search posts of RSS chess feeds archive in yourchess.net  

RESULTSFound 238 results for the word 'sokolov' in 33150 chess posts stored in the archive of yourchess.net since june 2008
 
<< SEARCH MORE
 
11? Campionato Europeo: diretta del VII turno
 
  • LIVE h. 15:30
  • GM Ivan Sokolov-Caruana
  • GM Rodshtein-Dvirnyy
  • Femminile
  • MI Danielian-Sedina
Oggi si disputa il settimo turno del Campionato Europeo Caruana. Domani è previsto il primo ed unico giorno di riposo.
Per sapere cosa è successo nel sesto turno, clicca QUI 

Ieri è stata una giornata molto positiva per gli italiani e, come sempre accade in questo genere di manifestazioni, dopo una giornata positiva arrivano gli impegni tosti. Tra gli azzurri con almeno il 50% dei punti Caruana, Dvirnyy e Piscopo incontreranno tre forti GM, mentre Godena e Valsecchi se la vedranno con due MI. Le partite di Caruana e Dvirnyy saranno trasmesse in diretta dalle ore 15:30.

Non basta comunque avere meno del 50% per avere vita facile, visto che Lanzani (2.5) affronterà il GM greco Banikas (2617). Stesso discorso vale per Barlocco (2), che incontrerà il MI Zueger (2425), mentre Ortega, Shytaj e Brunello (2.5) affronteranno due MI e un MF con un elo attorno ai 2300. Da segnalare, infine, il derby tra Bentivegna e Corrado Astengo.

Migliori performance degli italiani
Nome Elo Performance Variazione Elo
Caruana Fabiano 2680 2763 +6,20
Dvirnyy Daniyyl 2450 2669 +17,60
Godena Michele 2561 2519 -1,80
Piscopo Pierluigi 2418 2421 +0,10
Brunello Sabino 2476 2366 -9,10
Astengo Corrado 2136 2360 +18,15
Lanzani Mario 2371 2344 -2,30
Shytaj Luca 2472 2333 -11,10
Valsecchi Alessio 2360 2294 -5,10
Ortega Lexy 2479 2276 -12,20
Bentivegna Francesco 2361 2257 -10,65

Femminile
Sedina Elena 2334 2510 14,10
Brunello Marina 2217 2211 -0,90
Zimina Olga 2319 2180 -11,50
Brunello Roberta 2043 2105 +6,75
Tonel Giulia 2023 1999 -1,50




VI turno: Caruana si appresta a giocare 33.Cxf6+. Salgado Lopez abbandonerà dopo poche mosse



La MI armena Elina Danielian, prossima avversaria della Sedina

VII turno, prime scacchiere
1 10 GEO GM Jobava Baadur GEO 2695 5 GM Riazantsev Alexander RUS 2660 RUS 29
2 58 SRB GM Vuckovic Bojan SRB 2630 5 GM Efimenko Zahar UKR 2640 UKR 48
3 1 HUN GM Almasi Zoltan HUN 2720 5 5 GM Nepomniachtchi Ian RUS 2656 RUS 35
4 3 SVK GM Movsesian Sergei SVK 2709 5 GM Mamedov Rauf AZE 2639 AZE 49
5 61 BUL GM Delchev Aleksander BUL 2625 GM Vallejo Pons Francisco ESP 2708 ESP 5

incontri degli italiani
10 51 BIH GM Sokolov Ivan BIH 2638 GM Caruana Fabiano ITA 2680 ITA 15
49 87 ISR GM Rodshtein Maxim ISR 2609 4 4 IM Dvirnyy Daniyyl ITA 2450 ITA 219
130 74 GRE GM Banikas Hristos GRE 2617 IM Lanzani Mario ITA 2371 ITA 274
138 203 ITA GM Ortega Lexy ITA 2479 IM Medancic Rikard CRO 2311 CRO 296
140 205 ITA IM Brunello Sabino ITA 2476 FM Kunze Carlo GER 2306 GER 297
141 209 ITA IM Shytaj Luca ITA 2472 IM Nedochetov Mikhail RUS 2299 RUS 301
83 224 FRA IM Vernay Clovis FRA 2440 GM Godena Michele ITA 2561 ITA 135
158 236 SUI IM Zueger Beat SUI 2425 2 2 FM Barlocco Carlo ITA 2173 ITA 337
106 242 ITA IM Piscopo Pierluigi ITA 2418 3 3 GM Cvitan Ognjen CRO 2550 CRO 143
161 276 ITA FM Bentivegna Francesco ITA 2361 2 2 Astengo Corrado ITA 2136 ITA 345
117 279 ITA FM Valsecchi Alessio ITA 2360 3 3 IM Sebenik Matej SLO 2504 SLO 177

incontri delle italiane
18 10 ARM IM Danielian Elina ARM 2491 4 IM Sedina Elena ITA 2334 ITA 56
69 117 SRB Djukic Sandra SRB 2214 2 2 Tonel Giulia ITA 2023 ITA 144
56 141 CRO WFM Berke Ana CRO 2097 IM Zimina Olga ITA 2319 ITA 60
57 143 ITA Brunello Roberta ITA 2043 WGM Paulet Iozefina ROU 2303 ROU 70
67 146 LUX Boyarchenko Marie LUX 2009 2 2 WIM Brunello Marina ITA 2217 ITA 115

 
Regolamento

Calendario
Il torneo si disputa sulla lunghezza di 11 turni (6-17 marzo). L'inizio delle partite è previsto per le ore 15:30. Unico giorno di riposo sabato 13 marzo. Il 18 marzo si svolgeranno gli eventuali Tie-breaks.

Criteri di spareggio in caso di arrivo a pari merito sono previsti i seguenti criteri di spareggio tecnico:
a)  Median-Buchholz 1
b)  Buchholz
c)  Numero di vittorie 
d) Punteggio Progressivo.

Spareggi Rapid sono previsti gli spareggi (15'+10" per mossa) solo per stabilire:
a)  il Campione Europeo
b)  i vincitori di Medaglie
c)  I qualificati (22) alla prossima World Cup.

Tempo di Riflessione 90' x 40 mosse + 30' per terminare la partita + 30" di incremento per mossa a partire dalla prima mossa. 

Siti Utili

sito ufficiale

Live Stream

risultati su chessresult

 articoli di presentazione di Angelmann   1^ parte  2^ parte

 Report fotografico di Ruigino Tonel

VISORE
per vedere la partita di Dvirnyy seguire il percorso Live Games -- > Men --> Board 31-50
per vedere la partita della Sedina seguire il percorso Live Games -- Women


 
http://www.scacchierando.net/dblog/articolo.asp?articolo=1758
2010-03-12T14:30:00+01:00
 
 
 
11? Campionato Europeo: diretta del VI turno
 
Caruana torna alla vittoria e sale a 4.5!
  • Dvirnyy batte il GM Sanikidze e sale a 4!!
  • Femminile 
  • la Sedina patta con la GM Hoang Thanh e raggiunge quota 4
  • Nell'articolo i visori delle partite di Caruana e Sedina
  • Domani LIVE h. 15:30 Ivan Sokolov-Caruana
  • GM Rodshtein-Dvirnyy e MI Danielian-Sedina
Nel VI turno del Campionato Europeo Caruana, dopo tre patte consecutive, torna alla vittoria travolgendo il GM  spagnolo Salgado Lopez. Importantissima vittoria per Dvirnyy contro il GM Sanikidze (2566). Daniyyl sale così a 4. Godena batte il MI Azaladze e raggiunge quota 3.5. 

Nulla da fare per Brunello con il GM Nyback. Sabino resta a 2.5 e viene superato da Piscopo e Valsecchi, che vincono facendo rispettare il pronostico, e agganciato da Ortega Lanzani (vittorie) e Shytaj (patta),

Prosegue l'ottimo torneo (una vittoria e due patte con tre MI, performance 2360) di Corrado Astengo che patta con il MI Rasulov e sale a quota 2 con Bentivegna (patta),

In classifica generale Jobava e Efimenko ristabiliscono le gerarchie battendo i giocatori che li avevavo agganciati in vetta nel turno precedente, Timofeev e Nisipeanu. Da segnalare il veemente ritorno del numero uno del tabellone, l'ungherese Almasi, che dopo un inizio zoppicante (due patte nei primi tre turni) ha infilato tre vittorie consecutive (oggi vittoria, con il nero, contro Sutovsky) e si trova a solo mezzo punto dalla vetta.

Femminile Bella prova della Sedina che patta con la GM Hoang Thanh Trang, e nel finale di donne che si è presentato sulla  scacchiera forse avrebbe potuto ottenere di più! Elena sale così a quota 4/6. La Zimina perde  con la WIM Isgandarova. Stessa sorte per Marina Brunello. A risollevare le sorti della famiglia ci pensa la sorella Roberta, che con il nero batte la WFM russa Semenova. Buona patta per la Tonel contro la WIM austrica Kopinits.

In classifica generale la GM polacca Socko torna di nuovo da sola al comando battendo la GM russa Kosinteseva.

Per sapere cosa è successo nel quinto turno, clicca QUI 




La WIM Isgrandova, avversaria della Zimina


Il GM Sanikidze, avversario odierno di Dvirnyy 


VI turno, prime scacchiere
1 36 RUS GM Timofeev Artyom RUS 2655 0-1
  GM Jobava Baadur GEO 2695 GEO 10
2 48 UKR GM Efimenko Zahar UKR 2640 1-0   GM Nisipeanu Liviu-Dieter ROU 2661 ROU 28
3 42 ISR GM Sutovsky Emil ISR 2650 4 0-1   4 GM Almasi Zoltan HUN 2720 HUN 1
4 5 ESP GM Vallejo Pons Francisco ESP 2708 4 1/2   4 GM Zvjaginsev Vadim RUS 2643 RUS 46
5 7 ENG GM Adams Michael ENG 2704 4 1/2   4 GM Sokolov Ivan BIH 2638 BIH 51

incontri degli italiani
21 15 ITA GM Caruana Fabiano ITA 2680 1-0   GM Salgado Lopez Ivan ESP 2592 ESP 100
93 65 FIN GM Nyback Tomi FIN 2624 1-0   IM Brunello Sabino ITA 2476 ITA 205
102 135 ITA GM Godena Michele ITA 2561 1-0
  IM Azaladze Shota GEO 2433 GEO 230
84 219 ITA IM Dvirnyy Daniyyl ITA 2450 3 1-0
  3 GM Sanikidze Tornike GEO 2566 GEO 130
151 261 CZE IM Plat Vojtech CZE 2395 2 1-0   2 FM Barlocco Carlo ITA 2173 ITA 337
168 274 ITA IM Lanzani Mario ITA 2371 1-0     Spika Ivica CRO 2086 CRO 357
160 279 ITA FM Valsecchi Alessio ITA 2360 2 1-0   2   Valkovic Kristian CRO 2027 CRO 366
132 302 ISR   Katzir Moshe ISR 2288 2 1/2
  2 IM Shytaj Luca ITA 2472 ITA 209
142 309 CRO FM Dimitrijevic Darko CRO 2272 2 0-1   2 IM Piscopo Pierluigi ITA 2418 ITA 242
165 336 ITA   Pantaleoni Claudio ITA 2179 0-1   IM Berbatov Kiprian BUL 2481 BUL 202
166 344 CRO   Kinez Ivo CRO 2138 0-1
  GM Ortega Lexy ITA 2479 ITA 203
167 345 ITA   Astengo Corrado ITA 2136 1/2   IM Rasulov Vugar Ural Oglu AZE 2457 AZE 215
169 350 ROU   Neagos Raul-Alexandru ROU 2110 1/2
  FM Bentivegna Francesco ITA 2361 ITA 276


incontri delle italiane
11 56 ITA IM Sedina Elena ITA 2334 1/2   GM Hoang Thanh Trang HUN 2487 HUN 11
44 60 ITA IM Zimina Olga ITA 2319 0-1
  WIM Isgandarova Khayala AZE 2224 AZE 110
63 115 ITA WIM Brunello Marina ITA 2217 2 0-1   2   Abdulla Khayala AZE 2141 AZE 136
69 123 RUS WFM Semenova Elena RUS 2195 0-1     Brunello Roberta ITA 2043 ITA 143
70 144 ITA   Tonel Giulia ITA 2023 1/2   WIM Kopinits Anna-Christina AUT 2183 AUT 127

 
Regolamento

Calendario
Il torneo si disputa sulla lunghezza di 11 turni (6-17 marzo). L'inizio delle partite è previsto per le ore 15:30. Unico giorno di riposo sabato 13 marzo. Il 18 marzo si svolgeranno gli eventuali Tie-breaks.

Criteri di spareggio in caso di arrivo a pari merito sono previsti i seguenti criteri di spareggio tecnico:
a)  Median-Buchholz 1
b)  Buchholz
c)  Numero di vittorie 
d) Punteggio Progressivo.

Spareggi Rapid sono previsti gli spareggi (15'+10" per mossa) solo per stabilire:
a)  il Campione Europeo
b)  i vincitori di Medaglie
c)  I qualificati (22) alla prossima World Cup.

Tempo di Riflessione 90' x 40 mosse + 30' per terminare la partita + 30" di incremento per mossa a partire dalla prima mossa. 

Siti Utili

sito ufficiale

Live Stream

risultati su chessresult

 articoli di presentazione di Angelmann   1^ parte  2^ parte

 Report fotografico di Ruigino Tonel

---------------------------------------------------------------
GM Caruana, Fabiano (ITA, 2680) - GM Salgado Lopez, Ivan (SPA, 2592) 1-0
Difesa Alekhine

--------------------------------------------------------------
MI Sedina, Elena (ITA, 2334) - GM Hoang Thanh, Trang (HUN, 2487) 1/2
Difesa francese
 
http://www.scacchierando.net/dblog/articolo.asp?articolo=1756
2010-03-11T14:30:00+01:00
 
 
 
11? Campionato Europeo: diretta del V turno
   
Caruana patta di nuovo e sale a 3.5
  • Dvirnyy patta con un altro GM e sale a quota 3!
  • Nulla da fare per Godena con Motylev
  • Femminile
  • La Sedina vince e sale a 3.5!
  • Nell'articolo i visori delle partite di Caruana e Godena
  • Oggi Caruana-Salgado Lopez e Sedina-GM Hoang Live h. 15.30
Nel quinto turno del Campionato Europeo, Caruana patta con Safarlj e sale a 3.5/5 mentre Godena, coraggiosamente, sceglie una variante minore della spagnola contro Motylev ma finisce con il perdere in 20 mosse. Nel sesto turno Fabiano se la vedrà con il GM spagnolo Ivan Salgado Lopez. Prosegue la serie positiva di Dvirnyy, ancora imbattuto in questo torneo, che con il nero patta con il forte GM tedesco Buhmann (2587) e sale a 3!  Domani quinto GM in questo torneo per Daniyyl: Tornike Sanikidze (2566).

Questa volta Brunello fa rispettare i favori del pronostico, vince e raggiunge Michele a quota 2.5. Domani Sabino è atteso dall'incontro con il GM Nybak (2624)

Putroppo arrivano le notizie delle sconfitte di Piscopo, Valsecchi, Lanzani, Bentivegna e, a sopresa, di Shytaj. Tutti questi giocatori restano sotto la quota del 50%.

Nessun giocatore resta a punteggio pieno dopo il V turno. In prima scacchiera Jobava ed Efimenko pattano e vengono raggiunti da Nisipeanu e Timofeev, vittoriosi su Pelletier e Skoberne. 

Femminile Buone notizie dal torneo femminile. La Sedina vince e torna nelle zone alte della classifica con 3.5. Ottima patta di Marina Brunello (nero) con la MI Borsuk. Prima vittoria in questo campionato europeo per la Tonel e per Roberta Brunello, che così salgono a 1.5. La  Zimina perde e resta a 2.5.

Anche nel torneo femminile nessuna giocatrice resta a punteggio pieno, visto che la Socko patta con Anna Muzychuk. La giocatrice polacca viene raggiunta in vetta dalla Kosintseva e, a sopresa, dalla scozzese Arakhamia-Grant che ha avuto la meglio su Pia Cramling.

Per sapere cosa è successo nel quarto turno, clicca QUI 



con il tedesco
Buhmann arriva la 4^ patta con il 4° GM per di Dvirnyy


con la turca Betul Cemre Yildiz la Sedina coglie un'importante vittoria

V turno, prime scacchiere
1 10 GEO GM Jobava Baadur GEO 2695 4 1/2     4 GM Efimenko Zahar UKR 2640 UKR 48
2 51 BIH GM Sokolov Ivan BIH 2638 1/2     GM Vallejo Pons Francisco ESP 2708 ESP 5
3 71 MDA GM Iordachescu Viorel MDA 2621 1/2     GM Adams Michael ENG 2704 ENG 7
4 24 RUS GM Inarkiev Ernesto RUS 2667 1/2     GM Szabo Gergely-Andras-Gyula ROU 2525 ROU 159
5 28 ROU GM Nisipeanu Liviu-Dieter ROU 2661 1-0     GM Pelletier Yannick SUI 2611 SUI 83

Incontri degli italiani
 
15 90 AZE GM Safarli Eltaj AZE 2606 3 1/2   3 GM Caruana Fabiano ITA 2680 ITA 15
45 6 RUS GM Motylev Alexander RUS 2705 1-0   GM Godena Michele ITA 2561 ITA 135
75 104 GER GM Buhmann Rainer GER 2587 1/2   IM Dvirnyy Daniyyl ITA 2450 ITA 219
112 163 NED IM Janssen Ruud NED 2516 2 1-0   2 FM Valsecchi Alessio ITA 2360 ITA 279
139 186 ISL GM Danielsen Henrik ISL 2494 1-0   IM Lanzani Mario ITA 2371 ITA 274
190 203 ITA GM Ortega Lexy ITA 2479 ½ 1-0   ½   Pfeifer Antun CRO 1900 CRO 382
142 205 ITA IM Brunello Sabino ITA 2476 1-0   FM Schiendorfer Emanuel SUI 2340 SUI 286
97 242 ITA IM Piscopo Pierluigi ITA 2418 2 0-1   2 GM Gajewski Grzegorz POL 2567 POL 129
155 256 RUS IM Kargin Arseny RUS 2400 1-0     Astengo Corrado ITA 2136 ITA 345
138 276 ITA FM Bentivegna Francesco ITA 2361 0-1   GM Svetushkin Dmitry MDA 2554 MDA 139
127 307 CRO FM Djurovic Goran CRO 2276 2 1-0   2 IM Shytaj Luca ITA 2472 ITA 209

Incontri delle italiane
29 56 ITA IM Sedina Elena ITA 2334 1-0   WIM Yildiz Betul Cemre TUR 2244 TUR 103
31 104 SVK   Mrvova Alena SVK 2239 1-0   IM Zimina Olga ITA 2319 ITA 60
54 53 ISR IM Borsuk Angela ISR 2338 1/2   WIM Brunello Marina ITA 2217 ITA 115
76 143 ITA   Brunello Roberta ITA 2043 ½ 1-0   ½   Starcevic Andrea CRO 1712 CRO 151
77 155 CRO   Batory Lucija CRO 1575 ½ 0-1   ½   Tonel Giulia ITA 2023 ITA 144


Regolamento

Calendario
Il torneo si disputa sulla lunghezza di 11 turni (6-17 marzo). L'inizio delle partite è previsto per le ore 15:30. Unico giorno di riposo sabato 13 marzo. Il 18 marzo si svolgeranno gli eventuali Tie-breaks.

Criteri di spareggio in caso di arrivo a pari merito sono previsti i seguenti criteri di spareggio tecnico:
a)  Median-Buchholz 1
b)  Buchholz
c)  Numero di vittorie 
d) Punteggio Progressivo.

Spareggi Rapid sono previsti gli spareggi (15'+10" per mossa) solo per stabilire:
a)  il Campione Europeo
b)  i vincitori di Medaglie
c)  I qualificati (22) alla prossima World Cup.

Tempo di Riflessione 90' x 40 mosse + 30' per terminare la partita + 30" di incremento per mossa a partire dalla prima mossa. 

Siti Utili

sito ufficiale

Live Stream

risultati su chessresult

 articoli di presentazione di Angelmann   1^ parte  2^ parte

 Report fotografico di Ruigino Tonel

Partite commentate in diretta da Megalovic
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Safarly - Caruana 1/2

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Motylev - Godena  1-0

 
http://www.scacchierando.net/dblog/articolo.asp?articolo=1754
2010-03-10T14:30:00+01:00
 
 
 
Spectacular chess in Rijeka – 4 on 4.5/5

Four players on 4.5/5 in RijekaAfter five rounds of play, Zahar Efimenko, Liviu-Dieter Nisipeanu, Artyom Timofeev and Baadur Jobava are sharing the lead at the European Individual Championship in Rijeka. The four grandmasters scored 4.5 points and are chased by 23 GMs who are on 4/5.

The 11th European Individual Men and Women’s Chess Championship is held from 5th to 19th of March 2010 in Rijeka, in new Zamet Centre sports hall. The event is organized by chess club “Rijeka”, in agreement with the Croatian Chess Federation under the auspices of the City of Rijeka and the European Chess Union. It is open to all players representing the chess federations which comprise the European Chess Union (FIDE zones 1.1 to 1.9) regardless of their title or rating. There is also no limit of participants per federation.

The championship is based on Swiss system in accordance with the ECU Tournament Rules and FIDE Rules of Chess. The rate of play is 90 minutes for 40 moves plus 30 minutes for the rest of the game with an increment of 30 seconds per move, starting from move one. As always, the European Championship is a qualification event for the next World Cup. According to FIDE regulations and the decision of the ECU Board, 22 players will qualify.

Rounds 4-5

Especially the 4th round in Rijeka saw a number of highly entertaining games and in this report we’ll present a few diagrams to give you an idea of how amazing the game of chess can be (if you didn’t knew already). Let’s start with the following brilliancy by Georgia’s number one player Baadur Jobava.

Krasenkow-Jobava
Position after 32…Rxe3Krasenkow-Jobava

The whole game had been a big tactical squirmish, but up to this point Polish grandmaster Krasenkow was still in the game. A puzzle book would ask a question like: “Is 33.Qg2 good or bad here?”. The answer… (calculate first!) …is…bad, though White had obviously counted on it. With 33.Qh4 he might still be on top, but the obvious 33.Qg2? was answered by 33…Bd4!! 34.Rxd4 Re1+35.Qf1 Ne3!! and White resigned.

Jobava

Imaginative play by Baadur Jobava

18-year-old Tamir Nabaty from Israel is a player without any title yet, but he’ll probably become at least an IM soon. In Rijeka he drew with GM Zoltan Gyimesi and then defeated GMs Gadir Guseinov and Ildar Khairullin, only to be stopped by top seeded GM Zoltan Almasi yesterday. The game against Khairullin had a nice finish.

Nabaty-Khairullin
Position after 31…Kc7Nabaty-Khairllin


Again we can pretend to be writing a tactics book (perhaps we should do that, one day…) and here we’ll ask: “Can White take on h8?” It’s a nice example of the theme “The deceiver deceived” because at first sight it looks like he cannot, because Black gives a check on e3 and then plays Qf2 (an important trick to know, often useful in blitz games as well). Then Rg1 can be answered by Re1, and after e.g. Ne8+, Kb6 Black controls the d4 square. But… if there’s a check in the position, always “check it”! The game went 32.Qxh8! Qe3+ 33.Kh1 Qf2 34.Nd5+! (the check that needed to be checked) Kd7 35.Qc8+!! (another one!) and Black resigned.


Don’t miss Movsesian’s finish in his game against Chirila, Bologan’s handling of the King’s Indian against Babula or Nisipeanu catching Pelletier’s queen. And we didn’t even mention the game Motylev-Godena yet, a true 19th century chess classic! All below in the game viewer.


After five rounds Zahar Efimenko, Liviu-Dieter Nisipeanu, Artyom Timofeev and Baadur Jobava are sharing the lead. Today the top pairings include Timofeev-Jobava, Efimenko-Nisipeanu, Sutovsky-Almasi, Vallejo-Zvjaginsev and Adams-I.Sokolov. In the women’s section Arakhamia-Grant, T.Kosintseva and Socko are on 4.5/5.

European Championship 2010 | Round 5 Standings (top 40)

European Championship 2010 | Round 5 Standings
Full standings here

Selection of games rounds 4-5

Game viewer by ChessTempo

Zamet Centre

The top boards of the 5th round

Zamet Centre

Young & old in Rijeka

Photos courtesy of the official website, more here

Links

 
http://www.chessvibes.com/reports/spectacular-chess-in-rijeka-4-players-on-4-55/
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:26:42 +0000
 
 
 
Totes Rennen in Reykjavik
Gleich vier Spieler beendeten das Reykjavik-Open mit 7 Punkten. So musste die Zweitwertung über den Turniersieg entscheiden. Hier hatte Ivan Sokolov die Nase vorn und gewann vor Yuriy Kozubov, Abhijeet Gupta und Lokalmatador Hannes Stefansson. Juniorenweltmeister Jorge Cori kam mit 6,5 Punkten auf Platz Sechs. Beste Frau wurde Harika Dronavalli. Die Inderin wurde mit sechs Punkten Zehnte. Insgesamt hatten sich 104 Spieler am Turnier beteiligt.
Turnierseite... Endstand, Partien, Bilder...
 
http://chessbase.de/nachrichten.asp?newsid=10133
Mon, 08 Mar 2010 00:00:00 GMT
 
 
 
Four-way tie at Reykjavik Open

Four-way tie in ReykjavikThe 2010 Reykjavik Open ended in a four-way tie between Abhijeet Gupta, Yuriy Kuzubov, Ivan Sokolov and Hannes Stefansson. The four grandmasters all ended on 7/9; Dutchman Sokolov had the best tiebreak.

The Reykjavik Open took place February 24 – March 3 in the capital of Iceland. It was a 9-round Swiss with 104 players (20 GMs, 16 IMs). The rate of play was 1.5 hours for 40 moves plus 30 minutes to end te game, with an increment of 30 seconds starting from move 1. The main sponsor was MP Bank, the bank started by grandmaster Margeir Pétursson and the only bank in Iceland that more or less managed to avoid the biggest damage in the crisis so far.

Reykjavik OpenAs always the Reykjavik open was quite a strong event, with 11 GMs rated higher than 2550 and six rated 2600 or higher. Besides the usual suspects (Baklan, Dreev…) there were the sometimes quite famous veterans (Westerinen, Ehlvest, Romanishin) and some of the biggest talents around (Nyzhnyk, Jorge and Deysi Cori).

In the end the first place was shared between Abhijeet Gupta (India), Yuriy Kuzubov (Ukraine), Ivan Sokolov (The Netherlands) and Hannes Stefansson (Iceland). Sokolov recovered well from his terrible result at his last open, the open in Cappelle-la-Grande. For local hero Stefansson it was the third time in a row that he ended (shared) first, and the fifth time in total.

Reykjavik Open 2010 | Final Standings (top 30)

Reykjavik Open 2010 | Final Standings

Selection of games

Game viewer by ChessTempo

Reykjavik Open 2010

Veterans meet: Alexey Dreev (Russia) vs Oleg Romanishin (Ukraine)

Reykjavik Open 2010

Newcomers meet: Yuriy Kuzubov (Ukraine) vs Ilya Nyzhnyk (Ukraine)

Reykjavik Open 2010

Peruvian rising star Jorge Cori vs Iceland's number two (on rating still behind the inactive Johann Hjartarson) Hannes Stefansson

Reykjavik Open 2010

Ivan Sokolov (The Netherlands) vs Irina Krush (USA)

Reykjavik Open 2010

A draw in the last round between Hannes Stefansson and Abhijeet Gupta

Reykjavik Open 2010

The fifth victory for Stefansson

Photos courtesy of the tournament website

Links

 
http://www.chessvibes.com/reports/four-way-tie-at-reykjavik-open/
Thu, 04 Mar 2010 10:44:29 +0000
 
 
 
Reykjavik Open final standings
Final standings, top 4
  Players Country Points Tie-break
1 Sokolov Ivan BIH 7 53
2 Kuzubov Yuriy UKR 7 52
3 Gupta Abhijeet IND 7 51,5
4 Stefansson Hannes ISL 7 51
 
http://www.usefulchess.com/others/chess_news.html#reykjavik
Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:00:31 +0200
 
 
 
Reykjavik Open 2010 - Grandmasters Sokolov, Kuzubov, Gupta and Stefansson shared the first place
The traditional Reykjavik Open chess tournament was held on 24th February - 3rd March, with 104 players taking participation. GM Ivan Sokolov bounced back after the loss in the eighth round and won a beautiful game versus IM Alex Lenderman, which propelled him to the shared first place. GM Yuriy Kuzubov also scored with white pieces, against GM Aloyzas Kveinys and joined Sokolov on the top.
 
http://www.chessdom.com/news-2010/reykjavik-open
Fri, 05 Mar 2010 02:30:11 +0100
 
 
 
Reykjavik Open 2010 - Round Eight - Abhijeet Gupta and Hannes Stefansson leading prior to the final
The traditional Reykjavik Open chess tournament is currently ongoing on Iceland, with 104 players taking participation. The 2008 World Junior Champion Abhijeet Gupta of India defeated the Bosnian GM Ivan Sokolov in the penultimate round and moved ahead to the shared first place, together with the local GM Hannes Stefansson.
 
http://reports.chessdom.com/news-2010/reykjavik-open-r8
Wed, 03 Mar 2010 03:00:26 +0100
 
 
 
Sokolov führt in Reykjavik
Trotz der Finanzkrise, die Island ganz besonders hart getroffen hat, lebt das Reykjavik Schachopen und erfreut sich in auch diesem Jahr ansteigender Beliebtheit. Viele Profis, darunter Spitzenspieler wie Dreev oder Sokolov, Openspezialisten wie Kogan, Kacheishshvili, Nataf oder Kveinys und zahlreiche einheimische Spieler beteiligen sich an Islands größtem Schachturnier, das mit einem Preisfonds von 20.000 USD wieder ansehnlich dotiert ist. Nach sieben Runden führt Ivan Sokolov (6 P.) vor Hannes Stefansson, Illya Nyzhnyk, Abhijeet Gupta und Igor-Alexandre Nataf (je 5,5 P.).
Turnierseite... Tabelle, Partien, Bilder...
 
http://chessbase.de/nachrichten.asp?newsid=10117
Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:00:00 GMT
 
 
 
Reykjavik Open 2010 - Round Three - Four players sharing the lead with perfect score
The traditional Reykjavik Open chess tournament is currently ongoing on Iceland, with 104 players taking participation. After three rounds, experienced Grandmasters Ivan Sokolov and Vladimir Baklan, as well as the former World Junior Champion Harika Dronavalli and Denmark's IM Thorbjorn Bromann, are in the lead with perfect score.
 
http://reports.chessdom.com/news-2010/reykjavik-open-r3
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:19:30 +0100
 
 
 
Scacchi tra i ghiacci : Rejkyavik - Open 2010


REYKJAVIK OPEN 2010

Il suggestivo Open di Reykjavik è iniziato il 24 Febbraio e terminerà il 3 Marzo dopo 9 turni. Sono presenti 104 giocatori provenienti da ben 22 nazioni.
Si gioca presso il Reykjavik Cityhall. L'evento è organizzato dalla Federazione Scacchistica Islandese e dal Reykjavik Chess Academy.  Il circolo cittadino che fu fondato nel 1900 vanta una lunga tradizione e il primo torneo internazionale fu organizzato nel 1964 e vide la vittoria del mago di Riga.

L'edizione 2009 registrò il record di presenze con ben 110 giocatori da 21 Paesi. Alla fine a trionfare furono Hédinn Steingrímsson, Hannes Stefánsson and Yuiry Kryvoruchko.
Erano presenti anche parecchi italiani mentre quest'anno nessuno si è spinto fino a certe latitudini.
Nel 2008 si affermò invece il duo cinese composto da Wang Yue e Wang Hao.



L'Ucraino Vladimir Baklan, numero 1 del Tabellone



LISTA PREISCRITTI

No.     Name FED Rtg
1 UKR GM Baklan Vladimir UKR 2654
2 RUS GM Dreev Alexey RUS 2650
3 BIH GM Sokolov Ivan BIH 2649
4 UKR GM Kuzubov Yuriy UKR 2634
5 USA GM Shulman Yuri USA 2624
6 USA GM Ehlvest Jaan USA 2600
7 SWE GM Hillarp Persson Tiger SWE 2581
8 IND GM Gupta Abhijeet IND 2577
9 ISL GM Stefansson Hannes ISL 2574
10 USA IM Lenderman Alex USA 2560
11 FRA GM Maze Sebastien FRA 2554
12 LTU GM Kveinys Aloyzas LTU 2536
13 FRA GM Nataf Igor-Alexandre FRA 2534
14 LAT GM Miezis Normunds LAT 2533
15 ISR GM Kogan Artur ISR 2524
16 SWE IM Grandelius Nils SWE 2515
17 UKR GM Romanishin Oleg M UKR 2512
18 ISL GM Danielsen Henrik ISL 2495
19 UKR IM Nyzhnyk Illya UKR 2495
20 POR GM Galego Luis POR 2487
21 PER IM Cori Jorge PER 2483
22 IND IM Harika Dronavalli IND 2471
23 RUS GM Ivanov Mikhail M RUS 2465
24 USA IM Krush Irina USA 2455
25 SRB IM Boskovic Drasko SRB 2454
26 IND FM Grover Sahaj IND 2448
27 DEN IM Bromann Thorbjorn DEN 2434
28 ISL IM Gunnarsson Jon Viktor ISL 2429
29 ISL GM Thorhallsson Throstur ISL 2426
30 PER WIM Cori T Deysi PER 2412
31 IND WGM Karavade Eesha IND 2405
32 ISL IM Thorfinnsson Bragi ISL 2398
33 IND IM Tania Sachdev IND 2398
34 ISL IM Kjartansson Gudmundur ISL 2391
35 ISL IM Thorfinnsson Bjorn ISL 2383

Presente anche il duo Jorge e Deysi Cori, fratelli peruviani ormai veri e propri globetrotter scacchistici vista l'assiduità con cui stanno giocando tornei in giro per il mondo.



Deysi e Jorge ( a 2 su 2) Cori, fratelli Peruviani



MI indiana Tania Sachdev, ha fermato sul pari il GM svedese Hillarp Persson



Un'altra MI Indiana, Harika Dronavalli, a 2 su 2

L'Islanda è un Paese affascinante e degno di essere visitato nonostante la scarsità di popolazione (coloni prevalentamente giunti da Norvegia e Isole britanniche verso la fine dell'800 d.c.) e l'isolamento geografico.Infatti la varietà e la particolarità di scenari naturali  la rendono una nazione unica sotto certi punti di vista. L'islanda è scolpita dai ghiacci ma è anche ricca di vulcani e da questo mix derivano forti contrasti e colori irripetibili.

Il Paese è stato investito da una profonda crisi economica nel 2008 a cui si è giunti dopo una serie di sintomi negativi come l'eccessivo ricorso al credito da parte dei cittadini determinandone una maggiore esposizione al rischio, una bolla immobiliare determinanta da una continua crescita dei prezzi delle case e investimenti nel settore ed infine un elevato rapporto debito sul pil. Insomma una situazione non poi così lontana dalla nostra con l'aggravante che con una popolazione ed economia di così piccole dimensioni le banche si sono trovate molto più in difficoltà ad affontare uno scenario talmente negativo. Ora in virtù della crisi la moneta ha perso gran parte del valore e giocare il torneo e visitare il Paese è particolarmente conveniente.

Un Viaggio in Islanda sulle note di Joga,
canzone della nota cantante locale Bjork





FOTO







Un'installazione di Tea Mäkipää and Halldór Úlfarsson durante il Reykjavik Art Festival



Reykjavik



Una splendida e imponente Chiesa ghiacciata



Aurora Boreale


LINKS UTILI:


RISULTATI e ABBINAMENTI
QUI  

  PARTITE IN DIRETTA QUI
 
http://www.scacchierando.net/dblog/articolo.asp?articolo=1733
2010-02-25T23:00:00+01:00
 
 
 
Zherebukh (16) wins in Cappelle

Yaroslav ZherebukhYaroslav Zherebukh Saturday won the strong open in Cappelle-La-Grande. The Ukrainian grandmaster, just 16 year old, was the only player to finish on 7.5/9. Veteran GM Mihhail Gurevich was doing well, but lost the crucial round 8 game to Zherebukh.

Yaroslav Zherebukh | Photo Jean Michel Delfosse

The 26th edition of the Cappelle-La-Grande chess festival was held 13-20 February. The main event was a big 9-round Swiss.

The rate of play of 90 minutes plus 30 seconds per move for the first 40 moves and then 30 minutes plus 30 seconds per move to the end of the game. Draws by mutual agreement in under 20 moves were not allowed.

venue

The tournament was organized by the “L’Echiquier Cappellois” chess club and took place at the Palais des Arts in Cappelle-la-Grande, just south of Dunkerque, France.


Yet another relatively unknown Ukrainian grandmaster won in Cappelle this year. 16-year-old Yaroslav Zherebukh scored 7.5 points and only lost to the winner of last year, Yuri Vovk. As Chess Today reports, both are in fact pupils of IM Vladimir Grabinsky.

Zherebukh finished ahead of many favourites, such as Yuri Drozdovskij (2625), Murtas Khazgaleyev (2643) and Ivan Sokolov (2649). The latter probably won’t like to be reminded of the tournament, finishing 85th with 5.5/9 as the top seed. His performance rating was just at GM level: 2507. In Wijk aan Zee Sokolov told me that he’ll be tournament director of the big Bosna chess festival this year, so, well, he has more important things to do! ;-)

Cappelle-La-Grande 2010 | Final Standings

Cappelle 2010

Selection of games

Game viewer by ChessTempo

Links

 
http://www.chessvibes.com/reports/underdog-zherebukh-wins-in-cappelle/
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:28:42 +0000
 
 
 
26th Cappelle-la Grande Open
The 26th Cappelle-la Grande Open takes place 13th-20th February 2010. Ivan Sokolov, Murtas Kazhgaleyev, Jon Ludvig etc play.
 
http://www.chess.co.uk/twic/chessnews/events/26th-cappelle-la-grande-open
Sun 14 Feb 2010 09:04:00 PM UTC
 
 
 
Torneo Internacional de Ajedrez Ciudad de Linares: Ronda 1

Veselin Topalov (BUL-2805), Levon Aronian (ARM-2781), Boris Gelfand (ISR-2761), Vugar Gashimov (AZE-2759), Alexander Grischuk (RUS-2736) y Francisco (Paco) Vallejo Pons (ESP-2705), empezaron a mostrar su talento y arrancó Linares.

 

La primera edición del torneo fue en 1978. En esta primera edición fue la única en que participó un jugador giennense, Viriato Pacheco y fue ganada por el sueco Jaan Eslon (que jugó muchos torneos en España, ya fallecido), fue el ganador de esta edición empatado a puntos con Roberto Debarnot de Argentina. Desde entonces se celebró de los años impares hasta 1987, año en que Linares acogió el match final de candidatos al título entre Anatoly Karpov y Andréi Sokolov. A partir de 1988 el torneo se ha venido celebrando todos los años (a excepción de 1996 en el que la ciudad acogió el Campeonato del mundo de ajedrez femenino).

 
http://www.zonadeajedrez.com/noticias/noticias/837-torneo-internacional-de-ajedrez-ciudad-de-linares-ronda-1
Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:19:21 +0000
 
 
 
Brunello e Denis Rombaldoni a Cappelle La Grande


Brunello e Denis Rombaldoni a Cappelle Le Grande

Con i suoi 640 iscritti ha preso il via oggi, a Cappelle Le Grande (Francia), uno degli Open più frequentati dell'Europa occidentale. Il livello dei partecipanti non è certamente quello del concomitante Aeroflot, ma è garantita la presenza di una ventina di over 2600. Difenderanno i nostri colori i Maestri Internazionali Sabino Brunello e Denis Rombaldoni, alla caccia di una Norma GM.

Denis Rombaldoni è alla sua seconda partecipazione consecutiva in questa manifestazione. Nell'edizione del 2009 Denis partì alla grande battendo il GM Frolyanov, ma successivamente incappò in qualche passo falso concludendo, comunque, con un apprezzabile 5.5/9.

Dopo aver superato abbondantemente quota 2500 e aver sfiorato la terza norma GM, Sabino Brunello ha attraversato un periodo di leggero appannamento. Questo torneo potrebbe essere l'occasione giusta per rimettersi in marcia.

Partecipano al torneo altri due giocatori italiani: Felix Stips (2205) e Veronika Goi (1944).

In arrivo dal Moscow Open, anche quest'anno non farà mancare la sua presenza in questo torneo il Grande Maestro russo Igor Naumkin, simpatico e talentuoso giocatore spesso impegnato nei tornei italiani. 

E' prevista la trasmissione in diretta delle prime 20 scacchiere (visore in fondo a questo articolo)

I turno degli italiani

7 BRUNELLO Sabino 2484   DUHAYON Yves 2241
69 ROMBALDONI Denis 2497   WEGE Jochen 2263
103 ZDEBSKAJA Natalia 2408   STIPS Felix 2209
37 NABUURS Mart 2143   GOI Veronika 1944

i nostri due Alfieri


Veronika Goi, unica giocatrice italiana in gara, mentre gioca alla cieca

foto tratta dalla galleria fotografica del settore arbitrale della FSI

 

Igor Naumkin

Preiscritti Over2600

1 SOKOLOV Ivan 2649 F BIH
2 KAZHGALEYEV Murtas 2643 F KAZ
3 HAMMER Jon Ludvig 2627 F NOR
4 DROZDOVSKIJ Yuri 2625 F UKR
5 ROZENTALIS Eduardas 2623 F LTU
6 SANDIPAN Chanda 2622 F IND
7 NEGI Parimarjan 2621 F IND
8 SUMETS Andrey 2621 F UKR
9 VOROBIOV Evgeny E. 2621 F RUS
10 BALOGH Csaba 2619 F HUN
11 FEDORCHUK Sergey A. 2619 F UKR
12 SANIKIDZE Tornike 2615 F GEO
13 MAMEDOV Nidjat 2610 F AZE
14 GHARAMIAN Tigran 2609 F FRA
15 EDOUARD Romain 2608 F FRA
16 CORRALES JIMENEZ Fidel 2602 F CUB
17 KRYVORUCHKO Yuriy 2602 F UKR
18 FIER Alexandr 2601 F BRA
19 KOVALYOV Anton 2601 F ARG


Ivan Sokolov, numero uno del ranking di partenza


Jon Ludvig Hammer ha fatto la fortuna di molti fantallenatori nell'Europeo 2009


Parimarjan Negi, 6° nel Corus B 2010


la cinese Zhao Xue, giocatrice con l'elo più alto (2504)


Regolamento

Non sono ammesse le patte per accordo in meno di 20 mosse. In caso di arrivo in sede di gioco con oltre 30' di ritardo verrà decretata la sconfitta

Calendario si gioca dal 13 al 20 febbraio tutti i giorni alle ore 14 ad esclusione del primo turno, posticipato alle 16 e dell'ultimo, anticipato alle 10. Il giorno 15 si disputeranno due turni (3° e 4°), il primo alle ore 9 ed il secondo alle 17.

Sistema di accoppiamento viene utilizzato lo svizzero accelerato per 7 turni

Tempo di riflessione 90' x 40 mosse + 30' x terminare la partita + 30" di incremento per mossa dalla prima mossa.


un'immagine della sede di gioco tratta dal sito ufficiale

Siti Utili

sito ufficiale

articolo dell'edizione 2009 di runner

Visore
 
http://www.scacchierando.net/dblog/articolo.asp?articolo=1723
2010-02-13T20:00:00+01:00
 
 
 
Moscow Open 2010

  31 over 2600 in gara!

Inizia oggi la “20 giorni moscovita”, con la sesta edizione dell’Open di Mosca che, ormai tradizionalmente, prelude al torneo Aeroflot (8 – 19 febbraio). L’ombra dell’open più forte del mondo  toglie forse un po’ di luce ad un Festival in realtà fantastico, con numeri da capogiro: circa 1300 gli scacchisti in gara, con un open femminile che raggiunge le 136 preiscritte e la presenza di 74 GM nel torneo principale, dei quali 31 over 2600!!

Il torneo si svolge presso l’Università Statale di Mosca. Suona bene questa collocazione in un tempio della cultura, abbastanza distante, invece e purtroppo, dalla nostra realtà. Si gioca dal 30 gennaio al 7 febbraio, sempre alle ore 16 (14 in Italia) tranne l’ultimo turno, previsto alle 11 (le nove da noi). Identico per tutti i tornei il tempo di gioco, 105 minuti per la partita più 30 secondi per mossa a partire dalla prima. Come sempre razionale e ben fatto il sito di riferimento http://www.moscowchessopen.ru/eng/index . Prevista la trasmissione online delle partite, con link non ancora segnalato ma che credo corrisponda al solito http://russiachess.org/online/ . Montepremi notevolissimo di oltre 5 milioni di rubli (circa 118.000 euro), con 500.000 rubli al vincitore del torneo A.

Sergei Rublevsky

I primi 20 del tabellone principale:

1 GM Rublevsky Sergei 2697 RUS 1974

2 GM Motylev Alexander 2697 RUS 1979

3 GM Bologan Viktor 2692 MDA 1971

4 GM Bu Xiangzhi 2673 CHN 1985

5 GM Georgiev Kiril 2672 BUL 1965

6 GM Zhigalko Sergei 2668 BLR 1989

7 GM Kurnosov Igor 2668 RUS 1985

8 GM Najer Evgeniy 2665 RUS 1977

9 GM Vescovi Giovanni 2660 BRA 1978

10 GM Lastin Alexander 2659 RUS 1976

11 GM Nepomniachtchi Ian 2658 RUS 1990

12 GM Sasikiran Krishnan 2653 IND 1981

13 GM Grachev Boris 2653 RUS 1986

14 GM Khismatullin Denis 2651 RUS 1984

15 GM Inarkiev Ernesto 2649 RUS 1985

16 GM Le Quang Liem 2647 VIE 1991

17 GM Bareev Evgeny 2643 RUS 1966

18 GM Kazhgaleyev Murtas 2643 KAZ 1973

19 GM Savchenko Boris 2638 RUS 1986

20 GM Andreikin Dmitry 2635 RUS 1990

 

Ernesto Inarkiev

Non pochi i giocatori che hanno già toccato quota 2700 in carriera. Grandissimo equilibrio comunque e gara pressoché impossibile da pronosticare. Un open così dovrebbe essere più adatto a giocatori che sanno rischiare e che riescono a trovare una buona vena nella gara, tuttavia un giocatore “solido” come Inarkiev, ad esempio, si è comportato benissimo sia nel 2008, nel gruppo dei secondi (alle spalle di Timofeev) dopo aver condotto il torneo con una impressionante serie di vittorie, sia nel 2009, sempre nel gruppetto dei secondi a mezzo punto dal vincitore Onishuk. D’altra parte, altrettanto buoni i risultati di un furente attaccante come Nepomniachtchi, anche lui a 7 su nove nel 2009 (e vincitore dell’Aeroflot 2008!).

"Nepo"

Sorprende un poco la discesa sotto i 2700 di Bu Xiangzhi ma il 24enne cinese ha relativamente ridotto la sua attività nel 2009, giocando peraltro meno spesso all’estero, forse in relazione ad impegni extra-scacchistici (magari qualche lettore ne sa di più). Se si è preparato per questa gara (e per il prossimo Aeroflot) Bu potrebbe essere da “pronosticare”. Notevole crescita nel recente periodo per il 19enne vietnamita Le Quang Liem, sicuramente talentuoso anche se non so se già abbastanza maturo e “roccioso” da sapersi imporre in un torneo così difficile. Fuori dai primi 20 in graduatoria Elo spiccano i nomi della Hou Yifan (2590) e del super creativo 17enne Sanan Sjugirov (2610). Non mancano poi grandi nomi, come Bareev, Andrei Sokolov, Evgeny Sveshnikov. Nonostante i ripetuti fallimenti nel fantascacchi, mi lancio comunque con un possibile podio: 1° Nepo, 2° Bu, 3° Rublevsky!

Bu Xiangzhi

Da notare la presenza di Igor Kurnosov, oggetto lo scorso anno all’Aeroflot di accuse di utilizzo di mezzi informatici da parte di Mamedyarov, duramente battuto nel confronto diretto e ritiratosi poi dalla gara; ne parlammo anche attraverso un’intervista a Mamedyarov di Ludwig Rettore, nostro corrispondente da Mosca (!! : - ) ) nelle ultime due edizioni. Non mi sembra che quest’anno Ludwig sia presente ma ripropongo l’introduzione al torneo che ci ha inviato nell’edizione 2009, del tutto attuale per trasportarci nella capitale degli scacchi:

Luwig Rettore impegnato contro il super GM Emil Sutowsky

"Agli amici di Scacchierando,

Mosca è indubbiamente la vera capitale degli scacchi, citare la meraviglia di questi due megaopen immancabilmente appaiati nel mese di febbraio sarebbe per me l’ennesima ripetizione e naturalmente non sono il solo esempio che premia e mette in luce la dedizione di questa città per la nostra amata arte. A tratti è proprio l’aria che si respira a fare la differenza, si vedono ragazzi in metrò presi da tattiche sfide sul cellulare, né è una rarità vedere gente intenta a risolvere l’ultimo problema sulla Shakmatnaia Nedelia, o su un qualche quotidiano russo. Per di più si tratta spesso di problemi che escono dalla nostra un po’ labile mentalità scacchistica in quanto non tendono necessariamente a combinazioni da matto o a cospicui vantaggi di materiale bensì guarda un po’, a semplici vantaggi posizionali, al guadagno di un pedone o dei due alfieri, o ancora di una misera casa debole. Il testo si rivela essere sempre il bianco muove ( e perciò non necessariamente vince!) inducendo perciò il solutore a immedesimarsi nella partita, e a cercare la verità in ogni ambito dell’arte scacchistica, in ogni parte dell’universo della scacchiera. Insomma andare a caccia anche di quei cosiddetti ‘vantaggi minori’ rientra nella tipica logica della scuola russa e porta ad apprezzarne forse ancor più globalmente il gioco e perciò a migliorarsi… (Un consiglio per i nostri mitici direttori Messa e Capece…)

Ma a proposito di bella aria che si respira, io mi reco spesso allo sgangherato circolo dell’Oktiabrskaia club (con le sedie senza schienale e i re senza croce) a due passi dal monumento di Lenin. Qui i tornei lampo sono all’insegna dei grandi maestri e talvolta anche dei grandi nomi, una fortuna che ovviamente si possono permettere data la vastità di GM. Anzi… vedendone sempre di nuovi viene da chiedersi: ma quanti ve ne sono nella sola Mosca? Una domanda che rimbalzo a Runner and company…

Beh per stavolta ho messo più in luce lo sfondo che i tornei in sé data ahimé, la carenza di italiani disposti a parteciparvi quest’anno. Niente Caruana, niente Brunello… (presenti all’Aeroflot 2008 - ndr) quasi niente, nell’Aeroflot a dire il vero vi sarò soltanto io mentre nell’Open di Mosca sarò accompagnato appena da un altro paio di italiani nell’Open B. Ovviamente niente di sufficiente a destare troppo interesse… eppure…eppure pensandoci bene un bel nome in grado di difendere i nostri colori e a farci sognare c’è, soprattutto ricordando quello che ha fatto l’anno scorso e di come gioiva non solo per i risultati eccellenti ottenuti ma anche, ancor più, per il vostro apporto! Avete capito di chi sto parlando?…"

Na zdarovia!

Ludwig Rettore

Non mi sembra ci siano italiani in gara in questa edizione 2010 ma il “nostro” Igor Naumkin (autore di un magnifico torneo nel 2008) c’è anche quest’anno!

Se poi vogliamo affidarci ad un’assonanza italiana per tifare possiamo puntare l’attenzione su Giovanni Vescovi, anche se a parte il nome non ho idea di quanto vicina e avvertita sia la sua ascendenza italiana. Vescovi, 31 anni, è diventato IM a 15 anni e GM a 20, entrando nella top 100 mondiale nel 2001 e superando la soglia dei 2600 nel 2002, pur contemperando l’attività scacchistica con gli studi giuridici. Tra i suoi migliori risultati la vittoria nel torneo delle Bermuda del 2004, doppio girone a sei giocatori in cui ha superato Gelfand, Movsesian, Iordachescu, Shabalov e Macieja, concludento imbattuto con 7 su 10. Nel dicembre 2006 la decisione di lasciare il professionismo per dedicarsi alla carriera legale. Tuttavia, incoraggiato da familiari ed amici, lo scorso giugno ha scelto di dedicarsi completamente all’attività scacchistica, con l’obiettivo dichiarato di superare i 2700. Ha vinto il suo settimo titolo brasiliano lo scorso dicembre ma ha avuto una prova sofferta in prima scacchiera nel recente World Team Chess Championship. Questo Moscow Open é una occasione, peraltro non facile, per ritrovare fiducia.

Il pluricampione brasiliano Giovanni Vescovi

 

 
http://www.scacchierando.net/dblog/articolo.asp?articolo=1702
2010-01-30T02:00:56+01:00
 
 
 
Corus Chess Tournament
shirovThe 2010 Corus Chess Tournament is taking place from 15th until 31st January 2010 in Wijk aan Zee, Netherlands. The winner of the top group will qualify for the Grand Slam Final 2010.

The Corus has three main tournaments. They are played according to the round-robin system, whereby each competitor plays in turn against every other during the tournament. All three Grandmaster groups have 14 players and start on January 16th. All rounds begin at 13:30 hours, except for the last round on January 31st, which begins at 12.30 hours.

The first rest day arrived after four rounds of fierce fighting. Alexei Shirov is off to a flying start in the top group A, having scored all four wins, and is now full point ahead of the chasing pack. "If I try to play for a draw with Black in the Petroff, I lose, and when I try to win with White I also lose." - Shirov shared for the official website. Thus far, Alexey Shirov earned three IJmond Veelzijdig prizes, awarded by the commentator GM Ivan Sokolov for the best game of the day in each group.Hikaru Nakamura continues to play in fantastic shape after the World Team Chess Championship and signs nice wins against van Wely and Short. Tied on the second place with Nakamura are Magnus Carlsen and Vassily Ivanchuk. Dutch Grandmasters Loek van Wely and Jan Smeets are holding a negative record with three consecutive losses each.

In the B group former Russian and now Dutch wonderboy Anish Giri and experienced Chinese Ni Hua are sharing the first place with three points each. Giri beat the top Grandmasters P. Harikrishna and Liviu-Dieter Nisipeanu at the beginning, while Ni also scored against strong opposition - Emil Sutovsky and Finland's Tomy Nyback. The two leaders split point ina head-to-head encounter in the 4th round. Dmitry Reinderman, another local Grandmaster, is last with only half a point which he took off from Giri.

Two future stars, Li Chao and Ray Robson, are dominating the mixed C tournament, and both have collected 3.5 points from four games. The nearest followers are full point behind, but the race is still long with nine rounds to go.

The action continues on Thursday, tune in to follow the games on the official website. A number of other chess services provide live expert commentary on selected games.


shirov
Alexei Shirov


vassily-ivanchuk
Vassily Ivanchuk


ni-hua
Ni Hua


nisipeanu
Liviu-Dieter Nisipeanu



 
http://www.fide.com/component/content/article/1-fide-news/4290-corus-chess-tournament
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 06:41:50 +0000
 
 
 
Niederländische Liga
Mit einigen deutschen Spielern gespickt ist die auch Mannschaft von Homburg Apeldoorn, die in der höchsten niederländischen Spielklasse, der Meesterklasse antritt. In der heutigen 5. Runde hatten die Spieler GM Michael Hoffmann, GM Sebastian Siebrecht und IM Ilja Zaragatski nichts zu bestellen und verloren allesamt bei der 2,5-7,5 Klatsche gegen den souveränen, verlustpunktfreien Tabellenführer aus Groningen, welcher mit Ivan Sokolov am Spitzenbrett antritt. IM Alexander Kabatianski gelang für die Apeldoorner immerhin ein Remis gegen IM Erik Hoeksema. Mit 8 Mannschaftpunkten Tabellenzweiter ist derzeit Schrijvers Rotterdam. HSG ist das zweite Topteam der Liga, da mit Stars wie Van Wely, Stellwagen, L´Ami , Smeets, Seirawan und Nikolic bestückt. HSG hat noch eine Nachholpartie gegen den punktlosen Tabellenletzten HWP SAS van Gent zu bestreiten und könnte bei einem Sieg auf Platz 2 vorstoßen.  Offizielle Seite
 
http://www.schach.com/component/content/article/1-schach/772-niederlaendische-liga
Sun, 10 Jan 2010 23:20:35 +0000
 
 
 
Aronian, Agassi and the Project Triangle of Chess

Every chess player, no matter how weak, has a high point in his career. Mine occurred in May 2007, during the last round of the Dutch Team Chess Championship. I was playing in the Master League, the highest level in Dutch chess, and I was surrounded by all the top players of The Netherlands. Moreover, I had prepared a spectacular line which was sure to make the headlines the next day. In reality, I was displaying typical amateur behaviour.

During the first moves, I was king of the world; never felt better. Everything went according to plan. From the outside, it looked as if we got a sharp position on the board, full of chances for both players. To be sure, everybody was looking at my game. What could go wrong? Yet it was then that it all went horribly wrong.

My opponent was the talented youngster Wouter Spoelman, now a respected GM who recently did live commentary for ChessVibes during the Tal Memorial. In a sharp Najdorf main line, I had ‘prepared’ an obscure variation which would guarantee me interesting play against the uncastled black king, and with my opponent unprepared, I hoped to achieve at least a draw and, most  importantly, gain the respect from my teammates, including several grandmasters. It wasn’t to be.

Moll-Spoelman
Dutch League, 2007

In this position, instead of the usual 14.f6, I played the little-analysed

14.g6!? and immediately got up from my chair. I walked around for a while and saw that Ivan Sokolov was studying my position with some interest. I also saw that my opponent had never looked at this move before as he buried his head in his hands and started thinking for almost 45 minutes. In the mean time, I walked around, ordered several coffees, chatted with friends and enjoyed life. When I finally came back to the board, I saw that my opponent had played the expected

14…hxg6 I remembered that John Nunn, in his seminal The Complete Najdorf: 6.Bg5 now gave 15.fxg6 fxg6 16.b4 Na4 17.Nxa4 bxa4 18.e5! leading to extremely complex play, as in the game Markzon-DeFirmian, New York 1991, which I had thorougly looked at in my preparations. So I instantly played what is in retrospect the most stupid move of my entire chess career:

15.fxg6?? and went in total shock after Spoelman played

15…0-0!! … brutally ending my preparation by playing a novelty Nunn failed to mention and, more importantly, which I had failed to analyse beforehand. I immediately felt I was now lost in a higher sense: black’s king is safe, he has an extra center pawn, a lead in development and apart from an isolated e-pawn, my pieces just don’t coordinate at all. I cursed myself for my sloppy homework and my horrible attitude of walking around and being proud of myself instead of thinking about the game. Most of all, I realized how utterly untalented I was in ‘feeling chess’, in recognizing crucial moments and sensing the ‘momentum’, especially in such an important game. I felt utterly amateurish in such a professional setting, and I was truly ashamed of myself. 

Of course, if I had actually thought for a few minutes at move 15, I would have played 15.fxe6! regardless of what Nunn had written, if only because Black can’t castle after that in view of the threat Nd5. Now, however, after the subsequent 16.Qh5 fxg6 17.Qxg6 Bf6 Black was already better and won easily in 32 moves. It was to be my last game in the Master League, and I think I still haven’t fully recovered since. I’m a ‘mere’ chess amateur now - always was destined to be one – and all I have of that period is a few good memories of playing at a level where I totally didn’t belong.

Well, to be honest I had it coming. My ‘preparation’ consisted of checking Nunn’s book and looking at a few possibilities in the DeFirmian game. I hadn’t really studied the tactical nuances of the position at all, let alone its strategical characteristics. I simply lacked the time to do more than I did, but I was also lazy. In short, I lacked both time and interest. I guess I just wasn’t that into chess anymore.

Secondly, I found the fact that I was playing together with these top players in one room more important than actually winning the game. I was playing chess for all the wrong reasons: not because I wanted to have success, but because I wanted to be successful. I wanted to enjoy chess instead of playing it well. And thirdly, of course, I just lacked the talent to turn the game around after seeing it go wrong. In fact, I didn’t even believe in being able to turn it around.  I played a few weak moves right after the crucial stage and found myself lost before I knew it. 

Why am I telling you all this? I think the three factors I’ve mentioned quite accurarely define amateur chess life in general. I thought about this during a project management course in which the teacher showed us the following picture:

This dilemma (here applied to restaurants) is also known as the Project Triangle, which states a project can’t be done cheap, fast and good: it’s always a combination of two, not three of these. Similar examples can be found in other fields, such as operation systems (fast, efficient, stable), engineering parts (strong, light, cheap), dateable men (handsome, high-Earner, faithful) and, inevitably, women (single, sane, sexy, smart – choose three). 

Can this principle also be applied to chess? Well, a club member of mine has long ago suggested that for chess players, it’s impossible to be succesful in relationships, work and chess all at the same time. But what about more specific chess-related aspects? Looking at the above example, I came up with the following ‘Chess Triangle’:

Chess Triangle

Pick any two. It’s funny how this triangle works for me: I can have fun and not spend time studying chess, but I will lose games as a result of this relaxed attitude and therefore not be successful. Or I can enjoy chess and aim to be successful, but it requires hard work and there’s no way to take it easy. Finally, I can relax and be successful, but at the very least it forces me to play systematic, mechanical and – to me – dull chess; trustworthy openings I know like the back of my hand, instead of experimenting with interesting new ideas.

I think this pretty much works for most chess players, but some seem to defy the rule gloriously. Levon Aronian seems a case in point. The Armenian super-GM has a reputation of not being a hard worker at all. He seems the ultimate example of the relaxed chess player who’s still successful and has fun playing. Asked about the single most important factor in his current success, he answered: “Pure luck”. This seems to echo Artur Rubinstein, arguably the greatest pianist of the 20th century, who once proclaimed: “It is said of me that when I was young I divided my time impartially among wine, women and song. I deny this categorically. Ninety percent of my interests were women.”

Aronian likes to sleep late and has claimed to be “lazy” in his opening preparation. Is he the Rubinsteinian exception that proves the rule? Perhaps, but I, for one, do not believe for a single second that he doesn’t prepare his ass off, together with Gabriel Sargissian, when he faces the big guys. Apart from his reputation of being lazy, Aronian, just like Rubinstein, also has a reputation of being ironic in his answers - perhaps to disguise his true intentions, perhaps because he equates being serious with being boring.

Looking at some of Aronian’s colleagues, however, it’s easy to see hard work is a necessary part of being succesful in chess even for those who could theoretically compensate it with sheer talent. This is the same message Malcolm Gladwell brings home in his recent book Outliers: it’s all about hard work, or: practice, practice, practice. (Gladwell mentions both chess and music as clear examples.) Sadly, that’s exactly what chess amateurs like me lack: time to practice. Even ignoring the fact that most amateurs, including myself, lack any talent for the game, it’s simply a matter of not having enough time to spend on chess, resulting in such awful things as my game against Spoelman.

Like so many others, I try to compensate it by telling myself it’s all about “having fun” and “taking it easy”, but somehow it feels bad when the results don’t follow. No matter how hard I convince myself of the opposite, I still feel positively annoyed whenever I lose. Then again, I don’t want to play ’solid’ or ’safe’ chess and at least avoid the worst kind of catastrophes. I want to have fun in chess, not only by scoring good results but also by playing itself.  But maybe this, too, is over-ambitious.

I’ve often wondered whether a chess ‘pro’ like Vladimir Epishin, who used to play in about every European tournament imaginable, routinely grinding amateurs down in the first three rounds only to start playing seriously against his colleagues in later rounds – whether he actually enjoys chess as a game. Sure, he often wins prizes and he works hard for it, but that’s preciesely the point: it’s work for him (and many others), but where’s the fun in playing? Does he enjoy trying out a new idea in the Sicilian? Somehow, I have my doubts.

I am reminded of Andre Agassi, one of my teenage tennis-heroes, who recenlty stated (in his autobiography) that he hated tennis during his most succesful period. (And he wasn’t alone: his wife, Steffi Graf, used to hate it, too.) Again, the triangle seems to work not only for amateurs but for most (chess) players I can think of. You can’t have fun and relax and be successful at the same time – come to think of it, this is especially true for professionals.

Well then, may it be a consolation for us patzers! We’ll remain amateurs for the rest of our lives – and boy, don’t we hate it? – but at least we get to choose whether we want to have fun, to relax or to be succesful (at least to a certain extent). Against Spoelman, I chose to relax, and got kicked for it hard. Andre Agassi didn’t have that option. Sometimes being an amateur isn’t so bad after all.

 
http://www.chessvibes.com/columns/aronian-agassi-and-the-project-triangle-of-chess/
Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:48:55 +0000
 
 
 
Five Easy Pieces: White Open Sicilian Repertoire
Many amateur chess players are put off from playing the Open Sicilian (1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 followed by 3.d4) as White because of the wide range of choices at Black's disposal and the apparently large amount of theory you need to know to support this choice. The Open Sicilian looks like a lot of study.  But 2.Nf3 followed by 3.d4 is looking better than anything else against the Sicilian these days, and the anti-Sicilian side-lines (especially the Grand Prix, Smith-Morra, and Alapin) have accumulated enough theory of their own to make the effort to learn them nearly comparable to some main line repertoire choices.  A number of repertoire books, including John Nunn's three editions of Beating the Sicilian (my first influence), Nigel Davies's interesting Taming the Sicilian, Jesus de la Villa's mixed bag Dismantling the Sicilian, and (the best of the lot and most current) Quality Chess's multiple-authored Experts vs. the Sicilian make it almost seem possible to get your arms around main line Open Sicilian theory with just a little guidance.

But is it possible to construct a low-theory, not-so-mainline Open Sicilian repertoire that is completely supported by free web sources?  That's the challenge I took on in compiling the following "Five Easy Pieces" main line Sicilian webliography.  If anyone is looking for a "starter" Open Sicilian repertoire on the web, here it is.  I may revise it down the road if my interest (or that of readers) merits, especially to add to the supplemental resources at the end.  As always, reader suggestions are most welcome.

The lines I have chosen emphasize White's claim on the center, typically with an early f4 advance. These are very dangerous lines, especially at the amateur level where you are likely to score many quick kills by just over-running your opponent in the center (typically with an early e5) or on the kingside (often with an f5 advance).

1) Sicilian Dragon, Levenfish Variation (B71)
The Levenfish Variation has always intrigued me. White sets a huge trap for naive Dragoneers (or hasty blitz players) who continue with the natural 6...Bg7, when 7.e5! leads to some very sharp and dangerous play (that anyone who is booked enough to survive would have avoided by playing the safer 6...Nc6 in the first place!)  And some Black alternatives turn out not to be completely free of danger, as the following resources suggest.



Transpo Tips: Black can sidestep the Levenfish and "enter the Dragon" via an Accelerated (2...Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Nxd4 g6) or Hyper-Accelerated (2...g6) move order. You can meet the Accelerated with an early f4 push in the Maroczy Bind (which is essentially a Four Pawns Attack against the KID) as described in "How to Beat a GM, Part One Torture" and "How to Beat a GM, Part Five" by IM Tim Taylor. And you can meet the Hyper-Accelerated with 3.d4 cxd4 4.Qxd4! Nf6 5.e5! as discussed by Gary Lane in Opening Lanes #115 -- meeting 3.d4 Bg7!? with 4.dxc5! Qa5+ 5.c3! as discussed by Jonathan Hilton in "How Wojo Won: The Accelerated Dragon" (which covers Nakamura - Wojtkiewicz, New York 2005, where Wojo lost; also see their game from 2004).

2) Najdorf (B93), Scheveningen (B82), and Classical (B56) with f4

Viktor Kupreichik and others have played a very straight-forward f4 system against lines where Black gets a small center (with d6 and e6).  This is most clear in the Najdorf line 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 exd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.f4 followed generally by a4, Bd3, Nf3, O-O, and possibly Qe1-g3 or -h4. This is a very straightforward line and much easier for White to play than for Black. 




3) Sveshnikov Variation, Markovic Attack (B33)
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 e5 6.Ndb5 d6 7.Nd5 Nxd5 8.exd5
This might be called the "simplified Svesh," as White avoids the long and well-trodden paths of 7.Bg5 for the exchange line 7.Nd5 Nxd5 8.exd5, fixing the pawn center and giving the game a more strategic character. White can play this line in a few ways, but my links below focus on two: (1) the tricky and tactical 8...Nb8 9.Qf3!? meeting 9...a6 by 10.Qa3 pinning the a-pawn so that the Knight can remain on b5 and preparing a direct piece assault on the backward d-pawn by Bd2-b4, and (2) the solid 8...Nb8 9.c4 planning an eventual f4! to hault Black's kingside ambitions before getting on with the business of a queenside attack with c5.  The latter will hold up best long-term, but the former makes for some fun games and perhaps an interesting side-line.

Transpo Tips: Black can try to reach the Sveshnikov while side-stepping the 7.Nd5 line via different early-e6 move orders, but the f4 system I recommend will generally keep play in our ballpark. White also needs to be prepared for the other ...e5 lines, especially the Haberditz and Lowenthal discussed by Bücker above.  Strong play against the Lowenthal was demonstrated in the game Robson - Vigorito, which I have annotated. 

4) Paulsen and Kan (B48)
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nc6 5.Nc3 followed generally by Be3, Bd3, O-O and eventual f4 advance.  This is much more straight-forward than the g3 "Guseinov Gambit" lines I've written about here previously.

5) Pin Variation, Koch's Refutation (B40)
The ultra-sharp Pin Variation (
1.e4 c5  2.Nf3 e6  3.d4 cxd4  4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 Bb4) has become popular among amateurs, but Koch's 6.e5 looks practically like a refutation.

Supplemental Material
Black has a number of sidelines that you need to know as White.  I may add more material here and welcome reader recommendations.

  • Kovacevic vs Pazos-Gambarrotti at Chessgames
    A solid response to 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 d5!? is 5. Bb5, which practically forces a favorable ending for White -- as analyzed in depth by Gary Lane in Opening Lanes #124 at ChessCafe.
  • Tofte - Wohl, Arctic Challenge 2009 at Chessgames
    This looks like a good approach to the Grivas (early Qb6), which represents essentially a transposition to the f4 lines considered above.  The main line Grivas for White typically involves an ultra-aggressive g4 and O-O-O here, but I think White does better with the more circumspect O-O treatment that Tofte demonstrates.
 
http://www.kenilworthchessclub.org/kenilworthian/2010/01/five-easy-pieces-open-sicilian.html
Sun, 03 Jan 2010 05:45:00 +0000
 
 
 
NJKOs Advance to Final Four

The New Jersey Knockouts advanced to the final four of the US Chess League with their victory Monday night over Baltimore. Wins by the New York Knights (Monday over Boston), Miami Sharks (Wednesday over Seattle) and San Francisco Mechanics (Wednesday over Arizona) have made for an unpredictable final, since the Knockouts were the only team with the better record to advance. Miami's victory over Seattle was especially a surprise, with GM Julio Becerra not only beating GM Hikaru Nakamura but doing so in a record 12 moves!

I have analyzed the Knockouts victory over Baltimore and posted it online in a java replay article along with the PGN file to download.

The New Jersey - Baltimore match was very hard fought, but Baltimore had little chance against the best team in the League playing with draw odds (which meant that Baltimore had to win the match to advance). Nevertheless, Baltimore gave it their all and the games were very hard fought and complex (which is part of why I have not posted my analysis sooner!)

The game that interested me most was the Board One encounter between GM Joel Benjamin and GM Sergey Erenburg, which had lots of drama in all of its stages. Benjamin played the super-solid Spanish Four Knights (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Bb5), which I have written about in these pages (see my Spanish Four Knights Bibliography and various articles). It's a great opening to choose when you are playing with draw odds as White. Erenburg played the increasingly popular 4...Bd6!? which has been discussed by a number of sources, including an article in SOS #1 by Jeroen Bosch titled "Sokolov's Surprise" (currently available online as a PDF download at the New in Chess website.) This line has turned into a "cold war" of sorts, with Black waiting for White to castle kingside before he castles himself to avoid a potentially dangerous g4-g5 attack. The waiting game continues with White playing h3 (to support a possible g4 advance) and a3 (to provide an escape square for the Bishop) and Black playing h6 (to prevent a pin by Bg5) and a6 (trying to gain the Bishop pair by either Bxc6 dxc6 or Ba4 b5 Bb3 Na5 etc.) Black has more useful waiting moves than White does, however, and so White generally castles before Black and the second player can equalize without much trouble (as discussed by Larry Kaufman in The Chess Advantage in Black and White). But if Black wants to avoid a drawish Four Knights game then he might need to think of another plan.

Some recent games have shown that Black can get away with castling right away, inviting White into the complications that follow g4 and often gaining good counterplay against White's king in the center. It's a double-edged continuation, but just the thing if you need to play for a win, so Erenburg naturally gave it a try. But he made a clear mistake after 5.d3 a6 6.Ba4 h6 7.a3 0-0!? 8.g4! Bc5 9.Rg1 d6 10.h3 Nh7 when White pushed forward with 11.g5 and he answered with 11...g6? (temporarily sacrificing a pawn) when probably 11...hxg5 or even 11...h5!? are better and lead to a balanced but complex struggle. After Erenburg's error, Benjamin had firm control of the initiative and great prospects of a kingside attack. However, just when the game began to look like it would be decided in the middlegame, Benjamin traded queens and headed for a slightly advantageous ending so that he could play for a win or draw without risk of losing. Erenburg fought hard and the ending became a very double-edged slugfest. Benjamin probably was never really at risk of losing, but both players were challenged to keep from getting in time trouble due to the complexity of the situation. Eventually Benjamin found a line that assured either a clear advantage or a draw by repetition (which by that point would have won the match.) Refusing to submit to the team loss, Erenburg chose a dangerous way to continue the game, after which Benjamin was able to force a win on the strength of a central passed pawn. This was quite an epic encounter and worth careful study.

Dean Ippolito's game on Board Two against Tegshsuren Enkhbat was a much more straightforward affair. The opening posed some problems for Black, but none for which Ippolito seemed unprepared. Displaying his command of elite opening theory, Ippolito demonstrated an important improvement on some previous high level games in a line of the Slav where White typically has some chances of making trouble for Black in the ending. But Ippolito played with excellent care and secured a draw by repetition in an equal Rook ending. It is possible that most of the game was covered in his preparation.

On Board Three, Mackenzie Molner took up the White side of a well-traveled and extremely double-edged line of the Sveshnikov Sicilian where Black gambits a pawn. His opponent, Shinsaku Uesugi, eventually got very strong counterplay that won back the pawn with advantage. However, rather than patiently building up his position, Uesugi went for premature breakthroughs (especially with 28...f4 and 37...e3) that ended up allowing lots of exchanges. When he exchanged Rooks in time pressure with 42...Ra7, the game petered out into a drawn bishops of opposite color ending, which essentially guaranteed a New Jersey match win.

Battsetseg - Finn
Black to play.

Bour Four had the brilliant expert Sean Finn playing WIM Tsagaan Battsetseg in a line of the Saemisch King's Indian that resembled a Benko Gambit. A clear ratings favorite, Battsetseg seemed to be playing to keep things under control and have a quiet game. But Finn would have none of that, offering up his b-pawn for queenside counterplay. Battsetseg declined the gambit but Finn got good play anyway. And when Battsetseg seemed to have him stymied, Finn channeled Boris Gulko to play a brilliant "GM Exchange sac" that changed the course of the game. Likely White could have maintained equality, but Battsetseg missed a neat tactic (see diagram above) that netted Finn a winning material advantage, which he promptly converted with the help of connected passed pawns. This was a brilliant game from start to finish and I expect Finn to have a master rating by next season.

Next week, New Jersey faces their arch-rival New York Knights, who have been responsible for ending New Jersey's previous two seasons. Let's hope there are plenty of donuts on hand -- and that the third time is the charm.

Related Links
 
http://www.kenilworthchessclub.org/kenilworthian/2009/11/njkos-advance-to-final-four.html
Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:43:00 +0000
 
 
 
Torneo internacional de Pamplona
GM Julio Granda

GM Julio Granda

Esta época de diciembre parece ser la más propicia del año para jugar ajedrez. Para prueba, pueden observarse las páginas www.ajedrezenmadrid.com, www.susanpolgar.blogspot.com, http://www.europe-echecs.com/ o www.chess-results.com/, que en opinión de este colaborador le brindan muy buena información al interesado en estos temas. En estas páginas, el lector podrá informarse de la gran cantidad de torneos que hay actualmente en juego en todo el mundo.

El torneo internacional de Pamplona comprende un torneo magistral, al que aquí haremos referencia, y uno abierto, en el que hay inscritos 60 jugadores; todos españoles, con excepción del búlgaro Iván Tetimov.

Ficha del torneo magistral: 
Organizador  : IO Joaquin Perez-Seoane
Director del Torneo  : GM Jesus De la Villa García
Árbitro Principal  : IA Jesus Mena
Árbitro  : FA Gregorio Sola
Ciudad  : Pamplona
Categoría  : 13 (Elo medio: 2575)
Fecha  : 21.12.2009 A 29.12.2009

El torneo se disputará en el Hotel Blanca de Navarra de Pamplona. El acto de clausura y el reparto de premios tendrán lugar el día 29 de diciembre de 2009 a las 21′00 horas en la sala de juego.
 
El ritmo de juego será de 90 minutos para las primeras 40 jugadas más otros 30 minutos para terminar la partida.  Desde la primera jugada se añadirán 30 segundos por cada nueva jugada realizada. Se utilizarán relojes digitales. 

Listado de Participantes torneo magistral:

SNo.

 

Nombre

EloInt

FED

Aut

1

GM

GEORGIEV, Kiril

2672

BUL

  -

2

GM

MEIER, Georg

2653

GER

  -

3

GM

GRANDA ZÚÑIGA, Julio E.

2640

PER

Can

4

GM

LAZNICKA, Viktor

2637

CZE

Cat

5

GM

MIRZOEV, Azer

2617

AZE

Cat

6

GM

LOPEZ MARTINEZ, Josep Manuel

2589

ESP

Cat

7

IM

ALSINA LEAL, Daniel

2523

ESP

Cat

8

IM

RECUERO GUERRA, David

2494

ESP

Ast

9

IM

REINALDO CASTIÑEIRA, Roi

2488

ESP

Gal

10

IM

HUERGA LEACHE, Mikel

2435

ESP

Nav

 Clasificación tras la 4ª ronda:

Rank

SNo.

 

Nombre

Elo

FED

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Pts

Sonen

Res.

1

7

GM

GRANDA ZUÑIGA, Julio E.

2640

PER

*

 

 

 

1

1

 

 

1

1

4

5,00

0

2

3

GM

GEORGIEV, Kiril

2672

BUL

 

*

½

½

 

 

1

½

 

 

4,50

0

3

1

GM

MEIER, Georg

2653

GER

 

½

*

½

½

 

 

 

 

1

3,50

0

4

2

GM

LOPEZ MARTINEZ, Josep M.

2589

ESP

 

½

½

*

 

 

½

 

 

1

3,25

0

5

4

GM

LAZNICKA, Viktor

2637

CZE

0

 

½

 

*

 

½

1

 

 

2

3,00

0

6

6

GM

MIRZOEV, Azer

2617

AZE

0

 

 

 

 

*

 

½

½

1

2

1,00

0

7

9

IM

ALSINA LEAL, Daniel

2523

ESP

 

0

 

½

½

 

*

 

½

 

2,75

0

8

8

IM

REINALDO CASTIÑEIRA, Roi

2488

ESP

 

½

 

 

0

½

 

*

 

 

1

2,25

0

9

5

IM

RECUERO GUERRA, David

2494

ESP

0

 

 

 

 

½

½

 

*

 

1

1,75

0

10

10

IM

HUERGA LEACHE, Mikel

2435

ESP

0

 

0

0

 

0

 

 

 

*

0

0,00

0

A continuación, veamos quiénes han ganado el torneo desde que se fundó en el año 90. 

AÑO

CAMPEÓN  SEGUNDO TERCERO

1990

Leonid Yudasin Viktor Korchnoi Zsuzsa Polgar

1991

Leonid Yudasin Miguel Illescas Zsuzsa Polgar

1992

Joel Lautier Miguel Illescas David García

1993

Jordi Magem Andrei Sokolov Felix Izeta

1994

Alexander Morozevich Vadim Zvjaginsev Jordi Magem

1995

Jordi Magem Julio Granda Miguel Illescas

1996

Zoltan Almasi Jonathan Speelman Zurab Azmaiparashvili

1997

Miguel Illescas Ulf Anderson Julio Granda

1998

Alexander Morozevich Michal Krasenkov Loek Van Welly

1999

Nigel Short Boris Gelfand Zoltan Almasi

2001

Viktor Bologan Teimour Radjabov Zoltan Almasi

2002

Rustam Kasimdzhanov Viktor Bologan Paco Vallejo

2003

Miguel Illescas Luke McShane Emil Sutovsky

2004

Boris Gelfand Segei Karjakin Lázaro Bruzón

2005

Ruslan Ponomariov P. Harikrishna Ivan Cheparinov

2006

Alexander Morozevich Dmitry Jakovenko Alexei Shirov

2007

Francisco Vallejo Yue Wang Baadur Jobava

2008

Krishnan Sasikiran Vladimir Malakhov Francisco Vallejo

Veamos ahora dos de las partidas que ha ganado el peruano Julio Granda, que en esta ocasión lleva cuatro partidas ganadas en las cuatro rondas.     
                  
Granda Zúñiga, Julio (2640) – Recuero Guerra, David (2494) [A29]
19. Ciudad de Pamplona – Magistral Pamplona ESPAÑA (2.2), 22.12.2009

 1.c4 Cf6 2.Cc3 e5 3.Cf3 Cc6 4.g3 Ab4 5.Ag2 0–0 6.0–0 Te8 7.d3 h6 8.e4 d6 9.h3 a6 10.Ae3 Axc3 11.bxc3 b5 12.c5 Ae6 13.cxd6 cxd6 14.Cd2 d5 15.Cb3 Dc8 16.Rh2 dxe4 17.dxe4 Td8 18.Dc1 Dc7 19.Da3 Axb3 20.axb3

Granda se ha quedado con la pareja de alfiles.

20…Td3 21.Db2 a5

El negro se prepara para doblar las torres en la columna ‘d’.

22.Tfd1 Txd1 23.Txd1 Td8 24.Tc1 Db7 25.c4 Cb4 26.Da1 bxc4 27.Txc4 Cc6 28.Da4 Td6 29.Tc5 Db4 30.Dxb4 axb4 31.Tc4 Cd7 32.Af1 Rh7 33.Rg2 Rg6 34.f4 f6 35.Rf2 Rf7 36.h4 exf4 37.gxf4 g5 38.e5 fxe5 39.fxg5 hxg5 40.hxg5 Cd4 41.Tc7 Rg6 42.Ad3+ Rh5 43.Tc1 e4

La situación del rey negro es delicada. Está cayendo en una red de mate. Por eso se deciden a entregar este peón.

44.Axe4 Ce5 45.Af4 Te6 46.Re3 Cg6 47.Th1+ Rg4 48.Tg1+ Rh5 49.Th1+ Rg4 50.Rxd4 Cxf4 51.g6!? Te7 52.Th7 Ce6+ 53.Rc4 Cg7 54.Ad5 Rf5 55.Txg7 Txg7

La torre está presa y el otro peón está a punto de caer.
56.Af7 Re5 57.Rc5 Rf6 58.Rxb4 Re7 59.Rc5 Rd7 60.Rd5 Re7 61.Re5 Rf8 62.Re6

Ahora la torre está obligada a tomar.

Posición final

1–0
(15) Mirzoev, Azer (2617) – Granda Zúñiga, Julio (2640) [E20]
19. Ciudad de Pamplona – Magistral Pamplona ESP (3.5), 23.12.2009
1.d4 Cf6 2.c4 e6 3.Cc3 Ab4 4.Ad2 0–0 5.a3 Axc3 6.Axc3 Ce4 7.Dc2 Cxc3 8.Dxc3 b6 9.Cf3 Ab7 10.e3 d6 11.Ae2 Cd7 12.0–0 c5 13.Tfd1 De7 14.dxc5 Cxc5 15.Cd2 Tac8 16.Tac1 Tc7 17.b4 Cd7 18.Dd4 Tfc8 19.Cb3 Dg5

El peón ‘d’ es débil, pero por ahora Granda amenaza mate en ‘g2’.

20.g3

Posición después de 20.g3

Posición después de 20.g3

Da la impresión de que esta jugada sea la causa de muchos de los problemas del GM Mirzoev a lo largo de la partida.

20…Dg6

Tampoco se puede tomar el peón ‘d’ por 21…De5, con nueva amenaza de mate.

21.Df4 e5 22.Dg4 Df6 23.Dh3 g6 24.Df1 De6 25.Cd2 Cf6 26.Af3 Aa6 27.b5 Ab7 28.Axb7

Aquí termina el capítulo del poderoso alfil blanco de las negras. Pero continua vigente la debilidad blanca en ‘c4’.
 
28… Txb7 29.Tc3 Tbc7 30.Td3 Rg7 31.h4 e4 32.Td4 Tc5 33.a4 h6 34.Dg2 d5!? 35.cxd5 Txd5 36.Cb3 Te5 37.Tb4?! De7 38.Tbd4 De6 39.Tb4 Cd5 40.Cd4 Dg4

Con unas piezas más activas, Granda no está interesado en las tablas.

41.Tbb1

Esto, por desgracia, es una necesidad.

41…Cc3 42.Df1 Cxd1 43.Txd1 Tc3 44.Ta1 Td5 45.De1 Td3 46.Rh2 g5 47.hxg5 Txg5 48.Rg1 Th5 49.Df1 Rh7 50.Te1 Rh8 51.Tc1? Txe3 52.Tc8+
 
[52.fxe3 Dxg3+ 53.Dg2 Dxe3+ 54.Rf1 Dxc1+ 55.Rf2 Dd2+ 56.Rg1 Dxd4+]

52…Rh7 53.Tc7 Txg3+

0–1

Construcción histórica en Pamplona

Construcción histórica en Pamplona


Artículos relacionados

  • No hay ningún artículo relacionado
 
http://www.ajedrez32.com/torneo-internacional-de-pamplona/
Sat, 26 Dec 2009 02:13:28 PST
 
 
 
Carlsen officially world’s number 1 at 2810

Last month he turned 19, and today Magnus Carlsen officialy became the official world’s number one player. On the January 1st FIDE rating list the Norwegian as a rating of 2810, 5 points more than Veselin Topalov, who had occupied the number 1 spot since October 2008.

CarlsenAfter winning the London Chess Classic with three wins and four draws it was a fact: Magnus Carlsen would become the youngest world’s number one in chess history. Thanks to the “live list” by Hans Arild Runde (which you can also find in the far right column on this website) everyone could already see how the top rankings would look like, and today this became official due to FIDE’s publication of the January list.

World Champion Viswanathan Anand won 2 points and is still in third place; after the Tal Memorial and London Vladimir Kramnik surpassed Levon Aronian to become 4th. Vassily Ivanchuk is back in the top 10, and Wang Yue entered for the first time – the Chinese GM is now the world’s 9th player. After a successful period, Shakhriyar Mamedyarov is 11th now. Leko and Morozevich dropped out of the top 10.

Frenchman Vachier-Lagrave, just two months older than Carlsen, has now entered the top 20 while another former prodigy, Sergei Karjakin, dropped out – but let’s not forget he’ll be defending his Corus title soon. Vladimir Malakhov’s successful period resulted in a rise from spot 31 to 22. Without getting too much attention, Zoltan Almasi and David Navara occupy the excellent spots 26 and 27.

ShortA disappointing London Chess Classic cost Nigel Short his 2700+ rating but he’s still just England’s best player at 2696; Michael Adams is now one spot below him at 2694. 17-year-old Fabiano Caruana did well again and climbed no less than 30 places; from spot 81 to 51. Another young player did even better: 18-year-old Sergei Zhigalko went from 93 to 58. New in the top 100 compared to the previous list are Ian Nepomniachtchi (69th), Wesley So (77th), Viktor Laznicka (84th), Le Quang Liem (93rd) Tomi Nyback (97th) and Evgeny Bareev (98th).

In the women’s list again the top 3 didn’t change; the difference between Judit Polgar and Humpy Koneru is now 68 points. Nadezhda Kosintseva climbed from 9th to 5th while Alexandra Kosteniuk and Kateryna Lahno are back into the top 10. Nana Dzagnidze dropped out from 4th place all the way to 14th.

Below you’ll find the new top 100, the top 100 women, the top 20 juniors and the top 20 girls. We give the first two lists including the changes with the previous lists. All data courtesy of FIDE.

FIDE JANUARY 2010 RATING LIST: TOP 100 PLAYERS

Legend:
black color – player remained on the same position
green color – player moved up in the list
red color – player moved down in the list
blue color – player is new to the current Top list
Old represents player’s position in the previous period list

Rank   Old    Name Title Country Rating Games
 1  2  Carlsen, Magnus  g  NOR  2810 (+9)  16 (+6)
 2  1  Topalov, Veselin  g  BUL  2805 (-5)  4 (-6)
 3  3  Anand, Viswanathan  g  IND  2790 (+2)  9 (+9)
 4  5  Kramnik, Vladimir  g  RUS  2788 (+16)  16 (+16)
 5  4  Aronian, Levon  g  ARM  2781 (-5)  17 (+4)
 6  7  Gelfand, Boris  g  ISR  2761 (+3)  25 (+14)
 7  6  Gashimov, Vugar  g  AZE  2759 (+1)  21 (+10)
 8  12  Ivanchuk, Vassily  g  UKR  2749 (+10)  13 (0)
 9  16  Wang, Yue  g  CHN  2749 (+15)  8 (-19)
 10  8  Svidler, Peter  g  RUS  2744 (-10)  27 (+10)
 11  19  Mamedyarov, Shakhriyar  g  AZE  2741 (+22)  19 (-6)
 12  9  Leko, Peter  g  HUN  2739 (-13)  9 (-1)
 13  13  Ponomariov, Ruslan  g  UKR  2737 (-2)  25 (+20)
 14  17  Eljanov, Pavel  g  UKR  2736 (+7)  14 (-1)
 15  14  Grischuk, Alexander  g  RUS  2736 (0)  8 (-5)
 16  11  Radjabov, Teimour  g  AZE  2733 (-15)  13 (+3)
 17  10  Morozevich, Alexander  g  RUS  2732 (-18)  19 (+19)
 18  23  Vachier-Lagrave, Maxime  g  FRA  2730 (+12)  21 (+21)
 19  15  Jakovenko, Dmitry  g  RUS  2730 (-6)  17 (+7)
 20  20  Shirov, Alexei  g  ESP  2723 (+4)  19 (+1)
 21  18  Karjakin, Sergey  g  RUS  2720 (-3)  12 (0)
 22  31  Malakhov, Vladimir  g  RUS  2716 (+10)  15 (-11)
 23  28  Wang, Hao  g  CHN  2715 (+7)  10 (-3)
 24  34  Bacrot, Etienne  g  FRA  2713 (+13)  18 (-9)
 25  21  Dominguez Perez, Leinier  g  CUB  2712 (-7)  4 (+4)
 26  33  Almasi, Zoltan  g  HUN  2710 (+6)  7 (-8)
 27  30  Navara, David  g  CZE  2708 (+1)  15 (+6)
 28  24  Nakamura, Hikaru  g  USA  2708 (-7)  7 (-10)
 29  22  Movsesian, Sergei  g  SVK  2708 (-10)  2 (-14)
 30  27  Tomashevsky, Evgeny  g  RUS  2705 (-3)  14 (-7)
 31  26  Vallejo Pons, Francisco  g  ESP  2705 (-6)  10 (-10)
 32  39  Jobava, Baadur  g  GEO  2704 (+8)  15 (+15)
 33  25  Alekseev, Evgeny  g  RUS  2703 (-12)  13 (+6)
 34  32  Kasimdzhanov, Rustam  g  UZB  2702 (-3)  2 (-3)
 35  40  Motylev, Alexander  g  RUS  2697 (+2)  6 (-17)
 36  37  Rublevsky, Sergei  g  RUS  2697 (0)  4 (-13)
 37  38  Nielsen, Peter Heine  g  DEN  2697 (0)  0 (-10)
 38  29  Short, Nigel D  g  ENG  2696 (-11)  7 (-9)
 39  36  Adams, Michael  g  ENG  2694 (-4)  17 (+5)
 40  41  Kamsky, Gata  g  USA  2693 (-2)  6 (-10)
 41  42  Vitiugov, Nikita  g  RUS  2692 (-2)  8 (-16)
 42  44  Volokitin, Andrei  g  UKR  2692 (+1)  8 (-8)
 43  43  Bologan, Viktor  g  MDA  2692 (0)  6 (-18)
 44  45  Naiditsch, Arkadij  g  GER  2687 (-2)  13 (-13)
 45  46  Miroshnichenko, Evgenij  g  UKR  2686 (0)  0 (-26)
 46  48  Polgar, Judit  g  HUN  2682 (+2)  4 (-2)
 47  50  Nisipeanu, Liviu-Dieter  g  ROU  2681 (+4)  12 (-2)
 48  51  Sargissian, Gabriel  g  ARM  2680 (+4)  12 (-4)
 49  35  Akopian, Vladimir  g  ARM  2678 (-22)  10 (+3)
 50  49  Moiseenko, Alexander  g  UKR  2677 (0)  0 (-17)
 51  81  Caruana, Fabiano  g  ITA  2675 (+23)  18 (-3)
 52  47  Bu, Xiangzhi  g  CHN  2673 (-9)  6 (-16)
 53  54  Georgiev, Kiril  g  BUL  2672 (0)  0 (-13)
 54  53  Harikrishna, P.  g  IND  2672 (0)  0 (-16)
 55  78  Fressinet, Laurent  g  FRA  2670 (+17)  12 (-2)
 56  62  Areshchenko, Alexander  g  UKR  2670 (+6)  6 (-10)
 57  52  Onischuk, Alexander  g  USA  2670 (-2)  4 (-14)
 58  93  Zhigalko, Sergei  g  BLR  2668 (+22)  13 (+13)
 59  65  Smirin, Ilia  g  ISR  2668 (+6)  11 (-5)
 60  58  Kurnosov, Igor  g  RUS  2668 (+2)  10 (-10)
 61  59  Najer, Evgeniy  g  RUS  2665 (-1)  4 (-13)
 62  61  Tiviakov, Sergei  g  NED  2662 (-2)  2 (-32)
 63  67  Riazantsev, Alexander  g  RUS  2661 (0)  0 (-16)
 64  91  Vescovi, Giovanni  g  BRA  2660 (+12)  20 (+1)
 65  55  Cheparinov, Ivan  g  BUL  2660 (-11)  15 (+10)
 66  66  Berkes, Ferenc  g  HUN  2659 (-2)  9 (-12)
 67  70  Lastin, Alexander  g  RUS  2659 (+3)  4 (-7)
 68  79  Meier, Georg  g  GER  2658 (+5)  12 (+2)
 69  -  Nepomniachtchi, Ian  g  RUS  2658 (+)  10 (+)
 70  92  Beliavsky, Alexander G  g  SLO  2657 (+9)  18 (+1)
 71  56  Efimenko, Zahar  g  UKR  2657 (-11)  10 (-14)
 72  60  Ni, Hua  g  CHN  2657 (-8)  10 (-25)
 73  88  Smeets, Jan  g  NED  2657 (+7)  10 (-7)
 74  57  Sutovsky, Emil  g  ISR  2657 (-9)  9 (-17)
 75  68  Roiz, Michael  g  ISR  2657 (-2)  8 (+5)
 76  74  Avrukh, Boris  g  ISR  2656 (+1)  8 (+1)
 77  -  So, Wesley  g  PHI  2656 (+)  8 (+)
 78  69  Krasenkow, Michal  g  POL  2656 (0)  0 (-19)
 79  89  Fridman, Daniel  g  GER  2654 (+5)  8 (-7)
 80  75  Ganguly, Surya Shekhar  g  IND  2654 (0)  4 (-21)
 81  73  Baklan, Vladimir  g  UKR  2654 (-1)  2 (-30)
 82  80  Grachev, Boris  g  RUS  2653 (+1)  18 (-5)
 83  64  Sasikiran, Krishnan  g  IND  2653 (-11)  4 (-5)
 84  -  Laznicka, Viktor  g  CZE  2652 (+)  16 (+)
 85  86  Timofeev, Artyom  g  RUS  2652 (+1)  4 (-18)
 86  96  Khismatullin, Denis  g  RUS  2651 (+8)  16 (0)
 87  72  Dreev, Alexey  g  RUS  2650 (-5)  9 (-35)
 88  84  Sokolov, Ivan  g  BIH  2649 (-3)  12 (+1)
 89  94  Inarkiev, Ernesto  g  RUS  2649 (+4)  6 (-15)
 90  90  Seirawan, Yasser  g  USA  2649 (0)  2 (+1)
 91  99  Korobov, Anton  g  UKR  2648 (+6)  17 (+3)
 92  87  Postny, Evgeny  g  ISR  2648 (-2)  7 (-19)
 93  -  Le, Quang Liem  g  VIE  2647 (+)  20 (+)
 94  71  Pashikian, Arman  g  ARM  2647 (-9)  6 (-5)
 95  63  Landa, Konstantin  g  RUS  2645 (-19)  10 (-6)
 96  85  Milov, Vadim  g  SUI  2644 (-8)  6 (+1)
 97  -  Nyback, Tomi  g  FIN  2643 (+)  13 (+)
 98  -  Bareev, Evgeny  g  RUS  2643 (+)  10 (+)
 99  77  Kazhgaleyev, Murtas  g  KAZ  2643 (-10)  9 (-6)
 100  97  Socko, Bartosz  g  POL  2643 (0)  8 (-7)



FIDE JANUARY 2010 RATING LIST: TOP 100 WOMEN

Rank   Old    Name Title Country Rating Games
 1  1  Polgar, Judit  g  HUN  2682 (+2)  4 (-2)
 2  2  Koneru, Humpy  g  IND  2614 (+11)  8 (+2)
 3  3  Hou, Yifan  g  CHN  2590 (+2)  14 (-16)
 4  5  Stefanova, Antoaneta  g  BUL  2545 (+4)  7 (-8)
 5  9  Kosintseva, Nadezhda  m  RUS  2533 (+15)  9 (-12)
 6  7  Cramling, Pia  g  SWE  2528 (+3)  4 (-2)
 7  6  Muzychuk, Anna  m  SLO  2523 (-9)  25 (-3)
 8  11  Kosteniuk, Alexandra  g  RUS  2523 (+6)  10 (+4)
 9  17  Lahno, Kateryna  g  UKR  2518 (+19)  16 (+10)
 10  8  Kosintseva, Tatiana  g  RUS  2515 (-7)  8 (-12)
 11  12  Chiburdanidze, Maia  g  GEO  2514 (0)  0 (-13)
 12  13  Ju, Wenjun  wg  CHN  2512 (+3)  4 (-44)
 13  10  Sebag, Marie  g  FRA  2510 (-8)  8 (-3)
 14  4  Dzagnidze, Nana  g  GEO  2506 (-41)  19 (-1)
 15  14  Zhao, Xue  g  CHN  2504 (-2)  4 (-37)
 16  18  Mkrtchian, Lilit  m  ARM  2503 (+11)  9 (-11)
 17  15  Pogonina, Natalija  wg  RUS  2501 (0)  0 (0)
 18  16  Danielian, Elina  m  ARM  2495 (-4)  11 (-13)
 19  21  Javakhishvili, Lela  m  GEO  2493 (+11)  7 (-16)
 20  22  Cmilyte, Viktorija  m  LTU  2489 (+9)  9 (+1)
 21  19  Hoang Thanh Trang  g  HUN  2487 (0)  0 (-6)
 22  23  Paehtz, Elisabeth  m  GER  2484 (+4)  9 (+3)
 23  24  Ruan, Lufei  wg  CHN  2479 (+4)  2 (-9)
 24  20  Xu, Yuhua  g  CHN  2478 (-5)  3 (-25)
 25  26  Harika, Dronavalli  m  IND  2471 (+4)  11 (-4)
 26  34  Gaponenko, Inna  m  UKR  2470 (+13)  16 (-14)
 27  29  Arakhamia-Grant, Ketevan  g  SCO  2470 (+4)  9 (-4)
 28  32  Zhu, Chen  g  QAT  2470 (+7)  4 (-13)
 29  30  Qin, Kanying  wg  CHN  2466 (0)  0 (0)
 30  27  Zatonskih, Anna  m  USA  2466 (0)  0 (-16)
 31  33  Tan, Zhongyi  wg  CHN  2464 (+4)  3 (-22)
 32  31  Zhukova, Natalia  wg  UKR  2462 (-3)  8 (-1)
 33  39  Khotenashvili, Bela  m  GEO  2461 (+7)  8 (-17)
 34  25  Dembo, Yelena  m  GRE  2457 (-11)  8 (-12)
 35  37  Skripchenko, Almira  m  FRA  2456 (0)  0 (-5)
 36  35  Rajlich, Iweta  m  POL  2455 (-2)  13 (-7)
 37  42  Krush, Irina  m  USA  2455 (+4)  5 (-12)
 38  38  Tairova, Elena  m  RUS  2455 (0)  0 (-7)
 39  28  Ushenina, Anna  m  UKR  2452 (-14)  6 (-9)
 40  41  Hunt, Harriet V  m  ENG  2452 (0)  0 (0)
 41  36  Socko, Monika  g  POL  2450 (-7)  14 (0)
 42  46  Gunina, Valentina  wf  RUS  2448 (+2)  7 (-6)
 43  44  Korbut, Ekaterina  m  RUS  2448 (0)  0 (0)
 44  45  Muzychuk, Mariya  m  UKR  2447 (0)  0 (-12)
 45  47  Atalik, Ekaterina  m  TUR  2445 (0)  0 (0)
 46  40  Shen, Yang  wg  CHN  2444 (-8)  2 (-33)
 47  50  Foisor, Cristina-Adela  m  ROU  2440 (+5)  10 (-7)
 48  48  Huang, Qian  wg  CHN  2439 (-3)  3 (-23)
 49  52  Khukhashvili, Sopiko  m  GEO  2438 (+6)  7 (-8)
 50  57  Zhang, Xiaowen  wg  CHN  2437 (+15)  24 (-4)
 51  51  Repkova, Eva  m  SVK  2434 (0)  0 (-8)
 52  43  Romanko, Marina  m  RUS  2433 (-16)  6 (-5)
 53  49  Melia, Salome  m  GEO  2431 (-5)  9 (-4)
 54  55  Kovalevskaya, Ekaterina  m  RUS  2428 (+1)  4 (-9)
 55  60  Munguntuul, Batkhuyag  wg  MGL  2427 (+14)  15 (+1)
 56<
 
Thu, 31 Dec 2009 10:22:56 +0000
 
 
 
Lista FIDE ufficiale 1 gennaio 2010
Magnus Carlsen

Magnus Carlsen

Ecco i primi 100 giocatori della lista FIDE al 1° gennaio 2010 (Caruana è 51°):

1 Carlsen, Magnus g NOR 2810 16 1990
2 Topalov, Veselin g BUL 2805 4 1975
3 Anand, Viswanathan g IND 2790 9 1969
4 Kramnik, Vladimir g RUS 2788 16 1975
5 Aronian, Levon g ARM 2781 17 1982
6 Gelfand, Boris g ISR 2761 25 1968
7 Gashimov, Vugar g AZE 2759 21 1986
8 Ivanchuk, Vassily g UKR 2749 13 1969
9 Wang, Yue g CHN 2749 8 1987
10 Svidler, Peter g RUS 2744 27 1976
11 Mamedyarov, Shakhriyar g AZE 2741 19 1985
12 Leko, Peter g HUN 2739 9 1979
13 Ponomariov, Ruslan g UKR 2737 25 1983
14 Eljanov, Pavel g UKR 2736 14 1983
15 Grischuk, Alexander g RUS 2736 8 1983
16 Radjabov, Teimour g AZE 2733 13 1987
17 Morozevich, Alexander g RUS 2732 19 1977
18 Vachier-Lagrave, Maxime g FRA 2730 21 1990
19 Jakovenko, Dmitry g RUS 2730 17 1983
20 Shirov, Alexei g ESP 2723 19 1972
21 Karjakin, Sergey g RUS 2720 12 1990
22 Malakhov, Vladimir g RUS 2716 15 1980
23 Wang, Hao g CHN 2715 10 1989
24 Bacrot, Etienne g FRA 2713 18 1983
25 Dominguez Perez, Leinier g CUB 2712 4 1983
26 Almasi, Zoltan g HUN 2710 7 1976
27 Navara, David g CZE 2708 15 1985
28 Nakamura, Hikaru g USA 2708 7 1987
29 Movsesian, Sergei g SVK 2708 2 1978
30 Tomashevsky, Evgeny g RUS 2705 14 1987
31 Vallejo Pons, Francisco g ESP 2705 10 1982
32 Jobava, Baadur g GEO 2704 15 1983
33 Alekseev, Evgeny g RUS 2703 13 1985
34 Kasimdzhanov, Rustam g UZB 2702 2 1979
35 Motylev, Alexander g RUS 2697 6 1979
36 Rublevsky, Sergei g RUS 2697 4 1974
37 Nielsen, Peter Heine g DEN 2697 0 1973
38 Short, Nigel D g ENG 2696 7 1965
39 Adams, Michael g ENG 2694 17 1971
40 Kamsky, Gata g USA 2693 6 1974
41 Vitiugov, Nikita g RUS 2692 8 1987
42 Volokitin, Andrei g UKR 2692 8 1986
43 Bologan, Viktor g MDA 2692 6 1971
44 Naiditsch, Arkadij g GER 2687 13 1985
45 Miroshnichenko, Evgenij g UKR 2686 0 1978
46 Polgar, Judit g HUN 2682 4 1976
47 Nisipeanu, Liviu-Dieter g ROU 2681 12 1976
48 Sargissian, Gabriel g ARM 2680 12 1983
49 Akopian, Vladimir g ARM 2678 10 1971
50 Moiseenko, Alexander g UKR 2677 0 1980
51 Caruana, Fabiano g ITA 2675 18 1992
52 Bu, Xiangzhi g CHN 2673 6 1985
53 Georgiev, Kiril g BUL 2672 0 1965
54 Harikrishna, P. g IND 2672 0 1986
55 Fressinet, Laurent g FRA 2670 12 1981
56 Areshchenko, Alexander g UKR 2670 6 1986
57 Onischuk, Alexander g USA 2670 4 1975
58 Zhigalko, Sergei g BLR 2668 13 1989
59 Smirin, Ilia g ISR 2668 11 1968
60 Kurnosov, Igor g RUS 2668 10 1985
61 Najer, Evgeniy g RUS 2665 4 1977
62 Tiviakov, Sergei g NED 2662 2 1973
63 Riazantsev, Alexander g RUS 2661 0 1985
64 Vescovi, Giovanni g BRA 2660 20 1978
65 Cheparinov, Ivan g BUL 2660 15 1986
66 Berkes, Ferenc g HUN 2659 9 1985
67 Lastin, Alexander g RUS 2659 4 1976
68 Meier, Georg g GER 2658 12 1987
69 Nepomniachtchi, Ian g RUS 2658 10 1990
70 Beliavsky, Alexander G g SLO 2657 18 1953
71 Efimenko, Zahar g UKR 2657 10 1985
72 Ni, Hua g CHN 2657 10 1983
73 Smeets, Jan g NED 2657 10 1985
74 Sutovsky, Emil g ISR 2657 9 1977
75 Roiz, Michael g ISR 2657 8 1983
76 Avrukh, Boris g ISR 2656 8 1978
77 So, Wesley g PHI 2656 8 1993
78 Krasenkow, Michal g POL 2656 0 1963
79 Fridman, Daniel g GER 2654 8 1976
80 Ganguly, Surya Shekhar g IND 2654 4 1983
81 Baklan, Vladimir g UKR 2654 2 1978
82 Grachev, Boris g RUS 2653 18 1986
83 Sasikiran, Krishnan g IND 2653 4 1981
84 Laznicka, Viktor g CZE 2652 16 1988
85 Timofeev, Artyom g RUS 2652 4 1985
86 Khismatullin, Denis g RUS 2651 16 1984
87 Dreev, Alexey g RUS 2650 9 1969
88 Sokolov, Ivan g BIH 2649 12 1968
89 Inarkiev, Ernesto g RUS 2649 6 1985
90 Seirawan, Yasser g USA 2649 2 1960
91 Korobov, Anton g UKR 2648 17 1985
92 Postny, Evgeny g ISR 2648 7 1981
93 Le, Quang Liem g VIE 2647 20 1991
94 Pashikian, Arman g ARM 2647 6 1987
95 Landa, Konstantin g RUS 2645 10 1972
96 Milov, Vadim g SUI 2644 6 1972
97 Nyback, Tomi g FIN 2643 13 1985
98 Bareev, Evgeny g RUS 2643 10 1966
99 Kazhgaleyev, Murtas g KAZ 2643 9 1973
100 Socko, Bartosz g POL 2643 8 1978
 
Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:35:11 +0000
 
 
 
Hastings: dal 28 si lotta per la leggenda

hastings3
Rubinstein, Alekhine, Capablanca, Euwe, Fine, Keres, Botvinnik, Smyslov, Spassky, Tal e Karpov, giusto per citare qualche nome, chi non darebbe un mese di stipendio per finire in questo albo d’oro alzi la mano! Eppure scopro con somma sorpresa che il campo dei partecipanti non è certamente all’altezza della storia del torneo, forse complice un primo premio di “sole” 2.000 sterline…..

hastings7
Hastings, amena località balneare nella costa meridionale dell’Inghilterra….beh, diciamo subito che a dicembre fare un bagno in quelle acque non è che sia il massimo, forse è meglio giocare a scacchi. Perchè la cartolina dice famosa dal 1066?

hastings8 Semplice, perchè nel 1066 vi si tenne una importante battaglia tra le truppe di Aroldo II Re degli Anglosassoni e Guglielmo II Duca di Normandia, che aveva in neri (cioè doveva invadere l’Inghilterra)  e che vinse con una brillante combinazione: “Guglielmo convinse i suoi a fingersi spaventati e, al successivo attacco, quando i Normanni cominciarono a ritirarsi, gran parte dei Sassoni si gettò all’inseguimento. Scesi dal colle, i cavalieri si voltarono e caricarono sulla scompigliata formazione nemica.”

hastings4
Dal 1066 passiamo direttamente al 1895, anno che vede il primo grande torneo di Hastings, non ancora  disputato nel periodo di Capodanno,  ma in pieno agosto, per la gioia degli accompagnatori che potevano fare il bagno. Quel memorabile torneo, al quale partecipò anche l’italiano Beniamino Vergani, si concluse con l’inatteso successo dello semi-sconosciuto americano Pillsbury davanti a tutti i più forti giocatori dell’epoca, Lasker, Steinitz, Cigorin e Tarrasch in testa.

yates
Nel 1919 si disputa un’altra edizione estiva, vinta da Capablanca (la terza ed ultima è del 1922 e vincerà Alekhine), e finalmente giungiamo all’inverno del 1920, quando parte la prima edizione a cadenza annuale, quella 1920/21, che vedrà il successo di Frederick Dewhurst Yates (foto sopra da Chessbase). Da allora ecco i vincitori:

1920/21 Yates 1967/68 Gheorghiu, Hort, Stein and Suetin
1921/22 Kostic 1968/69 Smyslov
1922/23 Rubinstein 1969/70 Portisch
1923/24 Euwe 1970/71 Portisch
1924/25 Maróczy, Przepiorka, Steiner and Tartakower 1971/72 Karpov and Kortschnoj
1925/26 Alekhine and Vidmar 1972/73 Larsen
1926/27 Tartakower 1973/74 Kuzmin, Szabó, Tal and Timman
1927/28 Tartakower 1974/75 Hort
1928/29 Colle, Marshall and Takacs 1975/76 Bronstein, Hort and Uhlmann
1929/30 Capablanca 1976/77 Romanishin
1930/31 Euwe 1977/78 Dzindzichashvili
1931/32 Flohr 1978/79 Andersson
1932/33 Flohr 1979/80 Andersson and Nunn
1933/34 Flohr 1980/81 Andersson
1934/35 Euwe, Thomas and Flohr 1981/82 Kupreichik
1935/36 Fine 1982/83 Vaganian
1936/37 Alekhine 1983/84 Karlsson and Speelman
1937/38 Reshevsky 1984/85 Sveshnikov
1938/39 Szabó 1985/86 Petersson
1939/40 Parr 1986/87 Chandler, Larsen, Lputian, Speelman
1945/46 Tartakower 1987/88 Short
1946/47 Alexander 1988/89 Short
1947/48 Szabó 1989/90 Dolmatov
1948/49 Rossolimo 1990/91 Bareev
1949/50 Szabó 1991/92 Bareev
1950/51 Unzicker 1992/93 Polgár and Bareev
1951/52 Gligoric 1993/94 Nunn
1952/53 Golombek, Medina, Penrose, Yanofsky 1994/95 Luther
1953/54 Alexander and Bronstein 1995/96 Conquest, Khalifman and Lalic
1954/55 Keres and Smyslov 1996/97 Hebden, Nunn and Rozentalis
1955/56 Kortschnoi and Olafsson 1997/98 Sadler
1956/57 Gligoric and Larsen 1998/99 I. Sokolov
1957/58 Keres 1999/00 Sutovsky
1958/59 Uhlmann 2000/01 Conquest and Sasikiran
1959/60 Gligoric 2001/02 Barsov, Harikrishna and Sasikiran
1960/61 Gligoric 2002/03 Nielsen
1961/62 Botvinnik 2003/04 Kotronias and Rowson
1962/63 Gligoric and Kotov 2004/05 Belov  (Knock-out)
1963/64 Tal 2005/06 Neverov  (sistema svizzero)
1964/65 Keres 2006/07 Gagunashvili and Neverov (svizzero)
1965/66 Spassky and Uhlmann 2007/08 Malakhatko (svizzero)
1966/67 Botvinnik 2008/09 Kurnosov (svizzero)

Avete visto che nomi? Fino agli anni ‘90 la politica era quella di fare un torneo con pochi giocatori (normalmente 10), invitando qualche asso straniero e molti giovani britannici, ma negli ultimi anni dopo una edizione ad eliminazione diretta, si è passati al sistema svizzero, e purtroppo è diventato quasi impossibile convincere qualche forte giocatore a cimentarsi in un torneo-lotteria.

hastings6
Nella foto sopra (tratta dal bell’articolo “A Pilgrimage To Hastings 2003/4″ che trovate qui: hem.passagen.se/tjmisha/1066/hostings.html ) potete vedere una delle pareti del locale circolo scacchistico di Hastings, ricoperta di fotografie di campioni transitati da lì, e non sempre risultati vincitori.

hastings5
Questa è la sede di gioco, io sinceramente mi aspettavo uno di quegli enormi palazzi dell’800 tutto guglie……comunque qui si tengono l’open principale e gli altri tornei minori.

drozdovskij01
Vediamo il campo dei partecipanti 2009/10, che poi non è così scarso, a cominciare da Yuri Drozdovskij, l’ukraino che vanta un punteggio Elo di 2625:

DROZDOVSKIJ Yuri, UKR, gm, 2625
HRACEK Zbrynek, CZE, gm, 2624
EDOUARD Romain, FRA, gm, 2620
ISTRATESCU Andrei, ROU, gm, 2624
HOWELL David, ENG, gm, 2597
WILLIAMS Simon, ENG, gm, 2550
HEBDEN Mark, ENG, gm, 2522
ARKELL Keith, ENG, gm 2464
SHALNEV Nikolai, GER, gm, 2450
COLLINS Sam, IRL, im, 2431
PHILIPPE Christophe, FRA, im, 2430
BREDER Dennis, GER, im, 2427
GREET Andrew, ENG, im, 2423
MARTIN Andrew, ENG, im, 2423
ZDEBSKAJA Natalia, UKR, wgm, 2408

Quest’ultima è la signora del già citato GM ukraino. Come possiamo contare, 15 giocatori con un Elo superiore a 2400 punti, e sicuramente altri si aggiungeranno.

KasparovHowell2
Attenzione anche al talentuoso 19enne britannico David Howell (foto Chessbase sopra), che nel recente torneo di Londra è rimasto imbattuto con avversari del rango di Carlsen e di Kramnik, e che se non ha un calo di forma dovrebbe essere il naturale favorito.

hastings1

Durante lo svolgimento del torneo cercherò di aggiornarvi sulla situazione ed eventualmente presentarvi qualche bella partita.

 
Sat, 26 Dec 2009 19:32:34 +0000
 
 
 
The Big ChessVibes Christmas Trivia Quiz (part III of III)

Today we give you the third and last set of ten questions of our Big ChessVibes Christmas Trivia Quiz. Soon we’ll bring you all the answers. Good luck!

Today questions 21-30. Send your answers before Sunday, December 27th, 23:59 CET to christmas09@chessvibes.com and who knows, you might end up winning one of the following prizes:

Prizes

NIC Yearbook NIC Magazine ICC
First prize: 1-year subscription New in Chess Yearbook Second prize: 1-year subscription New in Chess Magazine Third prize: 1-year subscription Internet Chess Club (ICC)

Big ChessVibes Christmas Trivia Quiz – Part III

Before we start with the last ten questions, we’d like to make clear that you can answer your questions in whatever form you like. So if you prefer to use a text editor or spreadsheet program, and send an email with an attachment, that’s fine.

Rider Hotel, Cambridge Springs

21. Many of you have probably heard of the Interzonal tournament that was held in 1973 in Petropolis, but do you also know in which country that city is located?
21A Combine the following ‘chess cities’ with the correct countries in 2009.

Abazzia Bosnia & Herzegovina
Barmen Brazil
Breslau Germany
Bugojno Italy
Cambridge Springs Croatia
Merano Austria
Petropolis Poland
Semmering United States


The Luzhin DefenceA question about the above cities. True or not true?
21B Abazzia – here the famous theme tournament was held in 1912, where the Evans Gambit was the obligatory opening.
21C Barmen – this tournament (1905) had an official tournament song.
21D Breslau – birth place of Adolf Anderssen.
21E Bugojno – the main sponsor of these five tournaments was a stitching-machine factory.
21F Cambridge Springs – the Rider Hotel, where the famous 1904 tournament took place, burnt down completely during the Bay of Pigs incident in 1961.
21G Merano – the location of Nabokov’s The Luzhin Defence
21H Petropolis – Stefan Zweig, author of Die Schachnovelle, died here in 1942.
21I Semmering – the 1937 World Championship match between Vera Menchik and Sonja Graf took place here, in the Panhans Hotel.

Marcel Duchamp22. Of all chess players, Marcel Duchamp is by far the most famous for activities outside the chess world. Besides playing chess, the following persons have another career, in art, science, politics or a different kind of sports. Make the correct connections!

Utut Adianto economist at the IMF
Simen Agdestein electro technician
Nona Gaprindashvili minister
Alexander Grischuk papyrologist
Robert Hübner member of parliament
Bozidar Ivanovic pianist
Cenek Kottnauer poker player
Kenneth Rogoff tennis player
Mark Taimanov chairman national Olympic committee
Sir George Thomas soccer player
Milan Vidmar water polo player


Grave Alekhine23. Where were they buried?

Alexander Alekhine Amsterdam
Marcel Duchamp Budapest
Max Euwe Copenhagen
Bobby Fischer New Orleans
Emanuel Lasker New York
Geza Maroczy New York
Paul Morphy Paris
Aaron Nimzovich Rouen
Rudolf Spielmann Selfoss
Wilhelm Steinitz Solna


fischer24. In January 2009, at 15 years, 7 months and 1 day Anish Giri became the youngest Grandmaster in the world. Well, on that day he scored his 3rd GM norm; he received the title officially a bit later.
24A Who was the youngest GM before Giri, and who became the youngest GM after him?
24B Traditionally the list of youngest GMs in history starts with Bobby Fischer, who became a GM in 1958, when he was 15 years, 6 months and 1 day old. However, this list of youngest grandmasters ever (so not the youngest GM at a certain moment in the world, but youngest ever) contains ten names, and one of them is Fischer. Give this list of ten names in the correct order.

kiev 197825. The grandmaster tournament Kiev 1978 was won by Alexander Beliavsky, who, despite losses against the number 2 and 3, won the tournament with a 2-point margin. However, the tournament became famous because of something else: the tournament book. What was so special about this book?

player26. We know the player in the picture as a strong grandmaster. In Iceland, however, he’s mainly known as the founder and president of the only Icelandic bank that didn’t collapse in 2008. What’s his name (and the name of the bank)?

ton timman27. In the picture we see Ton Timman playing against his more famous brother Jan. Below you’ll find duos; eight of these duos are siblings, eight are not. Which eight duos are siblings?

Espen/Simen Agdestein John/Paul Littlewood
Georgy/Viacheslav Agzamov Turkan/Zeinab Mamedjarova
Daniel/Rafael Fridman Alisa/Mirjana Maric
Krum/Kiril Georgiev Predrag/Nebojsa Nikolic
Ilya/Dmitry Gurevich Boris/Ruslan Ponomariov
Mikhail/Vladimir Gurevich Nigel/Philip Short
Csaba/Jozsef Horvath Igor/Alexander Zaitsev
Edward/Emanuel Lasker Andrei/Sergei Zhigalko


28. In this video you can see on of the most successful table tennis players today (red shirt). But what is his name?
28A Bu Xiangzhi
28B Ni Hua
28C Wang Hao
28D Wang Yue


olympiad29. There are not many players who represented three different federations at Olympiads. From the following list of players, pick the two players who do not belong to this small group: Alexander Beliavsky, Erich Eliskases, Boris Gelfand, Mikhail Gurevich, Viktor Korchnoi, Zdenko Kozul, Ivan Sokolov.

journalism30. Chess journalism – which names belong to which media?

Leonard Barden Columnist El País
Frederic Friedel Columnist The Guardian
Leontxo Garcia Editor Chessbase (English)
Dirk Jan ten Geuzendam Editor Chessbase (Spanish)
Mark Gluhovsky Editor 64
Dirk Poldauf Editor British Chess Magazine
John Saunders Editor Chess Life Online
Jennifer Shahade Editor New in Chess Magazine
Yuri Vasiliev Editor Schach
Nadja Woisin Photographer Sport-Express


That’s it! Soon we’ll give the prizes to the best participants, and publish the answers. Feel free to discuss the quiz in the comments, but needless to say, no answers please!

 
Sat, 26 Dec 2009 11:53:51 +0000
 
 
 
Memorial “Mikhail Tal” 2009 (3)

Tercera ronda: Anand-Svidler.

¡Cómo preveíamos!. Hoy se dieron tres partidas preciosas. De momento me quedo con la de Anand, pero las victorias de Aronian sobre Leko y sobre todo la de Krámnik, con negras, sobre Morozevich no desmerecen en absoluto.

Hoy “Miguel Tal” estaría muy contento de su torneo (!?).

Anand pareció que sacó poco de la apertura contra Svidler, pero pronto movió un caballo de tres alfil rey a dos torre para provocar f2-f4 y f4-f5 que hizo las delicias del público presente.



A mi se me pareció esta partida a un gran combate de boxeo entre dos pesos pesados, cuando uno de ellos impone su ley, ¡con pegada directa!, que deja “groggy” al rival hasta mandarlo posteriormente al suelo tras un par de golpes más al mentón.

Pasen, vean y repito, ¡tampoco se pierdan la victoria de Krámnik!.

Sin duda, el torneo se pone ahora bonito!.     

Anand,V (2788) - Svidler,P (2754) [D85]
Memorial Tal Moscow (3), 07.11.2009
[Jimenez,A sobre notas de ICC y Rybka]

1.d4 Cf6 2.c4 g6 3.Cc3 d5 Defensa Grunfeld. 4.cxd5 Variante del Cambio. 4...Cxd5 5.Ad2!? Preparación casera para intentar batir la defensa favorita del rival. [5.e4] 5...Ag7 6.e4 Cb6 [6...Cxc3] 7.Ae3 0-0 8.h3 Para evitar la molesta clavada ...Ag4. [8.Ae2; 8.f4] 8...e5 [8...f5; 8...Cc6] 9.Cf3! exd4 [9...Cc6] 10.Axd4 Axd4 11.Dxd4 De7 Las negras no quieren entregar tan fácil el control de la columna "c" a las blancas, algo que sucedería en caso de cambiar en "d4". [11...Cc6 12.De3 Ae6 13.Td1 De7 14.Ad3 Cc4 15.Dc1 Db4 16.b3 C4e5 17.Cxe5 Cxe5 18.0-0 Tad8 19.Ab1 Dc5 20.Db2 Cf3+ 21.gxf3 Dg5+ 22.Rh1 Dh5 23.Cd5 Txd5 24.Txd5 Dxf3+ 25.Rg1 Axh3 26.Tg5 Axf1 27.Rxf1 Td8 28.Td5 Txd5 29.exd5 Dd1+ 30.Rg2 Dg4+ 1/2-1/2 Sokolov,I (2691)-Eljanov,P (2639)/Gothenburg 2005] 12.De3 [12.Ae2 Cc6 13.De3 Ae6 14.0-0 Tad8 1/2-1/2 Broomfield,M (2362)-Lalic,B (2509)/Coulsdon 2007] 12...Cc6 [12...f5 13.Ae2 fxe4 14.Cxe4 Af5 15.Cc5 Dxe3 16.fxe3 C8d7 17.Cxb7 Tae8 18.0-0 Txe3 19.Tae1 Ae4 20.Ca5 Ad5 21.b3 Cc5 22.Ab5 Txe1 23.Cxe1 Ce4 24.Txf8+ Rxf8 25.Ac6 Re7 26.Axd5 Cxd5 27.Cd3 Cdc3 28.a4 Rd6 29.Cc4+ Rd5 30.Cb4+ Rd4 31.Cc6+ Rc5 32.C4e5 Rd5 33.a5 a6 34.g4 g5 35.Rg2 Cb5 36.b4 Cbd6 37.h4 gxh4 38.Rh3 h6 39.Rxh4 Cc8 40.Rh5 Cf6+ 41.Rh4 Cd6 42.Rg3 Cfe4+ 43.Rf4 Cc3 44.Cb8 c5 45.Cxa6 cxb4 46.Cxb4+ Rc5 47.Cec6 Cc4 48.a6 Cb5 49.Rg3 Rb6 50.Rh4 Ce3 51.Rg3 Cc7 52.a7 Rb7 53.Rf4 Cxg4 54.Rxg4 Cb5 55.Rh5 Cxa7 56.Rxh6 Cxc6 1/2-1/2 Sokolov,I (2691)-Sutovsky,E (2674)/Gothenburg 2005] 13.Ab5 Diagram



13...Cb4N [13...f5 14.Axc6 bxc6 15.exf5 Dxe3+ 16.fxe3 Axf5 17.0-0 Tae8 18.Tae1 Ad3 19.Tf2 Cd5 20.Td2 Ae4 21.Cxe4 Txe4 22.Td3 Tfe8 23.Rf2 a5 24.Cd2 Cb4 25.Td7 T4e7 26.Txe7 Txe7 27.Tb1 Te5 28.a3 Cd3+ 29.Re2 Cf4+ 30.Rf3 Cd3 31.Re2 Cf4+ 32.Rf3 Cd3 33.Cc4 Tc5 34.b3 Ce5+ 35.Cxe5 Txe5 36.Tc1 Tb5 37.Tc3 Tb6 38.Re4 Rf7 39.Rd4 Re6 40.e4 Rd6 41.Tf3 Re6 42.e5 c5+ 43.Rc4 Rxe5 44.Tf7 h6 45.Txc7 Rf4 46.Txc5 Rg3 47.Txa5 Rxg2 48.b4 Rxh3 49.b5 Tb8 50.Ta6 Tg8 51.b6 Tb8 52.a4 g5 53.a5 1-0 Gleizerov,E (2552)-Iordachescu,V (2567)/Khanty Mansiysk 2007/CBM 121 Extra] 14.Tc1 Lógica y no sólo para evitar el jaque en "c2". 14...Ae6 15.b3 controlando "c4". 15...a6 16.Ae2 amenazando mejorar el caballo con Cf3-d4. 16...Cc6 17.0-0+/= f6?! Esta jugada debilitadora no gustó en el ICC. 18.Tfe1 Tad8 19.Af1 Af7 [19...Cd7? 20.Cd5!+/-] 20.Ch2! Con idea de f2-f4. 20...Ae6 21.f4! La partida se torna interesante. 21...Cd4? Diagram



[Es mejor 21...Tfe8 Rybka.] 22.f5!! La jugada de un campeón del mundo. Prácticamente de la nada resurge tácticamente. 22...Af7 [22...Ac8!? ICC. 23.Cd5 Cxd5 24.Dxd4+/= Rybka.] 23.Cg4 Con la destructora idea de e4-e5. 23...gxf5 24.Ch6+! Anand pasa brillantemente al ataque. 24...Rh8 [Pues no valía la simple 24...Rg7 por 25.Dxd4! Txd4 26.Cxf5++-] 25.Df2! Anand en su elemento táctico. 25...fxe4? [Pero, ¿qué hacer?. Rybka indica que tras lo señalado en el ICC las blancas siguen teniendo ventaja duradera: 25...f4 26.Dxf4 De5 27.Df2 c5 28.Cg4 Dg5 29.Dxf6+ Dxf6 30.Cxf6 Axb3 31.e5 Ae6 32.Cce4+/=] 26.Txe4 Dd6 [26...Ce6 27.De3 Td6 28.Te1+-] 27.Td1! clavando al caballo. 27...c5 En breve b3-b4 decide!. 28.Cxf7+ Txf7 29.b4! f5 30.bxc5! Diagram



Svidler se tambaléa antes de caer en la lona. Tras 22.f5!!, podríamos decir que el efecto sobre el deportista ruso es muy parecido al que ejercía sobre sus contrincantes la "mano de piedra" de Mike Tyson!. 30...fxe4 31.Dxf7 Cf3+ 32.Dxf3! K.O. Las doce últimas jugadas blancas fueron de "ensueño". [32.Dxf3 Dxc5+ 33.Df2+-] 1-0




Un saludo!,

Angel Jiménez Arteaga
http://www.ajedrezcanarias.com (Secretos de Alcoba)

 
Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:06:00 +0000
 
 
 
19? Torneo Internazionale Ciudad de Pamplona


E' iniziato ieri 21 Dicembre e terminerà il 29  il 19°  Torneo Internazionale Ciudad de Pamplona,  presso l'Hotel Blanca de Navarra. Si tratta di una manifestazione dalla lunga tradizione visto che si è svolto ininterrottamente dal 1990 ad oggi,  ed è organizzata  dall' Institution Oberena e sponsorizzata dal governo di Navarra e dalla città di Pamplona.
Nel corso della sua storia il torneo ha visto la partecipazione di illustri over 2700. Quest'anno non ci sono nomi della top 30 mondiale ma  la Media Elo è comunque elevata e pari a 2575 , con Kiril Georgiev numero 1 di tabellone (2672). 
Presente anche il GM cecoslovacco Laznicka, autore recentemente di una buona World Cup ma battuto ieri al primo turno dal GM peruviano Granda Zuniga.



Kiril Georgiev, numero 1 del Tabellone



LAZNICKA alla World Cup 2009

Si tratta di un torneo round robin , quindi di 9 turni, con cadenza di gioco 90 minuti x 40 mosse + 30 minuti + 30 secondi per mossa.

Curiosità:  nella prima edizione terza classificata fu la pluricampionessa Olimpica e Mondiale Susan Polgar. In quella occasione realizzò la sua terza norma di GM e conseguentemente il titolo. Nel 2006 Morozevich vinse il torneo imbattuto con 6 su 7 e perfomance pari a 2951.


Ecco la lista completa dei partecipanti 2009 :

1

GM

GEORGIEV, Kiril

2672

BUL

 

2

GM

MEIER, Georg

2653

GER

 

3

GM

GRANDA ZUÑIGA, Julio E.

2640

PER

 

4

GM

LAZNICKA, Viktor

2637

CZE

 

5

GM

MIRZOEV, Azer

2617

AZE

 

6

GM

LOPEZ MARTINEZ, Josep Manuel

2589

ESP

 

7

IM

ALSINA LEAL, Daniel

2523

ESP

 

8

IM

RECUERO GUERRA, David

2494

ESP

 

9

IM

REINALDO CASTIÑEIRA, Roi

2488

ESP

 

10

IM

HUERGA LEACHE, Mikel

2435

ESP

 


CALENDARIO TORNEO


Round 1 on 2009/12/21 at 16:00

GM MEIER, Georg 2653 - IM HUERGA LEACHE, Mikel 2435
GM LOPEZ MARTINEZ, Josep Manuel 2589 - IM ALSINA LEAL, Daniel 2523
GM GEORGIEV, Kiril 2672 - IM REINALDO CASTINEIRA, Roi 2488
GM LAZNICKA, Viktor 2637 - GM GRANDA ZUNIGA, Julio E. 2640
IM RECUERO GUERRA, David 2494 - GM MIRZOEV, Azer 2617

Round 2 on 2009/12/22 at 16:00

IM HUERGA LEACHE, Mikel 2435 - GM MIRZOEV, Azer 2617
GM GRANDA ZUNIGA, Julio E. 2640 - IM RECUERO GUERRA, David 2494
IM REINALDO CASTINEIRA, Roi 2488 - GM LAZNICKA, Viktor 2637
IM ALSINA LEAL, Daniel 2523 - GM GEORGIEV, Kiril 2672
GM MEIER, Georg 2653 - GM LOPEZ MARTINEZ, Josep Manuel 2589

Round 3 on 2009/12/23 at 16:00

GM LOPEZ MARTINEZ, Josep Manuel 2589 - IM HUERGA LEACHE, Mikel 2435
GM GEORGIEV, Kiril 2672 - GM MEIER, Georg 2653
GM LAZNICKA, Viktor 2637 - IM ALSINA LEAL, Daniel 2523
IM RECUERO GUERRA, David 2494 - IM REINALDO CASTINEIRA, Roi 2488
GM MIRZOEV, Azer 2617 - GM GRANDA ZUNIGA, Julio E. 2640

Round 4 on 2009/12/24 at 15:00

IM HUERGA LEACHE, Mikel 2435 - GM GRANDA ZUNIGA, Julio E. 2640
IM REINALDO CASTINEIRA, Roi 2488 - GM MIRZOEV, Azer 2617
IM ALSINA LEAL, Daniel 2523 - IM RECUERO GUERRA, David 2494
GM MEIER, Georg 2653 - GM LAZNICKA, Viktor 2637
GM LOPEZ MARTINEZ, Josep Manuel 2589 - GM GEORGIEV, Kiril 2672

Round 5 on 2009/12/25 at 16:00

GM GEORGIEV, Kiril 2672 - IM HUERGA LEACHE, Mikel 2435
GM LAZNICKA, Viktor 2637 - GM LOPEZ MARTINEZ, Josep Manuel 2589
IM RECUERO GUERRA, David 2494 - GM MEIER, Georg 2653
GM MIRZOEV, Azer 2617 - IM ALSINA LEAL, Daniel 2523
GM GRANDA ZUNIGA, Julio E. 2640 - IM REINALDO CASTINEIRA, Roi 2488

Round 6 on 2009/12/26 at 16:00

IM HUERGA LEACHE, Mikel 2435 - IM REINALDO CASTINEIRA, Roi 2488
IM ALSINA LEAL, Daniel 2523 - GM GRANDA ZUNIGA, Julio E. 2640
GM MEIER, Georg 2653 - GM MIRZOEV, Azer 2617
GM LOPEZ MARTINEZ, Josep Manuel 2589 - IM RECUERO GUERRA, David 2494
GM GEORGIEV, Kiril 2672 - GM LAZNICKA, Viktor 2637

Round 7 on 2009/12/27 at 16:00

GM LAZNICKA, Viktor 2637 - IM HUERGA LEACHE, Mikel 2435
IM RECUERO GUERRA, David 2494 - GM GEORGIEV, Kiril 2672
GM MIRZOEV, Azer 2617 - GM LOPEZ MARTINEZ, Josep Manuel 2589
GM GRANDA ZUNIGA, Julio E. 2640 - GM MEIER, Georg 2653
IM REINALDO CASTINEIRA, Roi 2488 - IM ALSINA LEAL, Daniel 2523

Round 8 on 2009/12/28 at 16:00

IM HUERGA LEACHE, Mikel 2435 - IM ALSINA LEAL, Daniel 2523
GM MEIER, Georg 2653 - IM REINALDO CASTINEIRA, Roi 2488
GM LOPEZ MARTINEZ, Josep Manuel 2589 - GM GRANDA ZUNIGA, Julio E. 2640
GM GEORGIEV, Kiril 2672 - GM MIRZOEV, Azer 2617
GM LAZNICKA, Viktor 2637 - IM RECUERO GUERRA, David 2494

Round 9 on 2009/12/29 at 16:00

IM RECUERO GUERRA, David 2494 - IM HUERGA LEACHE, Mikel 2435
GM MIRZOEV, Azer 2617 - GM LAZNICKA, Viktor 2637
GM GRANDA ZUNIGA, Julio E. 2640 - GM GEORGIEV, Kiril 2672
IM REINALDO CASTINEIRA, Roi 2488 - GM LOPEZ MARTINEZ, Josep Manuel 2589
IM ALSINA LEAL, Daniel 2523 - GM MEIER, Georg 2653

 

ALBO D' ORO

 

Leonid Yudasin Viktor Korchnoi Zsuzsa Polgar
Leonid Yudasin Miguel Illescas Zsuzsa Polgar
Joel Lautier Miguel Illescas David García
Jordi Magem Andrei Sokolov Felix Izeta
Alexander Morozevich Vadim Zvjaginsev Jordi Magem
Jordi Magem Julio Granda Miguel Illescas
Zoltan Almasi Jonathan Speelman Zurab Azmaiparashvili
Miguel Illescas Ulf Anderson Julio Granda
Alexander Morozevich Michal Krasenkov Loek Van Welly
Nigel Short Boris Gelfand Zoltan Almasi
Viktor Bologan Teimour Radjabov Zoltan Almasi
Rustam Kasimdzhanov Viktor Bologan Paco Vallejo
Miguel Illescas Luke McShane Emil Sutovsky
Boris Gelfand Segei Karjakin Lázaro Bruzón
Ruslan Ponomariov P. Harikrishna Ivan Cheparinov
2006 Alexander Morozevich Dmitry Jakovenko Alexei Shirov
2007 Francisco Vallejo Yue Wang Baadur Jobava
2008 Krishnan Sasikiran Vladimir Malakhov Francisco Vallejo


PAMPLONA

Una stupenda città antica di duemila anni che si può fregiare di bellissime opere artistiche ben amalgamate agli edifici moderni.  Infatti la città ha saputo  integrare con armonia le esigenze attuali con quella che è stata la propria storia, senza creare due mondi paralleli e divisi.
Anche la natura e il verde hanno conservato un vastissimo spazio.



Una bellssima immagine della cattedrale gotica di Santa Maria eretta nela XIV secolo.
In particolare il chiostro è uno splendido esempio dello stile.
Al tempo l'incoronazione del re e le riunioni del Parlamento avvenivano all'interno
della Cattedrale. Invece la facciata esterna neoclassica è molto più sobria ed esteticamente semplice.



Giardini Palacio de Navarra



La piazza di Pamplona




SITO UFFICIALE
 
2009-12-22T13:00:00+01:00
 
 
 
World Cup tiebreaks round 1: more Chinese successes

After Yu Yangyi’s surprising success of yesterday, two more famous grandmasters were eliminated by Chinese rising stars in the tiebreaks today. Gabriel Sargissian lost to Li Chao and Emil Sutovsky went down against Zhou Weiqi. Tomorrow is already the second round and we’re left with 64 players.

The FIDE World Chess Cup takes place November 20th-December 15th inn Khanty-Mansiysk, Russia. It’s a seven-round knockout with six rounds of matches comprising two games per round. The final seventh round consists of four games.

Round 1 (November 21-23): 128 players Round 5 (December 3-5): 8 players
Round 2 (November 24-26): 64 players Round 6 (December 6-8): 4 players
Round 3 (November 27-29): 32 players Round 7 (December 10-14): 2 players
Round 4 (November 30-December 2): 16 players


The time control is 90 minutes for the first 40 moves followed by 30 minutes for the rest of the game with an addition of 30 seconds per move from move one. Games start at 15:00h local time (11:00 CET).

Round 1.3

For a while it was unclear whether the tiebreaks would consist of two or four rapid games, since the results page was showing only ‘R1′ and ‘R2′ after the ‘G1′ and ‘G2′, followed by ‘B1′, ‘B2′ et cetera. But the regulations stipulate four and in the course of the day it became clear that the players indeed had to play four rapid games.

David Smerdon from Australia again showed good chess against 2700-GM Dominguez from Cuba; only after three more draws Dominguez managed to decide the match. When Smerdon had shown world-class Dragon preparation in his first game with black, the Cuban was more successful in a sideline in game 4.

Smerdon proved a tough opponent for Dominguez

GMs Navara (Czech Republic) and Laylo (Philippines) also started with two draws, but then the Czech won two games in a row. Bacrot defeated Nijboer in the first two rapid games and then decided matters by drawing a rook ending with a pawn down in the third.

Bacrot in round 2, Nijboer out

Naiditsch opened the score in his minimatch against Hou Yifan, but the Chinese countered immediately. In the third game it was the German’s turn again, the third win for Black, when Hou Yifan blundered an exchange right after the opening. With a draw in the fourth game Naiditsch reached the 2nd round,

After Movsesian yesterday, Sargissian was the second player to be eliminated by one of the many strong young Chinese grandmasters. After both winning two and then drawing two, Li Chao turned out to be the strongest blitz player. It was slightly surprising that Sargissian went for the same Scotch ending (you know, the one Radjabov likes to play with White) with Black in a must-win situation. Sutovsky suffered the same fate against Zhou Weiqi: a draw in the first game was followed by two wins for the Chinese.

Emil Sutovsky is also out

Cheparinov went through thanks to just one rapid victory against Kryvoruchko, but his friend and colleague in Topalov’s team of seconds, l’Ami, was eliminated by Sasikiran. Tiviakov lost 2.5-1.5 in the rapids against Iturrizaga (check the move 25…Nf3! in their last game) and so all Dutch speaking grandmasters had to say goodbye to the World Cup already after one round.

Sergei Tiviakov was eliminated by Eduardo Iturrizaga from Venezuela

Shabalov lost the first rapid game against Baklan, “falling for” a standard trick in the Sicilian and resigning on move 12 being two pawns down for nothing. But the Latvian-born American GM came back, allowed the same trick in the next White game because he has thought up an improvement and won eventually in the second blitz game.

Alex Shabalov (USA), another qualifier for round 2.

Negi lost to Milov and Timofeev sent Leitao home (another match where all wins were scored by the Black player). One rapid victory was enough for Khalifman to defeat Fier and after six draws; Bartel beat Grachev 2-0 in the blitz.

The match Fier-Khalifman

For Gustafsson the adventure is also over after the first round; he blew two promising positions against Inarkiev and then had to win with Black, but the Russian forced a perpetual at some point. Savchenko-Shulman was another match that was decided in the blitz; interestingly, here too Black won all rapid games. But then Savchenko won with White in the first blitz game (which was not preserved correctly, unfortunately) and drew the second. Tkachiev first drew with Black against Le Quang Liem and then beat the Vietnamese GM in two endings.

Vladislav Tkachiev knocks out Vietnamese grandmaster Le Quang Liem

So was too strong for Guseinov in quickplay; the Philippine rising star won three rapid games in a row. Nyback did the same as Shabalov: losing the first rapid game but eventually winning the match in the blitz. The by far longest match of the first round was Akobian-Tregubov, an absolute thriller. Eventually the American grandmaster won the marathon in the 10th (!) blitz game. Just look at it!

Akobian, Varuzhan USA 1 0 ½ ½ 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 9
Tregubov, Pavel V. RUS 0 1 ½ ½ 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 7

Tiebreak games round 1

Game viewer by ChessTempo

Cheparinov and L'Ami before the start of the tiebreak...

...Cheparinov having reason to smile afterwards as well...

...but L'Ami went down against Sasikiran

FIDE World Cup – Tiebreak results round 1

Name NAT G1 G2 R1 R2 R3 R4 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 B10 SD Tot
Round 1 Match 01
Gelfand ISR 1 ½ 1.5
Obodchuk RUS 0 ½ 0.5
Round 1 Match 02
Sarwat EGY 0 0 0
Gashimov AZE 1 1 2
Round 1 Match 03
Svidler RUS 1 1 2
Hebert CAN 0 0 0
Round 1 Match 04
Abdel Razik EGY 0 0 0
Morozevich RUS 1 1 2
Round 1 Match 05
Radjabov AZE 1 1 2
Ezat EGY 0 0 0
Round 1 Match 06
Bezgodov RUS 0 0 0
Ivanchuk UKR 1 1 2
Round 1 Match 07
Ponomariov UKR ½ 1 1.5
El Gindy EGY ½ 0 0.5
Round 1 Match 08
Sriram IND ½ 0 0.5
Grischuk RUS ½ 1 1.5
Round 1 Match 09
Jakovenko RUS 1 ½ 1.5
Rizouk ALG 0 ½ 0.5
Round 1 Match 10
Kabanov RUS 0 0 0
Wang Yue CHN 1 1 2
Round 1 Match 11
Eljanov UKR 1 ½ 1.5
Al Sayed QAT 0 ½ 0.5
Round 1 Match 12
Rodriguez Vila URU 0 ½ 0.5
Karjakin UKR 1 ½ 1.5
Round 1 Match 13
Mamedyarov AZE 1 1 2
Kosteniuk RUS 0 0 0
Round 1 Match 14
Kunte IND ½ 0 0.5
Shirov ESP ½ 1 1.5
Round 1 Match 15
Dominguez CUB ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 3.5
Smerdon AUS ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 0 2.5
Round 1 Match 16
Yu Yangyi CHN 1 ½ 1.5
Movsesian SVK 0 ½ 0.5
Round 1 Match 17
Vachier-Lagrave FRA ½ 1 1.5
Yu Shaoteng CHN ½ 0 0.5
Round 1 Match 18
Pridorozhni RUS ½ 0 0.5
Alekseev RUS ½ 1 1.5
Round 1 Match 19
Tomashevsky RUS 1 ½ 1.5
Ivanov USA 0 ½ 0.5
Round 1 Match 20
Friedel USA 0 0 0
Wang Hao CHN 1 1 2
Round 1 Match 21
Navara CZE 1 0 ½ ½ 1 1 4
Laylo PHI 0 1 ½ ½ 0 0 2
Round 1 Match 22
Amin EGY 0 0 0
Malakhov RUS 1 1 2
Round 1 Match 23
Bacrot FRA ½ ½ 1 1 ½ 3.5
Nijboer NED ½ ½ 0 0 ½ 1.5
Round 1 Match 24
Morovic CHI 0 ½ 0.5
Rublevsky RUS 1 ½ 1.5
Round 1 Match 25
Jobava GEO 1 ½ 1.5
Robson USA 0 ½ 0.5
Round 1 Match 26
Hess USA ½ 0 0.5
Motylev RUS ½ 1 1.5
Round 1 Match 27
Kamsky USA 1 ½ 1.5
Antonio PHI 0 ½ 0.5
Round 1 Match 28
Gupta IND ½ 0 0.5
Vitiugov RUS ½ 1 1.5
Round 1 Match 29
Bologan MDA 1 ½ 1.5
Adly EGY 0 ½ 0.5
Round 1 Match 30
Hou Yifan CHN ½ ½ 0 1 0 ½ 2.5
Naiditsch GER ½ ½ 1 0 1 ½ 3.5
Round 1 Match 31
Bu Xiangzhi CHN ½ 0 0.5
Pelletier SUI ½ 1 1.5
Round 1 Match 33
Nisipeanu ROU 1 ½ 1.5
Lupulescu ROU 0 ½ 0.5
Round 1 Match 34
Li Chao CHN ½ ½ 1 0 ½ ½ 1 1 5
Sargissian ARM ½ ½ 0 1 ½ ½ 0 0 3
Round 1 Match 35
Onischuk USA ½ 1 1.5
Flores, Diego ARG ½ 0 0.5
Round 1 Match 36
Kryvoruchko UKR ½ ½ ½ ½ 0 ½ 2.5
Cheparinov BUL ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ 3.5
Round 1 Match 37
Efimenko UKR 0 ½ 0.5
Milos BRA 1 ½ 1.5
Round 1 Match 38
Zhou Weiqi CHN ½ ½ ½ 1 1 3.5
Sutovsky ISR ½ ½ ½ 0 0 1.5
Round 1 Match 39
Najer RUS 1 ½ 1.5
Ghaem Maghami IRI 0 ½ 0.5
Round 1 Match 40
Iturrizaga VEN ½ ½ 1 0 ½ 1 3.5
Tiviakov NED ½ ½ 0 1 ½ 0 2.5
Round 1 Match 41
Areshchenko UKR 1 ½ 1.5
Corrales Jimenez CUB 0 ½ 0.5
Round 1 Match 42
L’Ami NED ½ ½ ½ 0 0 1.5
Sasikiran IND ½ ½ ½ 1 1 3.5
Round 1 Match 43
Smirin ISR 1 ½ 1.5
Ehlvest USA 0 ½ 0.5
Round 1 Match 44
Shabalov USA 1 0 0 1 ½ ½ ½ 1 4.5
Baklan UKR 0 1 1 0 ½ ½ ½ 0 3.5
Round 1 Match 45
Ganguly IND 1 1 2
Filippov UZB 0 0 0
Round 1 Match 46
Khalifman RUS ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ 3.5
Fier BRA ½ ½ ½ ½ 0 ½ 2.5
Round 1 Match 47
Fressinet FRA 1 1 2
Sjugirov RUS 0 0 0
Round 1 Match 48
Petrosian ARM ½ 0 0.5
Meier GER ½ 1 1.5
Round 1 Match 49
Grachev RUS ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 0 0 3
Bartel POL ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 1 5
Round 1 Match 50
Bruzon CUB ½ 0 0.5
Caruana ITA ½ 1 1.5
Round 1 Match 51
Sokolov NED 0 0 0
Fedorchuk UKR 1 1 2
Round 1 Match 52
Negi IND 1 0 ½ 0 0 1.5
Milov SUI 0 1 ½ 1 1 3.5
Round 1 Match 53
Timofeev RUS ½ ½ ½ 1 0 1 3.5
Leitao BRA ½ ½ ½ 0 1 0 2.5
Round 1 Match 54
Gustafsson GER 1 0 0 0 ½ 1.5
Inarkiev RUS 0 1 1 1 ½ 3.5
Round 1 Match 55
Savchenko RUS ½ ½ 1 0 1 0 1 ½ 4.5
Shulman USA ½ ½ 0 1 0 1 0 ½ 3.5
Round 1 Match 56
Sandipan IND 1 ½ 1.5
Kobalia RUS 0 ½ 0.5
Round 1 Match 57
Tkachiev FRA ½ ½ ½ 1 1 3.5
Le Quang Liem VIE ½ ½ ½ 0 0 1.5
Round 1 Match 58
Akobian USA 1 0 ½ ½ 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 9
Tregubov RUS 0 1 ½ ½ 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 7
Round 1 Match 59
So PHI 1 0 1 1 1 4
Guseinov AZE 0 1 0 0 0 1
Round 1 Match 60
Sakaev RUS ½ 1 1.5
Granda Zuniga PER ½ 0 0.5
Round 1 Match 61
Laznicka CZE 1 ½ 1.5
Papaioannou GRE 0 ½ 0.5
Round 1 Match 62
Nyback FIN 1 0 0 1 ½ ½ ½ 1 4.5
Andreikin RUS 0 1 1 0 ½ ½ ½ 0 3.5
Round 1 Match 63
Mamedov AZE ½ 0 0.5
Zhou Jianchao CHN ½ 1 1.5
Round 1 Match 64
Volkov RUS 0 ½ 0.5
Amonatov TJK 1 ½ 1.5

Links

 
Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:25:16 +0000
 
 
 
World Cup: Bu Xiangzhi, Movsesian, Efimenko & Sokolov eliminated

Sergei Movsesian is the strongest player who already has to leave the World Cup after two days of play. After losing the first game to Yu Yangyi, the Slovak GM was held to a draw in the second game today. Zahar Efimenko was eliminated 1.5-0.5 by Gilberto Milos; Yannick Pelletier beat Bu Xiangzhi with the same score while Ivan Sokolov lost both his games to Sergey Fedorchuk.

The FIDE World Chess Cup takes place November 20th-December 15th inn Khanty-Mansiysk, Russia. It’s a seven-round knockout with six rounds of matches comprising two games per round. The final seventh round consists of four games.

Round 1 (November 21-23): 128 players Round 5 (December 3-5): 8 players
Round 2 (November 24-26): 64 players Round 6 (December 6-8): 4 players
Round 3 (November 27-29): 32 players Round 7 (December 10-14): 2 players
Round 4 (November 30-December 2): 16 players


The time control is 90 minutes for the first 40 moves followed by 30 minutes for the rest of the game with an addition of 30 seconds per move from move one. Games start at 15:00h local time (11:00 CET).

Round 1.2

During the second day of the World Cup the live transmission went well, although we’re not too enthusiastic about the choice of game viewer which is the free Montreux Java applet. During replay the games often jump to the final position, and another downside of it is that it doesn’t respond to the keyboard arrow keys, which we find much more convenient quickly replaying lots of games. Anyway, enough complaining.

Boris Gelfand, top seed at this event, was indeed the first to reach the second round because he didn’t care too much about losing a few rating points and agreed to a draw at move 12. Gashimov, Svidler, Morozevich, Radjabov, Ivanchuk, Wang Yue, Mamedyarov, Ganguly, Fressinet and Fedorchuk reached the next round by 2-0 victories; the latter by upsetting the higher-rated Ivan Sokolov.

15-year-old Chinese super-talent (already a GM with 2527 and an expected rating change of 29.7) Yu Yangyi knocked out Sergei Movsesian, who avoided theory today with a Closed Sicilian with c3, but didn’t come close to kingside attack. He had to repeat moves to avoid a disaster on the queenside.

Yu Yangyi surprisingly knocks out Sergei Movsesian

The third surprise in this first round so far is the elimination of Zahar Efimenko, who yesterday lost with the white pieces against 46-year-old Gilberto Milos. Today the young Ukrainian reached an ending with three pawns against a knight, but the experienced Brazilian grandmaster didn’t falter. Bu Xiangzhi was defeated 0.5-1.5 by Yannick Pelletier, who heroically defended a very difficult position with Black yesterday and then crushed his opponent today in a Grünfeld.

A nice thing about the World Cup is that you get to see top 10 players playing against IMs or “weak” GMs, the kind of opponents almost all of us would lose against. The way these top GMs beat them is often very instructive. In most cases the lower-rated players can go along quite well for a while, but after a few hours of play they inevitably start to make small mistakes, which are immediately punished.

Tomorrow are the tiebreaks of the first round:
Dominguez-Smerdon, Navara-Laylo, Bacrot-Nijboer, Hou Yifan-Naiditsch, Li Chao-Sargissian, Kryvoruchko-Cheparinov, Zhou Weiqi-Sutovsky, Iturrizaga-Tiviakov, L’Ami-Sasikiran, Shabalov-Baklan, Khalifman-Fier, Grachev-Bartel, Negi-Milov, Timofeev-Leitao, Gustafsson-Inarkiev, Savchenko-Shulman, Tkachiev-Le Quang Liem, Akobian-Tregubov, So-Guseinov and Nyback-Andreikin.

The rules for the tiebreaks are:

3. 8. 1. a. If the scores are level after the regular games, after a new drawing of colors, four (4) tie-break games shall be played. The games shall be played using the electronic clock starting with 25 minutes for each player with an addition of 10 seconds after each move.

3. 8. 1. b. The tie-break games shall be played according to the following:

1. Play is governed by the Technical Regulations (annex 1), which apply with the exceptions mentioned below in (2), (3) and (4).
2. The player do not need to record the moves. An arbiter shall record the moves.
3. The player who has the move may stop the clock and consult the Arbiter’s score sheet and if his next move will produce a threefold repetition of position (according to Article 9.2a of the Technical Regulations), or the 50 moves rule (according to Article 9.3a of the Technical Regulations), he himself must write the intended move on the score sheet and claim the draw if he wants. A player can also claim a draw according to articles 9.2b and 9.3b of the Technical Regulations. If the claim is found to be correct, the game is immediately ended as a draw. If the claim is found to be incorrect, the Arbiter shall add three (3) minutes to the opponent’s remaining time and the game continues with the intended move in accordance with Article 4 of the Technical Regulations. A maximum of two (2) incorrect claims for a draw can be made by each player. If a player makes a 3rd incorrect claim, the arbiter shall declare the game lost for this player.
4. If a game has ended by resignation, checkmate, time loss, stalemate, triple repetition or any other of the ways described in article 5 of the Technical Regulations, no claim for irregularities shall be accepted (irregularities include clock settings and all other described in article 7 of the Technical Regulations).

3. 8. 2. a. If the scores are level after the games in paragraph 3.8.1a, then, after a new drawing of colors, a match of 2 games shall be played with a time control of 5 minutes plus 3 seconds increment after each move. In case of a level score, the same match will be repeated to determine a winner. If still there is no winner after 5 such matches (total 10 games), one sudden-death game will be played as described below in 3.8.3a.

3. 8. 2. b. The games shall be played according to the Rules mentioned in 3.8.1.b.

3. 8. 3. a. If the score is still level after five matches as described in 3.8.2a, the players shall play a single decisive sudden death game. The player who wins the drawing of lots may choose the color. The player with the white pieces shall receive 5 minutes, the opponent with the black pieces shall receive 4 minutes whereupon, after the 60th move, both players shall receive an
increment of 3 seconds from move 61. In case of a draw the player with the black pieces is declared the winner.

3. 8. 3. b. The games shall be played according to the Rules mentioned in 3.8.1.b.

3. 8. 4. Between the tie-break games as well as before the start of the sudden death game there shall be a pause of at least 10 minutes, unless the Chief Arbiter decides otherwise.

Games round 1.2

Game viewer by ChessTempo

Players are queuing for a security scan...

...here Radjabov just passes, followed by Onischuk and Bologan

Adly-Bologan, a 0.5-1.5 victory for the Moldavian GM

Parimarjan Negi faces Vadim Milov tomorrow again in the tiebreaks

Mamedyarov-Kosteniuk: 2-0 for the Azeri GM

Sergei Tiviakov will play tiebreaks tomorrow against his young opponent Eduardo Iturrizaga

Jan Gustafsson won the first, but lost the second game to Ernesto Inarkiev

Ivan Cheparinov and Yuryi Kryvoruchko are going to play rapid and possible blitz games as well

In the clash between the Romanians, Nisipeanu qualified 1.5-0.5

FIDE World Cup – Results round 1

Name NAT Rtng G1 G2 Total
Round 1 Match 01
Gelfand, Boris ISR 2758 1 ½ 1.5
Obodchuk, Andrei RUS 2404 0 ½ 0.5
Round 1 Match 02
Sarwat, Walaa EGY 2405 0 0 0
Gashimov, Vugar AZE 2758 1 1 2
Round 1 Match 03
Svidler, Peter RUS 2754 1 1 2
Hebert, Jean CAN 2420 0 0 0
Round 1 Match 04
Abdel Razik, Khaled EGY 2469 0 0 0
Morozevich, Alexander RUS 2750 1 1 2
Round 1 Match 05
Radjabov, Teimour AZE 2748 1 1 2
Ezat, Mohamed EGY 2472 0 0 0
Round 1 Match 06
Bezgodov, Alexei RUS 2484 0 0 0
Ivanchuk, Vassily UKR 2739 1 1 2
Round 1 Match 07
Ponomariov, Ruslan UKR 2739 ½ 1 1.5
El Gindy, Essam EGY 2493 ½ 0 0.5
Round 1 Match 08
Sriram, Jha IND 2497 ½ 0 0.5
Grischuk, Alexander RUS 2736 ½ 1 1.5
Round 1 Match 09
Jakovenko, Dmitry RUS 2736 1 ½ 1.5
Rizouk, Aimen ALG 2500 0 ½ 0.5
Round 1 Match 10
Kabanov, Nikolai RUS 2501 0 0 0
Wang, Yue CHN 2734 1 1 2
Round 1 Match 11
Eljanov, Pavel UKR 2729 1 ½ 1.5
Al Sayed, Mohamad N. QAT 2504 0 ½ 0.5
Round 1 Match 12
Rodriguez Vila, Andres URU 2508 0 ½ 0.5
Karjakin, Sergey UKR 2723 1 ½ 1.5
Round 1 Match 13
Mamedyarov, Shakhriyar AZE 2719 1 1 2
Kosteniuk, Alexandra RUS 2517 0 0 0
Round 1 Match 14
Kunte, Abhijit IND 2522 ½ 0 0.5
Shirov, Alexei ESP 2719 ½ 1 1.5
Round 1 Match 15
Dominguez Perez, Leinier CUB 2719 ½ ½ 1
Smerdon, David AUS 2525 ½ ½ 1
Round 1 Match 16
Yu, Yangyi CHN 2527 1 ½ 1.5
Movsesian, Sergei SVK 2718 0 ½ 0.5
Round 1 Match 17
Vachier-Lagrave, Maxime FRA 2718 ½ 1 1.5
Yu, Shaoteng CHN 2529 ½ 0 0.5
Round 1 Match 18
Pridorozhni, Aleksei RUS 2533 ½ 0 0.5
Alekseev, Evgeny RUS 2715 ½ 1 1.5
Round 1 Match 19
Tomashevsky, Evgeny RUS 2708 1 ½ 1.5
Ivanov, Alexander USA 2539 0 ½ 0.5
Round 1 Match 20
Friedel, Joshua E USA 2551 0 0 0
Wang, Hao CHN 2708 1 1 2
Round 1 Match 21
Navara, David CZE 2707 1 0 1
Laylo, Darwin PHI 2552 0 1 1
Round 1 Match 22
Amin, Bassem EGY 2553 0 0 0
Malakhov, Vladimir RUS 2706 1 1 2
Round 1 Match 23
Bacrot, Etienne FRA 2700 ½ ½ 1
Nijboer, Friso NED 2561 ½ ½ 1
Round 1 Match 24
Morovic Fernandez, Ivan CHI 2562 0 ½ 0.5
Rublevsky, Sergei RUS 2697 1 ½ 1.5
Round 1 Match 25
Jobava, Baadur GEO 2696 1 ½ 1.5
Robson, Ray USA 2567 0 ½ 0.5
Round 1 Match 26
Hess, Robert L USA 2572 ½ 0 0.5
Motylev, Alexander RUS 2695 ½ 1 1.5
Round 1 Match 27
Kamsky, Gata USA 2695 1 ½ 1.5
Antonio, Rogelio Jr PHI 2574 0 ½ 0.5
Round 1 Match 28
Gupta, Abhijeet IND 2578 ½ 0 0.5
Vitiugov, Nikita RUS 2694 ½ 1 1.5
Round 1 Match 29
Bologan, Viktor MDA 2692 1 ½ 1.5
Adly, Ahmed EGY 2583 0 ½ 0.5
Round 1 Match 30
Hou, Yifan CHN 2588 ½ ½ 1
Naiditsch, Arkadij GER 2689 ½ ½ 1
Round 1 Match 31
Bu, Xiangzhi CHN 2682 ½ 0