Sin xenofobias, sin persecuciones, sin exclusiones, sin expulsiones ni deportaciones. Claro que siempre hay miserables, pero la mayoría los asimiló e integró como a uno más. Aún la Argentina fue generosa enviando alimentos a pueblos devastados por la Guerra Civil o la Guerra Mundial.

Francisco (Franz) Benkö nació en Berlín el 24 de junio de 1910[1]. De padre húngaro y madre austríaca.

Cuando empezó la Primera Guerra Mundial yo tenía sólo cuatro años. Mi padre había fallecido cuando yo tenía un año y medio, y mi madre murió cuando había cumplido 16 años. Sufrí hambre y frío; la falta de calcio me provocaba serios problemas en las uñas y los dientes, que se rompían fácilmente. Antes que estallara la Segunda Guerra Mundial, en 1936 decidí emigrar, teniendo en consideración la difícil situación en que se encontraban los judíos en Alemania en ese momento. Ya en Berlín jugaba al ajedrez en primera categoría. (…)” Entrevista de Juan S. Morgado, 1984, Ajedrez de Estilo / ChessBase.

"Un día estaba tan desesperado que no aguanté más, entré al aula del colegio y me bebí un frasco de tinta" dijo al periodista del Diario La Nación alguna vez (La Nación, enero 12 de 2010)

Esta historia es común a muchos de nuestros antepasados; bisabuelos, abuelos y padres que nos contaron cosas muy parecidas.

En aquella Alemania nazi, donde el régimen de Hitler perseguía a los judíos, sin un peso en el bolsillo, se embarcó con su hermana hacia Buenos Aires.[2]

Como tantos inmigrantes hizo todo lo posible para rescatar gente que había quedado en Alemania y así consiguió traer a 9 familias en el último barco que zarpó antes del estallido de la Segunda Guerra Mundial. Simplemente les salvó la vida.

Por sobre todas las cosas un amante de la vida. No sólo fue buen jugador de ajedrez (aparte de gran coleccionista y compositor de problemas), sino que amaba la música clásica y aún hizo una profunda investigación sobre si Shakespeare era o no el testaferro de Roger Manners.[3]

Otra historia pintoresca es la “historia del abanico”, también referida en el reportaje de Morgado: “Cuando mi madre tenía 17 años le regalaron un abanico. A través del tiempo fueron firmándolo diversas personalidades. Mi mamá era una apasionada de la música y consiguió la firma de Johann Strauss, quien personalmente dibujó un pentagrama con las primeras notas del vals Voces de Primavera, como homenaje a mi madre. Otra de las firmas es de Katharina Schratt, que fuera la amante del Emperador Francisco José por muchos años. Yo seguí la tradición, y al reverso de las firmas de músicos, empecé a coleccionar las de grandes ajedrecistas: Alekhine, Capablanca, Kasparov, Karpov, Tal, Petrosian, Judit Polgar, Smyslov, Vera Menchik, Tartakower, y también de músicos como Friedrich Gulda.

Ha sido testigo y partícipe de gran parte de la historia del ajedrez argentino, así que podría haber escrito libros y libros. No importa si era, con 99 años el ajedrecista activo más viejo del planeta y con 98 años y 2044 de ELO, jugaba el fuerte ProAm de Villa Martelli o unos meses antes el tradicional Abierto de Mar del Plata. No se trata de records ni tampoco de hacer un prolijo inventario de su historial ajedrecístico.

Como él decía, refiriéndose a su longevidad ajedrecística: “Creo que he batido un record mundial: ¡debo ser el ajedrecista que perdió más partidas!

En 1928 y 1929 entabló dos partidas con Alekhine en sesión de simultáneas. Dijo, rememorando el Torneo de las Naciones de 1939[4]: “Concurrí todos los días. Hablé varias veces con Alekhine, que se mostró muy amable. Nunca encontré en él el más mínimo vestigio antisemita. No creo que los artículos que se le atribuyen sean de él. Alekhine era demasiado inteligente para ser antisemita.”[5]

Jugó 17 veces el Campeonato Argentino de ajedrez. En 1949 jugó por primera vez el tradicional Torneo de Mar del Plata y desde entonces fue un asiduo participante, siendo su última participación en 2008 (con 97 años!). En esa oportunidad, consultado respecto del por qué de su participación, declaró: "Lo hago en agradecimiento al ajedrez en mi larga vida, y como propaganda para todo el mundo del excelente beneficio de su práctica como antídoto contra el mal de Alzheimer".[6]

Así relataba su encuentro en el Club Argentino de Ajedrez con Bobby Fischer: "(había) muy poca gente. Pero en eso apareció nada menos que Robert 'Bobby' Fischer. Como no había adversarios más calificados a la vista me invitó a jugar blitz. Y en la primera, sorpresivamente, lo vencí. Claro que después se puso serio y me ganó tres seguidas".[7]

Lo había visto en el Abierto Internacional de Morón de 1981 y recuerdo que le ganó a un fuerte jugador de primera categoría de mi club.[8]

Lo volví a ver en el 2002, en el 8vo CONGRESO NACIONAL DE PROFESORES DE AJEDREZ Y 1ero. INTERNACIONAL, donde conjuntamente con los GM’s Panno y Rossetto y el MI Foguelman, contaron parte de su historia que es gran parte de la del Ajedrez Argentino. Un juvenil Benkö (92 años entonces), refirió muchas de las cosas que acá se cuentan. Vienen a mi memoria dos comentarios que se hicieron:

“-Al viejo Benkö hubo que convencerlo que no venga manejando.-“ (impresionante).

Un importante profesor, que utiliza cuentos para acompañar problemas o ejercicios tácticos y facilitar el aprendizaje de los niños, comentaba que tenía una buena historia, pero que no le satisfacía el ejemplo ajedrecístico que había utilizado. Otro profesor le dijo: -No te preocupes, cuando venga el viejo Benkö mostraselo y el encontrará en su impresionante colección de problemas el indicado. (lo que da idea de por qué se decía que tenía la más importante recopilación de problemas de ajedrez y su amor por ellos).

Allí hizo referencia a otra peculiar historia, cómo conoció a su segunda esposa: “(Torneo de las Naciones 1939) Concurrí todos los días. (…) Simultáneamente se jugaba el Campeonato Mundial Femenino, que fue ganado por Vera Menchik. En una de las rondas me paré junto a mi esposa para ver la partida que jugaba María Angélica Berea, más tarde coronada como la primera Maestra Internacional argentina, y le comenté: ¨Mirá qué linda mujer¨. María Angélica se casó luego con el Sr. Montero, y se fue a vivir al interior. Veinticinco años después me casaba con ella, yo viudo, ella divorciada.[9]

Para que conozcan un poco su juego, acompaño las dos partidas con Alekhine, las que le ganó a Arturo Pomar y a Edward Lasker en 1949, una partida que le ganó a el MI Jorge Szmetan en 1993 en el Abierto Najdorf, un empate en el Continental de 2005[10] contra el conocido jugador colombiano Juan Minaya (varias veces representante olímpico de su país) y su victoria frente al fuerte jugador Avalos Parra en el Pro-Am de Villa Martelli de 2008 (con 98 años!!!!).

Muchas veces dijo: "Este juego me salvó la vida.” Seguramente es la pura verdad en su acepción literal y en muchos otros sentidos.

Querido viejo Benkö, que me traes recuerdos de mi padre (n.1906), de mi tío (n.1909), del bisabuelo de mis hijos (n.1912) -también Franz, como vos- y de tanta gente que me enriqueció con sus historias y enseñanzas de vida; mereces un lugar en la historia, no sólo del ajedrez.

Sólo intento acercarte al conocimiento y corazón de todos los que leen esta humilde nota, que habla de una historia de vida y mucho más.

Ahora uno de tus tantos problemas, el que le costase resolver al Gran Misha Tal. Veremos si lo resuelven los lectores. Un simple Mate en 3 jugadas.

{iframe height="560"}visor3/benko_mateentres.php {/iframe}
Adiós Maestro de la Vida.

Bicentenario Sch-Benko
{iframe height="530"}visor3/franciscobenko.php?jugadores=Algunas partidas de F. Benko{/iframe}
 
http://www.zonadeajedrez.com/articulos/reportajes/821-muchomasqueunmaestro
Sun, 31 Jan 2010 09:59:14 +0000
 
 
 
Chennai Open begins

Chennai Open Chess begins on Monday
PTI, 24 January 2010, 09:19pm IST

CHENNAI: Grandmaster Ghaem Ehsan Maghami of Iran, top seed with an ELO of 2589, will start as favourite for the title in the Chennai Open 2010 International Grand Chess Masters Tournament beginning on Monday.

The 11-round Swiss format tournament, launched formally, ends on February 3.

Maghami, fresh from his triumph in the recently concluded 8th Parsvnath International Grandmasters Tournament in Delhi, has replaced Russian GM Maxin Turov (2584) as top seed on better ELO rating.

But Maghami will face stiff challenge from second seeded Turov, a joint winner at the Parasvnath International event with him, and third seed GM Dmitry Krayakvin also of Russia.

The Indian challenge in the event is headed by Grandmasters Arunprasad and Sundararajan Kidambi. GM Arunprasad, who played a stellar role in India's bronze medal winning performance at the World Team Championship recently, missed out the title race in Delhi as he was handicapped by his absence in the first two rounds. He will be raring to have a go at the title this time around.

The prestigious event has attracted 390 entries from 14 nations in Asia and Europe, including 19 Grandmasters, 27 International Masters, three Woman Grandmasters and three Woman International Masters.

The tournament provides a very good opportunity for Indian players to gain GM and IM norms from this event.

Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com
 
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/chess/top-stories/Chennai-Open-Chess-begins-on-Monday/articleshow/5495724.cms
2010-01-25T01:09:00.001-06:00
 
 
 
More about barriers
Our endgame blog started the New Year on the subject of barriers. Just a week later, we can offer you two more examples on this important theme. In Getz-O'Toole, played in the Masters in Hastings, White won in exemplary fashion with the help of a horizontal barrier. A vertical barrier could be seen in Sasikiran-Aronian, where a draw would have been the correct result. But the world class Armenian GM went wrong, allowing Sasikiran to win with flawless technique. In Aronian's place would you have found the correct move in the diagram? Black to play and draw! The solution is here, but first ponder over it with a larger version of the diagram.
 
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=6057
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT
 
 
 
Pocket Fritz 4: installation, activation, update
A new version of our pocket-sized grandmaster was released in mid December. It contains the chess engine Hiarcs 13, about which you may have read in our Copa Mercosur report. The program, as it is suggested by the DVD cover, is a complete multitask tool for training and enjoying chess. In a new series we introduce you to this Swiss penknife amongst chess programs, starting with the basics.
 
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=6059
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT
 
 
 
Chess in the Democratic Republic of Congo
The President of the Spanish CF Javier Ochoa visited the city of Kinshasa, capital of the Democratic Republic of Congo (former Zaire) from 2 to 8 December invited by the Spanish Embassy in the frame of the Embassy's cultural activities.

congo

The Embassy initiated its program of cooperation with the Chess Federation of Congo in 2008 by providing financial support via Mel Carbajo and Felix Costales Artieda, Ambassador of Spain in Congo, for the 1st Tournament "Ville de Kinshasa".

This year the project made a step forward and in addition to the 2nd tournament in which participated more than 60 players and was won by Gaspard Mashala (who is also president of the Katanga Liga) a chess workshop was organized where, following the request of the CF of Congo, Javier Ochoa explained some details and ideas of the Shveshnikov variation of the Sicilian Defense and gave simultaneous exhibitions, some of which with time control, in order to estimate the level of the local players and to comment of various technical issues.

In the simultaneous exhibitions only Eustache Kazadi of Kinshasa managed to beat the master, while Gaspard was the only one to make a draw in the games with time control. A. Kabangu was another challenger in the games with time control.

congo_1

A few hours after his arrival at Kinshasa the President of the Spanish CF organized a meeting with his colleague Guy Esungi Botetsi and the executives of his Federation in order to review some issues of mutual interest and help them organize a future working plan.

The Spanish Embassy also scheduled during those days two important meetings with the Ministers of Sport and Education which were also attended by the President of the Spanish CF and the Spanish Ambassador, Guy Esungi Botetsi, President of the CF of Congo.

congo_3

The outcome of the meetings was the support and the official commitment that Congo will participate for the first time in the 2010 Olympiad and a promise that the Ministry of Education will support the Project of Chess in Schools as presented by the President, Guy Esungi. During the meeting the Small Fritz, one of the working tools that Spanish CF uses for the Spanish project, was presented to the Minister and various units of the device were donated to the CF of Congo. The Spanish CF also donated a chess board fresco.

The local CF was in charge of the organization of the tournament, while Felicien Betu, Karl Yale, Pierrot Kayemba and Odon Zanga acted as Arbiters assisted by Angela María Rivera Yepes of the Spanish Embassy who had been preparing everything for months.

Javier Ochoa de Echagüen expressed his gratitude to the Ambassador Felix Costales for this excellent initiative.
 
http://www.fide.com/component/content/article/15-chess-news/4234-chess-in-the-democratic-republic-of-congo
Fri, 18 Dec 2009 07:07:47 +0000
 
 
 
Chess in the Congo!

The President of the Spanish CF Javier Ochoa visited the city of Kinshasa, capital of the Democratic Republic of Congo (former Zaire) from 2 to 8 December invited by the Spanish Embassy in the frame of the Embassy’s cultural activities.

Spain's Chess Federation President Javier Ochoa with Congolese chess officials.

Spain’s Chess Federation President Javier Ochoa with Congolese chess officials.

The Embassy initiated its program of cooperation with the Chess Federation of Congo in 2008 by providing financial support via Mel Carbajo and Felix Costales Artieda, Ambassador of Spain in Congo, for the 1st Tournament “Ville de Kinshasa”.

This year the project made a step forward and in addition to the 2nd tournament in which participated more than 60 players and was won by Gaspard Mashala (who is also president of the Katanga Liga) a chess workshop was organized where, following the request of the CF of Congo, Javier Ochoa explained some details and ideas of the Shveshnikov variation of the Sicilian Defense and gave simultaneous exhibitions, some of which with time control, in order to estimate the level of the local players and to comment of various technical issues.

In the simultaneous exhibitions only Eustache Kazadi of Kinshasa managed to beat the master, while Gaspard was the only one to make a draw in the games with time control. A. Kabangu was another challenger in the games with time control.

Spain's Chess Federation President Javier Ochoa with Congolese chess officials.

Javier Ochoa plays a round of blitz in full view of Congolese kibitzers.

A few hours after his arrival at Kinshasa the President of the Spanish CF organized a meeting with his colleague Guy Esungi Botetsi and the executives of his Federation in order to review some issues of mutual interest and help them organize a future working plan.

The Spanish Embassy also scheduled during those days two important meetings with the Ministers of Sport and Education which were also attended by the President of the Spanish CF and the Spanish Ambassador, Guy Esungi Botetsi, President of the CF of Congo.

Ochoa meets with with Guy Esungi Botetsi, President of Congo Chess Federation.

Ochoa meets with with Guy Esungi Botetsi, President of Congo Chess Federation.

The outcome of the meetings was the support and the official commitment that Congo will participate for the first time in the 2010 Olympiad and a promise that the Ministry of Education will support the Project of Chess in Schools as presented by the President, Guy Esungi. During the meeting the Small Fritz, one of the working tools that Spanish CF uses for the Spanish project, was presented to the Minister and various units of the device were donated to the CF of Congo. The Spanish CF also donated a chess board fresco.

The local CF was in charge of the organization of the tournament, while Felicien Betu, Karl Yale, Pierrot Kayemba and Odon Zanga acted as Arbiters assisted by Angela María Rivera Yepes of the Spanish Embassy who had been preparing everything for months.

Javier Ochoa de Echagüen expressed his gratitude to the Ambassador Felix Costales for this excellent initiative.

Source: http://www.fide.com/component/content/article/15-chess-news/4234-chess-in-the-democratic-republic-of-congo

Friday, 18 December 2009 07:07

 
http://www.thechessdrum.net/blog/2010/01/07/chess-in-the-congo/
Fri, 08 Jan 2010 01:14:15 +0000
 
 
 
Chess.com iPhone App - Available Now!
Chess.com has finally released it&rsquo;s iPhone app! Featuring player vs. player games, play vs. computer, and chess training tools, this free app will allow more than 1 million Chess.com members access to free online play, and will allow all use...
 
http://www.chess.com/news/chesscom-iphone-app---available-now-1595
Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:16:48 -0800
 
 
 
Ajedrez - Valores
PROMOVER EL AJEDREZ CON VALORES HUMANOS,

El juego ciencia es un instrumento pedagogico para aprender a pensar con inteligencia, disciplina y sobre todo con Don de gentes …Hacer campeones no es suficiente , es necesario que los niños y jovenes aprendan a comportarse como personas que aporten a la sociedad lo mejor de si, con sus sueños y sus talentos (ESF)l science game is a teaching tool to learn to think with intelligence, discipline and above all with people don ... Making champions is not enough, we need to children and young people learn to behave as a society make the best, with their dreams and talents (ESF) El ajedrez es una piedra de toque para la inteligencia.
"Wolfang Goethe"El ajedrez es un juego útil y honesto, indispensable en la educación de la juventud. "Simón José Antonio de la Santísima Trinidad Bolívar y Palacios" Todo el mundo cree que los juegos de los niños no son más que juegos, pero se equivocan, el juego infantil es el factor determinante en la formación del perfecto ciudadano" PLATON1.
INTRODUCCION APERTURA Hoy por hoy estamos viviendo una problemática en los niños y la juventud que afecta notablemente el desarrollo Intelectual y el comportamiento social de los estudiantes , ES PRECISAMENTE LA FALTA DE CONCENTRACION, LAS ACTITUDES IRREVERENTES HACIA LOS PADRES, Y EL USO INAPROPIADO DEL TIEMPO LIBRE .
Es muy común ver como la mayoría de los niños no tienen el habito de concentrarse mas de una hora en una lectura o en el desarrollo de un proyecto que exija pensar y desarrollar habilidades cognoscitivas con disciplina constante y los pocos que lo hacen, no lo hacen a diario, sino de vez en cuando, por cumplir tareas y obligados.
Pero es de anotar que muchos duran horas y horas en internet vagando de aquí para allá sin rumbo fijo, y asimilando lo bueno, lo malo y lo feo de la información globalizada de difícil control.
También duran metidos de cabeza mas de 5 horas en un el televisor viendo los mismos dibujos animados violentos, sin cansarse o programas de adultos sin orientación de los padres.
De la misma se entregan con pasión al PlayStation, Xbox con prisa y sin pausa jugando programas de extrema violencia, repetitivos que no enseñan valores, y que de una u otra manera influyen en la conducta del los niños.
Otros salen de sus hogares, por ahí sin rumbo a ver que encuentran y muchos pueden encontrar los caminos de la droga, las malas compañías o una mala hora. La televisión, el internet y los juegos de ciber no son malos, son grandes avances de nuestra época, pero su uso inapropiado puede afectar el comportamiento y la salud de los niños y los jóvenes menores de 18 años.
En los pueblos o sector rural la cuestion es más crítica, los padres no saben qué hacer con sus hijos un fin de semana y como aprovechar el tiempo libre en actividades que beneficien a los niños Los extremos son malos y un niño es la síntesis de lo que piensa y hace, ve y juega, aprende y siente.
Esta generación de niños y jóvenes buscan refugio en la tecnología y pasan horas en los ciber tratando de tener contacto con otro tipo de juegos, que les propone la informática y se tornan evasivos de la realidad y esa conducta esa apenas un síntoma que los convierte en niños y jóvenes desconcentrados, indisciplinados y violentos. Por esas razones se hace necesario tomar medidas por los padres, educadores y gobernantes, sobre todo hoy que los estudiantes entran y salen cada vez más jóvenes de las instituciones educativas, la cual no tienen la madurez suficiente para tomar una decisión apropiada y saber elegir, porque una cosa es que un niño haga lo que le venga en gana sin importar las consecuencias y otra muy distinta es que tenga ganas de hacer lo mejor para su vida, para su desarrollo, para ser mas persona.
A la mayoría de padres les gustaría ver que sus hijos menores de edad se destaquen en una disciplina; toquen violín, lean y escriban libros, jueguen ajedrez, practique un deporte, que sean ejemplo para los demás niños y aprovechen el tiempo libre, que esa energía se canalice en actividades sanas de recreación y crecimiento personal. Muchos profesores, con vocación desean que los alumnos desarrollen su capacidad en su materia y se conviertan en brillantes exponente del arte, la ciencia, el deporte y superen las expectativas formativas y educativas mas allá de lo curricular.
Muchos gobernantes, alcaldes y líderes desean que la niñez y los jóvenes de la comunidad que dirigen se destaquen, en el deporte, las artes, las ciencias como valores y talentos y alejarlos del ocio malsano y la drogadicción. Por ellos, por el futuro del Mundo es la hora tomar cartas en el asunto, antes que sea demasiado tarde, y promover actividades para que los niños y jóvenes participen con disciplina, concentración y don de gentes.
Entre ellas el ajedrez es una alternativa formativa y definitiva Porque cumple con la satisfacción de estas necesidades de desarrollo personal; en primer tiene un conjunto de normas y reglas para jugarlo, en segundo lugar desarrollar habilidades cognoscitivas y en tercer lugar se aplican normas de buenas maneras para convivir en la paz. Por ejemplo este juego milenario es un deporte de caballerosidad y convivencia, tanto es así, que la FIDE aplica un código de ética, la cual exige que antes de comenzar a jugar cada partida, en un torneo, se debe dar la mano al contendor y después de la partida también; expresando el espíritu deportivo de ser magnánimo en la victoria y humilde en la derrotas, el jugador que no lo haga será sancionado drásticamente.
El juego ciencia se ha convertido en una propuesta educativa, el ajedrez es más que en una herramienta pedagógico, es un oportunidad para desarrollar talento con valores humanos, enseñar a pensar, desarrollando la inteligencia, aprender a aprender con una metodología especial, y formar mejores ciudadanos con don de gentes. El Ajedrez, además de sus bondades como juego de entretenimiento, que ha superado la prueba del tiempo, merece la jerarquía de institucionalizarse como propuesta educativa y formativa para el crecimiento intelectual, social de los niños y los jóvenes del Mundo.
lel chess is a touchstone for the intelligence. " Wolfgang Goethe "The chess game is a useful and honest, essential in the education of youth." Simón José Antonio de la Santisima Trinidad Bolivar y Palacios "Everybody believes that children's games are only games, but they are wrong, the children's game is the determining factor in the formation of the perfect citizen" PLATO 1. INTRODUCTION OPENING Today we are experiencing a problem in children and youth that significantly affects the intellectual development and social behavior of students, is precisely the lack of concentration, ATTITUDES TOWARD PARENTS irreverence, and the improper use of leisure time. It is very common to see as most children do not have the habit of focusing on more than an hour reading or developing a project that requires thinking and cognitive abilities develop with constant discipline and the few who do, do not daily, but occasionally, for tasks and duties. But it should be noted that many take hours and hours on the internet from here to there wandering aimlessly fixed and assimilating the good, the bad and the ugly of global information that is difficult to control. Also last head tucked over 5 hours in a TV watching the same cartoon violence, without getting tired or programs for adults without parental guidance. In the same ship with passion andalusia PlayStation, Xbox with haste and without pause playing programs of extreme violence, repeated that they do not teach values, and that in any way influence the behavior of children. Others leave their homes around aimlessly to find and see that many may find the road of drugs, bad company or a bad time. Television, internet and cyber games are not bad, are major advances of our time, but its improper use can affect the behavior and health of children and young people under 18 years In the rural villages or the most critical issues, parents do not know what to do with their children one weekend and take advantage of free time in activities that benefit children The extremes are bad and a child is a synthesis of what he thinks and does, go and play, learn and feel. This generation of children and young people seeking refuge in technology and spend hours in cyber trying to have contact with other games, which offers computer and become evasive of reality and behavior that just a symptom that makes them children and young decentralized, undisciplined and violent For these reasons it is necessary to take action by parents, educators and governments, especially now that students enter and leave more young people in educational institutions, which are not mature enough to make an appropriate decision and choices, because one thing is that a child do what it pleases regardless of the win and another very different is that you want to do what is best for their lives, their development, to be more person The majority of parents would like to see their minor children stand out in a discipline; play violin, read and write books, play chess, practice a sport, they are examples to other children and use the free time that energy is channeled in healthy recreational activities and personal growth Many teachers, dedicated students who wish to develop their capacity in their area and become brilliant exponent of the art, science, sport and exceed the expectations training and education beyond the curriculum Many governors, mayors and leaders who want children and young people in the community that is run out, sports, arts, science, values and talents away from leisure and unhealthy addiction For them, the future of Sucre is the time taken in the matter before it is too late, and promote activities for children and young people involved with discipline, concentration and giving people. Among them, chess is a formative and definitive alternative Because it meets with the satisfaction of these needs for personal development in a first set of standards and rules for play, second to develop cognitive abilities and third rules are good ways to live together in peace. For example, this game is one thousandth of chivalry and sports together, so much so that the FIDE ethics code applies, which requires that before you play each game in a tournament, you should shake hands and contendor andalusia after the game as well, expressing the spirit of sports to be magnanimous in victory and humble in defeat, the player who does so will be punished severely. The game science has become an educational proposal, chess is more than a pedagogical tool, is an opportunity to develop talent with human values, teach us to think, develop intelligence, learning to learn a particular methodology, and train better citizens of nations with Don Chess, as well as its benefits entertaining game that has stood the test of time, it deserves the status of institutionalized education and training as a proposal for intellectual growth, social development of children and young people in Sucre
 
http://unespacioparaelajedrez.blogspot.com/2009/10/ajedrez-valores.html
Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:46:00 +0000
 
 
 
Roman's Lab series - Instructional Chess DVDs


Roman Dzinzi's Gran Maestro de ajedrez presenta una gran colección de videos de instrucción de Ajedrez .

Roman's Lab Vol 1 - Learning Openings the Easy Way, Traps & Novelties
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568919/92cf16e/CHESSRomans.part01.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568920/04078a9/CHESSRomans.part02.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568921/860109f/CHESSRomans.part03.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568922/301365e/CHESSRomans.part04.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568923/c51624f/CHESSRomans.part05.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568924/f254af5/CHESSRomans.part06.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12594108/95a827c/CHESSRomans.part07.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12594109/678fad4/CHESSRomans.part08.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12594110/bd31bb7/CHESSRomans.part09.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12594111/30b196b/CHESSRomans.part10.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 2 - Sacrifices and Tactics that End Games in the Opening
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568925/d08a784/CHESSRomansD2.part01.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568926/eebd89d/CHESSRomansD2.part02.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568927/4638870/CHESSRomansD2.part03.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568928/1be7519/CHESSRomansD2.part04.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568929/299116e/CHESSRomansD2.part05.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568930/4989915/CHESSRomansD2.part06.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568931/912fe99/CHESSRomansD2.part07.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568932/e9e60da/CHESSRomansD2.part08.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568933/f88ac83/CHESSRomansD2.part09.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12593880/7694e78/CHESSRomansD2.part10.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 3 - Transition to the Middle Game
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568934/2ac653a/CHESSRomansD3.part01.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568935/5ee7e2e/CHESSRomansD3.part02.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568936/bce900d/CHESSRomansD3.part03.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568937/366cc4a/CHESSRomansD3.part04.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12815916/8c4aebe/CHESSRomansD3.part05.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568939/46a7c5f/CHESSRomansD3.part06.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568940/b555d36/CHESSRomansD3.part07.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568941/9937b8f/CHESSRomansD3.part08.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568942/67751d9/CHESSRomansD3.part09.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568943/1f770c9/CHESSRomansD3.part10.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 4 - Planning & Attacking Based on Superiority of Pieces
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568944/ca755bd/CHESSRomansD4.part01.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568945/10145a9/CHESSRomansD4.part02.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568946/b643ed7/CHESSRomansD4.part03.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568947/6f09d58/CHESSRomansD4.part04.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568948/b09a4b7/CHESSRomansD4.part05.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568949/3444b72/CHESSRomansD4.part06.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568950/11cc621/CHESSRomansD4.part07.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568951/8064a7a/CHESSRomansD4.part08.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568952/da6e907/CHESSRomansD4.part09.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568953/2c534dd/CHESSRomansD4.part10.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 5 - Rapid and Complete Opening Repertoire for White
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568954/24a852b/CHESSRomansD5.part1.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568955/fc6fa30/CHESSRomansD5.part2.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568956/100e9f0/CHESSRomansD5.part3.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568957/f7da600/CHESSRomansD5.part4.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568958/f5b4d8f/CHESSRomansD5.part5.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568960/9335b07/CHESSRomansD5.part6.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 6 - Rapid and Complete Opening Repertoire for Black
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568972/325ecd9/DVD06_-_Rapid_and_Complete_Opening_Repertoire_for_the_Tournament_Player_-_BLACK_-_MPG.part01.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568973/6165ee2/DVD06_-_Rapid_and_Complete_Opening_Repertoire_for_the_Tournament_Player_-_BLACK_-_MPG.part02.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568974/691af81/DVD06_-_Rapid_and_Complete_Opening_Repertoire_for_the_Tournament_Player_-_BLACK_-_MPG.part03.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568975/8063348/DVD06_-_Rapid_and_Complete_Opening_Repertoire_for_the_Tournament_Player_-_BLACK_-_MPG.part04.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568976/c5a540b/DVD06_-_Rapid_and_Complete_Opening_Repertoire_for_the_Tournament_Player_-_BLACK_-_MPG.part05.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568977/4b5e105/DVD06_-_Rapid_and_Complete_Opening_Repertoire_for_the_Tournament_Player_-_BLACK_-_MPG.part06.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568978/d5cff29/DVD06_-_Rapid_and_Complete_Opening_Repertoire_for_the_Tournament_Player_-_BLACK_-_MPG.part07.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568979/645fb5d/DVD06_-_Rapid_and_Complete_Opening_Repertoire_for_the_Tournament_Player_-_BLACK_-_MPG.part08.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568980/5ece58a/DVD06_-_Rapid_and_Complete_Opening_Repertoire_for_the_Tournament_Player_-_BLACK_-_MPG.part09.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568981/e43ac02/DVD06_-_Rapid_and_Complete_Opening_Repertoire_for_the_Tournament_Player_-_BLACK_-_MPG.part10.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568982/c068606/DVD06_-_Rapid_and_Complete_Opening_Repertoire_for_the_Tournament_Player_-_BLACK_-_MPG.part11.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 7 - Think and Play like a Grandmaster
http://hotfile.com/dl/11359919/bbfdcff/Romans_Lab_Think_like_a_GM.part01.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/11359918/20a77ac/Romans_Lab_Think_like_a_GM.part02.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/11927152/4aa8829/Romans_Lab_Think_like_a_GM.part03.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/11362313/0a7eed0/Romans_Lab_Think_like_a_GM.part04.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/11364112/7bf1f39/Romans_Lab_Think_like_a_GM.part05.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/11364364/3a5b409/Romans_Lab_Think_like_a_GM.part06.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/11365699/8d3ed1a/Romans_Lab_Think_like_a_GM.part07.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/11365951/b167bdb/Romans_Lab_Think_like_a_GM.part08.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/11367895/8889ebd/Romans_Lab_Think_like_a_GM.part09.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/11368364/31d5ce2/Romans_Lab_Think_like_a_GM.part10.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 8 - Comprehensive Chess Endings 1
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568983/25a9baf/DVD08_-_Comprehensive_Chess_Endings_Part_1_-_AVI.part1.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568984/76ce236/DVD08_-_Comprehensive_Chess_Endings_Part_1_-_AVI.part2.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568985/48fab59/DVD08_-_Comprehensive_Chess_Endings_Part_1_-_AVI.part3.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568986/8ae2e64/DVD08_-_Comprehensive_Chess_Endings_Part_1_-_AVI.part4.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568987/13a28c9/DVD08_-_Comprehensive_Chess_Endings_Part_1_-_AVI.part5.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12568988/d9b94d9/DVD08_-_Comprehensive_Chess_Endings_Part_1_-_AVI.part6.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 9 - Comprehensive Chess Endings 2
http://hotfile.com/dl/12612223/1375d30/DVD09_-_Comprehensive_Chess_Endings_-_Part_2_-_MPG.part01.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12612224/ee3ef3d/DVD09_-_Comprehensive_Chess_Endings_-_Part_2_-_MPG.part02.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12612225/d4fc017/DVD09_-_Comprehensive_Chess_Endings_-_Part_2_-_MPG.part03.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12612226/6261ad2/DVD09_-_Comprehensive_Chess_Endings_-_Part_2_-_MPG.part04.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12612227/1722ef7/DVD09_-_Comprehensive_Chess_Endings_-_Part_2_-_MPG.part05.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12612228/d809923/DVD09_-_Comprehensive_Chess_Endings_-_Part_2_-_MPG.part06.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12612229/f049b52/DVD09_-_Comprehensive_Chess_Endings_-_Part_2_-_MPG.part07.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12612230/03f96ac/DVD09_-_Comprehensive_Chess_Endings_-_Part_2_-_MPG.part08.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 10 - Greatest Games of Chess ever Played - Part 1
http://hotfile.com/dl/12655016/08c7c3f/DVD10_-_Greatest_Games_of_Chess_Ever_Played_-_Part01_-_WMV.part1.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12655017/996f014/DVD10_-_Greatest_Games_of_Chess_Ever_Played_-_Part01_-_WMV.part2.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12655018/20efc70/DVD10_-_Greatest_Games_of_Chess_Ever_Played_-_Part01_-_WMV.part3.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/12655019/777b19c/DVD10_-_Greatest_Games_of_Chess_Ever_Played_-_Part01_-_WMV.part4.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 11 - Greatest Games of Chess ever Played - Part 2

http://hotfile.com/dl/17249659/f7d41ae/roman11.part1.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249660/3b5c53d/roman11.part2.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 12 - New Improvements in Opening Theory
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249661/d38be41/roman12.part1.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249662/56352a1/roman12.part2.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249663/5c41fa0/roman12.part3.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 13 - Maximize Your Success against 1.b4, c4, d4
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249664/8df4204/roman13.part1.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249665/ae7f264/roman13.part2.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249666/56099ea/roman13.part3.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249667/4167206/roman13.part4.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 14 - Improve your Combinational & Tactical Skills - Part 1
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249668/b0a4a7e/roman14.part1.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249669/9f2370d/roman14.part2.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249670/95a088f/roman14.part3.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249671/1ed6960/roman14.part4.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 15 - Improve your Combinational & Tactical Skills - Part 2
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249614/66f0c8b/15_-_Improve_your_Combinational_Preparation_and_Tactical_Skills_%282%29.part1.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249615/6010856/15_-_Improve_your_Combinational_Preparation_and_Tactical_Skills_%282%29.part2.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249616/dc98b15/15_-_Improve_your_Combinational_Preparation_and_Tactical_Skills_%282%29.part3.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249617/8602ba3/15_-_Improve_your_Combinational_Preparation_and_Tactical_Skills_%282%29.part4.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 16 - Learn to play the English The Easy Way
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249618/6edbdb9/16_-_Learn_to_Play_the_English_Opening_the_Easy_Way.part01.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249619/b55e577/16_-_Learn_to_Play_the_English_Opening_the_Easy_Way.part02.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249620/92052ad/16_-_Learn_to_Play_the_English_Opening_the_Easy_Way.part03.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249621/de997fc/16_-_Learn_to_Play_the_English_Opening_the_Easy_Way.part04.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249622/de096ba/16_-_Learn_to_Play_the_English_Opening_the_Easy_Way.part05.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249623/9de7d22/16_-_Learn_to_Play_the_English_Opening_the_Easy_Way.part06.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249624/b653e5e/16_-_Learn_to_Play_the_English_Opening_the_Easy_Way.part07.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249625/3ebcfce/16_-_Learn_to_Play_the_English_Opening_the_Easy_Way.part08.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249626/282543b/16_-_Learn_to_Play_the_English_Opening_the_Easy_Way.part09.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 17 - Unbeatable Secret Weapons for Black
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249627/2e1835d/17_-_Unbeatable_Secret_Weapons_for_Black.part1.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249628/251e242/17_-_Unbeatable_Secret_Weapons_for_Black.part2.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249629/1eac92b/17_-_Unbeatable_Secret_Weapons_for_Black.part3.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249630/3e2c442/17_-_Unbeatable_Secret_Weapons_for_Black.part4.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249631/2c7d94a/17_-_Unbeatable_Secret_Weapons_for_Black.part5.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 18 - Blitz as a tool to better chess & Secrets in Beating your Chess Computer
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249632/6362009/18_-_Blitz_as_a_Tool_to_Better_Chess__Secrets_in_Beating_Your_Chess_Computer_Programs.part1.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249633/cfd1145/18_-_Blitz_as_a_Tool_to_Better_Chess__Secrets_in_Beating_Your_Chess_Computer_Programs.part2.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249634/6d2ff06/18_-_Blitz_as_a_Tool_to_Better_Chess__Secrets_in_Beating_Your_Chess_Computer_Programs.part3.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 19 - Understanding & Dominating your chess game with Pawn Structures
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249635/1961104/19_-_Understanding_and_Dominating_Your_Chess_Game_with_Pawn_Structures.part1.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249636/ffe5d21/19_-_Understanding_and_Dominating_Your_Chess_Game_with_Pawn_Structures.part2.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 20 - Step-by-Step Manoeuvring in Closed Positions
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249637/1799e0b/20_-_Step_by_Step_Essential_Maneuvering_in_Closed_Positions.part1.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249638/fb1b9a2/20_-_Step_by_Step_Essential_Maneuvering_in_Closed_Positions.part2.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 21 - The King’s Indian Defence
http://hotfile.com/dl/16125670/5200c22/21_-_The_Easy_Way_to_Play_the_Kings_Indian_Defense.part1.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/16128898/f1a6fc7/21_-_The_Easy_Way_to_Play_the_Kings_Indian_Defense.part2.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/16132425/aa053e9/21_-_The_Easy_Way_to_Play_the_Kings_Indian_Defense.part3.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 22 - The Scotch and Giuoco Piano
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249639/238716e/22_-_The_Easy_Way_to_Play_the_Scotch_and_Giuoco_Piano_Openings.part1.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249640/2857356/22_-_The_Easy_Way_to_Play_the_Scotch_and_Giuoco_Piano_Openings.part2.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 23 - Grand Prix and Reti
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249641/05b92f8/23_-_The_Easy_Way_to_Play_the_Grand_Prix_and_Reti_Opening.part1.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249642/75c379b/23_-_The_Easy_Way_to_Play_the_Grand_Prix_and_Reti_Opening.part2.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249643/5399db0/23_-_The_Easy_Way_to_Play_the_Grand_Prix_and_Reti_Opening.part3.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249644/d15ad42/23_-_The_Easy_Way_to_Play_the_Grand_Prix_and_Reti_Opening.part4.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 24 - Live from Las Vegas National Open
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249645/37e667a/24_-_Live_From_Las_Vegas_National_Open.part1.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249646/8c2a983/24_-_Live_From_Las_Vegas_National_Open.part2.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249647/4c727dc/24_-_Live_From_Las_Vegas_National_Open.part3.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249648/9fe21dd/24_-_Live_From_Las_Vegas_National_Open.part4.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249649/5bd4152/24_-_Live_From_Las_Vegas_National_Open.part5.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249650/bf2547f/24_-_Live_From_Las_Vegas_National_Open.part6.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249651/0f4c501/24_-_Live_From_Las_Vegas_National_Open.part7.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 25 - Easy Way to Beat The Pirc Modern Defense
http://hotfile.com/dl/17249652/393ec0d/25_-_Easy_way_to_beat_the_Pirc-Modern_defence.part1.rar.html
ttp://hotfile.com/dl/17249653/cf3d942/25_-_Easy_way_to_beat_the_Pirc-Modern_defence.part2.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 26 - Nimzovitch’s My System Part 1
http://hotfile.com/dl/16158419/a7f2a6e/26_-_Nimzowitschs_My_System_Part_1.part1.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/16160186/e9e628f/26_-_Nimzowitschs_My_System_Part_1.part2.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 27 - Nimzovitch's My System Part 2
http://hotfile.com/dl/16183344/638cded/27_-_Nimzowitschs_My_System_Part_2.part1.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/16184148/f184635/27_-_Nimzowitschs_My_System_Part_2.part2.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 28 - Easy Way to Learn The King's Indian Attack
http://hotfile.com/dl/16987818/d444d16/roman28.part1.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/16993625/23235f9/roman28.part2.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 29 - Mastering the Endgame Series - Part 1 Nuevos
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398356/273852d/roman29.part1.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398357/5053416/roman29.part2.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398358/7144580/roman29.part3.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398359/17971a1/roman29.part4.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398360/20c07a0/roman29.part5.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398361/fc47814/roman29.part6.rar.html
Roman's Lab Vol 30 - Mastering the Endgame Series - Part 2 Nuevos
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398362/034942a/roman30.part1.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398363/a46f257/roman30.part2.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398364/06ff362/roman30.part3.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398365/349486e/roman30.part4.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398366/1a6f764/roman30.part5.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398367/89e7f0b/roman30.part6.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 31 - Mastering the Opening Series - Repertoire for Black 1
http://hotfile.com/dl/17436873/3ebe127/roman31.part1.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17436874/ce44bd0/roman31.part2.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 32 - Mastering the Opening Series - Repertoire for Black 2
http://hotfile.com/dl/17436875/8828a5d/roman32.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 33 - Mastering the Opening Series - Crushing Lines for White
http://hotfile.com/dl/17453805/36ed363/roman33.part1.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17453806/a7f0bb1/roman33.part2.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17436879/d908945/roman33.part3.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 34 - Repertoire for Black vs. Queen's Gambit Nuevos
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398368/41a087b/roman34.part1.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398369/794f9bb/roman34.part2.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398370/a1e0b29/roman34.part3.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398371/251230e/roman34.part4.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 35 - Mastering the Opening Series - 1. d4 Repertoire for White
http://hotfile.com/dl/16188849/040598e/35_-_Mastering_The_Opening_Series_Romans_Original_D4_Repertoire_for_White.part1.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/16188850/b0cd41a/35_-_Mastering_The_Opening_Series_Romans_Original_D4_Repertoire_for_White.part2.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/16191275/8dd2e47/35_-_Mastering_The_Opening_Series_Romans_Original_D4_Repertoire_for_White.part3.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/16194098/0438f1c/35_-_Mastering_The_Opening_Series_Romans_Original_D4_Repertoire_for_White.part4.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/16196699/78a384a/35_-_Mastering_The_Opening_Series_Romans_Original_D4_Repertoire_for_White.part5.rar.html
Roman's Lab Vol 36 - The Art of Defence
http://hotfile.com/dl/17436880/6bb0bf4/roman36.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 37 - Encyclopedia of Chess Openings Vol 1 Nuevos
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398372/e183e5f/roman37.part01.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398373/0135106/roman37.part02.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398374/42ceac1/roman37.part03.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398375/cee6404/roman37.part04.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398376/490c56a/roman37.part05.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398377/f17797b/roman37.part06.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398378/3db2b5a/roman37.part07.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398379/0ed9b64/roman37.part08.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398380/c0aa231/roman37.part09.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398381/b3adf02/roman37.part10.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398382/a92b0ad/roman37.part11.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398383/b617868/roman37.part12.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398384/d887887/roman37.part13.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398385/821f341/roman37.part14.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398386/17f3304/roman37.part15.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398387/46780f9/roman37.part16.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18678059/ae82dee/roman37.part17.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398389/631f7dc/roman37.part18.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398391/0da8e82/roman37.part19.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398392/269d476/roman37.part20.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18887455/2d17f6c/roman37.part21.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398395/9bb687e/roman37.part22.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398396/94900e1/roman37.part23.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398397/11c3f6b/roman37.part24.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398398/89386cf/roman37.part25.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398399/c6b494d/roman37.part26.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398400/be84a5e/roman37.part27.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398401/9f67fe2/roman37.part28.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398402/ddcc36c/roman37.part29.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398403/12e0a69/roman37.part30.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398404/cbbdc07/roman37.part31.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398405/1f26c50/roman37.part32.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18398406/073d5a5/roman37.part33.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 38 - Encyclopedia of Chess Openings Vol 2 Nuevos
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913018/dcf9be4/roman38.part01.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913019/7b16863/roman38.part02.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913020/1e649ff/roman38.part03.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913021/bb36da5/roman38.part04.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913022/9acbacf/roman38.part05.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913023/ec76123/roman38.part06.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913024/eb6fe5d/roman38.part07.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913025/66c59a1/roman38.part08.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913026/80544e4/roman38.part09.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913027/b8e7495/roman38.part10.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913028/0900f55/roman38.part11.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913029/ab590c9/roman38.part12.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913030/9ad3b0e/roman38.part13.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913031/4a9964a/roman38.part14.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913032/d40964b/roman38.part15.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913033/ebfd0ee/roman38.part16.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913034/5d30741/roman38.part17.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913035/b9fddd3/roman38.part18.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913036/922d05e/roman38.part19.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913037/7513242/roman38.part20.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913038/7de829f/roman38.part21.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913039/b963c99/roman38.part22.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913040/cea3cbc/roman38.part23.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913041/1cc1d94/roman38.part24.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913042/c497146/roman38.part25.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913043/f7d5d05/roman38.part26.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/19063304/16f9583/roman38.part27.rar.html ok
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913044/350dc39/roman38.part28.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913045/b571982/roman38.part29.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913046/16d8857/roman38.part30.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913047/83dd914/roman38.part31.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/19000441/f81f760/roman38.part32.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913049/fb4980a/roman38.part33.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/19000442/a8e6f13/roman38.part34.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913050/7922c14/roman38.part35.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18913051/ba38369/roman38.part36.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 39 - Encyclopedia of Chess Openings Vol 3 (2h 49m)

Roman's Lab Vol 40 - Encyclopedia of Chess Openings Vol 4 Nuevos
http://rapidshare.com/users/HX16YF

Roman's Lab Vol 41 - New Lines & Novelties in the Scotch and f4 Sicilian
http://hotfile.com/dl/17436881/96acb18/roman41.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 42 - New Lines against the Pirc, Scandinavian & Dragon
http://hotfile.com/dl/17436882/ea12f47/roman42.rar.html
Roman's Lab Vol 43 - New Lines & Novelties against the Caro Kann, Alekhine & French
http://hotfile.com/dl/17436883/ef3b7e9/roman43.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 45 - New Lines for Black in the Accelerated Dragon and King's Indian
Nuevos
http://hotfile.com/dl/18784368/1951107/Roman45.part01.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18784369/c1f24f0/Roman45.part02.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18784370/233a042/Roman45.part03.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18784371/d1de01d/Roman45.part04.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18784372/6f08047/Roman45.part05.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18784373/93fdf98/Roman45.part06.rar.html
Roman's Lab Vol 44 - New Lines for White against the Sicilian, French, Hippo, Latvian Nuevos
http://hotfile.com/dl/18511068/4c20eb1/roman44.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 46 - Most Incredible Tactics and Combinations Ever in the Endgame Nuevos
http://hotfile.com/dl/19069497/19f31e4/roman46.part01.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/19069498/c55c8c2/roman46.part02.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/19069499/a221d7b/roman46.part03.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/19069500/0df7862/roman46.part04.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 47 - The Most Brilliant Squeezes Ever in the Endgame Nuevos
http://hotfile.com/dl/19069501/6c90a00/roman47.part01.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/19069502/ef344d2/roman47.part02.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/19069503/125af48/roman47.part03.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/19069504/290b5f0/roman47.part04.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/19069505/3962062/roman47.part05.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/19069506/5942b67/roman47.part06.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 48 - System for White Against the Scillian Fianchetto and Non
http://hotfile.com/dl/17436884/5ae4763/roman48.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 49 - Magnificent Instructional Masterpieces in The King's Indian Defense
http://rapidshare.com/files/320794346/ROMAN49.part01.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/320810951/ROMAN49.part02.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/320794466/ROMAN49.part03.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/320811551/ROMAN49.part04.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/320857988/ROMAN49.part05.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/320876292/ROMAN49.part06.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/320877188/ROMAN49.part07.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/320857975/ROMAN49.part08.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/320882632/ROMAN49.part09.rar

Roman's Lab Vol 50 - Unsound Openings and How to Exploit Them
http://hotfile.com/dl/17436885/f74d229/roman50.part1.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/17436886/d498b1e/roman50.part2.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 51 - Building Powerful Attacks by Learning Piece Coordination nuevos

http://hotfile.com/dl/18983877/3acf8b8/roman51.part01.rar.html

http://hotfile.com/dl/18983878/b3b4a42/roman51.part02.rar.html

http://hotfile.com/dl/18983879/6e398c7/roman51.part03.rar.html

http://hotfile.com/dl/18983880/f5e577b/roman51.part04.rar.html

http://hotfile.com/dl/18983881/6c1dd5c/roman51.part05.rar.html


Roman's Lab Vol 52 - Finding Tactical Solutions in Overwhelming Positions

Roman's Lab Vol 53 - Improve Your Ability to Calculate Variations
http://hotfile.com/dl/17436887/555326a/roman53.rar.html

Roman's Lab Vol 54 - Capitalizing on Your Opponent's Weaknesses

Roman's Lab Vol 55 - A Tribute to Bobby Fischer Nuevos
http://hotfile.com/dl/18675398/2d88b81/roman55.part01.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18675399/b0a0003/roman55.part02.rar.html
http://hotfile.com/dl/18675400/8fe33
 
http://bibliotecaajedrez.blogspot.com/2009/11/romans-lab-series-instructional-chess.html
Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:23:00 +0000
 
 
 
New edition of a legendary tactics trainer

CT_ART 4.0We have just received from Moscow: CT-ART 4.0.

This new and improved version of the legendary tactics course CT-ART 3.0, the best chess training program according to many chess experts, has a new interface and adds 25% (1,000) new training exercises.

By studying, practicing and solving the carefully selected exercises you will improve your play. CT ART 4.0 is an excellent training tool for intermediate players and focuses entirely on your improvement.

– Study the training material and test your knowledge
– Review your rating history
– Keep track of the progress of multiple users
– Compete against your friends and family members
– Practice by playing against a chess program

CT-ART is the program about which author Michael de la Maza made his world famous claim that it gained him 400 Elo points in half a year!

De la Maza’s claim was based on the old version. This one is even better!

 
http://www.chessvibes.com/advertisement/new-edition-of-a-legendary-tactics-trainer/
Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:36:53 +0000
 
 
 
Computer skeptic no more

Computer skeptic no moreWith the first decade drawing to a close, many sites look back on the past ten years and publish their lists of ‘greatest’ movies and books, most influential people, most important historical events and most significant technological developments. In chess, it’s not difficult to establish the most important change, which is of course the rise of the now-indispensible engine as a tool for chess analysis. What’s more interesting is the change in attitude that it has inspired.

During the last few days, with the eyes of the entire world on the Copenhagen Climate Summit while climate ‘skeptics’ demand equal time in the debate and attempt to confuse public opinion with misinformation and politically motivated arguments, I was often reminded of how I myself used to look at chess computers in the 90s. As aggravated as I am now about the lowly tactics of today’s climate skeptics, I’m afraid back in the days I was a kind of computer-skeptic, too, in the sense that I found it very, very hard to believe chess engines could ever replace or imitate the best of human chess thinking. I simply couldn’t imagine a lifeless machine suggesting a subtle long-term positional exchange sacrifice.

Kramnik vs Deep FritzI also couldn’t believe a computer could ever understand what, say, Hedgehog positions were all about and secretly, I believed the strongest human grandmasters would always be able to outplay computers when all tactics had been drained out of the position. I sincerely thought nothing of importance could ever be learned from looking at computer chess except maybe a feel for hidden tactics. Of course, I was hopelessly wrong. The only positive thing I can say about it is that I was not alone. Even after the match Kramnik-Deep Fritz in 2006, which ended in a crushing defeat for the 14th World Champion, many people opined that Kramnik had lost due to ‘lack of concentration’ and other psychological reasons. Tellingly, though, no human vs. computer matches at the highest level have been played since.

What’s interesting is not that humans have gradually lost the battle against computers, but that nowadays there are almost no sceptics left when it comes to the supremacy of chess engines as a source of knowledge. Even the most traditionally-minded chess players, who at some point in their career solemnly promised they would never, ever, use a computer in their analysis, have now accepted this paradigm shift. Every respectable chess author, whether writing for New in Chess or the local club magazine, now checks his analyses with Rybka or Fritz – and anyone who doesn’t will be ridiculed and scorned by both reviewers and readers.

Gone are the days when people looked down on Kasparov’s win in the 10th game of his 1995 World Championship match against Anand, merely because he perpared the famous rook sacrifice on a1 with the help of Fritz 4. In fact, nowadays the added value of human chess analysis mainly consists of making use of computer analysis and then commenting upon it, making sensible selections and separating pure ‘brute force’ tactics from more positional lines in a humanly meaningful way. This is a totally different way of working for anyone involved in chess analysis and it has had a profound impact on chess culture.

First of all, as in many fields of expertise, the development has triggered a kind of ‘democratizing’ of chess analysis. As many have noted, nowadays any chess amateur with a chess engine and a strong CPU can refute the analysis of world class grandmasters. In fact, at some chess tournaments the only people in the playing hall who are not aware of the correct evaluation of a complicated position are the players themselves – for lack of earphones through which the commentators are briefing Rybka’s latest variations! According to some, this in turn has led to a decrease in respect for chess authorities. Perhaps this is true, although I personally think this has more to do with the large anonymous nature of internet itself than with the quality of one’s chess analysis. You don’t see someone from the audience of the Corus tournament come up to Carlsen and accuse him of being a ‘wimp’ for refusing to accept Morozevich’s incorrect piece sac, do you?

KasparovHowever, I think it was Kasparov himself who has said that this ‘democratization’ of chess is actually a good thing: the more people are involved in high-quality analysis, the more knowledge will be gained and the closer we will get to the Ultimate Truth. So much for all the bitter regrets and nostalgia for the lost age of chess innocence! It seems hard to disagree with Kasparov, but I would make one provision: chess enthusiasts should definitely realize that playing chess behind a board, against a real opponent, is completely different from looking at your monitor with an engine running in the background. This sounds trivial, but I’ve often been annoyed by kibitzers complaining about the lack of quality in time-scrambles, as if these players are absolutely required to see as much as their engine in the same amount of time and are totally worthless when they don’t!

With hindsight, I must admit it was pretty foolish to be so skeptical. The evidence was always there. Chess, essentially, is not just a game of humans but a set of mathematical rules that obey basic laws of physics. Actually, I think it won’t be too long before even the best chess players in the world don’t truly understand computer analysis anymore. We can already see signs of that in some games and variations: the ‘human explanation’ will then be just a speculative guess; chess intuition will be in the dark, looking for clues that perhaps simply aren’t there. It will just be nonsense to our human frame of reference, a bit like quantum physics.

We may not like it, but that’s just the way reality works. Reality simply cannot be combined with wishful-thinking. Perhaps climate ’skeptics’ should embrace this philosophy, too: the idea that we’re polluting the planet and can’t just do whatever we want anymore may not be a comforting thought, and it may not lead to a pleasant course of action, but we’ll just have to learn to deal with it. Who knows, we may even start to like it.

Yesterday, I read an excellent definition of a skeptic: “a person who strongly prefers to accept as fact only that for which there is verifiable and reasoned evidence, and who is prepared to put aside that fact should the evidence suggest this be done.” Of course, it’s this last condition that’s so hard to grasp for climate – and anti-evolution – skeptics, which is why some people prefer to call them ‘denialists’ (or ‘lobbyists’) instead. Being a skeptic is only useful if the evidence is on your side. If it isn’t – if chess computers win all the games, help us improve analysis and can even teach us interesting things about the game we didn’t know – it’s time to change your mind and stop preaching to the choir.

 
http://www.chessvibes.com/columns/computer-skeptic-no-more/
Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:06:52 +0000
 
 
 
Frauenbundesliga aus Baden-Baden live

An diesem Wochenende wird in der Frauenbundesliga die 3. und 4. Runde gespielt. In Baden-Baden kommt es dabei zu folgenden Begegnungen:

Samstag, 14 Uhr
OSG Baden-Baden – SK Großlehna
Karlsruher SF - SC Leipzig Gohlis

Sonntag,9.00
SC Leipzig Gohlis – OSG Baden-Baden
SK Großlehna - Karlsruher SF

Ergebnisse in Baden-Baden     Webseite OSG Baden-Baden     Einzelergebnisse 3. und 4. Runde      Partien

 
http://www.chess-international.de/?p=645
Sat, 05 Dec 2009 12:16:49 +0000
 
 
 
Live-Berichterstattung von der Deutschen Blitzeinzel

In Neumarkt in der Oberpfalz beginnt am kommenden Sonnabend, dem 5. Dezember, um 12.30 Uhr mit der persönlichen Anmeldung der Teilnehmer die 36. Deutsche Meisterschaft im Blitzschach. Gespielt wird in der Aula des Landratsamtes Neumarkt. Der Eintritt ist frei.
Von der Meisterschaft soll live berichtet werden. Und das ist gerade beim Blitzschach nicht einfach, wenn es nicht gerade eine Videoübertragung in Bild und Ton sein soll. Zudem sind Zugriffsprobleme zu erwarten, wie es kürzlich beim ND-Damenschachturnier in Berlin passierte, als der Traffic innerhalb weniger Minuten von praktisch Null auf über 900 Megabyte anwuchs. Drücken wir den Machern vom Schachklub Neumarkt die Daumen und sagen toi, toi, toi!
[DBEM-Seite des Schachklub Neumarkt]    Text: Frank Hoppe (DSB)
Beginn der Partien ca. 13 Uhr     Titelverteidiger ist GM Robert Rabiega     Partien

Teilnehmer

Kreuztabelle

Bilder

Kurzbericht

1. - 8. Runde

9. - 16. Runde

17. - 24. Runde

25. - 31. Runde

 
http://www.chess-international.de/?p=642
Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:20:32 +0000
 
 
 
Czech Coal Chess Match - Snowdrops and Old-hands, Marianske Lazne/Czech Republic

Die Schach-Legenden Viktor Kortschnoi  , Jan Timman, Robert Hübner und Vlastimil Hort werden mit jungen Großmeisterinnen Humpy Koneru  (Zeichnung) , Anna Muzychuk, Katerina Lahno eine Jana-Jackova ein doppelrundiges Turnier spielen., das in Marienbad im Cristal Palace Hotel von 28. November bis 5. Dezember stattfinden wird. Die Bedenkzeit beträgt 90 Minuten für 40 Züge zuzüglich jeweils 30 Minuten plus 30 Sek. pro Zug. Das Turnier wird durch eine Bürgervereinigung Prag Chess Gesellschaft gesponsert.

Turnierseite    Alle Runden beginnen um 16 Uhr      Partien


Copyright: EuropeEchecs

 

 
http://www.chess-international.de/?p=641
Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:37:51 +0000
 
 
 
Interactive Deep Analysis (IDeA) With Rybka Aquarium 2010

One of the biggest changes in Rybka Aquarium 2010 is the greatly improved Interactive Deep Analysis (IDeA). Many players were happy with the possibilities offered by IDeA in Rybka 3 Aquarium, but I’m afraid that it will look like a dinosaur compared to the new version. It provides better automatic analysis and much more effective ways to control the analysis process and the shape of the analysis tree. I’m sure that many serious players will find that the new and improved IDeA is an essential tool to stay competitive.

Read more
 
http://chessok.com/?p=23117
Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:14:51 +0000
 
 
 
Rebel Chess body announces biggest ever prize money tourney

Rebel Chess body announces biggest ever prize money tourney
PTI 30 November 2009, 04:15pm IST

NEW DELHI: Chess Association of India, a rebel body comprising disgruntled members of the official All India Chess Federation (AICF), on Monday sounded the war bugle by announcing the country's biggest ever prize money tournament next month.

The 'Delhi All India Open Chess Tournament' - a Rs 15 lakh event - will be held at the Sadhu Vaswani International School for Girls from December 23 to 29. The winner of the event would take home a hefty Rs 3 lakh prize money, CAI president Naveen Kumar Wal said.

"More than 500 participants, including some Grand Masters, International Masters and other rated players from India and abroad are expected to take part in the tournament. The entry fee for participation is Rs 1,000 with free accommodation to all players," Wal said.

CAI has also decided to hold seven tournaments - each with prize money of Rs five lakh - at Haryana, Rajasthan, Mumbai, Madhya Pradesh, Kerala, Tamil Nadu and Chandigarh in the near future.

In December next year, the association will organise a championship with cash prize of Rs 25 lakh in Lucknow, CAI Treasurer SK Tewari said.

The body came into existence on October 11 after a meeting of former AICF members here and decided to organise National championships and coaching camps for young players.

"For the past four-five years, chess players, organisers and State Associations are being deprived of their rights and treated as bonded labourers. To save all those from such humiliation and with an objective of developing the game, it has been unanimously decided to form a separate national body in the name of CAI," Wal said.

At the time of its formation, 18 state associations sent their consent to be a part of CAI and more are likely to join in near future, Wal said.

"We are ready to face any kind of challenge from AICF. There is a possibility that they might create hurdles for us, but we are ready for everything," Wal added.

Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com
Posted by Picasa
 
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/chess/top-stories/Rebel-Chess-body-announces-biggest-ever-prize-money-tourney/articleshow/5284610.cms
2009-11-30T08:29:00.002-06:00
 
 
 
New Products Available: CT-ART 4.0, Elementary Checkmates I & II

New Products are available for sale at our online shop:

The long awaited CT ART 4.0, which is a indispensable training tool for intermediate players. The new version sports a convenient user interface and adds 1,000 training exercises (2,200 basic exercises and 1,800 auxiliary exercises altogether)

There are also upgrade versions (from CT-ART 3.0) available:

Elementary Checkmates I & II which are mainly aimed for beginners who do not want to miss 1 move mate, but also would be useful as exercises for more experienced players:

 
http://chessok.com/?p=23066
Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:14:14 +0000
 
 
 
New CalChess Website: www.norcalchess.org
ANNOUNCEMENT from CalChess President Tom Langland (originally dated 11/01/09)

As many of you have observed the CalChess website (www.calchess.org) has suffered a major malware attack. From what I can gather, the website was possibly penetrated several weeks ago, and has since been hit critically. This is not the first time the site has been attacked and penetrated, but one of several. The current location appears to provide insufficient protection against outside attacks. I also continue to receive 40-50 spam messages a day.

My attempts to remedy the situation have met with extreme resistance, and the current environment is untenable. This was a position I thought was regrettably forthcoming.

To that end, I have been working on a long-term project to improve the site, and due to the above situation, I am releasing it ahead of my intended schedule.

So... I am announcing the new official Calchess website located at: http://www.norcalchess.org

The new site is still a work in progress, and I am looking forward to feedback. I do not have any plans to maintain the "old" site.

/Tom Langland/ (photo at right)

Postscript by fpawn: In fact, the www.calchess.org domain name already expired and the former website is now history. What a shame! The old webmaster put much effort into the site, but unfortunately the many tools were never utilized to their potential. I tried hard for several years to write articles in the hopes that other local chess players would contribute as well. Becoming frustrated, I turned my efforts to this blog and www.calchess.org died. There are many reasons why nobody wanted to post, ranging from pure laziness to the quirky personality of the webmaster. Fortunately, Tom Langland stepped up and volunteered many hours of his own time to develop www.norcalchess.org almost entirely from scratch. I sincerely hope it meets a better fate, and I pledge to contribute again. Nonetheless, I intend to continue posting the majority of my writings on this blog.
 
http://fpawn.blogspot.com/2009/11/new-calchess-website-wwwnorcalchessorg.html
Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:52:00 +0000
 
 
 
Aquarium’s Hidden Treasures

Rybka 3 Aquarium logotype Part One

Graphical Annotations

Visual annotations are an effective tool to recall your thoughts about a position and quickly remind you of its most important features. They are also essential for creating video lectures and very useful for live commentary. Open (or create) a game and click “Color Marks” on the “Comments” tab.

The graphical annotation palette is displayed as a floating window that you can drag anywhere on the screen and it stays open until you close it. It gives you quick access to a variety of graphics for annotating a position as shown in the image below.
The graphical annotation palette.

You can move back and forth in the notation and annotate a full game without closing the palette. You can even keep it open while adding other types of annotations or new variations to the notation.

If you want to use the mouse to make a move on the board, make sure that the leftmost icon (the mouse pointer) is selected. The graphic below shows the shapes that can be drawn on the chessboard.

Each shape is available in four different colors: red, green, blue, and yellow. Three of the shapes (the ‘X’, the rectangle and the circle) can be drawn on a single square; the arrows (straight and curved) can be drawn between any two squares and the filled rectangle can be drawn over any rectangular area on the board.
The graphical annotation shapes.

The currently selected shape is highlighted in the palette. In the example shown in the image, the straight blue arrow is selected.
The blue arrow is selected.

If you want to draw a particular shape and color, start by selecting it from the palette. If it is an ‘X,’ a rectangle or a circle, click the square where you want to draw the shape. An arrow is drawn by pressing and holding the left mouse button while dragging the mouse from one square to another. Holding the Shift key down while drawing a straight arrow draws a dashed arrow. For a filled rectangle shape, hold down the left mouse button while dragging the mouse across the board between opposite corners of the rectangle you want to draw.

You will notice that at the bottom of the drop-down list for each shape, there is an eraser icon. Clicking it erases all shapes of that type from the board. There are also two other options for deleting shapes.
Delete shapes.

The eraser icon on the palette allows you to delete shapes by clicking their endpoints and the broom removes all visual annotations from the current position.

“More options…” offers further options for graphical annotations.

“Copy to Clipboard” copies the graphical annotations to the clipboard. We discussed in last month’s column how they can be used in iBooks. “Paste from Clipboard” displays the graphical annotations on the chessboard.

The graphical annotations we have looked at so far can be used on the fly, e.g., for a live annotation of a game. “Additional Markers” offer even more options, such as displaying text on the board, but are more suitable for preparing annotations beforehand. The following diagram illustrates some of the features available in the “Additional markers”.
“Additional markers” annotations.

If you want to see further examples of graphical annotations in Aquarium, I recommend that you have a look at the excellent chess videos made by jrobichess.


Copy Board Image

Besides copying games in PGN format and positions in EPD format, Aquarium let’s you copy a graphic image of the board with all visual annotations.
Copy board image with graphics.

Clicking “Board Image” on the “Home –View” tab copies the current board image. After that you can paste it into a word processor, a graphics program or any other program that accepts graphics. This allows you to prepare diagrams for your documents, your website, etc. The diagram below was copied using this method and pasted into Microsoft Word.

The image is a copy of what you see on your Aquarium screen, including the board and piece themes, graphical annotations, etc.
Copied board image with graphics.

Aquarium allows you to set the exact size of the captured image – a feature welcomed by many authors. The advantage is that it will fit exactly into your design or that required by the publisher. In other words, the captured image is ready for publishing.

To display the “Save Board Image Options” right-click over the board and select “Board Image Options” as shown in the screenshot above.

When copying board images the “Size” parameter is the only one that matters. In this case it has been set to 242, which means that Aquarium will automatically create board images that are 242 x 242 pixels, regardless of the size of the board as displayed in Aquarium itself.
Set the size of the copied image.

Animations for the Web

You may have noticed the “Create Animation” button in the image above. Well, Aquarium can create animations based on captured board images. You can publish these animations on your blog, just like normal images.

Start by opening up the “Save Board Image Options” as shown above. Here you can select where your images will be saved (“Path”) and the size of the images. You should save your images to an empty directory, since “Create Animation” will include all images in the specified directory to create the animation.

Now that everything is set up, you can start saving board images that you want to include in the animation. Note that also here the board images are saved with visual annotations. When you are ready to save the first position, right click over the board and select “Save board image” from the menu as shown in the following screenshot.

Do the same for every board image you want to save. When you are done, you can create the animation; right-click over the board and select “Board Image Options.” The “Save Board Image Options” dialog we saw above will be displayed. This time click “Create Animations” to bring up the “Create GIF Animation” dialog box.
Create an animation.

Here you must make sure that “Source folder” points to the directory where you saved the board images. The resulting animation will be stored in the file specified in the “Destination file.” That is also the file you would display in your blog.

The “Delay time” decides how fast the animation runs. The unit is milliseconds, so a delay time of 1500 as shown in this example will display each image in the animation for 1.5 seconds. Note that if you want to display some of the positions longer than the default, you can save the same position more than once. For instance, some users like to display the initial image for a longer duration.

The following animation was created using this method.

To see examples of some very interesting animations created with the help of Aquarium, have a look at The Chunky Rook.


Online Tablebases

Collecting all multi-piece Nalimov tablebases requires a lot of disk space; therefore, most players either skip the tablebases altogether or only store a fraction of them on their hard disk. Even if you don’t have any tablebases at all, Aquarium can evaluate any position with six or fewer pieces accurately by doing a remote lookup on the ChessOK tablebase server. Here is an example rook endgame with six pieces on the board.

This position is from the game Shirov – Leko, Linares 2000. Leko just played 60…Ra1. The game ended in a draw, and many commentators agreed that the rook endgame was drawn. Let’s have Aquarium’s online tablebase evaluate this position.
Is it a draw?.

All I need to do is click the “TB6 Online” button on the “Analysis” tab and Aquarium returns an optimal variation that is added to the notation as shown below.
Online endgame lookup.

The variation inserted by Aquarium shows that Shirov could have won with 61.Rg3! instead of 61.Kf4, which leads to a draw as a second “TB6 Online” lookup would confirm. The exclamation mark (!) after a move in the tablebase variation means that this move is the only one that preserves the win. There are five such moves in the variation that ends with a checkmate after forty-three moves, so it is by no means trivial.

The online tablebases can be of great help when you are analyzing endgames.
Shirov missed a win!.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks are one of those little known, but very useful features of Aquarium. They allow you to bookmark one or more positions within a game and quickly jump between the marked positions. Aquarium actually gives you a choice of two types of bookmarks and they are switched on/off with the ‘M’ and ‘P’ keyboard shortcuts (or the right-click menu):

  • M allows you to define one bookmark and colors the corresponding move red in the notation (so it is different from coloring a tree move red). If you press ‘M’ again in another position in the game, that move becomes bookmarked and the bookmark is removed from the previous move. If you accidentally bookmark a move, you can remove the bookmark by pressing ‘M’ again (without moving the cursor).
  • P allows you to define multiple bookmarks and the bookmarked moves are colored blue. If you bookmark a move and move to a different position and press ‘P’ again, you will have two bookmarked moves. If the current move is bookmarked, you can press ‘P’ to remove the bookmark.
Here is an example showing four bookmarked moves, three blue (10.a4, 10…b6, and 13.e4) and one red (11.Bd3).

You can cycle between the blue bookmarked moves by using the Shift+P keyboard shortcut (or the right-click menu), making it easy to locate them even in long, heavily annotated games. Pressing Shift+M jumps to the red bookmark.
Two types of bookmarks.

Open Game at Bookmarked Position

Once you start using bookmarks you will probably want to know whether a game that you open has any bookmarked positions or not; I will show how you can change the red bookmark, so that Aquarium opens games at the bookmarked position if there is one.

Open a game and bookmark one of the moves by pressing “M.” Open the “Managing styles” dialog box with the Shift+S keyboard shortcut.

Make sure that “Temporary bookmark” is highlighted in the “Styles for current move” list, as shown is this example, and then click the “Edit styles” button. The “Edit special styles” dialog box will be shown.

All you need to do here is select “Set position” and then click OK to close the dialog boxes. You have changed the “Temporary bookmark,” so that Aquarium will open games at the bookmarked move. You can follow the same procedure for the blue bookmarks.

Move Classes and Styles

As you may have guessed when looking at the dialog boxes above, bookmarks are a special case of a more general concept supported by Aquarium: Move classes. Move classes can be used for a variety of purposes. They can be assigned both by users (such as the bookmarks described above) and by Aquarium itself (e.g., when inserting analyzed variations). There are thirty-two move classes available and you can apply different styles to them, such as foreground and background color, different fonts, font properties, etc. The classes come with preset styles, but you can change them in the “Edit special styles” dialog box shown above.

If you want to assign a class to a move, open the “Managing styles” dialog box with the Shift+S keyboard shortcut and select one or more classes for the move. The image below shows a partial list of the available classes.
Move classes.

In this example we have assigned two classes to the current move: “Temporary bookmark” and “Novelty.” The “Current style” pane shows what the currently highlighted class looks like and the “Final style” shows what the move will actually look like in the notation with all the assigned classes.


Game Classes

You can also assign classes to whole games. Game classes have no connection with move classes (unlike in Chess Assistant). Game classes are assigned in the game list and are displayed in the “Flags” column.

Each of the eight small squares represents one class. They are “My own game”, “Historic game”, “Model game”, “Annotated game from a book”, “Computer game”, “Opening theory/plans”, “Middlegame”, and “Endgame”.
Game classes.

As shown in the image above, the name of a class is displayed when you hover over it with the mouse pointer. Clicking the class assigns it to the game. Clicking again turns it off. If you have been examining an interesting game and want to find all games belonging to the same game classes, click in the “Flags” column of the game to the right of the classes and then click “Current Cell” in the “Search” group as shown below.

In this example we will search for all games belonging to the same classes as game number two; i.e., games belonging to the “Endgame” class.

Copying Game Fragments and Positions

Every Aquarium user probably knows that he can copy and paste games with Ctrl+C and Ctrl+V. Fewer users know that you can also copy the current position in EPD format, the moves up to the current position and the moves following the current position in PGN format. You will see all these options when you right-click over the notation and look at the “Copy” sub-menu.
Flexible copying of moves and positions.

As you can see, you can even copy all positions in the game as a set of EPD records. What you should notice here are the keyboard shortcuts listed after the options. Using a keyboard is often faster than using the mouse, so it is worth memorizing the shortcuts for these commands. Note that some of these shortcuts may differ depending on your keyboard layout, but you can always see the correct shortcuts by opening this menu.

Copy first moves copies the game up to the current position in PGN format.

Copy rest of moves copies the moves following the current position in PGN format.

In addition to these options you can actually copy an interval of moves, say moves ten to fifteen, although it is a hidden option that is not available as a menu selection. On a U.S. English keyboard you can use the square brackets to delimit the moves that you want to copy.
Copy a game fragment as PGN.

Here I pressed ‘[‘ before White’s tenth move and ‘]’ after Black’s fifteenth move. I have highlighted the selected moves, but the symbols preceding and following the selection are Aquarium’s way of showing the range of selected moves.

When I press Ctrl+C, Aquarium asks if I want to copy the whole game or just the selected moves.
Here I click “Selection” for copying only the selected moves from the game.

Dadi Jonsson.

 
http://chessok.com/?p=23017
Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:49:50 +0000
 
 
 
Interactive Deep Analysis (IDeA) With Rybka Aquarium 2010

A major new version of Rybka Aquarium will soon be released. It’s called Rybka Aquarium 2010 and it will be available before the holidays. This new version includes a free update to Rybka 4 when it is released.

One of the biggest changes in Rybka Aquarium 2010 is the greatly improved Interactive Deep Analysis (IDeA). Many players were happy with the possibilities offered by IDeA in Rybka 3 Aquarium, but I’m afraid that it will look like a dinosaur compared to the new version. It provides better automatic analysis and much more effective ways to control the analysis process and the shape of the analysis tree. I’m sure that many serious players will find that the new and improved IDeA is an essential tool to stay competitive.

Analyzing with many engines. The original IDeA could only use one engine for the analysis, but the new version can split the analysis between many engines. You can, for instance, use four instances of single core Rybka for the analysis on a quad computer, essentially reducing the multiprocessor overhead to zero. It’s like getting one extra core for free compared to running Rybka in 4-CPU mode.

Analyzing on a network of computers. This feature is a dream come true for power users, analysts, and serious players who want to take their analysis to a new level. If you own two computers, you can of course run Aquarium on one of them and use it for the analysis. In the new version you can also add engines running on your other computer to the pool of IDeA analysis engines. Using this method I have tested up to thirty-five engines analyzing simultaneously. The engines were running on various computers, some on my local network while others were located in different countries and connected to my Aquarium over the Internet. IDeA takes care of splitting the analysis between the available engines.

Multiple IDeA projects analyzed in parallel. You can define many analysis projects, each with its own analysis and tree settings. IDeA can analyze any number of those projects in parallel. The status of each project is saved between sessions, so you can manage many different IDeA projects much easier than before.

Multiple analysis “roots” for a single project. The starting position for IDeA analysis is called a “root.” If you are analyzing a position in IDeA when another interesting position shows up in the tree, you can make it a new root, without even stopping the analysis. You can remove the original root or let IDeA analyze from both roots. You can use this feature to focus IDeA on selected positions without restarting it. IDeA can keep a list of all roots that have been used in a project.

Shaping the analysis tree. The former single “variativity” parameter was not very effective and didn’t affect IDeA sufficiently. Now there are a number of new settings that have a significant influence on the shape of the IDeA analysis tree.

  • The “Tree width” parameter determines how wide the resulting IDeA tree will be. Although similar to “variativity,” this new parameter is much more effective.
  • The maximum length of variations can be defined. This allows you to make the tree denser near the root and avoid very long variations.
  • Analysis can be limited to positions within a certain evaluation range. Positions outside the specified range will not be explored further.
  • The number of alternatives generated for White/Black can be limited.
  • A “preferred side” can be set; e.g., for developing your opening repertoire.
  • A list of “thematic moves” can be given. You can use them to ensure that certain moves are always analyzed. For instance, in an attacking game you might want to make sure that the moves Bxh7+ and Ng5 are considered.
  • “False alarm check” immediately performs additional analysis of new moves that look “too good to be true,” preventing IDeA from spending more time on them if they turn out to be worse than they first looked.

All of these settings can be changed on the fly during the IDeA session, further emphasizing that IDeA is designed to be used as an interactive tool.

Move repetition detection. IDeA tasks no longer consist of a single position, but a full line that leads from the root node to the position to be analyzed. This enables Rybka to report 0.00 scores for twofold repetitions, and is generally more correct. This also leads to the fifty-move rule being observed.

Automatic backup of analysis trees. Besides more robust tree handling in IDeA, the analysis trees are now automatically backed up. Not only does it prevent data loss, but it may also prove useful in some other cases too.

Browsing the analysis queue. You can see a list of all tasks for the current stage; which tasks were automatically scheduled by IDeA and which ones you added manually. The corresponding positions can be displayed on the board and you can see the engine’s output for the selected task, prioritize the tasks, and delete unnecessary ones. If there are tasks waiting in the queue when you stop the analysis, they will be stored and processed the next time you start the analysis, even if you restart Aquarium.

Read more
 
http://chessok.com/?p=23011
Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:16:27 +0000
 
 
 
Carlsen - Ponomariov LIVE! - Tal Memorial 2009 live commentary with GM Christian Bauer, NM Pete Kara
At the same time you will be able to follow ALL GAMES of the round with human and computer analysis and commentary of GM Bauer, GM Safarli, NM Karagianis, and Jason Juett can be seen at the new live games tool of Chessdom.
 
http://games.chessdom.com/carlsen-ponomariov-live
Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:53:01 +0100
 
 
 
Carlsen - Morozevich LIVE! - Tal Memorial 2009 live commentary with GM Christian Bauer
Welcome to Tal Memorial 2009 live commentary on Chessdom.com! GM Christian Bauer will be covering for you the Carlsen - Morozevich. At the same time you will be able to follow ALL GAMES of the round with human and computer analysis at the new live games tool of Chessdom.
 
http://games.chessdom.com/carlsen-morozevich-tal-memorial-live
Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:33:57 +0100
 
 
 
Chessmaster For PS2
Check out the Review by Gamespot.



I'm an avid videogame nut but I've been stuck in older generation machines (PS2,Gamecube). I was wandering around my local Gamestop and happened across a fairly advanced (over Grandmaster strength) version of Chessmaster for the PS2. I'm about to leap out of my chair as I write this note. I'm just so excited. I don't know quite how I missed the 2003 release of this chess engine onto the PS2 platform. I remember the older Chessmaster for the Playstation that possessed the old flaws of previous chessmaster releases. This version fixed alot of those errors.

check out this screenshot featuring my favorite board template (because I'm used to the 2d chess sets on most chess playing websites:


This is going to be a good training tool in my opinion. I recommend it to all my readers ... it's a good alternative to the mind-numbing mediocrity of today's videogames (which are more like interactive movies than actual challenges, it's fun don't get me wrong).
 
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Chessvine/~3/8X4a5L8uf-I/611-Chessmaster-For-PS2.html
 
 
 
A brand-new system to become a better player

Revolutionize Your ChessWe have just received from our printers: Revolutionize Your Chess

In his latest book Viktor Moskalenko, former Ukrainian Champion and author of The fabulous Budapest Gambit and The Flexible French, presents a brand-new system to become a better player.

Most chess players fail to make real progress once they have reached a certain level. Moskalenko argues that this is because the general rules of the game have not been discovered yet!!

Besides adding the element of dynamic play, so characteristic of modern chess, to the famous theories by Steinitz and Nimzowitsch he introduces five “Touchstones”, providing players with tools to assess any position.

This new concept will show club players how to get a good grip on personal skills like intuition, psychology and concentration. And with “the Moskalenko Test” you can measure your progress.

For anyone who wants to get better at chess this book will be a big step forward. Revolutionize Your Chess is a breakthrough in chess teaching!

 
http://www.chessvibes.com/advertisement/a-brand-new-system-to-become-a-better-player/
Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:35:03 +0000
 
 
 
Chessbomb
Every day or two I do a quick patrol of the sites on my blog roll (look to your left). While visiting the Chessdom site, I noticed they had added a new live coverage tool, which was developed by, and named after, Chessbomb. I've had a play with it and it looks really good. The site combines broadcast, computer analysis (from Rybka) and user comments into one interface.
For the moment they are only covering the European Teams Championship, and the time difference works against us here in Australia, but it is still worth visiting during the day, as the overnight broadcasts are archived. For example, two games worth looking at from Round 5 are the Sutovsky v Svidler game, and the Bacrot v Aronian matchup. Due to the magic of colour coded moves (and Rybka) you can see where the players went wrong at crucial junctures during the game.
 
http://chessexpress.blogspot.com/2009/10/chessbomb.html
Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:54:00 +0000
 
 
 
Championnat d’Europe d'échecs par équipes : la Pologne stoppe la France
Etienne Bacrot et Laurent Fressinet pour la France © Site officiel
Etienne Bacrot et Laurent Fressinet pour la France © Site officiel
Le Direct Live Les parties d'échecs à visualiser Les parties à télécharger Le Direct Live à 15h + Les parties à Visualiser et/ou à Télécharger

Le 17e Championnat d’Europe d'échecs par équipes se tient à Novi Sad en Serbie du 21 au 31 Octobre 2009. Parmi les stars de l'échiquier, nous retrouvons entre autres Topalov, Aronian, Radjabov, Morozevich, Jakovenko, Svidler, Gashimov, Grischuk et Shirov.
La composition des deux équipes françaises :
Joël Lautier, le sélectionneur de l'équipe française, a choisi de jouer la carte jeune en alignant Romain Edouard (2620), Matthieu Cornette (2577) et Sébastien Feller (2570) encadrés d'Etienne Bacrot (2709) et Laurent Fressinet (2658). Côté féminin, Marie Sebag (2519), Sophie Milliet (2407), Maria Leconte (2325), Silvia Collas (2319) et Pauline Guichard (2304) défendent nos couleurs.
A découvrir: ChessBomb, une plate-forme pour l'analyse des parties en Live de notre partenaire Chessdom.
Les résultats de la ronde 7 en Live:
Pour en savoir plus:
 
http://www.chess-and-strategy.com/2009/10/championnat-deurope-dechecs-par-equipes_28.html
Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:02:00 +0000
 
 
 
Championnat d’Europe d'échecs par équipes : les Pays-Bas face à la France à 15h
Etienne Bacrot vainqueur de Levon Aronian, ronde 5
La Pépite de la ronde 5: Etienne Bacrot bat Levon Aronian © Site officiel
Le Direct Live Les parties d'échecs à visualiser Les parties à télécharger Le Direct Live à 15h + Les parties à Visualiser et/ou à Télécharger

Le 17e Championnat d’Europe d'échecs par équipes se tient à Novi Sad en Serbie du 21 au 31 Octobre 2009. Parmi les stars de l'échiquier, nous retrouvons entre autres Topalov, Aronian, Radjabov, Morozevich, Jakovenko, Svidler, Gashimov, Grischuk et Shirov.
La composition des deux équipes françaises :
Joël Lautier, le sélectionneur de l'équipe française, a choisi de jouer la carte jeune en alignant Romain Edouard (2620), Matthieu Cornette (2577) et Sébastien Feller (2570) encadrés d'Etienne Bacrot (2709) et Laurent Fressinet (2658). Côté féminin, Marie Sebag (2519), Sophie Milliet (2407), Maria Leconte (2325), Silvia Collas (2319) et Pauline Guichard (2304) défendent nos couleurs.
Le Cadeau du jour: ChessBomb, une plate-forme pour l'analyse des parties en Live de notre partenaire Chessdom.
Les appariements et résultats de la ronde 6 en Live:
Les résultats de la ronde 5:
Pour en savoir plus: